Re: 01/01/01!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Apr 25, 2005, 3:31:41 AM4/25/05

to

nemo wrote:

> "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:426A1B30...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> >
> >
> > One Weird Dude wrote:
> >
> > > In article <3A513130...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us>,
> > > Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
> > > > Today is 01/01/01, are you having fun?
> > > >
> > > How come nobody decided to pun on 01/01/01?
> >
> > 1573 days since 01/01/01. Does anyone know a nun?
>
> No. I know no nuns - not one nun - nun at all in fact!
>
> Edward Woodward would!

51.8 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Apr 25, 2005, 3:30:52 AM4/25/05

to

nemo wrote:

4 years and 3.8 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Apr 25, 2005, 6:46:58 AM4/25/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:426C9CAC...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

I thought we were tall king about nuns - or was the tall king Henry VIII. He
dissolved them all!

Nemo
Numbo One Punster!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Apr 27, 2005, 2:50:30 AM4/27/05

to

51 and 5/6th months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Apr 27, 2005, 5:53:44 AM4/27/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:426F3635...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 51 and 5/6th months since 01/01/01.
>

Whatsat gotta do with the discussion in hand?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Apr 28, 2005, 10:23:28 PM4/28/05

to

51.9 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 15, 2005, 11:06:48 PM5/15/05

to

op99 wrote:

> Thus spake "nemo" <ne...@newtylust.nit> on Sun, 08 May 2005 14:46:43 GMT:
>
> >
> > And what the hell is HA< HA< HA? Somebody laughing backwards?
> >
> >
>
> No, that would be "AH AH AH", unless of course it's LOL in which case you can't be sure.

4 years, 4 months, and 2 weeks since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

May 19, 2005, 1:47:35 PM5/19/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:42880E48...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Trophies were presented for looking ill once.

Most of the contestants didn't look ill enough, so the only the wan one won
one!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 10, 2005, 4:16:18 AM6/10/05

to

53.3 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 11, 2005, 4:28:03 AM6/11/05

to

53.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 20, 2005, 1:20:35 AM6/20/05

to

53/6 months since 01/01/01

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 20, 2005, 1:22:36 AM6/20/05

to

nemo wrote:

> "Keith E." <i.m....@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1114391702.03cfc16dc9235b4160ef952b33f28ab6@1usenet...
> > Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:25 GMT was a day just like any other,

> > until "nemo" <ne...@newtylust.nit> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

> > >news:426A2121...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> > >>
> > >>
> > >> One Weird Dude wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > In article <3A513130...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us>,
> > >> > Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
> > >> > > Today is 01/01/01, are you having fun?
> > >> > >
> > >> > How come nobody decided to pun on 01/01/01?
> > >>

> > >> 1573 days since 01/01/01. Does anyone here own a gun?
> > >
> > >Got a .177 air rifle. I'm saving up for a whole one.
> >
> > You must be a terrorist.
>
> So what does that make all the 'Merkins who've got everything from pistols
> to bazookas to tanks under their right to bare arms! They should wear
> long-sleeve shirts like everybody else, I tell you!"!
>
> And how could I be a teyrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrst with that! You can't do much
> with a rocket-propelled .177 pellet! They're so small they're a waist of
> time!
>
> And you've probably woken up ECHELON now, mentioning stuff like that!
>
> Hang on. There's someone knocking on the door. Nope. They're down the bottom
> of he stairs. Handy things, these Jean-Luc Petards!

Handy: Chinese demon.

nemo

unread,

Jun 20, 2005, 4:44:54 PM6/20/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:42B6529C...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Dynasty: Family of particularty vicious demons!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 26, 2005, 5:35:05 PM6/26/05

to

53.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Jun 28, 2005, 6:19:36 AM6/28/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:42BF1F89...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> 53.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

That's irrational!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 28, 2005, 10:30:40 PM6/28/05

to

53.9 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 29, 2005, 3:41:52 AM6/29/05

to

nemo wrote:

Why is 53 and 5/6ths irrational?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 29, 2005, 3:42:17 AM6/29/05

to

53 months and 4 weeks since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Jun 29, 2005, 9:02:51 AM6/29/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:42C250C0...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Shan't tell you!

Kung Fu Master Qui Chang Dobey

unread,

Jun 30, 2005, 11:00:33 AM6/30/05

to

nemo wrote:
> "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:42C250C0...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> >
> >
> > nemo wrote:
> >
> > > "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> > > news:42BF1F89...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > > > 53.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.
> > >
> > > That's irrational!
> >
> > Why is 53 and 5/6ths irrational?
> >
> Shan't tell you!

Irrational numbers: numbers with big ears!!

nemo

unread,

Jun 30, 2005, 7:00:39 PM6/30/05

to

"Kung Fu Master Qui Chang Dobey" <ganesh...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120143633....@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Baaaaaa! You've told 'im!

Anyway, do they play the banjo with no teeth, and come from a Southern town
where everyone is called Johnson?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jul 15, 2005, 7:24:58 PM7/15/05

to

54 months and 2 weeks since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 2, 2005, 12:31:49 AM9/2/05

to

2 x 28 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 2, 2005, 12:31:51 AM9/2/05

to

4 and 2/3rds years since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 2, 2005, 12:31:55 AM9/2/05

to

56 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 6, 2005, 11:35:58 PM9/6/05

to

56 and 1/6th months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 15, 2005, 11:27:31 PM9/15/05

to

56 months and 2 weeks since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 21, 2005, 9:53:51 PM9/21/05

to

56 and 2/3rd months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 28, 2005, 3:05:12 AM9/28/05

to

56.9 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 28, 2005, 3:05:45 AM9/28/05

to

nemo wrote:

> "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:42C250C0...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> >
> >
> > nemo wrote:
> >
> > > "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> > > news:42BF1F89...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > > > 53.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.
> > >
> > > That's irrational!
> >
> > Why is 53 and 5/6ths irrational?
> >
> Shan't tell you!

Why not?

nemo

unread,

Sep 29, 2005, 9:29:47 AM9/29/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:433A40C9...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Why not not?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 30, 2005, 2:26:00 AM9/30/05

to

56 months and 4 weeks since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Oct 1, 2005, 6:55:50 AM10/1/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:433CDA78...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 56 months and 4 weeks since 01/01/01.

The wan one still won then?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 1, 2005, 9:24:01 AM10/1/05

to

nemo wrote:

57 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Oct 2, 2005, 10:51:23 AM10/2/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:433E8DF0...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Heinz months?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 10, 2005, 6:45:29 PM10/10/05

to

nemo wrote:

> "Keith E." <i.m....@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1114391702.03cfc16dc9235b4160ef952b33f28ab6@1usenet...
> > Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:25 GMT was a day just like any other,

> > until "nemo" <ne...@newtylust.nit> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 22, 2005, 2:04:59 PM10/22/05

to

57 months and 3 weeks since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Oct 23, 2005, 10:49:56 AM10/23/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:435A7F4B...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 57 months and 3 weeks since 01/01/01.

That wan one's won so many times now, he'll be allowed to keep the trophy
soon!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 29, 2005, 3:21:17 PM10/29/05

to

57 and 4 weeks months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 1, 2005, 3:07:26 AM11/1/05

to

58 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 1, 2005, 3:08:43 AM11/1/05

to

2 x 29 months since 01/01/01. Does anyone know a nun?

nemo

unread,

Nov 3, 2005, 10:05:17 AM11/3/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:4367228B...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 2 x 29 months since 01/01/01. Does anyone know a nun?

I'm afraid I Mostel you that I know no nuns - not one nun is within by ken,
or even within Ken's ken then! - so the number of nuns I know is none! A big
fat Zero!

Edward Woodward would!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 26, 2005, 2:36:35 AM11/26/05

to

58.8 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 28, 2005, 6:13:43 PM11/28/05

to

58.9 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Dec 1, 2005, 5:34:54 PM12/1/05

to

59 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Dec 3, 2005, 10:12:14 AM12/3/05

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:438F7A8E...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> 59 months since 01/01/01.

OK. 01/01/01. But precisely what did Jaun win?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 1, 2006, 8:47:16 PM1/1/06

to

60 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Feb 15, 2006, 2:28:42 PM2/15/06

to

61.5 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Feb 15, 2006, 2:28:54 PM2/15/06

to

61 months and 2 weeks since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2006, 4:45:41 AM5/1/06

to

64 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2006, 4:46:22 AM5/1/06

to

8 Squared months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2006, 4:46:35 AM5/1/06

to

4 Cubed months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2006, 4:46:52 AM5/1/06

to

2 To The 6th months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 27, 2006, 2:44:50 AM6/27/06

to

65.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jul 1, 2006, 5:48:04 AM7/1/06

to

66 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 15, 2006, 10:25:08 PM9/15/06

to

68 months and 2 weeks since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 29, 2006, 3:29:43 AM9/29/06

to

68 months and 4 weeks since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 1, 2007, 3:31:15 AM1/1/07

to

72 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Jan 1, 2007, 5:43:52 PM1/1/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:4598C6D3...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> 72 months since 01/01/01.

Don't make no difference. We still awoke to find those cops down there. They
did not look at all happy. I shouted down to them, "Do you need a hand" and
they replied, "No thanks. We've found three already!"

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 2, 2007, 3:38:52 AM1/2/07

to

nemo wrote:

The cops are still looking 6 years later?

nemo

unread,

Jan 2, 2007, 11:04:10 AM1/2/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:459A1A1C...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Not with our rubbish being collected twice a week.

The Ripper was arrested shortly afterwards.

And now we've got all those murders of prostitutes in Ipswich! Different
bastard though. They've caught him too.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2516395,00.html

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 3, 2007, 3:42:12 AM1/3/07

to

nemo wrote:

> "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:459A1A1C...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> >
> >
> > nemo wrote:
> >
> > > "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> > > news:4598C6D3...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > > > 72 months since 01/01/01.
> > >
> > > Don't make no difference. We still awoke to find those cops down there.
> They
> > > did not look at all happy. I shouted down to them, "Do you need a hand"
> and
> > > they replied, "No thanks. We've found three already!"
> >
> > The cops are still looking 6 years later?
> >
> Not with our rubbish being collected twice a week.
>
> The Ripper was arrested shortly afterwards.
>
> And now we've got all those murders of prostitutes in Ipswich! Different
> bastard though. They've caught him too.
>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2516395,00.html

I thought that Jack the Ripper had operated in the late 19th century!

nemo

unread,

Jan 3, 2007, 1:17:23 PM1/3/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:459B6C64...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

I was talking about the Camden Ripper.

There's evidence that Jack the Ripper was a Freemason BTW. Probably why they
never caught him.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Mar 7, 2007, 11:45:04 PM3/7/07

to

6 years, 2 months and 6 days since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Mar 10, 2007, 12:24:11 PM3/10/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:45EF94D0...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 6 years, 2 months and 6 days since 01/01/01.

Aha! The wan one won again!

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2007, 4:31:01 AM5/1/07

to

76 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2007, 4:31:10 AM5/1/07

to

4 x 19 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2007, 4:31:21 AM5/1/07

to

6 years and 4 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2007, 4:31:32 AM5/1/07

to

6.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

May 1, 2007, 12:13:08 PM5/1/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:4636FAC5...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> 76 months since 01/01/01

Butt it's 01/05/07 today. Mayday!!

(sings . . )
The . . . workers' flag is deepest red!
Let's smash the bosses round the head! . . . .

Nemo.
Ohhhh! It's *still* really like being in heaven, to retire in 2007!!

nemo

unread,

May 1, 2007, 12:18:36 PM5/1/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:4636FAE4...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> 6.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

May 1, 2007, 12:20:02 PM5/1/07

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:4636FAE4...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> 6.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

That number is just the sort of thing that stopped people getting their food
supplies during WW2. It's irRational!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 26, 2007, 3:07:46 PM6/26/07

to

77.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 2, 2007, 12:36:53 AM10/2/07

to

93 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 2, 2007, 3:17:35 AM11/2/07

to

82 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 2, 2007, 3:17:38 AM11/2/07

to

2 x 41 months since 01/01/01. Does anyone know a nun?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 22, 2007, 1:48:12 AM11/22/07

to

94 and 2/3rds months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 4, 2008, 3:43:15 AM1/4/08

to

7 years and 3 days since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 6, 2008, 7:19:11 AM1/6/08

to

7 years and 5 days since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Jan 6, 2008, 1:14:34 PM1/6/08

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:477DF1A3...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 7 years and 3 days since 01/01/01.

What about 01/01/01/01, when at the fair on Hampstead Heath, a very sickly
and pale bloke had a go at the coconut shy and came away with a coconut. In
other words: The wan one won one!

Edward Woodward would.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 9, 2008, 3:05:41 AM1/9/08

to

7 years and 8 days since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

May 1, 2008, 3:06:17 AM5/1/08

to

88 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 1, 2008, 9:18:01 PM6/1/08

to

7 years and 5 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Jun 5, 2008, 5:47:17 PM6/5/08

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:48434A49...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 7 years and 5 months since 01/01/01.

High toll dew Manny Thiymes - it was that running race!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 1, 2008, 5:03:28 PM9/1/08

to

7 years and 8 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 1, 2008, 6:27:08 AM10/1/08

to

nemo wrote:

> "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

> news:433CDA78...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > 56 months and 4 weeks since 01/01/01.
>
> The wan one still won then?

93 months since 01/01/01.

nemo

unread,

Oct 2, 2008, 5:40:59 PM10/2/08

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:48E3507C...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

I've just heard that the wan one became even more wan and finally died and
big horse of his D-mise, all furure firsts of January have been cancelled.

So in the end, the wan one won the big one

Edward Woodward would!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 10, 2008, 8:16:48 PM10/10/08

to

nemo wrote:

> "Keith E." <i.m....@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1114391702.03cfc16dc9235b4160ef952b33f28ab6@1usenet...
> > Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:25 GMT was a day just like any other,

> > until "nemo" <ne...@newtylust.nit> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

> > >news:426A2121...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> One Weird Dude wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > In article <3A513130...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us>,
> > >> > Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
> > >> > > Today is 01/01/01, are you having fun?
> > >> > >
> > >> > How come nobody decided to pun on 01/01/01?
> > >>
> > >> 1573 days since 01/01/01. Does anyone here own a gun?
> > >
> > >Got a .177 air rifle. I'm saving up for a whole one.
> >
> > You must be a terrorist.
>
> So what does that make all the 'Merkins who've got everything from pistols
> to bazookas to tanks under their right to bare arms! They should wear
> long-sleeve shirts like everybody else, I tell you!"!
>
> And how could I be a teyrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrst with that! You can't do much
> with a rocket-propelled .177 pellet! They're so small they're a waist of
> time!
>
> And you've probably woken up ECHELON now, mentioning stuff like that!
>
> Hang on. There's someone knocking on the door. Nope. They're down the bottom
> of he stairs. Handy things, these Jean-Luc Petards!

Handy: Chinese demon.

nemo

unread,

Oct 11, 2008, 11:32:34 AM10/11/08

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:48EFF070...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

Handycap: Folding headgear. The wan one won one as a prize in a draw run by
Millie Narr.

Edward Woodward would nave liked one as well!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 1, 2008, 7:05:16 PM11/1/08

to

Tim Bruening

unread,

Nov 1, 2008, 7:05:36 PM11/1/08

to

94 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jan 10, 2009, 2:24:27 AM1/10/09

to

nemo

unread,

Jan 12, 2009, 9:14:22 AM1/12/09

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:49684D2B...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> 8 years and 8 days since 01/01/01.

Hasn't that wan one won enough events yet to be happy to retyre and sit at
home admiring his trophies?

Admire: A soft wet area of stinking, festering gore from thousands of
advertising executives and lower wanks who've finally got their just
desserts and been crushed alive very slowly in revenge for the heaps of
utter bilge they've been pumping out at us for decades ruining perfectly
good television programmes one after the other!

So there!

Buht Uhwwiy liyk thehy aydverts!

BANG!

Owwrrwwwwwrrwwww!

Got the stupid bastard!

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 28, 2009, 8:18:29 PM9/28/09

to

104.9 months since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Sep 29, 2009, 3:57:43 PM9/29/09

to

104 months and 4 weeks since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Oct 9, 2009, 4:51:10 AM10/9/09

to

nemo wrote:

> "Keith E." <i.m....@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1114391702.03cfc16dc9235b4160ef952b33f28ab6@1usenet...
> > Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:25 GMT was a day just like any other,
> > until "nemo" <ne...@newtylust.nit> wrote:
> > >

> > >"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 8, 2010, 2:58:11 PM6/8/10

to

9 years and 5 months and 1 week since 01/01/01.

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jun 8, 2010, 2:58:59 PM6/8/10

to

nemo wrote:

> "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

> news:42C250C0...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> >
> >
> > nemo wrote:
> >
> > > "Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

> > > news:42BF1F89...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > > > 53.833333333333333333333333333333 months since 01/01/01.
> > >
> > > That's irrational!
> >
> > Why is 53 and 5/6ths irrational?
> >
> Shan't tell you!

Why not?

Tim Bruening

unread,

Jul 24, 2010, 3:58:46 AM7/24/10

to

Did you eat a cinimon bun on 01/01/01?

Nemo

unread,

Jul 24, 2010, 9:49:42 AM7/24/10

to

"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message

news:4C4A9D36...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...

> Did you eat a cinimon bun on 01/01/01?
>

No.

The wan one who won ate the cinnamon bun!
And on 01/01/02 he was stuck in the loo,
Which wasn't much fun with a big runny bum!