Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Chris Uzdavinis (TeamB)  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: borland.public.delphi.non-technical, borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical
From: "Chris Uzdavinis (TeamB)" <ch...@uzdavinis.com>
Date: 2000/02/09
Subject: Re: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison

Robert Lee wrote in message <38A17EFD.CF06E...@nwu.edu>...
>The goal is to compare Delphi, BCB and VC++ at the code level from a
>performance perspective.  I've made some very simplistic passes at this
>in the pass, but to do it correctly requires more "real world" code
>examples.

Depends on your definition of real world code examples.  The real world code
I am working on simply cannot be written in VC++ because it's functionally
lacking.  If you choose to benchmark a subset the language such that VC++
can compile it, you are eliminating one of BCB's biggest strengths from the
competition.  Everyone knows VC++ is faster than BCB.  But I don't care how
fast it is if it isn't ANSI C++.  Well, let me rephrase.  I don't care how
fast it is if it can't compile my code. In that respect, VC++ is worthless
to me.

Chris (TeamB)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.