If you have the time and resources to replace the nucleotide and bring it to
full consensus, it might be worth it just to have the sequence on hand in
the future. And it might look better on a paper, though personally I
wouldn't nitpick such small details if I were reviewing it.
I think it would be a very bad idea to change it. It's a non-synonymous
substitution, which means you have a non-zero risk of altering your
protein's function. Meanwhile, one presumes that the native gene gets
translated fine despite not being a perfect match to the consensus. So
why change it?
Peter