committers call!

22 views
Skip to first unread message

James Stuart

unread,
Mar 30, 2012, 11:13:19 AM3/30/12
to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com
Topics:

1) internationalization
2) putting together a 3.4 release
3) bootstrap/ui talk
4) any other miscellaneous topics post LDCX drunken haze.

1pm EST/ 10am PST Monday!

plus many more, suggested by you.

Instructions for skype:

Add freeconferencecallhd.5308811400 as a contact in your skype account:
* copy and paste freeconferencecallhd.5308811400 (the entire name)
into your contact search area
* add as a contact

After freeconferencecallhd.5308811400 is listed in your contact list,
simply call that contact:
* Enter the following code through the Skype keypad (not by just
typing in the numbers on your keyboard): 651025 (you will prompted to
add the # sign). Note: you must enter the code in the Skype keypad,
not your keyboard number pad.

Instructions for Phone:
Access Code: 651025

Jonathan Rochkind

unread,
Apr 2, 2012, 10:49:06 AM4/2/12
to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com, James Stuart
I'd like to talk about the document fetch config Chris committed; I'd like to make sure we talk about before releasing a BL that includes it. I'll try to make a Github Issue before the meeting. I have some concerns.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Blacklight Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to blacklight-develo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacklight-development?hl=en.

Chris Beer

unread,
Apr 2, 2012, 10:55:22 AM4/2/12
to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com
Can we hash out the commit in a Github issue? I'm probably not going
to make the call today.

Here is the commit at issue:
https://github.com/projectblacklight/blacklight/commit/018196f3e33028bc4e8a0ae78fe1488298bc8ef6

It was the least disruptive way I could think of to make it easier to
work with arbitrary solr indexes, though I'm certainly open to other
approaches (or, general rethinking of the
multiple-request-handler-by-default approach, although that's
definitely a more significant change) .

Thanks,
Chris

Jonathan Rochkind

unread,
Apr 2, 2012, 10:59:58 AM4/2/12
to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com, Chris Beer
Sure, I'll make a Github Issue.

Just want to make sure we don't do a release with this in it until
others have had some input at least.

Thanks for the commit hash so I don't need to find it.

James Stuart

unread,
Apr 13, 2012, 7:17:10 PM4/13/12
to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com
Committers call! Next monday:

We really should resolve the outstanding solr request handler. (See Jonathan Rochkind's email)

Let me know if you've got any other topics of interest.




To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/blacklight-development?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Blacklight Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/blacklight-development?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Blacklight Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to blacklight-development@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to blacklight-development+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

Jonathan Rochkind

unread,
Apr 16, 2012, 11:44:55 AM4/16/12
to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com, James Stuart
* Current Hudson build failure.

* Latest version of Rails changes defaults for mass assignment. Release a patch version of BL with a fix for these defaults? I _think_ the fix is already committed to master.

On 4/13/2012 7:17 PM, James Stuart wrote:
Committers call! Next monday:

We really should resolve the outstanding solr request handler. (See Jonathan Rochkind's email)

Let me know if you've got any other topics of interest.


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <roch...@jhu.edu> wrote:
Sure, I'll make a Github Issue.

Just want to make sure we don't do a release with this in it until others have had some input at least.

Thanks for the commit hash so I don't need to find it.


On 4/2/2012 10:55 AM, Chris Beer wrote:
Can we hash out the commit in a Github issue? I'm probably not going
to make the call today.

Here is the commit at issue:
https://github.com/ projectblacklight/blacklight/ commit/ 018196f3e33028bc4e8a0ae78fe148 8298bc8ef6

It was the least disruptive way I could think of to make it easier to
work with arbitrary solr indexes, though I'm certainly open to other
approaches (or, general rethinking of the
multiple-request-handler-by- default approach, although that's
To post to this group, send email to blacklight-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to blacklight-develo...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages