Message from discussion Child porn

Comments: Gated by NETN...@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.gaynet
Comments: ********************************************************
Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header   *
Comments: * information for gateway passage.  No approval of the *
Comments: * content is implied.                                  *
Approved: NETN...@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU                              *
Comments: ********************************************************
Sender: gaynet-ow...@queernet.org
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!marlin.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au!rod
From: r...@marlin.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Rod Swift)
Subject: Re: Child porn
Date: 12 Dec 1994 07:14:07 GMT
Organization: The University of Western Australia
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <3cgt7v$g2m@styx.uwa.edu.au>
References: <52A9E95C31@marsh.vinu.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: marlin.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Sender: gaynet-ow...@queernet.org
Precedence: bulk

TIM BROWN (TBR...@Marsh.VINU.edu) wrote:

>The recent post by Rex about Child Pornography is a timely and
>disturbing one.  It reminded me about the controversy surounding
>NAMBLA.  What are the opinions out there about this group?  Is it
>"Time to dump NAMBLA"?

Yes.  NAMBLA is a pedophile organisation trying to gain
legitimacy by clinging onto mainstream gay rights.  In the end,
we will all suffer the backfire of this.  Gay rights groups have
already lost UN consultative status over this.

I never have, nor ever will, consider NAMBLA a gay-rights
organisation or even affiliated with the gay and lesbian
movement.

Rod