Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Update on Caltrain and bikes
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  7 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Steve Vanderlip  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Jan 16, 2:46 pm
From: Steve Vanderlip <stevev1...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:46:00 -0800
Subject: Update on Caltrain and bikes


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Eliot  
View profile  
 More options Jan 16, 3:29 pm
From: Mark Eliot <m...@eliotlabs.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:29:27 -0800
Local: Mon, Jan 16 2012 3:29 pm
Subject: Re: [BikeSMC] Update on Caltrain and bikes

Re: Warm Planet Bikes.

The place provides a great parking service.  HOWEVER, I don't think they run a great business.  I've tried to order tires from them twice -- the exact same set of tires.  They've completely lost my order each time.  By completely, I mean "who are you again?" every time I walk in to check on the order's progress and discover that, no, there's no record in their computer.  Apparently, the one guy who orders things works funny hours, the guys in the shop have trouble with computers, and communication amongst them all is difficult.  I'd love to give them my money, but they don't seem to want it.  If my experience is indicative, it's tough to see how the "retail revenue pays for the parking."

-M

On Jan 16, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Steve Vanderlip wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pat giorni  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17, 10:16 pm
From: pat giorni <hogo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Jan 17 2012 10:16 pm
Subject: Re: [BikeSMC] Update on Caltrain and bikes

They can't handle retail at this point because they cannibalized the space needed for retail to park 70 more bikes per day than the building can hold  and the business model outlined and the Caltrain contract called for, and they will not turn away bike parkers.  If they turned away those 70 extras per day, think of the great increase in bumping, or the fact that those folks would just get in their cars to commute.  Come to the Caltrain BAC meeting and listen to the long-delayed discussion on Thursday at the Samtrans bldg at 6:45-9:00 in San Carlos. 


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Adina Levin  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17, 10:38 pm
From: Adina Levin <aldeivn...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:38:39 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 17 2012 10:38 pm
Subject: Re: [BikeSMC] Update on Caltrain and bikes

"(Charging for bike parking is unfair, because Caltrain hugely subsidizes
car parking at station parking lots. Cyclists should get their fair share.)"

I understand why bike parking should be favorably priced compared to car
parking.  I don't understand why it should be free. I've parked there and
was surprised it was free - I was expecting to pay something.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pat giorni  
View profile  
 More options Jan 18, 1:36 pm
From: pat giorni <hogo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Jan 18 2012 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: [BikeSMC] Update on Caltrain and bikes

At first
glance, it may seem like charging for bike parking is a good idea, but there
are a few things to consider.
 
As a public
agency, Caltrain is not in the business to make money. Caltrain is in the
business to serve the public. They are subsidized by your and my tax dollars,
and they need to spend our money wisely to give the public what it wants and
needs.
 
Caltrain charges for car parking, but the small fee is not even enough to cover
maintenance of the parking lots, and it doesn’t begin to cover lost revenue if
the land were leased for another purpose. Right now, prime real estate in downtown areas on the Peninsula is taken up by Caltrain parking lots. If
Caltrain chooses to subsidize car parking so heavily, then why not bike
parking?
 
All public transit is subsidized, and bicycling keeps people off transit
reducing the need for additional routes and buses, so it makes economic sense
to subsidize bike parking. In Caltrain’s case, the “free” shuttles are not free
at all, and those shuttles cost more subsidy per passenger than city buses. The subsidy needed
to keep Warm Planet open is less than the per trip subsidy of most, if not all,
transit. For more information on subsidies, see http://www.sfbike.org/download/actions/caltrain/Plan_Bikes_on_Caltrai...
 
The reason
Warm Planet opened is to encourage people to ride bikes. If Warm Planet charged
for bike parking, then fewer people would park there. Charging for something we
actually want people to do is counterproductive. We should charge for things we
don’t want people to do. That’s why forward-thinking cities like London have
congestion pricing to discourage people from driving in the city center.
 
If Warm
Planet charged for bike parking, then some people would just bring their bikes
on the trains for free. The bike cars are already overcrowded, so it's better to
save bike space on the trains for those who really need their bikes at both
ends of their commute. Additionally, according to the common carrier code, it
is illegal in the state of California to charge for bringing a bicycle onboard
a train. Besides, strollers and luggage can be brought onboard for free, and
bikes are no different.
 
Biking is a
green commute method, which is good for everyone. If we want more people to bike, keeping bike parking free is
positive behavior reinforcement for the sake of everyone.

 (The cc list includes us, Caltrain Bicycle Advisory Committee, Caltrain
>>>>> public affairs, Caltrain customer service, and Caltrain Citizens Advisory
>>>>> Committee.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here are some suggested talking points for your email:
>>>>> a. Explain how you get to work, and why you use Warm Planet.
>>>>> b. Share why you appreciate that there is a bike shop attached to the
>>>>> bike parking. (Caltrain is considering other options, so we want to
>>>>> emphasize the benefit of staffed bike parking combined with a retail
>>>>> shop.)
>>>>> c. Say how your commute would change if Warm Planet closed.
>>>>> d. Emphasize how important it is for Warm Planet to stay open.
>>>>> e. Thank the Board for their support of bicycle commuting.
>>>>> f. Include your city of residence after your name.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A

 couple things to avoid saying:

 Location: 1250 San Carlos Ave, San Carlos. This is about a block from the
>>>>> San Carlos Caltrain station. Bike racks are in front of the building.
>>>>> Agenda: 
>>>>> http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/__Agendas+and+Minutes/BAC/pdf/01-19-12...
>>>>> 
>>>>> To ask for a third bike car on Bombardier trains, please make a comment at
>>>>> agenda item 6. To support Warm Planet Bikes, please make a comment at
>>>>> agenda item 9.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Isn’t it great that so many people

 are bicycle commuting! As always, thank

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Eliot  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26, 6:00 pm
From: Mark Eliot <m...@eliotlabs.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:00:16 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 26 2012 6:00 pm
Subject: Re: [BikeSMC] Update on Caltrain and bikes

Nice article about this on streetsblog yesterday.

http://sf.streetsblog.org/2012/01/25/caltrains-warm-planet-bike-stati...

This explains a few more things for me.  First WPB had a grant to handle bike parking and it expired.  That's a bit different than a subsidy.  Second, WPB is a for-profit company.  Third, according to Kash “This facility doesn’t exist so I can run a bike shop. This facility exists so that people who want to get on Caltrain can park their bikes.”

Taking this into account, I'd say, yeah, we need good parking facility at 4th/King and the cost for this should be borne by Caltrain for the reasons stated below.  Caltrain can budget the cost for this and contract via grant with a non-profit organization devoted to this if they like.  That may be the problem.  Kash doesn't want to run a for-profit business and it shows. Would the business be successful without the grant?  If not, then the grant truly is a business subsidy. Subsidizing *businesses* isn't Caltrain's deal.  And I'd say a business that relies on a single grant to stay afloat has a bad plan. That may be what's playing out right now.  Subsidizing *parking* is something Catrain can do (and, as pointed out, does do for auto parking).

This whole thing is screwy. A successful business would look at free parking and the space it occupies as a cost center and try to minimize it. Time spent parking bikes is time that could be used selling stuff and charging for labor.  It wouldn't be looking for more parking unless it could charge for it.   It would be looking for more paying customers and trying to use the parking space for more product inventory, etc.   That's not what we want, right?  We want more parking.  In fact, we can have that.  The retail space of the business could be turned into more parking.  The whole building could be for parking only.  But that eliminates the business.  Fine.  Hire an organization that can just manage the parking  -- the real mission.  Then, go farther.  Build incentives into the grant so that the organization really wants to find creative ways to park even more bikes and provide good service.

-M

On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:36 AM, pat giorni wrote:

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jym Dyer  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26, 6:36 pm
From: Jym Dyer <j...@econet.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 26 2012 6:36 pm
Subject: Re: [BikeSMC] Update on Caltrain and bikes

> This whole thing is screwy.

=v= I've been focusing on Caltrain for a few decades, and it's
even screwier than you describe.

> Hire an organization that can just manage the parking -- the
> real mission.  Then, go farther.  Build incentives into the
> grant so that the organization really wants to find creative
> ways to park even more bikes and provide good service.

=v= The focus on "grants" is half the problem here.  It's not
possible to strategize transportation when you have to cobble
things together from grants, so the Bay Area in general and
Caltrain in particular suffer from unworkable disconnects.

=v= The "incentives" notion is the other half of the problem,
one that extends nationwide.  Since the Nixon years, passenger
rail has toiled under the ideology that it should be run as a
business, paying its own way, its meagre subsidy begrudgingly
dispensed amongst much grumbling.  Everything it competes with,
of course, enjoys higher subsidies and massive bailouts, and
various amenities are expected to simply exist, no questions
asked.  Kind of like rail in other countries.

=v= Warm Planet should be considered such an amenity, as if
we were anywhere else in the world where rail is correctly
seen and supported as a social benefit.  And, ideally, the
model should be the Netherlands, where bike+train intermodal
commutes are wisely considered the most beneficial of all.
    <_Jym_>

P.S.:  I didn't respond to your earlier message complaining
about ordering tires from Warm Planet.  I don't agree "it shows"
that it's not run as a proper business.  I'm sorry you ran into
some bad service, but my own experience has been pretty much
the exact opposite.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »