Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion blog for birding aus - birders behaving badly
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
L&L Knight  
View profile  
 More options May 14 2008, 3:43 am
From: L&L Knight <l.kni...@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:43:44 +1000
Local: Wed, May 14 2008 3:43 am
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] re: blog for birding aus - birders behaving badly
Or feeding birds.  See http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3927291.ece

On 14/05/2008, at 5:36 PM, Ian May wrote:

> Hi All

> How many of us would not be here if our parents believed in "the  
> precautionary principle". LOL

> Seriously though, if impacts from twitching causes such alarm within  
> our fraternity, how do we justify and condone cannon netting and leg  
> flagging waders?

> Regards

> Ian

> Lawrie Conole wrote:

>> This conversation seems to have morphed (as they inevitably do)  
>> from a
>> discussion about birding ethics to a Salem twitch trial!  Speaking  
>> as a
>> naturalist/birder/ornithologist/ecologist/etc. who keeps life lists  
>> (and
>> therefore, *ipso facto*, you can add part-time twitcher to that  
>> list), I've
>> seen plenty of thoughtless behaviour by birders in my 30+ years of  
>> birding -
>> and only some of that by twitchers.  By this I mean things such as
>> inappropriate activity around nests, too many visits to other  
>> sensitive
>> locations, overuse of call playback, lack of discretion about who  
>> you tell
>> where the Red Goshawk nest is, and so on ... a kind of universal  
>> disregard
>> for, or lack of awareness of, the precautionary principle.

>> If twitchers turn up to a spot, look at the 'tick' for a few  
>> seconds and
>> then nick off, but do nothing else destructive, then surely the only
>> consequential outcome is a contribution to atmospheric carbon  
>> levels (and an
>> indirect impact on the biota in the long term - much like the  
>> impact most of
>> us have by lighting and heating our homes, etc.) ... and perhaps a  
>> rise in
>> the blood pressure of those who see twitching as the devil's work.

>> If a keen birder visits a nest site twice a day for a week and  
>> drives the
>> parents away, causing nesting failure, then the direct consequence is
>> obvious.  No twitching involved, necessarily.

>> Twitchers or birders, pure as the driven snow or otherwise, please  
>> heed
>> Stuart's original and completely legitimate message to behave  
>> *thoughtfully
>> and ethically *when you're out there.

>> Twitching isn't the real issue - birders behaving badly, whether  
>> twitching
>> or not, is.

> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com

> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
> unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-requ...@vicnet.net.au
> ===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-requ...@vicnet.net.au
===============================


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google