Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
borland.public.delphi.non-technical
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Robert Lee  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: borland.public.delphi.non-technical, borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical
From: Robert Lee <rh...@nwu.edu>
Date: 2000/02/10
Subject: Re: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Wayne Sherman wrote:

> Another question,

> Should BASM be allowed?  BASM is part of the Delphi product, but some C++
> compilers allow inline assembly also.  The goal would be to compare the
> performance of the code the compiler produces, no?

No assembler.  The point is to compare the compilers.  

--
Bob Lee
High Performance Delphi - http://www.econos.com/optimize/
Updated January 20


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google