CBC Says Israel "CAPTURED" Golan ...

[Kixi]

A couple of days ago CBC Radio news ran a story on Syria in which
their editors scripted that "Israel captured the Golan Heights from
Syria in 1967"

Well how obliging of CBC to attempt to legitimize the illegal act of
acquiring territory by force of arms - (per the UN charter).

You don't suppose CBC Jews are really zionists working for Israel
whilst they take fat pay checks from Canada? Naw, never!

[Canuck57]

Not really. Syria should have never started the war and they would not
lost the real-estate.

Good reasons for Israel to keep it too, as a further buffer for the next
attack.

Stupid insane radical Muslims need to know war comes at a cost.

Personally, Isreal should have taken more and sent the Palestinian/Hamas
squatters over the line.
--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing but debt and discontentment.

[Chom Noamsky]

March 8th 1965: We shall not enter Palestine with its soil covered in
sand, we shall enter it with its soil saturated in blood -- President of
Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser

May 18th 1967: The Zionist barrack in Palestine is about to collapse and
be destroyed. Every one of the hundred million Arabs has been living for
the past nineteen years on one hope – to live to see the day Israel is
liquidated... There is no life, no peace nor hope for the gangs of
Zionism to remain in the occupied land. As of today, there no longer
exists an international emergency force to protect Israel. The sole
method we shall apply against Israel is a total war which will result in
the extermination of Zionist existence -- Cairo Radio’s Voice of the
Arabs broadcast

May 22nd 1967: We want a full scale, popular war of liberation... to
destroy the Zionist enemy -- Syrian president Dr. Nureddin al-Attasi
speech to troops

***

Yep, the Arab bullies intimidate, threaten and target... then squeal
like stuck pigs when the 97lb weakling beats them up and takes their
lunch money.

[Greg Carr]

May Israel always prevail against its Arab enemies.

[Barry Bruyea]

On Mon, 14 May 2012 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT), Kixi <Kixi...@Hotmail.ca>
wrote:

Israel 'captured' the Golan Heights as Syria attempted to invade their
country you fucking idiot.

[Liberals are VERMIN]

On May 14, 7:19 pm, Canuck57 <Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On 14/05/2012 11:28 AM, Kixi wrote:
>
> > A couple of days ago CBC Radio news ran a story on Syria in which
> > their editors scripted that "Israel captured the Golan Heights from
> > Syria in 1967"
>
> > Well how obliging of CBC to attempt to legitimize the illegal act of
> > acquiring territory by force of arms - (per the UN charter).
>
> > You don't suppose CBC Jews are really zionists working for Israel
> > whilst they take fat pay checks from Canada? Naw, never!
>
> Not really.  Syria should have never started the war and they would not
> lost the real-estate.

I'd be careful how you rationalize keeping territory once a war is
done. It could lead to some really bad situations.

[welldone]

Liberals are VERMIN <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 14, 7:19 pm, Canuck57 <Canuc...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On 14/05/2012 11:28 AM, Kixi wrote:
>> > A couple of days ago CBC Radio news ran a story on Syria in which
>> > their editors scripted that "Israel captured the Golan Heights from
>> > Syria in 1967"
>>

>> Not really.  Syria should have never started the war and they would not
>> lost the real-estate.
>
>I'd be careful how you rationalize keeping territory once a war is
>done. It could lead to some really bad situations.
>

I'd be equally careful about rationalizing the idea of returning
territory lost in war. Kinda takes the sting out of losing a war and
makes it more likely there will be wars in the future.
---
--> "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think" <--
--> Off the monitor, through the modem, nothing but net <--

[Barry Bruyea]

On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:25:33 -0700, welldone <well...@wellhoned.com>
wrote:

Do-Overs seem to be method of getting back what you lost in a war you
started. An totally assinine contention, but not unexpected by those
who haven't won a war in 700 years, even with each other.

[Kixi]

On May 16, 7:49 am, Barry Bruyea <damnthetorped...@duck.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:25:33 -0700, welldone <welld...@wellhoned.com>
> wrote:

Well you jews will try every argument in an attempt to legitimize the
claim to the Golan Heights but even the UN, where Israel has
considerable influence, does not recognize any legitimacy to Israel's
occupation of Golan, West Bank and Jerusalem (East and West). To the
UN it is all unlawful and Israel's administration, imposed with the
force of military power, is nul and void. The UN even declares that
establishing facts on the ground will not change the legal status.

Guess why, for instance, no country in the world has its embassy in
"Israel's undivided capital".

[Alan Baker]

In article
<40010afc-992f-47f0...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

I'm not jewish...

...and I understand implicitly that when a country is attacked, the
attacker loses all right to complain if some of there territory is
annexed.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

[Dave Smith]

On 16/05/2012 7:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

>
> I'm not jewish...
>
> ...and I understand implicitly that when a country is attacked, the
> attacker loses all right to complain if some of there territory is
> annexed.
>

That is the way it usually works.
Only an idiot goes to war thinking it is a win-win situation. If you
try to take land by force you have to be prepared to lose some land if
you are not successful.

[Barry Bruyea]

On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Kixi <Kixi...@Hotmail.ca>
wrote:

Quoting U.N. arguments and actions is a sure fire way to negate any
point a fascist idiot like is able to make. Postings with you as an
author is reminiscent of the skinny little chicken farmer sitting
behind his giant desk spouting Nazi propaganda; it's called, "a joke".

[Kixi]

On May 16, 4:30 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <40010afc-992f-47f0-b78f-fda79ec85...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

That's the law of the jungle that the UN rejects. It is so easy for a
country to claim that they took new territory because they were
attacked. We know that zionists are not known for telling the
truth ... and they have a huge PR apparatus to make their lies stick.
That apparatus includes those on this board who monitor news groups.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

However, it should be remembered that it was Israel who started that
war.

VV

[Barry Bruyea]

They would have stupid not to, given the massing of troops on their
borders who sure as hell weren't there for a picnic. I know, you
think Jews should wait to be slaughtered before they take any action.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

If this is what you "know" about me, that gives me a good indication
of what other things you might think you "know".

VV

[Dave Smith]

I find it hard to fault Israel for the initial strike. Tension had been
rising for a while and Egypt had mobilized and 100,000 troops massed on
along the Israeli border. Syria and Jordan also had troops massed along
the border. I certainly didn't expect Israel to wait until Egypt invaded.

[Barry Bruyea]

What I 'know' about you is what you post and that is what it is, never
forget, perception is often more important than reality.

[Barry Bruyea]

Unfortunately, that is the crux of world opinion on Israel. Jews had
been passive through the centuries and the pronouncement of Jews back
in the 40's of "Never Again" was considered way beyond expectations
and were expected to sit back and take it. They didn't. The Arabs,
not having won a war since Saladin thought they had an easy mark and
have been whining ever since.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

Only for those who prefer to disregard reality.

ViejoVizcacha

[Barry Bruyea]

A category you've been in for a hell of a long time.

[Aaron Brown]

According to Forbes and a few others, Ottawa is one, if not the best
place to live in Canada for Executives.

Funny, if you pulled the Federal Government out of Ottawa, it would
become Bytown again.

A place with nice summers, very cold winters with little else to offer.

[Aaron Brown]

My friends boss is from Israel. He was in the 1967 6 day war.

He says that the best movie to watch about it is a flick that I've
seen and has Yiddish and Arabic subtitles. I can't recall the name.

I thought it was called Intifada, but so far seeking it has come up
blank. Probably because it was the Arabic name for the movie.

[Aaron Brown]

I know a lot of Jews, Arabs and Persians who get along well. I
worked at a computer company run by Israelites, manned by Iranians,
south Asian Muslims, Iraquies and even Orthodox Greeks (I was the
token Atheist). It wasn't all that bad. When people have the same
goal and live in a nation like Canada, capitalism rules over their
insufferable differences from the "Old Country".

[Aaron Brown]

The best part was during the "Christmas" holidays. We had a "Pot
Luck" lunch, and the food was mind blowing.

Food is a great way to break down barriers, and to learn new things.

[Barry Bruyea]

The "Intifiada" was the long term 'unpleasantness' caused by a
Palestinian uprising, not anything to do with the '67 war.

[Barry Bruyea]

A deliberate non-sequitur? Or just tourist information.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

Well, I am not the one who choses perceptions over reality.

[Kixi]

On May 19, 5:16 am, Aaron Brown <chaotica...@live.com> wrote:
>
> Food is a great way to break down barriers, and to learn new things.

Stealing land and military occupation is a great way to build up
barriers.

[Barry Bruyea]

You're reality is based on bigotry and prejudice. So, have fun.

[Barry Bruyea]

On Sat, 19 May 2012 18:36:50 -0700 (PDT), Kixi <Kixi...@Hotmail.ca>
wrote:

As the Nazis found out and got their maggot asses royally kicked.

[Dave Smith]

That is what your hero Hitler discovered when we opted for living space.

[Orion]

No, dimwit. The Arabs started it...Israel finished it. Read some
history.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

"After a period of high tension between Israel and its neighbors, the
war began on June 5 with Israel launching surprise air strikes against
Arab forces. The outcome was a swift and decisive Israeli victory.
Israel took effective control of the Gaza Strip and the Sinai
Peninsula from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan,
and the Golan Heights from Syria."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War

[Harcourt Fenton "Harry" Mudd]

Kixi wrote:
> A couple of days ago CBC Radio news ran a story on Syria in which
> their editors scripted that "Israel captured the Golan Heights from
> Syria in 1967"
>

> Well how obliging of CBC to attempt to legitimize the illegal act of
> acquiring territory by force of arms - (per the UN charter).
>
> You don't suppose CBC Jews are really zionists working for Israel
> whilst they take fat pay checks from Canada? Naw, never!

I've fished with Jews. They can cut bait just as well as anyone
else.

If the Jews were really in charge, do you seriously believe that an
anti-semite like you would have the right to slam them? They would
gut you and cut off your head like a freaking Perch. Fish that even
in the days before catch and release, we threw back because they were
useless.

That's not what happens in Iran towards the Jews, or in Nazi Germany.

And like Iran, Nazi Germany wasn't packed full of hate filled assholes
like you. Just dictatorial freaks in leadership who run the show.

[Canuck57]

On 14/05/2012 10:53 PM, Greg Carr wrote:
> On May 14, 7:58 pm, Chom Noamsky<c...@noamsky.here> wrote:

>> On 5/14/2012 10:28 AM, Kixi wrote:
>>
>>> A couple of days ago CBC Radio news ran a story on Syria in which
>>> their editors scripted that "Israel captured the Golan Heights from
>>> Syria in 1967"
>>
>>> Well how obliging of CBC to attempt to legitimize the illegal act of
>>> acquiring territory by force of arms - (per the UN charter).
>>
>>> You don't suppose CBC Jews are really zionists working for Israel
>>> whilst they take fat pay checks from Canada? Naw, never!
>>

>> March 8th 1965: We shall not enter Palestine with its soil covered in
>> sand, we shall enter it with its soil saturated in blood -- President of
>> Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser
>>
>> May 18th 1967: The Zionist barrack in Palestine is about to collapse and
>> be destroyed. Every one of the hundred million Arabs has been living for
>> the past nineteen years on one hope – to live to see the day Israel is
>> liquidated... There is no life, no peace nor hope for the gangs of
>> Zionism to remain in the occupied land. As of today, there no longer
>> exists an international emergency force to protect Israel. The sole
>> method we shall apply against Israel is a total war which will result in
>> the extermination of Zionist existence -- Cairo Radio’s Voice of the
>> Arabs broadcast
>>
>> May 22nd 1967: We want a full scale, popular war of liberation... to
>> destroy the Zionist enemy -- Syrian president Dr. Nureddin al-Attasi
>> speech to troops
>>
>> ***
>>
>> Yep, the Arab bullies intimidate, threaten and target... then squeal
>> like stuck pigs when the 97lb weakling beats them up and takes their
>> lunch money.
>
> May Israel always prevail against its Arab enemies.

Agreed. As no Muslim can ever be at peace for long, not even amongst
themselves.

--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing but debt and discontentment.

[Alan Baker]

In article
<24c7f03d-0267-4a1e...@x6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>,

Only in the sense that they fired the first shot. It was evident that
they were about to be attacked and they acted.

Good for them.

[Alan Baker]

In article
<ab41eed3-e74f-4c0a...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,

I'm so glad you choose to accept wikipedia as an authoritative source:

"On the eve of the war, Egypt massed approximately 100,000 of its
160,000 troops in the Sinai, including all of its seven divisions (four
infantry, two armored and one mechanized), four independent infantry
brigades and four independent armored brigades. No fewer than a third of
them were veterans of Egypt's intervention into the Yemen Civil War and
another third were reservists. These forces had 950 tanks, 1,100 APCs
and more than 1,000 artillery pieces.

...

Syria's army had a total strength of 75,000 and amassed them along the
Syrian border.[35] Jordan's army had 55,000 troops[36] and 300 tanks
along the Jordanian border, 250 of which were U.S. M48 Patton, sizable
amounts of M113 APCs, a new battalion of mechanized infantry, and a
paratrooper battalion trained in the new U.S.-built school. They also
had 12 battalions of artillery and six batteries of 81 mm and 120 mm
mortars.[37]

Documents captured by the Israelis from various Jordanian command posts
record orders from the end of May for the Hashemite Brigade to capture
Ramot Burj Bir Mai'in in a night raid, codenamed "Operation Khaled". The
aim was to establish a bridgehead together with positions in Latrun for
an armored capture of Lod and Ramle. The "go" codeword was Sa'ek and end
was Nasser. The Jordanians planned for the capture of Motza and
Sha'alvim in the strategic Jerusalem Corridor. Motza was tasked to
Infantry Brigade 27 camped near Ma'ale Adummim: "The reserve brigade
will commence a nighttime infiltration onto Motza, will destroy it to
the foundation, and won't leave a remnant or refugee from among its 800
residents".[37]

100 Iraqi tanks and an infantry division were readied near the Jordanian
border. Two squadrons of fighter-aircraft, Hawker Hunters and MiG 21,
were rebased adjacent to the Jordanian border.[37]

On June 2, Jordan called up all reserve officers, and the West Bank
commander met with community leaders in Ramallah to request assistance
and cooperation for his troops during the war, assuring them that "in
three days we'll be in Tel-Aviv".[37]

The Arab air forces were aided by volunteer pilots from the Pakistan Air
Force acting in independent capacity, and by some aircraft from Libya,
Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia to make up for the massive
losses suffered on the first day of the war."

The various arab nations sowed the wind and reaped the whirlwind.

Boo-hoo.

[Barry Bruyea]

On Sun, 20 May 2012 23:04:41 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote:

VV is not interested the real facts because they don't fit into the
bigotry and hate that motivates most of his posts. Truth has no place
for him, anymore than it does for Frau Goebbels.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

On May 21, 2:04 am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <ab41eed3-e74f-4c0a-98f5-101b97881...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,

And I am so glad that in all the length of your post there is not even
a shred of evidence that Israel was attacked first.

VV

[Barry Bruyea]

You have made an art form of being disingenuous, VV and in doing so
have made yourself look like exactly for what you are accused. No
country on Earth would have waited to see what was going to happen as
it was obvious to anyone with a bloody brain the Arabs were massing to
attack.

[Alan Baker]

In article
<e4bb0306-cd2c-4fd9...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>,

No. There is just every evidence needed by a nation that want to survive
that such attacks were imminent.

I've kept a salient point, that didn't seem to actually want to address:

> > Documents captured by the Israelis from various Jordanian command posts
> > record orders from the end of May for the Hashemite Brigade to capture
> > Ramot Burj Bir Mai'in in a night raid, codenamed "Operation Khaled". The
> > aim was to establish a bridgehead together with positions in Latrun for
> > an armored capture of Lod and Ramle. The "go" codeword was Sa'ek and end
> > was Nasser. The Jordanians planned for the capture of Motza and
> > Sha'alvim in the strategic Jerusalem Corridor. Motza was tasked to
> > Infantry Brigade 27 camped near Ma'ale Adummim: "The reserve brigade
> > will commence a nighttime infiltration onto Motza, will destroy it to
> > the foundation, and won't leave a remnant or refugee from among its 800
> > residents".[37]

[Kixi]

On May 20, 11:00 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote:
> In article

> <24c7f03d-0267-4a1e-b96b-5b4c95001...@x6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>,

>  Viejo Vizcacha <nats_ugly...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 8:14 pm, Dave Smith <adavid.sm...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > > On 16/05/2012 7:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
>
> > > > I'm not jewish...
>
> > > > ...and I understand implicitly that when a country is attacked, the
> > > > attacker loses all right to complain if some of there territory is
> > > > annexed.
>
> > > That is the way it usually works.
> > > Only an idiot goes to war thinking it is a win-win situation.   If you
> > > try to take land by force you have to be prepared to lose some land if
> > > you are not successful.
>
> > However, it should be remembered that it was Israel who started that
> > war.
>
> > VV
>
> Only in the sense that they fired the first shot. It was evident that
> they were about to be attacked and they acted.
>
> Good for them.

I thought Zionists massacred Palestinians and drove them into exile to
grab their land and that the 6 day war was a consequence of that.

[Alan Baker]

In article
<05f2e863-4754-4087...@ki5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

You thought wrong.

[Kixi]

When Jews are criticized, why do they switch the topic to Hitler and
"Nazis"?

[Barry Bruyea]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 08:56:35 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote:

VV contention about who 'started' the war is just about as legitimate
as Hitler's blatant lie that Poland attacked Germany. A pathetic lie
as is VV's accusation against Israel.

[Barry Bruyea]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:03:34 -0700 (PDT), Kixi <Kixi...@Hotmail.ca>
wrote:

Idiot, who was better at stealing land and occupying it with soldiers?
Hitler, of course, your hero.

[Viejo Vizcacha]

On May 21, 3:59 pm, Barry Bruyea <damnthetorped...@duck.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 08:56:35 -0700, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article
> ><e4bb0306-cd2c-4fd9-80e9-d419c7d1f...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>,

Israel started the war. That is beyond contention. If they were
justified or not is another story. But they started it. That is
History.

[Alan Baker]

In article
<4553d092-8894-4887...@pr7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

And equally "History" is that they simply acted first in a situation
where hostilities were about to break out.

[Dave Smith]

Actually, my comment had nothing to do with defending the Jews. It was
for about your hero, Hitler. Curiously, there are many issues that arise
here where you automatically spout off about how the Jews are
responsible for it.

[Barry Bruyea]

Pathetic defense of you contention, but, what the hell, if it helps
you float your boat.

[Unknown]

> On 14/05/2012 10:53 PM, Greg Carr wrote:
>> May Israel always prevail against its Arab enemies.

"Canuck57" <Canu...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xagur.9539$br3....@newsfe10.iad...

> Agreed. As no Muslim can ever be at peace for long, not even amongst themselves.

Is that what is known as a schizo-to-schizo exchange?

[Unknown]

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message
news:g28kr79kbb7n4ltca...@4ax.com...

> VV is not interested the real facts because they don't fit into the
> bigotry and hate that motivates most of his posts. Truth has no place
> for him, anymore than it does for Frau Goebbels.

There's a whole lot more "bigotry and hate" in YOUR postings than in any of his.
Why are you afraid to tell us that you're a jew?

[Unknown]

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message

news:qrjkr71cgeus9vi9u...@4ax.com...

> You have made an art form of being disingenuous, VV and in doing so
> have made yourself look like exactly for what you are accused. No
> country on Earth would have waited to see what was going to happen as
> it was obvious to anyone with a bloody brain the Arabs were massing to
> attack.

And yet you have no problem with Netanyahu recently asking President Obama and Stephen Harper
for support of ISRAEL'S
"pre-emptive attack" on the Palestinians?

Who's "massing" for a major attack now, you bigoted ass?

[Unknown]

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message

news:70dlr7hjjfpaaubbu...@4ax.com...

> Pathetic defense of you contention, but, what the hell, if it helps
> you float your boat.

You might want to tell us all why it is that jews have been expelled from country after country
after country. They live there for several generations and then suddenly that country wants
them out. Gone.

What is it about jews that turns the entire populations of countries against them and wants
them expelled - to the last person?

Once might be explainable. Twice might be a fluke. But dozens of countries either wanting
them out - or not allowing them in -
how do you explain that?

[Alan Baker]

In article <qtAur.26421$h64....@newsfe13.iad>,

Why don't you explain it to us, bigot?

[M.I. Wakefield]

"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:qtAur.26421$h64....@newsfe13.iad...

> What is it about jews that turns the entire populations of countries
> against them and wants them expelled - to the last person?

What should also be answered is: Why is Karen Gordon so fascinated by Jews?

[Unknown]

> "Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message news:qtAur.26421$h64....@newsfe13.iad...
>> What is it about jews that turns the entire populations of countries against them and wants
>> them expelled - to the last person?

Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
news:S6Bur.1510$g_7....@unlimited.newshosting.com...

> What should also be answered is: Why is Karen Gordon so fascinated by Jews?

No moreso than those of you who post 20 messages to my one - to support the zionists and
Israel.
Why are YOU so "fascinated by Jews"?

[M.I. Wakefield]

"Co...@minority.gov" wrote in message
news:msBur.38787$ax3....@newsfe05.iad...

> Kim Dobranski aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message
> news:S6Bur.1510$g_7....@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > What should also be answered is: Why is Karen Gordon so fascinated by
> > Jews?

> No moreso than those of you who post 20 messages to my one - to support
> the zionists and Israel.
> Why are YOU so "fascinated by Jews"?

Karen, nobody posts 20 messages to your 1 ... if they did, you wouldn't
account for over 10% of the postings to can.politics.

[Unknown]

"Canuck57" <Canu...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:kqgsr.4876$4P3....@newsfe08.iad...
> Stupid insane radical Muslims need to know war comes at a cost.

So do Americans and other countries that continue to invade, embargo or steal from muslim
countries. 9-11 was just one retaliation. 'War' can come to the U.S. and Canada and any/or
all of their allies just as easily as it can come to muslim countries.

[Unknown]

No moreso than those of you who post 20 messages to my one - to support
>> the zionists and Israel.
>> Why are YOU so "fascinated by Jews"?

Kim Dobranksi aka "M.I. Wakefield" <none@present> wrote in message news:8VBur.21440
$qS6....@unlimited.newshosting.com...

> Karen, nobody posts 20 messages to your 1 ... if they did, you wouldn't account for over 10%
> of the postings to can.politics.

Forged stats by your boyfriend. And almost 90% of my postings are nothing more than 'returned
mail' from spammers like yourself.

You and your low-brow American pals are intent on putting American topics into can.politics.
I'm here to put a wrench into your wheels. :->

[Barry Bruyea]

Cite one my posts, you dumb-ass to prove what you post. Instead of
just posting lies to satisfy your own hate and bigotry.
>

[Barry Bruyea]

Bigotry and hate at work here, Frau Goebbels. A subject for which you
are all too familiar.
>
>
>
>

[Unknown]

>>"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote

>>> VV is not interested the real facts because they don't fit into the
>>> bigotry and hate that motivates most of his posts. Truth has no place
>>> for him, anymore than it does for Frau Goebbels.

<ConsR@minority,gov> wrote:
>>There's a whole lot more "bigotry and hate" in YOUR postings than in any of his.
>>Why are you afraid to tell us that you're a jew?

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message

news:a0smr7ti3h5k9onkc...@4ax.com...

> Cite one my posts, you dumb-ass to prove what you post. Instead of
> just posting lies to satisfy your own hate and bigotry.

First tell us if you are a jew.

[Unknown]

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message

news:04smr7tjq4noej60t...@4ax.com...

> Bigotry and hate at work here, Frau Goebbels. A subject for which you
> are all too familiar.

Takes one to know one . . . . .

[Alan Baker]

In article <bkUur.25414$TC4....@newsfe14.iad>,

Why would that be important?

[Barry Bruyea]

First, show any post of mine with the kind of hate you reference, and,
please, don't confuse your own posts with mine. As to whether or not
I am or am not a Jew only feeds into your hate and bigotry.
>
>
>

[Barry Bruyea]

Then give us a cite, you loud mouthed bigoted bitch!
>

[Unknown]

>>Takes one to know one . . . . .

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message

news:u75or7hk1oh7j3cs7...@4ax.com...

> Then give us a cite, you loud mouthed bigoted bitch!

I just did - on the subject of Canada's initial involvement in Afghanistan. And you just went
silent. Or should I say 'dumb'?
And any time you resort to profanity or personal attack, I know that I've hit a nerve - and
you've lost again.

[Unknown]

"Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message

news:i45or7938anh3r333...@4ax.com...

> First, show any post of mine with the kind of hate you reference, and,
> please, don't confuse your own posts with mine. As to whether or not
> I am or am not a Jew only feeds into your hate and bigotry.

I thought so. You're jewish. And that's why you've been defending the indefensible on the
part of Israel and Jews in Canada and the U.S.

"Hate and bigotry" are the slogan for all jews who are ever challenged for their actions.
Still, the world IS getting smarter on the issue of Israel - and all their supporters around
the globe. Must keep you very busy posting your vitriol as the oppostion increases. . . .

[Alan Baker]

In article <buVur.39303$ax3....@newsfe05.iad>,

"Co...@minority.gov" <ConsR@minority,gov> wrote:

> "Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message
> news:i45or7938anh3r333...@4ax.com...
> > First, show any post of mine with the kind of hate you reference, and,
> > please, don't confuse your own posts with mine. As to whether or not
> > I am or am not a Jew only feeds into your hate and bigotry.
>
> I thought so. You're jewish. And that's why you've been defending the
> indefensible on the
> part of Israel and Jews in Canada and the U.S.

So because he won't bow to your tactics, he must be jewisH?

>
> "Hate and bigotry" are the slogan for all jews who are ever challenged for
> their actions.
> Still, the world IS getting smarter on the issue of Israel - and all their
> supporters around
> the globe. Must keep you very busy posting your vitriol as the oppostion
> increases. . . .

Bigot.

[Alan Baker]

In article <ohVur.19486$x11....@newsfe21.iad>,

"Co...@minority.gov" <ConsR@minority,gov> wrote:

> >>Takes one to know one . . . . .
>
> "Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message
> news:u75or7hk1oh7j3cs7...@4ax.com...
> > Then give us a cite, you loud mouthed bigoted bitch!
>
> I just did - on the subject of Canada's initial involvement in Afghanistan.
> And you just went
> silent. Or should I say 'dumb'?

Sorry, but I haven't seen this alleged "cite".

> And any time you resort to profanity or personal attack, I know that I've hit
> a nerve - and
> you've lost again.

[Barry Bruyea]

On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:10:24 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote:

>In article <ohVur.19486$x11....@newsfe21.iad>,
> "Co...@minority.gov" <ConsR@minority,gov> wrote:
>
>> >>Takes one to know one . . . . .
>>
>> "Barry Bruyea" <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote in message
>> news:u75or7hk1oh7j3cs7...@4ax.com...
>> > Then give us a cite, you loud mouthed bigoted bitch!
>>
>> I just did - on the subject of Canada's initial involvement in Afghanistan.
>> And you just went
>> silent. Or should I say 'dumb'?
>
>Sorry, but I haven't seen this alleged "cite".

And you never will; why should Frau Goebbels spoil her record?

[Canuck57]

Nope. Lookup the Iran/Iraq war. Muslim against Muslim. My Islam is
better than your Islam so lets shoot it out.

Fact is they like to kill.

--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing but debt and discontentment.

[Unknown]

"Canuck57" <Canu...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:7Sbvr.17076$3y3....@newsfe20.iad...

> Nope. Lookup the Iran/Iraq war. Muslim against Muslim. My Islam is better than your Islam
> so lets shoot it out.
>
> Fact is they like to kill.

. . . . Just not quite so much as those in the western world - especially the United States
(more recently with 'allies').

[Dave Smith]

On 21/05/2012 12:03 PM, Kixi wrote:
> On May 20, 5:51 am, Dave Smith<adavid.sm...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> On 19/05/2012 9:36 PM, Kixi wrote:
>>
>>> On May 19, 5:16 am, Aaron Brown<chaotica...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Food is a great way to break down barriers, and to learn new things.
>>
>>> Stealing land and military occupation is a great way to build up
>>> barriers.
>>
>> That is what your hero Hitler discovered when we opted for living space.
>
> When Jews are criticized, why do they switch the topic to Hitler and
> "Nazis"?

When Nazis discuss problems don't they usually just blame everything on
the Jews?