From: "Rodrigo B. de Oliveira" <rodrigobam...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:30:11 -0300
Local: Thurs, Mar 24 2005 12:30 pm
Subject: Re: IronPython 0.7 release.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:06:15 -0000, Bet's On! <l33t...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't see IronPython as a competitor. I mean, boo is meant to be
> ... > I wonder if this will have any effect on Boo or its development, now
more than just a programming language. That's why we have an open Boo.Lang.Compiler API, the extensible compilation pipeline, syntactic attributes/macros, etc. We haven't started to realize the benefits of this open compiler architecture yet but we will... Freedom is sometimes hard to get used to. hammett wants to build a ruby like language for .net:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6876990&forum_...
Why not use boo as the framework is beyond me.
The guys at the mono list were talking about forking mcs to write a
Better documentation/debugging tools, better project browsing tools,
Freedom and collaboration are the ways to get there.
-- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||