quick link followup

[Bruce D'Arcus]

Re: the citation links and law, interesting followup post:

<http://www.crossref.org/CrossTech/2009/03/introductory_signals.html>

The list is actually pretty generic, and we already support some of
them (I think).

"In support of an argument:
1) [no signal]. (NB that, apparently, this is increasingly deprecated.)
2) accord;
3) see;
4) see also;
5) cf.;

For Comparisons:
6) compare ... with ...;

For contradiction:
7) but see;
8) but cf.;

For background:
9) see generally;

And for examples:
10) e.g."

Bruce