Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

IBM does use USS for UNIX System Services.

9 views
Skip to first unread message

McKown, John

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 8:54:59 AM1/7/10
to
Maybe not officially, but on IBMLink, for APAR OA25204.

<quote>

PROBLEM SUMMARY:
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: Users of BSAM/QSAM that access UNIX System *
* Services, USS, files. *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: With today's z/OS UNIX System *
* Services, USS, there are two different *
* file formats: text and binary. The *
* files are seen as byte-streams. Text *
* allows a user to specify a delimiter *
* (one of a few predefined characters) *
* to indicate the end of a "record". On *
* output, the delimiter is appended to *
* the end of the data and stripped on *
* input. The delimiter is stored as an *
* attribute of the file. *
* *
* The problem that some applications are *
* encountering with text files in the *
* z/OS USS filesystem when using BSAM or *
* QSAM is there is no way for a text *
* file to contain a delimiter as part of *
* the data stream. *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
</quote>

ref:

https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/sis/viewAparDoc.wss?context=aparAndUsage&documentIds=OA25204&searchWords=IGGRPFX&libraryType=D&lc=en&cc=US


John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john....@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:29:10 AM1/7/10
to
>Maybe not officially, but on IBMLink, for APAR OA25204.

Why can't we bury this stupid discussion once for all?

--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE AG

Rob Schramm

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 10:25:18 AM1/7/10
to
I second this motion. The USS acronym debate has been debated ad nauseam,
please let it go the way of the dodo bird.

Rob Schramm

Ted MacNEIL

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 10:34:04 AM1/7/10
to
>>Maybe not officially, but on IBMLink, for APAR OA25204.

>Why can't we bury this stupid discussion once for all?

Because every now and then (last week as the latest example) some pedant complains when somebody else uses the USS in the 'wrong' way.

Sometimes, they are deliberately obtuse, even though the context points to UNIX System Services rather than VTAM.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

Bill Fairchild

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 10:48:58 AM1/7/10
to
What would be wrong with testing PSAMODE for being in SRB mode?

Bill Fairchild

Software Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.4503 * Mobile: +1.508.341.1715
Email: bi...@mainstar.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com

Greg Shirey

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 11:06:01 AM1/7/10
to
Hmmm. I searched the archives for a post last week which mentioned USS
and only found one (on the 28th) - and the discussion was VTAM. I can't
think of a "pedant" complaining here recently about this issue. I
remember there was a question earlier this week if USS and OMVS were the
same thing, and the answer was "Many people use USS to mean 'z/OS UNIX
System Services'. It is an unapproved acronym." This does not sound
like a complaint to me, it sounds like a helpful answer.

Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 9:33 AM

Because every now and then (last week as the latest example) some pedant
complains when somebody else uses the USS in the 'wrong' way.

Sometimes, they are deliberately obtuse, even though the context points
to UNIX System Services rather than VTAM.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Walt Farrell

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 11:15:17 AM1/7/10
to
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:53:59 -0600, McKown, John
<John....@HEALTHMARKETS.COM> wrote:

>Maybe not officially, but on IBMLink, for APAR OA25204.
>

Sorry, John, but I believe that is a proper and allowable use of USS. The
rule (as I understand it) is that first usage must be UNIX System Services,
and that was done here. The reference is clearly saying UNIX System
Services, and indicating that thereafter for this discussion, USS will be
used as a shorthand.

--
Walt

Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 11:47:41 AM1/7/10
to
In
<1255350322-1262878386-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2058433512-...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>,
on 01/07/2010

at 03:33 PM, Ted MacNEIL <eama...@YAHOO.CA> said:

>Because every now and then (last week as the latest example) some pedant
>complains when somebody else uses the USS in the 'wrong' way.

Sorry, tonto, but this thread was not opened by an alleged pedant.

>Sometimes, they are deliberately obtuse,

Sometimes you lie about other posters. This is a case in point.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

Ted MacNEIL

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 12:09:15 PM1/7/10
to
>Hmmm. I searched the archives for a post last week which mentioned USS
and only found one (on the 28th) - and the discussion was VTAM.

I responded to one such pedant, recently, and I thought it was on IBM-Main.
Maybe, it was RACF-L?

Anyways, in general I stay away from that (and other useless) argument.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

R.S.

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 4:16:45 PM1/7/10
to
McKown, John pisze: > Maybe not officially, but on IBMLink, for APAR OA25204. It is being *widely* used by IBMers, in presentations, in redbooks and in official documentation as well. AFAIK there are two (three?) IBM-MAIN members which are allergic to USS as UNIX System Services, the rest feel quite comfortable with ambiguity of the abbreviation/acronym/whatever_description_you_want. As well as several other abbreviations - in the mainframe world and outside. Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland P.S. Oh no! I did it again... Took part in the pointless discussion... BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl d Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S dowego, nr rejestru przedsi biorc w KRS 0000025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 ug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zak adowy BRE Banku SA (w ca ci wp acony) wynosi 118.763.528 z otych. W zwi zku z realizacj warunkowego podwy szenia kapita u zak adowego, na podstawie uchwa y XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca 2008r., oraz uchwa y XVI NWZ z dnia 27 pa dziernika 2008r., mo e ulec podwy szeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z . Akcje w podwy szonym kapitale zak adowym BRE Banku SA b w ca ci op acone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Peter Relson

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 8:50:53 AM1/8/10
to
>What would be wrong with testing PSAMODE for being in SRB mode?

PSAMODE is not an intended programming interface. Any assumption you make
about its values, let alone its stability, is done at your own risk.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 3:21:13 PM1/8/10
to
In <4B464F30...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 01/07/2010

at 10:16 PM, "R.S." <R.Sko...@BREMULTIBANK.COM.PL> said:

>AFAIK there are two (three?) IBM-MAIN members which are allergic to USS
>as UNIX System Services,

At least one of whom is an IBM employee.



--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

0 new messages