A recent article by former US cycling Olympian and current attorney
Bob Mionske succinctly summarizes the stakes for cycliss in the legal/
political sphere:
http://www.velonews.com/article/79749/legally-speaking-with-bob-mionske---a-question-of-liability
To summarize his summary, Illinois's Supreme Court recently decided
that its statute treating bicycles as vehicles only means that
cyclists have to follow the rules of the road. That is, there are no
protections or rights afforded by its status as a vehicle, only
obligations.
Some of Iowa's county supervisors recently have considered indirectly
banning group rides of 20 or more, due to a lawsuit based on a sheriff
deputy who marked off a dangerous section of pavement with cones
during RAGBRAI, only to later leave and take the cones right before a
rider hit the pavement and was killed. Demonstrations and lobbying by
cyclists has so far delayed a county from enacting such a statute.
Personally, growing up in Peoria, Illinois, I've found that those are
the worst drivers I've come across. I've found South Bend drivers to
be generally pretty fair, which fewer jerks per capita than a lot of
places in the Midwest.
So I'm not surprised that things have gotten so bad over there in
Illinois. But I can certainly see how as cycling becomes more
popular, there will be a big backlash among the as-yet-unconverted
Hoosiers, which could easily lead to similar legal problems.
Let's get organized before it's too late, and be polite when you ride!