Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Boost devel archive
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Updated serialization performance tests
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Brian Wood  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2012, 2:36 pm
From: Brian Wood <woodbria...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:34:48 -0600
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2012 2:34 pm
Subject: [boost] Updated serialization performance tests
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Shalom

I've updated this page --
http://webEbenezer.net/comparison.html

with results from Boost 1.52.

A few notes about the testing:

I decided to use -O2 on the Linux/g++ tests.  In previous
tests I used -O3.

I hadn't updated the Windows test results since the
Boost 1.48 time-frame.  Around Boost 1.51 I had to
start building the serialization library in Boost
with runtime-link=static in order to get the Windows
tests to build.  I haven't understood why that became
necessary, but the results for the serialization library
in Boost seem to have been adversely affected by this.
On Windows, I now report that tests built with the
serialization library in Boost are over 1.8 times slower
than parallel Ebenezer tests.  Previously I reported the
tests built with the serialization library in Boost were
between 1.7 and 1.8 times slower than the Ebenezer tests.

--
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises -- making programming fun again.
http://webEbenezer.net

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google