Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Cloned meat, dairy make way to the table

View parsed - Show only message text

Received: by 10.36.23.6 with SMTP id 6mr11429093nzw.1193789521319;
        Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Received: from outbound04.telus.net (outbound04.telus.net [199.185.220.223])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k36si1556355waf.2007.10.30.17.12.01;
        Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dgrmor...@telus.net designates 199.185.220.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=199.185.220.223;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dgrmor...@telus.net designates 199.185.220.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dgrmor...@telus.net
Received: from priv-edtnaa05.telusplanet.net ([207.194.78.177])
          by priv-edtnes73.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP
          id <20071031001200.VCPC7944.priv-edtnes73.telusplanet....@priv-edtnaa05.telusplanet.net>
          for <Bible-Prophecy-News@googlegroups.com>;
          Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:12:00 -0600
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [207.194.78.177])
	by priv-edtnaa05.telusplanet.net (BorderWare MXtreme Infinity Mail Firewall) with ESMTP id 1DPRBUW3VG
	for <Bible-Prophecy-News@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:11:58 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4727C831.5030407@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:11:29 -0700
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Organization: The Good News Ministry and Missions Outreach
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bible-Prophecy-News@googlegroups.com
Subject: Cloned meat, dairy make way to the table
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071030-0, 10/30/2007), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

*Perilous Times

Cloned meat, dairy make way to the table*

John Upton, The Examiner
2007-10-29 10:00:00.0

SAN FRANCISCO -Families and friends who share eggnog, lamb curry or beef 
stew this winter may not know whether the main ingredients came from 
cloned animals, after the governor vetoed a San Francisco lawmaker’s 
labeling bill.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is poised to end a voluntary 
moratorium on the sale of dairy and meat from cloned cattle, goats, pigs 
and sheep, after it ruled last year that the food is safe for humans. 
The agency published a health risk assessment in December that noted 
high death rates among cloned animals and host mothers, partly because 
of incidents of ‘large animal syndrome’ in cloned cattle and sheep.

A federal bill to require labels on food from cloned animals and their 
descendents has been stalled in Democratic-controlled congressional 
committees since February. A similar bill by state Sen. Carole Migden, 
D-San Francisco, passed the Legislature last month, but Gov. Arnold 
Schwarzenegger recently refused to sign it.

To clone an animal, scientists move its genetic material into excavated 
donor embryos, which are planted in host mothers to grow as genetic 
doppelgängers of the prized beast. A Pew Initiative on Food and 
Biotechnology survey last year found that two-thirds of Americans are 
“uncomfortable” with the technology.

Migden said labels on cloned food would let consumers know and choose 
what they put on the dinner table, but Schwarzenegger told lawmakers in 
a veto statement that Migden’s proposed rules “could be unworkable, 
costly and unenforceable,” and might violate federal law.

About a dozen agricultural and retail groups opposed Migden’s bill. 
California Farm Bureau lobbyist Noelle Cremers said cloning lets 
livestock producers “more quickly respond to consumer demand” by 
replicating valued animals, and that it would be “next to impossible” to 
segregate food, for labeling purposes, from cloned animals and their 
descendents.

Labels for cloned food would mislead consumers, which would violate 
federal law, said Cremers, because there’s “absolutely no difference” 
between food from cloned and non-cloned animals.

But food-safety and animal-welfare groups criticized Schwarzenegger’s 
decision. “The animals are injected with large amounts of hormones — and 
that’s a food safety issue,” said Rebecca Spector, the San 
Francisco-based West Coast director of The Center for Food Safety.

The nonprofit noted in a report that the federal government’s risk 
assessment relied heavily on studies that weren’t reviewed by other 
scientists. “We feel very strongly,” Spector said, “that there hasn’t 
been adequate testing.”

UC Davis biotechnologist Alison Van Eenennaam said overgrown young are a 
side effect of in vitro fertilization, and that they’re usually 
delivered safely by Caesarean section. “Most of these companies have got 
a few vets on staff,” she said. “It’s not like it’s Joe Blow out in the 
field hoping for the best.”

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google