Faith
Under Fire...
2,000 chaplains nix idea of same-sex ceremonies - Pentagon
memos put faith leaders at odds with definition of marriage
Posted: October 05, 2011
8:20 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
The Department of Defense may want to set up a conflict between
its policy and federal law written by Congress and signed by the
president, but several thousand evangelical Christian chaplains in
the military will have no part of it.
That's according to an announcement today from the Chaplain
Alliance for Religious Liberty, whose members are various
Christian church denominations or groups that "endorse" chaplains
for the United States military.
Just exactly how did America move from 'I Love Lucy' to this? Read
it in "HOW EVIL WORKS: Understanding and Overcoming the
Destructive Forces That Are Transforming America"
Chaplains must have those endorsers, or outside groups that affirm
that the individual chaplain is qualified for the leadership post
as chaplain, in order to be in the military.
The organization's statement today came in response to last week's
announcement by the Department of Defense that chaplains now can
participate in same-sex ceremonies and will be allowed to use
federal facilities for such exhibitions.
"While the memorandum acknowledges a chaplain's right to not
participate in same-sex 'marriage' ceremonies – a right not given
by the Pentagon, but rather given by the Creator and protected by
the chaplain's faith group – the new policy makes it clear that
the Pentagon has placed the military in the midst of a deeply
controversial issue during a time of ongoing war," the
organization said.
Spokesman Dr. Ron Crews, the executive director of the alliance,
explained, "By dishonestly sanctioning the use of federal
facilities for 'marriage counterfeits' that federal law and the
vast majority of Americans have rejected, the Pentagon has
launched a direct assault on the fundamental unit of society –
husband and wife."
So follows the alliance's statement that the more than 2,000
military chaplains represented by its endorsers will not be
involved in same-sex ceremonies.
At issue is the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which for all
federal purposes recognizes only a man and a woman as participants
in a marriage. Homosexual activists have been trying for some time
to get that definition repealed, even though two-thirds of all
states also have the same definition in their own constitutions or
laws.
Barack Obama joined their camp earlier this year by announcing
that the administration, through the Justice Department, simply
would not do its duty to defend an existing federal law, DOMA,
when it is challenged in court. Republicans in the U.S. House were
forced to obtain outside counsel for those disputes because of the
decision on the part of the White House not to provide a defense.
It was reported just last week that the Department of Defense
issued memos regarding same-sex "ceremonies" now that officials
have abandoned the centuries-old standard that those acting openly
on their homosexual lifestyle choices were disqualified from
military service.
In its announcement, the Defense Department said not only would
military chaplains be allowed to participate in such events, they
also could be held at military chapels across the nation.
That drew an immediate negative reaction from Archbishop Timothy
Broglio, the archbishop of the archdiocese for military services
in the Catholic church. The Roman Catholic Church "does not
perform the sacrament of matrimony for same-sex couples," said an
announcement.
Therefore, no such events will happen at West Point's Catholic
Chapel, which is a Catholic parish and is unlike the
nondenominational chapels found on other military installations.
Crews' announcement said the evangelicals were joining the
Catholics on this matter.
"I was stunned at the memorandum that came out last Friday," he
told WND. "It appears to set the Department of Defense in
opposition to Congress in that Congress has passed a definition of
marriage that is now federal law."
"It appears they're allowing chaplains to be in a position of
violating federal law, and that would be done by sanction of the
Defense Department," he said.
"We're very concerned if this is just the first salvo from the
Department of Defense after repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell,'" he
said.
He said he and his organizations were encouraging Christian
chaplains to remain in the military and serve the needs of the
soldiers and their families. But he also confirmed that it's clear
there are those who have decided they will just walk away from
what had been their ministry.
"We're not willing to abandon our soldiers and their families,"
Crews said.
The solution that is needed, he said, is a formal recognition in
the law that soldiers and chaplains have a right of conscience in
the military – and cannot be penalized for acting on their faith
system.
"We call once again for Congress to affirm that the federal
definition of marriage applies to the Department of Defense and
that no federal facilities may be used to circumvent federal law,"
he said. "In addition, we call on Congress to enact a 'right of
conscience' clause in the Revised Title 10 code to ensure that no
American, and especially not our service members, be forced to
deny their religious beliefs."
The DoD memos authorize military chaplains to conduct same-sex
"ceremonies" on or off base and make military property, such as a
chapel, available on a "neutral-to-sexual-orientation" basis.
The law of the land regarding marriage in the United States has
been the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law by
then-President Bill Clinton.
The federal law, defining marriage as the union of one man and one
woman, has been under increasing attack since President Obama took
office in January 2009.
One newly released memo, signed by Clifford Stanley,
undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, provides
guidelines to all military chaplains that "supersedes" prior
guidelines.
It states that a military chaplain "may participate in or
officiate any private ceremony, whether on or off a military
installation, provided that the ceremony is not prohibited by
applicable state and local law."
A second Defense memo declared that the military must make its
facilities available in a way that is "neutral to sexual
orientation."
Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., issued a statement Friday also criticizing
the Defense Department memos. In it, he says, "DOMA clearly
applies to the Department of Defense."
"The Department of Defense has decided to put the White House's
liberal agenda ahead of following the law," Akin said. "The
Defense of Marriage Act makes it clear that for the purposes of
the federal government, marriage is defined as between one man and
one woman. The use of federal property or federal employees to
perform gay marriage ceremonies is a clear contravention of the
law."
Akin noted that in May, the House of Representatives passed the
National Defense Authorization Act carrying his amendment on the
issue.
"My amendment, which is now the position of the House of
Representatives, would make it clear that federal employees and
federal property can only be used to support marriages that are
consistent with DOMA," Akin said.
In an email to WND, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt of the
Pray In Jesus Name Project said Obama's Pentagon "issued new
regulations Friday forcing all military chaplains to facilitate
homosexual wedding ceremonies in military chapels in some states"
or face disciplinary action.
"In other words, chaplains MUST open up their chapels to
desecration," Klingenschmitt said.
Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council also issued a
statement on the issue.
"It is outrageous that only 10 days after repeal of the law
against homosexuality in the armed forces, the Defense Department
is already pushing the military further down the slippery slope,"
he said. "The repeal law passed by the lame-duck Congress last
year said nothing about authorizing same-sex 'weddings' on
military bases or by military chaplains."
Perkins argued that the Defense of Marriage Act "remains the law
in America, defining marriage as a union of one man and one woman
for all purposes under federal law."
He noted that the House already taken action to reinforce DOMA,
"which clearly repudiates the policy announced today."