The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: borland.public.delphi.non-technical, borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical
From: Robert Lee <rh...@nwu.edu>
Date: 2000/02/09
Subject: Re: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
> I am interested in helping. I don't have much experience with C/C++ While getting that many examples would be great I expect that it will be > but I can help with Delphi code. I think that separating the comparisons > into categories is a good idea. > Something like this: a bit more spotty. Consequently, it is likely that each example will be its own sub catagory. > > Also there are a few niggling details to hash out. One per Example was what I was thinking. > Some questions: > 1) How would the entries map to Code Central submissions? > One submission per Category, SubCategory, Example, or Coding approach? > When someone wants to review the various comparisons from this project, Yes this can be handled simply by placing the appropriate keywords in > there should be a way to "filter out" all submissions relating to it in Code > Central. How this query is done and its results will depend on how the CC > entries have been organized. the description. I think that if a "system" is devised to use > CC then a single submitter should be used to ensure that all submissions are I don't think that will be necessary as the system doesn't need to be > consistent with the system. that complex: Description: > 2) How should the literal translation be approached? I was thinking of simply starting with someones off the shelf code in > Would this be a "brute force" implementation of psuedocode? > Should the OP version written first and literally translated into C++ or > vice versa? either language and then attempting a literal translation to the other. If need be the original could be adjusted to bring the two more in line. > 3) Will binaries be tested on more than one kind of processor? I can test on all of those, the PII vs PII distinction is hardly worth > PII, PIII, Athlon... making though. Probably, we'll use a PII as a baseline and make note of any significant deviations on Athlon as needed. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||