--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beagle Board" group.
To post to this group, send email to beagl...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard?hl=en.
> Is anybody running 1280x1024@60 resolution on the Beagleboard XM?
>
> I know this is overclocking and out of spec
Why do you say that?
>
>
> On Jan 28, 6:44 pm, Koen Kooi <k...@beagleboard.org> wrote:
>> Op 27 jan 2011, om 23:31 heeft Aussie-John het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Is anybody running 1280x1024@60 resolution on the Beagleboard XM?
>>
>>> I know this is overclocking and out of spec
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>
> Hi Koen,
>
> Because a contact at TI said that the DM3730 video output pixel clock
> max in spec is 75MHz.
Sort of, you can mux the DSS pins to different balls on the BGA, xM is using the fast ones, so it's just like the old beagles.
regards,
Koen
> Thanks for the replies guys,
>
> Has anybody done this on the new XM model, I am still investigaing the
> differences between the XM board and earler models
Just the same as before, the xM is just a faster version of the old beagle with a usb hub soldered on.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
Could you please tell me how to change the resolution?
I'm a new guy for XM, I check the Angstorm wiki, but can't find the
source code.
Thanks.
Jack
> regards,
>
> Koen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beagle Board" group.
To post to this group, send email to beagl...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
> I can run dvimode=1280x1024MR-16@60 in the script, I use the script
> from the DVSDK linux image from
> http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/dvsdk/DVSDK_4_00/latest/index_FDS.html
>
> but like say john
> " The Beagle Board xM could show 1280x1024 output with 60Hz but please
> note that it is overclocking and out of spec. This means TI does not
> guarantee it. The maximum spec in spec would be 1280 x 800 60Hz."
Again, where do you get the idea that is it "out of spec" and "overclocking"? The supported pixclock is >170MHz on beagle
> The supported pixclock is >170MHz on beagle
Where is this specified?
I have always understood that the maximum pixel rate was
83 MHz (original BB).
Dave
> Quoting Koen Kooi <ko...@beagleboard.org>:
>
>> The supported pixclock is >170MHz on beagle
>
> Where is this specified?
In the omap3 TRM.
> I have always understood that the maximum pixel rate was
> 83 MHz (original BB).
If you use the DSI PLL you get a 173MHz pixclock. Angstrom enabled that as default in the kernel, and has done that for years now. I have 1080p24 working nicely on a C4.
But 1920 x 1080 x 24 fps is a net rate of 48384000 triads/sec,
isn't it, so even when overheaded for the flyback periods,
it only requires a pixel clock in the ballpark of 50 MHz,
doesn't it?
Dave
> Quoting Koen Kooi <ko...@beagleboard.org>:
>
>>
>> Op 1 feb 2011, om 16:43 heeft dave higton het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Quoting Koen Kooi <ko...@beagleboard.org>:
>>>
>>>> The supported pixclock is >170MHz on beagle
>>>
>>> Where is this specified?
>>
>> In the omap3 TRM.
>>
>>> I have always understood that the maximum pixel rate was
>>> 83 MHz (original BB).
>>
>> If you use the DSI PLL you get a 173MHz pixclock. Angstrom enabled that as
>> default in the kernel, and has done that for years now. I have 1080p24
>> working nicely on a C4.
>
> But 1920 x 1080 x 24 fps is a net rate of 48384000 triads/sec,
> isn't it, so even when overheaded for the flyback periods,
> it only requires a pixel clock in the ballpark of 50 MHz,
> doesn't it?
72.something if I recall the hdmi specs correctly. The problem on omap3 is the the dividers you need to get a certain pixclock, using the 86.5 pixclock you will fail to get close to that
no, the H and V blanking periods are huge...
1080p24: 1920x1080@24 in 2750x1125 -> 74.25 MHz
OK, but it's still way below 173 MHz. It's even below 83 MHz,
so 1080p24 would still work even if the pixel clock were
limited to the 83 MHz figure that I had in mind, wouldn't it?
It's not a difficult screen mode to achieve.
Dave