Thanks for using the tools and for the suggestion. The challenge with these types of options is supporting every threshold that a user may want. In your case, you are interested in the 95% CI, but other might like different thresholds. I appreciate the utility of such an option, but prefer that these metrics be computed directly from the raw counts.
One compromise would be to add options to the "groupby" command for calculating CI. This way, one could pipe coverageBed -d or -hist output to groupby and calculate the metrics one is interested in.
Does this sound reasonable?
Best,
Aaron