Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Wayne Sherman  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: borland.public.delphi.non-technical, borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical
From: "Wayne Sherman" <WayneSherman-REMO...@msn.com>
Date: 2000/02/09
Subject: Re: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
Robert,

  I am interested in helping.  I not very good with C/C++ but I can help
with some Delphi code.  I think that separating the comparisons into
categories is a good idea.

Something like this:

Category
  Subcategory
    Code Example #1 (with some kind of description - maybe pseudocode)
      Literal Object Pascal translation / Literal C++ Translation
      Simplest OP implementation / Simplest C++ implementation
      Fastest OP implementation / Fastest C++ implementation

    Code Example #2 (with some kind of description - maybe pseudocode)
      Literal Object Pascal translation / Literal C++ Translation
      Simplest OP implementation / Simplest C++ implementation
      Fastest OP implementation / Fastest C++ implementation

for instance:

  String Manipulation Category
    String Searching Subcategory
      Example#1  - Description & pseudocode
        Literal Object Pascal translation / Literal C++ Translation
        Simplest OP implementation / Simplest C++ implementation
        Fastest OP implementation / Fastest C++ implementation

      Example#2  - Description & pseudocode
        Literal Object Pascal translation / Literal C++ Translation
        Simplest OP implementation / Simplest C++ implementation
        Fastest OP implementation / Fastest C++ implementation

    String Concatenation Subcategory
      Example#1  - Description & pseudocode
        Literal Object Pascal translation / Literal C++ Translation
        Simplest OP implementation / Simplest C++ implementation
        Fastest OP implementation / Fastest C++ implementation

      Example#2  - Description & pseudocode
        Literal Object Pascal translation / Literal C++ Translation
        Simplest OP implementation / Simplest C++ implementation
        Fastest OP implementation / Fastest C++ implementation
...

>  Also there are a few niggling details to hash out.

Some questions:
1) How would the entries map to Code Central submissions?
One submission per Category, SubCategory, Example, or Coding approach?
When someone wants to review the various comparisons from this project,
there should be a way to "filter out" all submissions relating to it in Code
Central.  How this query is done and its results will depend on how the CC
entries have been organized.  I think that if a "system" is devised to use
CC then a single submitter should be used to ensure that all submissions are
consistent with the system.  Maybe John can add another field to his CC
database for people who want to submit entries under their own custom
categories.

2) How should the literal translation be approached?
  Would this be a "brute force" implementation of the psuedocode?
  Will the OP version written first and literally translated into C++ or
vice versa?

Regards,

Wayne


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.