BicycleDriving Google Group

Re: [San-Diego-Bicyclist-Forum] Fwd: Bike to Work Video

nea...@gmail.com (Neal) — Mon, 20 May 2013 20:54:54 UT

<[link]>
<[link]>
*Hello Sara and All,*
Sara posted on Chainguard:
"Neal, see the attached pics of winning infrastructure in San Antonio."
*
I agree with you Sara* - those pictures you posted of bicycle

Re: [BicycleDriving] More Kari on Montreal study by Lusk et al ...

jsal...@bikexprt.com (John S. Allen) — Sat, 18 May 2013 02:33:01 UT

I Kary, not Kari.

John S. Allen
7 University Park
Waltham, MA 02453-1523 USA
781 891-9307
jsal...@bikexprt.com
[link]

Re: [BicycleDriving] More Kari on Montreal study by Lusk et al ...

ajburd...@gmail.com (Avery) — Sat, 18 May 2013 02:02:24 UT

Thanks for the correction. I confused Kary critiques of two studies of
cycle tracks in different Canadian cities. The latest letter further
undermines any slight credibility some might accord to the Teschke study

RE: [BicycleDriving] More Kari on Montreal study by Lusk et al ...

markortiza...@windstream.net (Mark Ortiz) — Fri, 17 May 2013 20:00:17 UT

Actually, although the Lusk study was done in Montreal, and Kari is in
Montreal, the study being critiqued is Teschke.

Mark Ortiz

[mailto:bicycledriving@googleg roups.com] On Behalf Of Avery
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:28 AM
To: bicycledriving@googlegroups.co m

Has this been posted?

More Kari on Montreal study by Lusk et al ...

ajburd...@gmail.com (Avery) — Fri, 17 May 2013 13:28:06 UT

Has this been posted?
[link] April 4, 2013
... and this is only part 1 concerning method weaknesses and follows other
data errors and omissions as previously covered on this forum (Allen, Pein
...)!

Re: [San-Diego-Bicyclist-Forum] Fwd: Bike to Work Video

sreid...@sbcglobal.net (Sara R) — Tue, 14 May 2013 04:01:59 UT

Her helmet straps need to be adjusted if she wants to protect her head and
not tear off an ear. If there are 3 lanes going in your direction plus a
share the road sign...take the lane. I find in urban traffic with frequent
starting and stopping that clip in pedals are a pain.

Re: [San-Diego-Bicyclist-Forum] Fwd: Bike to Work Video

ianbrettcoo...@gmail.com (Ian Cooper) — Mon, 13 May 2013 16:31:07 UT

[link]

The cyclist rides in the gutter, in the door zone, on the sidewalk, even
(at one point) in the gutter on the left hand side of the road. At another
point this results in what looks like an unsafe attempt, by an SUV, to pass
(at 2:53 - obviously staged, as it's the same car as at 2:51, but in a

Pinch-Point Documentary Film

rmsh...@gmail.com (Bob Shanteau) — Sun, 12 May 2013 20:42:01 UT

Motorists and cyclists in Cambridge, England
<[link]>

Re: [BicycleDriving] The Fight Is Over - VC vs Bicycle Infrastructure - Bicycle Infrastructure Won

fores...@johnforester.com (John Forester) — Sat, 11 May 2013 16:36:54 UT

Neal exposes his ideological limitations in these comments. The NYC
report was not about "bicycle infrastructure", but about a wide range of
street changes done so close to simultaneously that there is no way to
separate out the contributions of each component. As I have remarked
before, it is not very likely that a sidepath running alongside a park

Re: [BicycleDriving] The Fight Is Over - VC vs Bicycle Infrastructure - Bicycle Infrastructure Won

wharea...@gmail.com (Richard Wharton) — Sat, 11 May 2013 03:06:03 UT

Ad hominem but Neal needs to meet Dexter.

Sent from my iPad

The Fight Is Over - VC vs Bicycle Infrastructure - Bicycle Infrastructure Won

nea...@gmail.com (Neal) — Sat, 11 May 2013 02:51:13 UT

*Posted to 'Chainguard' forum:
*

*Hello Andy, Steve, Jack, and All,*

Jack posted:

“Lastly, please understand that this list is for the specific purpose of
promoting and protecting Vehicular Cycling - and has no other purpose
whatsoever. No matter how noble any other cause may be, it is not a topic

Re: [BicycleDriving] Re: LAB publishes FTR apologia

hfebelin...@lycos.com (Herman F. Ebeling, Jr.) — Wed, 08 May 2013 04:23:29 UT

Re: [BicycleDriving] LAB publishes FTR apologia

fores...@johnforester.com (John Forester) — Tue, 07 May 2013 23:49:54 UT

This is LAB's excuses for defending the FTR laws. This shows the extent
to which LAB depends on cyclist-inferiority cycling instead of
advocating the rights of cyclists. A pretty sorry pair of excuses these are.

LAB claims that the FTR law is "essential" to tell cyclists which way to
ride on the roadway. The FTR law is unnecessary; I always thought that

Re: LAB publishes FTR apologia

sreid...@sbcglobal.net (Sara R) — Tue, 07 May 2013 21:19:21 UT

I want to know why motorized vehicles need so much help to pass
bicyclists..The rider in the pic is practically in the gutter pan and there
are multiple lanes going in each direction. I also think that LAB needs to
update the recommendation to ride in the right hand third of a lane (fine
if the lane is wide) bad idea in a standard width lane, and there aren't

NY Times article on cycling education

sreid...@sbcglobal.net (Sara R) — Tue, 07 May 2013 21:11:19 UT

[link]
Yield to pedestrians in crosswalks (marked or unmarked) yes, otherwise no.
Why ride close enough to a cab to get doored in the first place? I
couldn't tell by the article what they might actually be teaching.