The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: borland.public.delphi.non-technical, borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical
From: Richard Bayarri Bartual <r...@visual-limes.com>
Date: 2000/02/11
Subject: Re: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
Robert Lee wrote: Well, your message text was about VC++ vs. BCB - Delphi wasn't actually mentioned in > Good for BCB vs VC but doesn't address the Delphi leg of the issue. the bit I was replying to. >Plus it leaves no room for anything but the literal translation and I don't think the MS examples are "tweaked" in any way because they're supposed to >whose to say that MS hasn't tweaked these with respect to there own >compiler. be didactic - if anything, they'd hopefully sacrifice efficiency for clarity, although one never knows with MS! > > Another idea might be to write some examples that thrash the NAG C++ numerics > Yes, this could be a good starting point. set of C and C++ source code numerics routines at www.brent.worden.org/products/numericsc.html and www.brent.worden.org/products/numericscpp.html. I don't usually do heavy numeric stuff in OP, but it shouldn't be too hard to convert the C ones to OP if there isn't anything comparable available for Delphi. Note I haven't used these, so I don't know how good they are - they just came up in a quick web search for freeware numerics libs. Even if they're not particularly efficient, using the same set of algorithms with all languages should provide a good starting point for some interesting benchmarks. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||