Perilous Times
The European 'dream’ has finally collided with reality
The drive towards a European superstate has had its flaws exposed at
last, says Christopher Booker.
The collapse of the euro: The most obvious place for disintegration to
begin was the single currency
Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker 9:00PM GMT 20 Nov 2010
Twelve years ago, I stood on the plinth of Nelson’s Column in the
pouring rain, addressing a crowd of 10,000 people. We had marched
through central London in the biggest ever demonstration against
Britain joining the euro, a course then being daily urged on us by the
BBC, with the aid of such Euro-zealots as Michael Heseltine, Chris
Patten, Kenneth Clarke and Sir Leon Brittan.
At the time, Mayor Ken Livingstone was calling for the removal of the
two statues of Victorian generals that stand on each side of Trafalgar
Square. I therefore jokingly began by suggesting that, if they were to
be replaced, this might be with a very small statue of John Major, for
negotiating Britain’s opt-out from the euro at Maastricht, and a much
larger statue of Sir James Goldsmith. It was the intervention of his
Referendum Party in the 1997 election that prodded all the other
parties into promising a referendum, thus stopping hopes of Britain’s
entry dead.
It was only when, a few years later, I began work on a comprehensive
history of the European “project” that I fully came to see how, for 50
years, it had only ever had one real agenda. As was laid down by its
founding genius, Jean Monnet, the sole underlying purpose behind
everything it has ever done has been to work stealthily – accreting its
powers step by step – towards the creation of an integrated “United
States of Europe”, ruled by one supra‑national government.
Monnet realised in the mid-Fifties that the only way to realise his
goal was to work towards it gradually, through a series of lesser
goals, each of which would serve to focus the energies of his
“Europe-builders” until it was time to move on to the next.
The first was to set up the embryonic institutions of his European
government by disguising them as necessary for the creation of the
Common Market. Once that was achieved, the focus moved on to creating a
“Single Market”, as an excuse to take further powers to the centre. The
next focus became “Economic and Monetary Union”, complete with that
supreme symbol of integration, a single currency. Finally, the
Europhiles could move on to the mighty goal – which took them eight
years – of giving Europe a “constitution”, thus completing the dream
conceived decades before,
When my co-author Richard North and I were compiling our history of how
all this had unfolded, The Great Deception, we concluded that the
“project” was eventually bound to unravel, simply because it was built
on too much deception and self-deception. The most obvious place for
disintegration to begin was the single currency. As shrewd observers
recognised right from the start, this could never last, because of the
essential contradiction between the low interest rates demanded by its
stronger economies and the temptation this would give their weaker
brethren, such as Greece, Ireland and Spain, to go on a reckless
spending spree.
It would be fun for a time – but no longer would they be able to defend
themselves from the consequences by allowing their currencies to
devalue. The inevitable result would eventually be an almighty bust,
which is what we are seeing today: the slow-motion collapse of what was
invented as the ultimate symbol of a united Europe. Like all such
collapses, it will be extremely painful. But it marks the time when
Monnet’s fantasy at last begins to collide with reality.