Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

IBMLink 2000 SUCKS

28 views
Skip to first unread message

Pinnacle

unread,
Jun 8, 2007, 1:32:18 PM6/8/07
to
IBMLink down and out again. Estimated up time 1400 EDT.

Regards,
Tom Conley

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

John_J...@ibm-main.lst

unread,
Jun 8, 2007, 1:38:35 PM6/8/07
to
Intuitively I'd make some arcane comment but this has happened so often
that it's not worth the energy - maybe that's their plan to simply wear us
down??

Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390

Pinnacle <pinn...@ROCHESTER.RR.COM>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-...@BAMA.UA.EDU>
06/08/2007 01:31 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-...@BAMA.UA.EDU>


To
IBM-...@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
IBMLink 2000 SUCKS

Bill Johnson

unread,
Jun 8, 2007, 1:42:51 PM6/8/07
to
It has been slow or down all day. How can an organization (IBM) who is trying to promote the mainfame as a platform of choice, migrate one of their most important functions off the mainframe? Sounds like very few listserv members are happy with their decision and we are their loudest advocates.

Bill Johnson

Regards,
Tom Conley



---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!

Pinnacle

unread,
Jun 8, 2007, 1:54:48 PM6/8/07
to
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pinnacle" <pinn...@ibm-main.lst>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:32 PM
Subject: IBMLink 2000 SUCKS


> IBMLink down and out again. Estimated up time 1400 EDT.
>

It's back now, but it still sucks.

Tom

Robert Justice

unread,
Jun 8, 2007, 1:55:42 PM6/8/07
to
meanwhile the 3270 interface, oh no wait, those morons eliminated the one
freaking interface that was actually WORKING CORRECTLY !

Clark Morris

unread,
Jun 8, 2007, 3:28:36 PM6/8/07
to
On 8 Jun 2007 10:42:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>It has been slow or down all day. How can an organization (IBM) who is trying to promote the mainfame as a platform of choice, migrate one of their most important functions off the mainframe? Sounds like very few listserv members are happy with their decision and we are their loudest advocates.

If IBMLink isn't on the mainframe could someone threaten to bring the
issue up in a way to cause maximum embarrassment?

0 new messages