UK: Christian Doctor fighting for his job, for spreading his faith, had prayed to God for a challenge
6 views
Skip to first unread message
-Pastor-Dale-Morgan-
unread,
Jun 17, 2012, 12:55:36 PM6/17/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
Faith
Under Fire...
UK: Christian Doctor fighting for his job, for spreading his
faith, had prayed to God for a challenge
Dr Richard Scott was given a warning by the General Medical
Council after he told a suicidal patient that Christianity may
offer help and he is now fighting to keep his job.
By Cristina Odone
9:30AM BST 17 Jun 2012
The Telegraph UK
Dr Richard Scott was frustrated with his lot. Despite having a
flourishing GP practice and happy family life, he felt that he was
not making a difference. So he turned to someone who had always
helped him in the past.
“I asked God to send me a challenge that would resonate with
people,” he says, “to make them see the importance of faith.”
God listened. Within the year, Dr Scott was locked in a battle
with the General Medical Council after he suggested to a suicidal
patient in August 2010 that religion might do more to help him
than medication.
He also found himself fighting for his own life, after being
diagnosed with bowel cancer.
Though Dr Scott has undergone painful surgery, radiation and two
rounds of chemotherapy, the cancer, he says, has been the least of
it.
What upsets him most is the realisation that it has become
dangerous today to express Christian beliefs in the workplace.
The GMC, which regulates standards among medical professionals,
issued Dr Scott with a warning last March. He had, it claimed,
“overstepped the line” when, in a consultation, he urged his
24-year-old patient to give Christianity a chance.
“The man was depressed, and had left his own faith. So I told him,
'You may find that Christianity offers you something that your own
faith did not.’ His mother complained that I was forcing my
religion down his throat.”
In finding that Dr Scott pushed his religious views on his
patient, the GMC warned that if any further complaints are made
about him, the GP of 28 years’ standing risks being struck off the
medical register.
His appeal against the official warning was quashed last Thursday,
after a four-day hearing that his counsel, Paul Diamond, called
“Stalinist”.
From his home in Margate, Kent, Dr Scott said: “It was as if I had
stepped into a secret court, with the witness, Patient A, never
appearing. He was allowed to give evidence over the telephone, and
remained a faceless accuser.”
This proved, he says, “the GMC’s bias against me — and any doctor
who wears his Christian faith on his sleeve”.
The same council that allows doctors to promote the healing
effects of homoeopathy, chiropractic and reiki, also known as palm
healing — which are all unsupported by Western, evidence-based
medicine but are backed by belief systems — has banned the mere
mention of faith and prayer in a consultation.
Yet, as Dr Scott points out, the medical impact of prayer has been
proved in a number of scientific studies.
“Christians recover 70 per cent faster,” he says. “They’re also
less likely to get depressed. In America, medical schools have
even introduced spirituality and health courses because they
recognise the significant role of faith as part of therapy.”
So, too, do the GPs at the Bethesda Medical Centre in Margate.
Posters and leaflets at the surgery — which is described in its
literature as “expressly Christian” but accepting of patients of
all faiths — advises that “if you don’t want to talk about faith,
let doctors know”.
The doctors, who include Dr Scott’s wife Heather, do outreach work
connected with alcoholics, drug addicts and suicides, and rely on
prayers and Bible readings in their mission. The practice, the GP
points out, takes its name from the healing pool mentioned in the
Gospel of John.
Dr Scott, 51, worries that his case is the latest in an alarming
trend that points to the marginalisation of Christianity. Whether
it is about abortion or gay marriage, the Christian perspective is
under fire from the authorities.
“Look at the GMC,” he says. “It is made up of the great and the
good. It is a pillar of the establishment. Yet can they claim to
speak for the majority of people in this country? No. More than 70
per cent of Britons, when asked if they believe in God, said yes.”
The former missionary doctor and father-of-three believes that
Christians must keep their faith “in the closet” or risk
punishment.
“I got off lightly,” he admits, “as I still have a job. Other
Christians suffered far more. The electrician who dared display a
palm frond in the window of his van was fired; and the nurse who
prayed for a patient was suspended.”
Dr Scott believes that efforts to eradicate Christianity’s
presence in public life are growing. Before the tribunal hearing,
he was vilified in the media as a Bible-thumping zealot; that
alone, he says, will intimidate other doctors who dare to infuse
their medical work with Christian charity.
By upholding this ruling, he believes the GMC has set a precedent,
making it a disciplinary offence to bring faith to work.
Will the midwife who opposes abortion or the doctor who opposes
assisted suicide be forced to go against their conscience and
participate in procedures they believe to be wrong?
“I fear,” says Dr Scott, “that more and more, the answer will be
'yes’.”
What is it about the Christian mindset that causes such hostility
in today’s liberal society? One reason, I venture, is that our
culture prizes individualism, and we have grown accustomed to
being able to sleep with whom we want, give birth when we want,
and even snuff out life (our own, or an unborn child’s) as we see
fit.
Dr Scott agrees that Christianity challenges this self-regard by
accepting taboos and cherishing principles that the contemporary
“anything-goes” culture has rejected. However, as he point out,
such moral absolutism when professed by Muslims is somehow
acceptable, but in Christians smacks of imperialism.
Dr Scott fears, too, that religious charities and organisations
that run hospitals, schools and hostels for the homeless are being
squeezed out of the public arena.
Just as Roman Catholic adoption agencies have been shut down
because they refused to place children in their care with
homosexual couples, so Christian hospices will be forced to shut
if they oppose euthanasia, and Christian hospitals to close if
they refuse to perform abortions.
It is a bleak scenario — and totally different from the welcome
that Dr Scott received in India and Africa during his years as a
medical missionary. While he and his wife worked in Tanzania and
Kenya, they found themselves loved and respected because of,
rather than in spite of, their faith.
“As Christians, we were seen to bring education and medicines, but
also an important ally against the witchdoctors who were causing
extraordinary violence and misery among the Masai.
"Even when we were unable to save a life, or a limb, the family
would offer us a slaughtered cow in gratitude.”
No slaughtered cows here — though his struggle has brought Dr
Scott hundreds of letters and emails of support. He takes comfort
in these, especially in messages from atheists.
The British sense of fair play is offended by censorship,
especially when its victims are targeted for their beliefs. When a
woman cannot wear a cross, or her colleague a hijab, it is not
only believers who cry foul.
Are Britons cross enough about this to fight back? “Yes,” Dr Scott
is adamant. “I think people are fed up of watching their
countrymen being bullied by the thought police.”
The GMC and other authorities, he says, ignore that Britons like
to live in a civilised country — one in which everyone is free to
have their say — at their peril.