ATTN. RUTH ALLEN
Mirjph
DEAR RUTH ALLEN:
WOULD YOU PLEASE TAKE MIKE HACKETT ONTO YOUR LIST? MAYBE IF YOU DO HE'LL STOP
DRIVING EVERYBODY HERE CRAZY. WE CAN'T VOUCH FOR HIS BEHAVIOR, BUT IF HE
BREAKS ANYTHING WE'LL PAY FOR IT.
THANK YOU.
And yes, Mike, I did indeed ask all 907 members of the list if they agree with
this. And they do.
Best, Jess
taw...@dynasty.net
LMFAO
oopppss sorry...no profanity
but still got quite a laugh out of this posting
Nancy
Jennie Ladew
At 02:46 PM 3/23/98 EST, Mirjph wrote:
>DEAR RUTH ALLEN:
>WOULD YOU PLEASE TAKE MIKE HACKETT ONTO YOUR LIST? MAYBE IF YOU DO HE'LL STOP
>DRIVING EVERYBODY HERE CRAZY. WE CAN'T VOUCH FOR HIS BEHAVIOR, BUT IF HE
>BREAKS ANYTHING WE'LL PAY FOR IT.
>THANK YOU.
>
>And yes, Mike, I did indeed ask all 907 members of the list if they agree
with
>this. And they do.
>Best, Jess
>
>
As one of the original ME listers I am pretty confident although its not my
decision to make that this ain't gonna happen anytime soon. In fact if it
does I am changing my gender, getting a passport and leaving the autism
world behind. (Do you think I can convince my son to act incognito so
nobody will know!)
M Hackett
Dear Jenny,
According to Jess, YOU LOSE !!! 907-1. Tell Ruth Good-bye for you
and Hello for me.
Were you referring an actual gender changing operation for
yourself, or did you mean just pretending to change gender by wearing
clothes of the opposite sex??
Fortunately, you don't need a passport to get off this list or
out of Louisiana!!
Your reference to "incognito" is kind of wierd. What does that
mean?
Mike
. .
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 19:13:23 -0500 Jennie Ladew <jen...@ZIPLINK.NET>
writes:
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Woodward, Robert A
>Dear Jenny,
> According to Jess, YOU LOSE !!! 907-1. Tell Ruth Good-bye for you
>and Hello for me.
> Were you referring an actual gender changing operation for
>yourself, or did you mean just pretending to change gender by wearing
>clothes of the opposite sex??
> Fortunately, you don't need a passport to get off this list or
>out of Louisiana!!
> Your reference to "incognito" is kind of wierd. What does that
>mean?
>Mike
Jennie, are you in Louisiana?? If so, please drop by to see me.
Diane
-------------------------------------------------
Parlante (Diane Woodward)
rwo...@lsumc.edu
RENEGO3
you guys are just too much. I have never laughed so hard at a posting
before!!!!
M Hackett
Perhaps, when hens are laying eggs, all that clucking is really laughter.
Mike
. .
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 07:23:53 EST RENEGO3 <REN...@AOL.COM> writes:
>you guys are just too much. I have never laughed so hard at a posting
>before!!!!
>
_____________________________________________________________________
Jennie Ladew
At 06:34 PM 3/23/98 -0800, M Hackett wrote:
>Dear Jenny,
> According to Jess, YOU LOSE !!! 907-1. Tell Ruth Good-bye for you
>and Hello for me.
> Were you referring an actual gender changing operation for
>yourself, or did you mean just pretending to change gender by wearing
>clothes of the opposite sex??
> Fortunately, you don't need a passport to get off this list or
>out of Louisiana!!
> Your reference to "incognito" is kind of wierd. What does that
>mean?
>Mike
>
Dear Mike,
I guess I would prefer just wearing the clothes and forgo the surgery.
(Besides this is a joke, so I don't really have to go anywhere unless I
want to or I do something so unforgivable the powers that be throw me off.)
Sorry, I don't have that much power to make people change their minds nor
would I try. As you stated so well you are allowed your opinions and views
and other people hold theirs.
I said incognito, because if I was "fleeing" and my son was going to
accompany me he would have to do it in utter disguise meaning no autistic
behavior, hence incognito, unknown, unnoticable. (Strangers have asked if
he has autism before. He's not a low profile type.)
Lastly, I don't live in Louisiana. Never have. Actually, I don't think I've
been there at all, although I would enjoy seeing New Orleans as well as
visiting a few families I know. But, thanks...and I think I know about the
passport thanks.
Jennie
>
(Nancy A. Boyett)
Like I said y'all...LMAO(laughing my ass off)....BIG TIME
Nancy
(Nancy A. Boyett)
croos dressing...autism and the like
y'all are truly a hoot
gonna go tell my brother Bubba about y'all here in a few
inform me i say
and entertain me a bit too
Nancy
Judy Ley Boertman
I have been watching the little "word games" that you all have with M.
Hackett. I have read a lot of what he says on both this list and the
alt.support.autism list. Mike, you have a lot of good things to say and are
supportive on the alt list. Why do you bother to stay on this list if you
don't have anything nice to say and everyone pisses you off all the time? I
have been waiting a long time to ask this question! Oh, and one more
thing. I missed this the first time around. Why are you so anti-Catholic?
Did a Catholic piss you off too, or are you just prejudiced against ALL
Catholics? No flaming intended, just curious.
Judy
(Nancy A. Boyett) wrote in message <19980324162137640.AAA144@boyett>...
M Hackett
Dear Judy,
I have been gang-flamed probably over a thousand times on this
list in the past year. I consider your assessment of me here below to be
a flame as you have tried here to set me up in the eyes of others as
"anti-Catholic", pissed off, and you have insinuated here below that I
should quit the list, that I don't have anything nice to say, etc, etc.
Just tacking a "No flaming intended, just curious" to the end of
the flame is like peeing on a bonfire -- everybody can see it does not
undo the flames.
Before the Censorship Panel was "elected" recently, people were
run off this list by a handful for rabid flamers, nothing seems to have
changed.
Mike
. .
Judy Ley Boertman
Dear Mike,
What I said in my previous post was nothing more than my observations
of the posts I have seen written by you. You told everyone here about the
alt.support.autism list and I am grateful for that. You seem so supportive
on the alt list.
I only see anger and complaints in your posts on this list. That is why I
asked if you aren't happy with this list, why do you continue to subscribe?
I subscribed to get support and information about autism, not to see the
"word games" that go on constantly. I will admit that I did delete you for
a while, but then I saw what you were contributing to the alt list, and I
started reading your posts on this list again.
Judy
M Hackett wrote in message <19980324.174249...@juno.com>...
(Nancy A. Boyett)
Mike
hey hon-i find you most entertaining and also a bit thought provoking in
what you do/say here
I do believe you would be a most interesting person to meet in real life
Keep...keeping us on our toes
Nancy
At 05:39 PM 3/24/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Dear Judy,
> I have been gang-flamed probably over a thousand times on this
>list in the past year. I consider your assessment of me here below to be
>a flame as you have tried here to set me up in the eyes of others as
>"anti-Catholic", pissed off, and you have insinuated here below that I
>should quit the list, that I don't have anything nice to say, etc, etc.
> Just tacking a "No flaming intended, just curious" to the end of
>the flame is like peeing on a bonfire -- everybody can see it does not
>undo the flames.
> Before the Censorship Panel was "elected" recently, people were
>run off this list by a handful for rabid flamers, nothing seems to have
>changed.
>Mike
>. .
>
Connie Quinn
Mike,
I agree with Judy. We joined this list for support and information, not to
hear the anger and complaints every time there is a message from you!
Connie
At 09:21 AM 3/25/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Mike,
> What I said in my previous post was nothing more than my observations
>of the posts I have seen written by you. You told everyone here about the
>alt.support.autism list and I am grateful for that. You seem so supportive
>on the alt list.
>I only see anger and complaints in your posts on this list. That is why I
>asked if you aren't happy with this list, why do you continue to subscribe?
>I subscribed to get support and information about autism, not to see the
>"word games" that go on constantly. I will admit that I did delete you for
>a while, but then I saw what you were contributing to the alt list, and I
>started reading your posts on this list again.
>Judy
>
>M Hackett wrote in message <19980324.174249...@juno.com>...
M Hack
Dear Judy,
You obviously should have continued to delete my posts. I suggest you
restart deleting my posts.
Mike
. .
Judy Ley Boertman wrote in message <6fb44i$b...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>...
>Dear Mike,
> What I said in my previous post was nothing more than my observations
>of the posts I have seen written by you. You told everyone here about the
>alt.support.autism list and I am grateful for that. You seem so supportive
>on the alt list.
>I only see anger and complaints in your posts on this list. That is why I
>asked if you aren't happy with this list, why do you continue to subscribe?
>
>M Hackett wrote in message <19980324.174249...@juno.com>...
>>Dear Judy,
>> I have been gang-flamed probably over a thousand times on this
>>list in the past year. I consider your assessment of me here below to be
M Hack
Dear Connie and Judy,
Please feel free to delete any posting that carries my name. You may
also delete the postings of people who can't control their anger and
complaints.
Mike
. .
Connie Quinn wrote in message
<3.0.5.32.1998032...@postoffice.ptd.net>...
>Mike,
>I agree with Judy. We joined this list for support and information, not to
>hear the anger and complaints every time there is a message from you!
>Connie
>
>
>
>At 09:21 AM 3/25/98 -0500, you wrote:
>> What I said in my previous post was nothing more than my observations
>>of the posts I have seen written by you. You told everyone here about the
>>alt.support.autism list and I am grateful for that. You seem so
supportive
>>on the alt list.
>>I only see anger and complaints in your posts on this list. That is why I
>>asked if you aren't happy with this list, why do you continue to
subscribe?
>>
>>M Hackett wrote in message <19980324.174249...@juno.com>...
>>>Dear Judy,
>>> I have been gang-flamed probably over a thousand times on this