Faith
Under Fire...
UK: High Court banning of council prayers ruling 'an attack
on centuries-old Christian traditions'
Bishops and MPs last night attacked a landmark ruling banning
local councils from saying prayers during meetings as an assault
on Britain’s Christian heritage.
By John Bingham, Religious Affairs Editor
7:30AM GMT 11 Feb 2012
The Telegraph UK
A High Court Judge ruled that there was no “lawful” place for
prayer during formal proceedings after an atheist parish
councillor objected that the tradition excluded non-believers.
Secular campaigners insisted the case had only “modest”
implications and would not interfere with anyone’s freedom of
religion.
But church leaders said it amounted to a victory for an
“aggressive secularist agenda” intent on banishing religion from
public life.
There were also fears that the ruling could throw local
preparations to celebrate the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee into doubt
by opening the door to legal challenges from opponents of the
monarchy.
Practices such as singing the national anthem could also come
under threat, it was claimed.
It followed a legal challenge by Clive Bone, a former member of
Bideford Town Council in Devon, who objected to the tradition on
grounds of conscience, supported by the National Secular Society.
Yesterday, at the High Court in London, Mr Justice Ouseley, ruled
that it did not breach Mr Bone’s human rights or amount to
discrimination.
But he nevertheless concluded that it was “not lawful” to say
prayers as part of formal meetings under a clause of the Local
Government Act 1972.
He issued a formal legal declaration stating that councils had “no
power” to include prayers in meetings – although they could be
held in council chambers before the formal proceedings get under
way.
Simon Calvert, a director of the Christian institute, which
supported the council’s case, said: “We are talking about
something that has gone on for centuries in a constitutionally
Christian country … this outlaws it at a stroke and it seems to be
another example of the courts siding with an aggressive secularist
agenda.”
He added: “Local authority lawyers are going to be asking
themselves … what about singing the national anthem? What about
celebrating the Diamond Jubilee? Do they fall outside the Local
Government Act?”
Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, is understood to be
concerned about a “chilling” effect on some councils planning
jubilee street parties for fear of legal action.
His lawyers are preparing to issue emergency legal guidance to
councils, effectively urging them to ignore the ruling.
They have advised him that new laws, due to come into force within
weeks, would override the judgment by giving councils a “general
power of competence” over proceedings.
Mr Pickles said freedom to worship was a “fundamental and
hard-fought British liberty”.
“We are a Christian country, with an established Church in
England, governed by the Queen,” he said.
“Public authorities – be it Parliament or a parish council –
should have the right to say prayers before meetings if they
wish.”
Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester, said
prayer was “central the public life of the country”.
“There is a huge constitutional implication to this,” he said.
“Where will this stop – by a test case about prayer in Parliament?
“Prayers in Parliament are definitely part of the proceedings,
they are recorded as such, they are on the order paper and part
therefore of the constitutional arrangement of the country as the
Queen in Parliament under God.”
Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, the
Islamic group, said the judgment was an “attack on all faith”.
“We are a religious country, a majority Christian country,” he
said.
“As people of faith – whether we take inspiration from
Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism or whatever – we should
take pride in that and be able to say prayers, I think this
judgment is a step back, it is an attack against freedom.”
Mr Bone, a retired engineer, from Bideford said he was “delighted”
by the ruling.
“I think this will stop sending out the wrong message – that local
government is for a certain type of person,” he said.
“I totally agree with Eric Pickles when he says that there should
be freedom of religion but it is not a licence to impose it on
others in inappropriate situations.”
Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular
Society, said: “This is an important step in recognition of
secularism in public life so that everybody whatever their
religion or lack of it feels equally welcome and treated with
equal respect.”
Cllr Imran Khan a Tory member of Reigate and Banstead Borough
Council in Surrey, said: “Religion has no place in politics.
“This High Court judgment is a victory for everyone who believes
that democracy and religious freedom is the cornerstone of western
free society.”
The council was granted leave to appeal but last night it emerged
that both sides were considering appeals – on different aspects of
the ruling.
The judgment came a day after a series of leading clerics called
on the Church of England General Synod to “resist” moves to
exclude chaplains from NHS hospitals.