Perilous
Times
Iran ready and able to build a nuclear bomb, UN watchdog
warns the world
Iran has acquired the know-how and material to build its first
nuclear weapon with assistance from a former Soviet scientist, the
UN's nuclear safety watchdog will disclose on Tuesday.
Abdul Qadeer Khan, the 'father' of Pakistan's atom bomb, handed
over plans for a neutron initiator, a key element in a bomb
By Alex Spillius, Adrian Blomfield in Jerusalem
11:00PM GMT 07 Nov 2011
The Telegraph UK
A landmark report from the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) will detail how specialists from Pakistan and North Korea
have also helped to take the Islamic regime to the threshold of
full nuclear capability.
Tension has risen in the Middle East in anticipation of the
report, amid suggestions that Israel may use it to justify a
pre-emptive military strike against Iran.
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, warned Israel on Monday
that such action would be a "very serious mistake fraught with
unpredictable consequences".
Russia and China are also likely to oppose new, tougher UN
Security Council sanctions against Iran, despite the IAEA making
clear the extent of the regime's nuclear ambitions.
Its report will disclose that North Korea has provided
mathematical formulas and codes involved in designing a nuclear
device and that Abdul Qadeer Khan, the "father" of Pakistan's atom
bomb, has handed over plans for a neutron initiator, a key element
in a bomb.
It will also say that the Iranians were aided for at least five
years by a former Soviet scientist, alleged by The Washington Post
to be Vyacheslav Danilenko. He was allegedly contracted in the
mid-1990s by Iran's Physics Research Centre, a facility linked to
its nuclear programme. There is no evidence that Moscow knew.
According to intelligence sources and documents provided by the
Iranians, he helped to design a so-called R265 generator, a
high-explosive device used to trigger a nuclear chain reaction.
The West also believes that Tehran has a blueprint for a nuclear
device small enough to fit into a warhead, and has completed a
steel container the size of a double decker bus in which the
high-explosive element of such a device could be tested.
The UN's nuclear watchdog will detail how the regime plans to
triple its capacity to enrich uranium to weapons grade at a
facility deep inside a mountain near Qom and is experimenting with
detonators and neutron physics in a way that can only be for
military purposes.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's president, accused Israel and the
United States yesterday of drumming up global support for a
military strike on its nuclear facilities, which his country
claims are for civilian and medical purposes only.
Mr Ahmadinejad added that Washington wanted to "save the Zionist
entity, but it will not be able to do so".
"This entity [Israel] can be compared to a kidney transplanted in
a body that rejected it. It will collapse and its end will be
near," he said.
His remarks came after Shimon Peres, the Israeli president, said:
"The possibility of a military attack against Iran is now closer
to being applied than the application of a diplomatic option."
However a push for a fifth round of UN sanctions is more likely in
the short term. Britain and the US still believe Iran can be
forced to back down, because the regime has not yet decided to
proceed to the "breakout" stage of placing a nuclear explosive
inside a warhead.
Israel will nonetheless press the West to act robustly. Benjamin
Netanyahu, the prime minister, and Ehud Barak, his defence
minister, have lobbied cabinet colleagues to back military
strikes.
The United States has failed to win a guarantee from Mr Netanyahu
that Israel will not act alone and is reportedly so concerned that
it has ordered its intelligence agencies to step up monitoring of
its ally. Some observers think Israel's rhetoric is intended to
galvanise the international community into stronger action than it
might otherwise have taken.
That could include a US ban on transactions with Iran's central
bank, or a ban on Iranian oil imports, though the effects of
either measure on Iranian society and the international economy
are regarded as highly unpredictable. There is no doubt in Western
capitals that the IAEA's quarterly report will offer the most
compelling evidence yet about the military aspects of Iran's
nuclear project, though it will stop short of concluding that the
regime is either building a bomb or has firmly decided to so.
Iran's history of deception and obstruction and the involvement of
bodies linked to the military in an ostensibly civilian scheme
have deepened suspicions. Mark Hibbs, of the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace, said: "If you look at the gamut of
activities over time, and how they are funded and organised, then
you can conclude this looks like a nuclear weapons programme,
because it is what all weapons programmes we know about have
looked like."