Life With Big Brother....
Report: NSA creating Big Brother spy system to monitor domestic
infrastructure
By Daniel Tencer
July 11th, 2010 -- 9:07 pm
Raw Story
Internal Raytheon email calls system 'Big Brother'
The National Security Agency has begun work on an "expansive" spy
system that will monitor critical infrastructure inside the United
States for cyber-attacks, in a move that detractors say could end up
violating privacy rights and expanding the NSA's domestic spying
abilities.
The Wall Street Journal cites unnamed sources as saying that the NSA
has issued a $100-million contract to defense contractor Raytheon to
build a system dubbed "Perfect Citizen," which will involve placing
"sensors" at critical points in the computer networks of private and
public organizations that run infrastructure, organizations such as
nuclear power plants and electric grid operators.
In an email obtained by the Journal, an unnamed Raytheon employee
describes the system as "Big Brother."
"The overall purpose of the [program] is our Government...feel[s] that
they need to insure the Public Sector is doing all they can to secure
Infrastructure critical to our National Security," the email states.
"Perfect Citizen is Big Brother."
Story continues below...
"Raytheon declined to comment on this email," the Journal reports.
Some officials familiar with Perfect Citizen see it "as an intrusion by
the NSA into domestic affairs, while others say it is an important
program to combat an emerging security threat that only the NSA is
equipped to provide," the Journal states.
The program is reportedly being funded under the Comprehensive National
Cybersecurity Initiative, a program launched by the Bush administration
in January, 2008, and continued under the Obama administration. The
initiative is budgeted to cost $40 billion over several years.
ANOTHER WAR WITHOUT DEFINITION?
News of the spy system comes in the wake of months of news reports and
government statements on the the threat of cyber-attacks. Last year,
the US pointed the finger of blame at North Korea for a "widespread"
attack on US and South Korean government computers. Earlier this year,
a coordinated attack on Google servers was identified as originating
from China.
But many observers say the threat of cyberwar is exaggerated, and they
suggest that profit may be a motive behind efforts to build
cyber-defense systems.
"It's about who is in charge of cyber security, and how much control
the government will exert over civilian networks," writes security
technology expert Bruce Schneier at the CNN Web site. "And by beating
the drums of war, the military is coming out on top."
Schneier sees danger in the media "mislabeling" activities like
computer hacking and "cyber-activism" as "cyberwar."
"One problem is that there's no clear definition of 'cyberwar.' What
does it look like? How does it start? When is it over? Even
cybersecurity experts don't know the answers to these questions, and
it's dangerous to broadly apply the term 'war' unless we know a war is
going on."
MONEY TO BE MADE
In a report published last month, Cecilia Kang at the Washington Post
described cyber-security as "Washington's growth industry of choice,"
and companies in the business are "in line for a multibillion-dollar
injection of federal research dollars."
Kang reported:
Delivering the keynote address at a recent cybersecurity summit
sponsored by Defense Daily, Dawn Meyerriecks, deputy director of
national intelligence for acquisition and technology, said that along
with the White House Office of Science and Technology, her office is
going to sponsor major research "where the government's about to spend
multiple billions of dollars."
Tom Burghardt at Pacific Free Press notes that the conference at which
Meyerricks spoke was sponsored, among other firms, by Raytheon.