Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
We're there, New Democrats! - Now let's go for 24 Sussex Drive !
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Unknown
May 12, 2012, 9:32:34 PM5/12/12
to
Time to take Canadians to the forefront of Canadian politics. Toss the assholes that are
catering to Big Oil, Big Banks, Israel and the fundamentalist religions . . . .
Let's give the NDP the support, the mandate, and the help it needs to make Canada a strong and
proud country once again.
'We don't need no steenkin' oil pipelines and jets with no engines', ya bloody Harper Cons.
We're holding steady in the polls . . . . too many lies, too many tax abuses, too many
environmental disregards . . . . . The Harper Tories are now paddling against the current.
_______________________________________
May 10, 2012
Tory support stays stagnant as NDP surges in Conservative strongholds: poll
OTTAWA — A new poll suggests the New Democrats are widening their support across the country
and gaining unprecedented favour in historically Conservative regions.
The Canadian Press Harris Decima survey indicates that the NDP have 34% of popular support,
compared to 30% for the Conservatives.
With a margin of error of 2.2 percentage points, support for the two parties could be equally
split.
Still, the poll indicates that the New Democrats have become competitive in traditional Tory
areas.
Among rural Canadians, the poll suggests the New Democrats have 31% support, compared to 35%
for the Tories.
The NDP appear to have the support of 36% of urban and suburban men, a number that has risen
steadily since February.
********************************************************************************
We hang the petty thieves and elect the greatest ones to public office.
catering to Big Oil, Big Banks, Israel and the fundamentalist religions . . . .
Let's give the NDP the support, the mandate, and the help it needs to make Canada a strong and
proud country once again.
'We don't need no steenkin' oil pipelines and jets with no engines', ya bloody Harper Cons.
We're holding steady in the polls . . . . too many lies, too many tax abuses, too many
environmental disregards . . . . . The Harper Tories are now paddling against the current.
_______________________________________
May 10, 2012
Tory support stays stagnant as NDP surges in Conservative strongholds: poll
OTTAWA — A new poll suggests the New Democrats are widening their support across the country
and gaining unprecedented favour in historically Conservative regions.
The Canadian Press Harris Decima survey indicates that the NDP have 34% of popular support,
compared to 30% for the Conservatives.
With a margin of error of 2.2 percentage points, support for the two parties could be equally
split.
Still, the poll indicates that the New Democrats have become competitive in traditional Tory
areas.
Among rural Canadians, the poll suggests the New Democrats have 31% support, compared to 35%
for the Tories.
The NDP appear to have the support of 36% of urban and suburban men, a number that has risen
steadily since February.
********************************************************************************
We hang the petty thieves and elect the greatest ones to public office.
M.I. Wakefield
May 12, 2012, 9:49:33 PM5/12/12
to
"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:LaErr.3858$6Y6....@newsfe19.iad...
> Time to take Canadians to the forefront of Canadian politics. Toss the
> assholes that are catering to Big Oil, Big Banks, Israel and the
> fundamentalist religions . . . .
"A week is a long time in politics"
- Harold Wilson
Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
news:LaErr.3858$6Y6....@newsfe19.iad...
> Time to take Canadians to the forefront of Canadian politics. Toss the
> assholes that are catering to Big Oil, Big Banks, Israel and the
> fundamentalist religions . . . .
- Harold Wilson
Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
simplicity
May 12, 2012, 10:56:17 PM5/12/12
to
universe... again.
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 4:56:56 PM5/14/12
to
Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
news:NqErr.132784$X35....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
decides on an earlier date. Depends on how many ridings were affected by the Cons' robocalls.
news:NqErr.132784$X35....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
Lots of time to marshall the opposition forces. And that could change if the Governor-General
decides on an earlier date. Depends on how many ridings were affected by the Cons' robocalls.
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 5:00:46 PM5/14/12
to
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
news:jonfiq$her$1...@dont-email.me...
> The "Karen Gordon Effect" has already predetermined the outcome, i.e., no matter what
> prediction she makes the opposite will come true.
Yep. Gun registries will spring up across this country under provincial jurisdiction. Will
throw a major wrench into your having switched from your usual 'Liberals or NDP' voting pattern
to the now-very-soiled Harper Cons. What a loser.
news:jonfiq$her$1...@dont-email.me...
> The "Karen Gordon Effect" has already predetermined the outcome, i.e., no matter what
> prediction she makes the opposite will come true.
Yep. Gun registries will spring up across this country under provincial jurisdiction. Will
throw a major wrench into your having switched from your usual 'Liberals or NDP' voting pattern
to the now-very-soiled Harper Cons. What a loser.
M.I. Wakefield
May 14, 2012, 5:06:49 PM5/14/12
to
"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:fkesr.9123$br3...@newsfe10.iad...
> Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
> news:NqErr.132784$X35....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
>
> Lots of time to marshall the opposition forces. And that could change if
> the Governor-General decides on an earlier date.
Two things Kkkaren has no idea about: who I am, and how this country works.
> Depends on how many ridings were affected by the Cons' robocalls.
One so far. Guelph. I demand a by-election in Guelph immediately.
news:fkesr.9123$br3...@newsfe10.iad...
> Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
> news:NqErr.132784$X35....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
>
> Lots of time to marshall the opposition forces. And that could change if
> the Governor-General decides on an earlier date.
> Depends on how many ridings were affected by the Cons' robocalls.
Barry Bruyea
May 14, 2012, 5:49:34 PM5/14/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 17:06:49 -0400, "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present>
wrote:
>"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
>news:fkesr.9123$br3...@newsfe10.iad...
>
>> Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
>> news:NqErr.132784$X35....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> > Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
>>
>> Lots of time to marshall the opposition forces. And that could change if
>> the Governor-General decides on an earlier date.
He can't, dipshit.
wrote:
>"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
>news:fkesr.9123$br3...@newsfe10.iad...
>
>> Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
>> news:NqErr.132784$X35....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> > Date of the next Federal Election: October 19, 2015.
>>
>> Lots of time to marshall the opposition forces. And that could change if
>> the Governor-General decides on an earlier date.
Chom Noamsky
May 14, 2012, 5:50:52 PM5/14/12
to
shouldn't you be rooting for the Conservatives if you don't want them to
win?
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 6:10:11 PM5/14/12
to
>>"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:oev2r79rto96i4q50...@4ax.com...
> He can't, dipshit.
Yes he can, half-wit.
>>> Lots of time to marshall the opposition forces. And that could change if
>>> the Governor-General decides on an earlier date.
"Barry Bruyea" <justfo...@still.com> wrote in message
>>> the Governor-General decides on an earlier date.
news:oev2r79rto96i4q50...@4ax.com...
> He can't, dipshit.
Yes he can, half-wit.
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 6:15:48 PM5/14/12
to
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
news:joruo5$i97$3...@dont-email.me...
> You know, now that the Karen Gordon Effect is a proven phenomena, shouldn't you be rooting
> for the Conservatives if you don't want them to win?
I don't have to switch from Liberals or NDP to vote for the Cons - because I don't have a gun
> for the Conservatives if you don't want them to win?
to register.
Dobranski - was hiding behind the door when they passed out brains
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 6:37:40 PM5/14/12
to
>> How 'bout you, Schild? Like Dobranski, did you change from Liberals to Cons because you
>> were
>> afraid to register your guns?
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
news:jorvro$pko$1...@dont-email.me...
> Personally, half the fun is watching Usenet womyn go into fits of rage over losing control.
> Word has it that when the Cons won you chewed your keyboard in half.
The provinces are setting up their own registries - ignoring dictator Vic Toews - and you think
WE are "losing control"?
Did you abuse your vote, is that what's troubling YOU, Dobranski?
PS: How's business with companies stateside since the Harper Cons became government? Still
selling your cars and assets to meet your expenses?
>> were
>> afraid to register your guns?
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
> Personally, half the fun is watching Usenet womyn go into fits of rage over losing control.
> Word has it that when the Cons won you chewed your keyboard in half.
The provinces are setting up their own registries - ignoring dictator Vic Toews - and you think
WE are "losing control"?
Did you abuse your vote, is that what's troubling YOU, Dobranski?
PS: How's business with companies stateside since the Harper Cons became government? Still
selling your cars and assets to meet your expenses?
Chom Noamsky
May 14, 2012, 8:26:38 PM5/14/12
to
On 5/14/2012 3:37 PM, Co...@minority.gov wrote:
>>> How 'bout you, Schild? Like Dobranski, did you change from Liberals to Cons because you
>>> were
>>> afraid to register your guns?
>
> Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky"<ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
> news:jorvro$pko$1...@dont-email.me...
>> Personally, half the fun is watching Usenet womyn go into fits of rage over losing control.
>> Word has it that when the Cons won you chewed your keyboard in half.
>
> The provinces are setting up their own registries - ignoring dictator Vic Toews - and you think
> WE are "losing control"?
> Did you abuse your vote, is that what's troubling YOU, Dobranski?
Which province(s) are setting up a registries? Imaging something in
>>> How 'bout you, Schild? Like Dobranski, did you change from Liberals to Cons because you
>>> were
>>> afraid to register your guns?
>
> Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky"<ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
> news:jorvro$pko$1...@dont-email.me...
>> Personally, half the fun is watching Usenet womyn go into fits of rage over losing control.
>> Word has it that when the Cons won you chewed your keyboard in half.
>
> The provinces are setting up their own registries - ignoring dictator Vic Toews - and you think
> WE are "losing control"?
> Did you abuse your vote, is that what's troubling YOU, Dobranski?
your head doesn't make it factual or true.
> PS: How's business with companies stateside since the Harper Cons became government? Still
> selling your cars and assets to meet your expenses?
on US markets, I get more business from Europe and Asia. I also
outsource development to China, Pakistan and India. The US could go
down the toilet and I wouldn't notice. The world is my globalist oyster.
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 8:57:31 PM5/14/12
to
>> PS: How's business with companies stateside since the Harper Cons became government? Still
>> selling your cars and assets to meet your expenses?
>> selling your cars and assets to meet your expenses?
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
news:jos7s9$9do$1...@dont-email.me...
> I see you're sniffing glue again. Personally, I've never been reliant on US markets, I get
> more business from Europe and Asia. I also outsource development to China, Pakistan and
> India. The US could go down the toilet and I wouldn't notice. The world is my globalist
> oyster.
Maybe I should have asked: Any takers for your old car and RV? How's that job hunt with the
> more business from Europe and Asia. I also outsource development to China, Pakistan and
> India. The US could go down the toilet and I wouldn't notice. The world is my globalist
> oyster.
federal government going?
Unknown
May 14, 2012, 9:11:10 PM5/14/12
to
Kim Dobranski - now posting as "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
news:Qygsr.51583$Yn4....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> The provinces don't have the constitutional authority to compile registries of those who buy
> long guns.
What makes you think that provincial registries need "constitutional authority", ya dumb
rabbit?
news:Qygsr.51583$Yn4....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> The provinces don't have the constitutional authority to compile registries of those who buy
> long guns.
What makes you think that provincial registries need "constitutional authority", ya dumb
rabbit?
Barry Bruyea
May 15, 2012, 6:48:04 AM5/15/12
to
>
SaPeIsMa
May 15, 2012, 8:54:14 AM5/15/12
to
"simplicity" <stella...@live.ca> wrote in message
news:91810d3a-f4d7-44dc...@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
Chom Noamsky
May 15, 2012, 9:02:21 AM5/15/12
to
you know how to find him since you've been stalking him for 12 years.
Chom Noamsky
May 15, 2012, 9:28:26 AM5/15/12
to
that Alberta lost? It's in the link you keep evading.
Chom Noamsky
May 15, 2012, 9:30:12 AM5/15/12
to
M.I. Wakefield
May 15, 2012, 9:51:55 AM5/15/12
to
"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:2Jmsr.6584$x11....@newsfe21.iad...
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The provinces need constitutional authority for *everything* they do,
fucktard.
news:2Jmsr.6584$x11....@newsfe21.iad...
The provinces need constitutional authority for *everything* they do,
fucktard.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 8:10:53 PM5/18/12
to
>> What makes you think that provincial registries need "constitutional authority", ya dumb
>> rabbit?
>> rabbit?
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
news:jotlm6$h96$2...@dont-email.me...
> Why did the existence of the LGR depend on a constitutional challenge that Alberta lost?
> It's in the link you keep evading.
Try and follow this, ya dumb person . . . .
> It's in the link you keep evading.
Long gun registry GONE. . . . bye-bye. . . au revoir . . . sayonara . . . .
GOT IT SO FAR? No more 'federal rules' apply because there is no more federal long gun
registry.
New registry created by PROVINCES. Only provincial rules apply. Nothing in "the Constitution"
applies to the long gun registry anyhow.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 8:15:12 PM5/18/12
to
>> What makes you think that provincial registries need "constitutional authority", ya dumb
>> rabbit?
Kim Dobranski, now postings as "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
>> rabbit?
news:%btsr.34809$kt4....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> The provinces need constitutional authority for *everything* they do, fucktard.
Your stupidity knows no bounds, Dobranski.
>
> The provinces need constitutional authority for *everything* they do, fucktard.
The provinces have jurisdiction over their own legislation - as long as it doesn't violate the
provisions of any federal laws or regulations.
If there ARE NO federal laws or regulations regarding long guns any longer, there are no
federal laws or regulations for the provinces to violate. Did you get that, ya stupid person?
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 8:19:39 PM5/18/12
to
Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
news:jotk5b$8hh$1...@dont-email.me...
> You might get a more helpful answer if you ask Kim Dobranski. I'm sure you know how to find
> him since you've been stalking him for 12 years.
You know that I only 'made you' about a year and a half ago. The "12-year" shit is your
> him since you've been stalking him for 12 years.
boyfriend's mantra.
Same bed. . . . same mantras.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 8:20:38 PM5/18/12
to
"Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message news:jotlpg$h96$4...@dont-email.me...
> On 5/15/2012 3:48 AM, Barry Bruyea wrote:
>> Ok, Frau, tell us how.
>
> Don't wait for the crickets to stop chirping.
Look it up for yourselves. Google is friendly even to stupid persons.
>> Ok, Frau, tell us how.
>
> Don't wait for the crickets to stop chirping.
M.I. Wakefield
May 18, 2012, 8:25:24 PM5/18/12
to
"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:hyBtr.26135$_l.2...@newsfe15.iad...
> >> What makes you think that provincial registries need "constitutional
> >> authority", ya dumb
> >> rabbit?
>
> Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
> news:jotlm6$h96$2...@dont-email.me...
> > Why did the existence of the LGR depend on a constitutional challenge
> > that Alberta lost? It's in the link you keep evading.
>
> Try and follow this, ya dumb person . . . .
>
> Long gun registry GONE. . . . bye-bye. . . au revoir . . . sayonara .
> . . .
> GOT IT SO FAR? No more 'federal rules' apply because there is no more
> federal long gun registry.
Absolutely correct. Very good, Kkaren.
> New registry created by PROVINCES. Only provincial rules apply. Nothing
> in "the Constitution" applies to the long gun registry anyhow.
Epic fail for Karen. The Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that gun
registration falls under the purview of criminal law, and the criminal law
is solely a Federal responsibility, so the Provinces are constitutionally
barred from setting up their own gun registries.
news:hyBtr.26135$_l.2...@newsfe15.iad...
> >> What makes you think that provincial registries need "constitutional
> >> authority", ya dumb
> >> rabbit?
>
> Kim Dobranski aka "Chom Noamsky" <ch...@noamsky.here> wrote in message
> news:jotlm6$h96$2...@dont-email.me...
> > Why did the existence of the LGR depend on a constitutional challenge
> > that Alberta lost? It's in the link you keep evading.
>
> Try and follow this, ya dumb person . . . .
>
> Long gun registry GONE. . . . bye-bye. . . au revoir . . . sayonara .
> . . .
> GOT IT SO FAR? No more 'federal rules' apply because there is no more
> federal long gun registry.
> New registry created by PROVINCES. Only provincial rules apply. Nothing
> in "the Constitution" applies to the long gun registry anyhow.
registration falls under the purview of criminal law, and the criminal law
is solely a Federal responsibility, so the Provinces are constitutionally
barred from setting up their own gun registries.
M.I. Wakefield
May 18, 2012, 8:35:43 PM5/18/12
to
"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:pHBtr.21731$9H3....@newsfe06.iad...
> Look it up for yourselves. Google is friendly even to stupid persons.
All evidence to the contrary from you aside.
news:pHBtr.21731$9H3....@newsfe06.iad...
> Look it up for yourselves. Google is friendly even to stupid persons.
Unknown
May 18, 2012, 8:55:52 PM5/18/12
to
Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
news:TLBtr.2995$qS6....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
GUNS in the FEDERAL books for the provinces to have to worry about 'surplanting' those laws and
registries with PROVINCIAL ones.
Once the Harper government killed those registries - and their adherent laws - there was no
more adjunct/subordination of laws by the provinces to any federal legislation. They now have
a clean slate on which to compile & register and screen long gun owners.
No more "conflict" or "subservient legislation" or "contravention" to a federal law or
authority BECAUSE THE FEDS KILLED THE LONG GUN REGISTRY AND IT NO LONGER EXISTS IN THE FEDERAL
ARENA. I don't know how much more clearly this can be said . . . let's just leave it as:
'Another rightwing dummy (Dobranksi/Wakefield/Chomsky) doesn't know a deal law when it's
carcass is tossed at his feet.
Long live Provincial long gun registries - and their administration by the individual provinces
who set them up.
news:TLBtr.2995$qS6....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> Epic fail for Karen. The Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that gun registration
> falls under the purview of criminal law, and the criminal law is solely a Federal
> responsibility, so the Provinces are constitutionally barred from setting up their own gun
> registries.
No, ya stoopid, stoopid person . . . . . there HAVE TO BE LAWS AND REGISTRIES GOVERNING LONG
> falls under the purview of criminal law, and the criminal law is solely a Federal
> responsibility, so the Provinces are constitutionally barred from setting up their own gun
> registries.
GUNS in the FEDERAL books for the provinces to have to worry about 'surplanting' those laws and
registries with PROVINCIAL ones.
Once the Harper government killed those registries - and their adherent laws - there was no
more adjunct/subordination of laws by the provinces to any federal legislation. They now have
a clean slate on which to compile & register and screen long gun owners.
No more "conflict" or "subservient legislation" or "contravention" to a federal law or
authority BECAUSE THE FEDS KILLED THE LONG GUN REGISTRY AND IT NO LONGER EXISTS IN THE FEDERAL
ARENA. I don't know how much more clearly this can be said . . . let's just leave it as:
'Another rightwing dummy (Dobranksi/Wakefield/Chomsky) doesn't know a deal law when it's
carcass is tossed at his feet.
Long live Provincial long gun registries - and their administration by the individual provinces
who set them up.
Roger Ramjet
May 25, 2012, 11:21:19 PM5/25/12
to
On May 12, 9:32 pm, "Co...@minority.gov" <ConsR@minority,gov> wrote:
> Time to take Canadians to the forefront of Canadian politics. Toss the assholes that are
> catering to Big Oil, Big Banks, Israel and the fundamentalist religions . . . .
Blah Blah! And Jack Layton had a Ph. D. in Political Science, and not
> Time to take Canadians to the forefront of Canadian politics. Toss the assholes that are
> catering to Big Oil, Big Banks, Israel and the fundamentalist religions . . . .
dirtying his hands as a worker, never belonged to a Union in his life,
and was very nice looking in those $2000 Canali suits and the fucking
$400 neckties. Don't get me started on his shirts! He made Don
Cherry look like a street urchin!
My question to you, my dear, is "Will Mr. Mulcair move to Stornoway?
When even the hallowed Mr. Layton said he wouldn't?
And why is it that you usually look down on Easterners Karen?
But you support the Montrealer Layton and now Ontario's Mulcair?
Roger Ramjet
May 25, 2012, 11:27:30 PM5/25/12
to
Ontario border.
Even Harper is from Toronto.
M.I. Wakefield
May 26, 2012, 12:11:17 AM5/26/12
to
"Roger Ramjet" wrote in message
news:2b7ed37c-804e-4b44...@ec4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> I often wonder if Canada has leaders born west of the Manitoba /
> Ontario border.
>
> Even Harper is from Toronto.
Even Diefenbaker was born in Ontario.
Joe Clark was born in High River, Preston Manning in Edmonton, Deb Grey in
Vancouver, and Kim Campbell in Port Alberni.
news:2b7ed37c-804e-4b44...@ec4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> I often wonder if Canada has leaders born west of the Manitoba /
> Ontario border.
>
> Even Harper is from Toronto.
Joe Clark was born in High River, Preston Manning in Edmonton, Deb Grey in
Vancouver, and Kim Campbell in Port Alberni.
0 new messages