adding prism equivalent properties?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Bruce D'Arcus

unread,
Oct 29, 2009, 4:08:08 PM10/29/09
to Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group
As i'm looking at a bunch of journal RSS feeds, I'm noting most of
them I'm looking at are in RSS 1.0, and all use prism properties.
Shall we add some triples to associate prism:volume to bibo:volume,
etc.?

Example:

prism:endingPage "445" ;
prism:startingPage "427" ;
prism:volume "16" ;
# well, this one would be bibo:issue; prism:number isn't
necessarily exactly equivalent then
prism:number "4" ;
# no equivalent
prism:publicationDate "2009-10-01" ;
# not sure?
prism:section "Articles" ;

Bruce

Ross Singer

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 9:41:11 AM10/30/09
to bibliographic-ontolog...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <bda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As i'm looking at a bunch of journal RSS feeds, I'm noting most of
> them I'm looking at are in RSS 1.0, and all use prism properties.
> Shall we add some triples to associate prism:volume to bibo:volume,
> etc.?

+1

I think making it easiest to get from the source data -> citation
makes a lot of sense.

-Ross.

Owen Stephens

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 10:19:45 AM10/30/09
to Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group
Sorry, just trying to get up to speed with some of this. What do you
mean that prism:number isnt nececssarily equivalent? (to bibo:issue?)

Bruce D'Arcus

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 10:24:37 AM10/30/09
to bibliographic-ontolog...@googlegroups.com


On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Owen Stephens <owen....@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Sorry, just trying to get up to speed with some of this. What do you
> mean that prism:number isnt nececssarily equivalent? (to bibo:issue?)

Well, I suppose it depends exactly how prism:number is defined, but
bibo:number, for example, Is a document number.

Owen Stephens

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 10:31:54 AM10/30/09
to Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group
Yes - agreed prism:number is equivalent to bibo:issue not bibo:number

On Oct 30, 2:24 pm, Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Owen Stephens <owen.pa...@gmail.com>  

Tom Keays

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 2:28:09 PM10/30/09
to bibliographic-ontolog...@googlegroups.com
I think this is a fantastic idea. Making equivalences of this type
explicit will be a big help!

Tom

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <bda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages