Re: Labrador Byelection Re: Go East.........

[The Doctor]

In article <kms6lj$6ge$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>In article <kms5qh$5nr$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>In article <kms4h1$4k3$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>In article <kms3hf$3lh$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>In article <kms1kh$200$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>In article <kms0jd$q2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>In article <kmrv6u$sl1$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>In article <acv2p8taeapifq0ot...@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>[Default] On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:26:02 -0700 (PDT), while chained to a
>>>>>>>>desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>> $On May 13, 8:04 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> $> In article <HCZjt.13408$Fe.12...@newsfe20.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> $> PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> $>
>>>>>>>>> $> >Young.....er....middle aged man
>>>>>>>>> $>
>>>>>>>>> $> >Going to Cambridge Ontario first thing in the morning for a week of work.  A
>>>>>>>>> $> >chance to see Toronto again hopefully for a day or two.
>>>>>>>>> $>
>>>>>>>>> $> >Weather sucks out there dang it, can't seem to get good weather in the right
>>>>>>>>> $> >place
>>>>>>>>> $>
>>>>>>>>> $> >Have a good week folks!
>>>>>>>>> $>
>>>>>>>>> $> >(And yes Sharx I actually like Toronto)
>>>>>>>>> $>
>>>>>>>>> $> NO jobs in TO I hear.
>>>>>>>>> $
>>>>>>>>> $What do you care? You've never had a job in your life.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If there really are no jobs in TO, I guess that is the result of
>>>>>>>>decades being a Liberal stronghold.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(BTW, doctor, while it is dangerous basing election results on recent
>>>>>>>>polls, current polls suggest the Liberals are about to get creamed by
>>>>>>>>the NDP in the BC provincial election.)
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>John Fleming
>>>>>>>>Edmonton, Canada

So John Fleming on Halloween could not decide on a Halloween
custom for 2013. His good Toastmaster friend Dave Yadallee described
how Liberals were beating the odds. So John cracked an egg on his face
and went out being a pollster for Halloween!!

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
>>>>>>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
>>>>>>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
>>>>>>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
>>>>>>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In Labrador
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>62/91 polls reporting
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Liberal Yvonne Jones 50.6%
>>>>>>>Con Peter Penashue 29.8%
>>>>>>>NDP Harry Borlase 19.2%
>>>>>>>Lib'n Norman Andrews 0.5%
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>>>>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>>>>>>>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>>>>>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Update
>>>>>>
>>>>>>82/91 polls
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Liberal 51.1%
>>>>>>Con 28.6%
>>>>>>NDP 19.9%
>>>>>>Lib'n 0.4%
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>>>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>>>>>>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>>>>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
>>>>>
>>>>>Update
>>>>>
>>>>>84/91 polls reporting
>>>>>
>>>>>Liberal 51.2%
>>>>>Con 28.5%
>>>>>NDP 19.9%
>>>>>LIb'n 0.4%
>>>>>--
>>>>>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>>>>>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>>>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
>>>>
>>>>Update 86/91 pools reporting
>>>>
>>>>Liberal 50.8%
>>>>Con 29.1%
>>>>NDP 19.7%
>>>>Lib'n 0.4%
>>>>
>>>>10979 votes counted particpation rate 54.2%
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>All right in the general election 2 years ago
>>>>
>>>>Labrador
>>>>
>>>>Con 39.81%
>>>>Liberal 39.07%
>>>>NDP 19.83%
>>>>Green 1.30%
>>>>
>>>>turnout 10744/20104 53.44%
>>>>
>>>>Noted the byelection has higher turnout.
>>>>--
>>>>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>>>>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
>>>
>>>88/91 polls reporting
>>>
>>>Labrador
>>>
>>>Liberal 50.7%
>>>Con 28.9%
>>>NDP 20.0%
>>>Lib'n 0.4%
>>>--
>>>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>>>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
>>
>>90/91 polls reporting
>>
>>Liberal 49.4%
>>Con 30.9%
>>NDP 19,3%
>>Lib'n 0.4%
>>
>>Participation rate 58.1%
>>
>>Get the tanker ready John!
>>--
>>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
>
>Finals numbers all 91 polls reporting
>
>Liberal Yvonne Jones 5814 votes 48.2%
>Con Peter Penashue 3922 votes 32.5%
>NDP Harry Borlase 2273 votes 18.8%
>Lib'n Norman Andrews 50 votes 0.4%
>
>Participation rate 59.6% (12059 voters of a list of 20251)
>
>Results from 2011 May
>
>
>Con 4256 39.81%
>Liberal 4177 39.07%
>NDP 2120 19.83%
>Green 139 1,30%
>
>Pariticiption Rate 53.44%
>
>So from 2011 to 2013
>
>Participation is up 6.16%
>
>Liberals up 1637 votes and up 9.13%
>Cons down 334 votes and down 7.31%
>NDP up 154 votes and up 1.03%
>
>
>I wonder what would happen if this were a uniform national pattern?
>
>All right John send the tanker to all Harper Cons!
>

And Liberals are back with a majority government in BC. Life is good. Now
Christy Clark ahs to find a seat.

>--
>Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
>http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
>B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!


--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
I am a New World Order Enemy! I Endorse freedoms!

[Mr.Smartypants]

On May 15, 6:29 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>
> So John Fleming on Halloween could not decide on a Halloween
> custom for 2013.  His good Toastmaster friend Dave Yadallee described
> how Liberals were beating the odds.  So John cracked an egg on his face
> and went out being a pollster for Halloween!!
>
>

WTF does all that gibberish mean!!?

[The Doctor]

In article <f91f589c-e76b-48e0...@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On May 15, 6:29=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>
>> So John Fleming on Halloween could not decide on a Halloween

>> custom for 2013. =A0His good Toastmaster friend Dave Yadallee described
>> how Liberals were beating the odds. =A0So John cracked an egg on his face

>> and went out being a pollster for Halloween!!
>>
>>
>
>WTF does all that gibberish mean!!?

Lies chronic liar and satanic illuminati occultic anti-Semitic bigot
Mr.Smartypants . Mr.SmartyPants is a luser lurker stalker. 

Fascist for you.

[ConsRconž]

On 5/15/2013 5:29 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> And Liberals are back with a majority government in BC. Life is good.
> Now Christy Clark ahs to find a seat.

Still rooting for conservative leaders, eh, doc? No bloody wonder the
voters in this country got fed up with your Liberals and found YOUR seat
with their collective foot.

It's not 'Liberals' who govern BC - it's conservatives hiding behind the
Liberal label.

If you were any smarter than you are, you would have noticed that it's
Stephen Harper that holds Christy Clark's hand in all negotiations
involving oil pipelines and in foisting the HST onto BCers. You won't
see Justin Trudeau doing that. Unless he wants no seats at all in BC,
that is.

[Carter]

On 15/05/2013 5:32 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <f91f589c-e76b-48e0...@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
> Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> On May 15, 6:29=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> So John Fleming on Halloween could not decide on a Halloween
>>> custom for 2013. =A0His good Toastmaster friend Dave Yadallee described
>>> how Liberals were beating the odds. =A0So John cracked an egg on his face
>>> and went out being a pollster for Halloween!!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> WTF does all that gibberish mean!!?
>
>
> Lies chronic liar and satanic illuminati occultic anti-Semitic bigot
> Mr.Smartypants . Mr.SmartyPants is a luser lurker stalker. 
>
> Fascist for you.

Will you people please strip nf.general from the address list in
this thread. There is nobody here interested in your bickering.

Carter
>

[The Doctor]

In article <VoSkt.483$1m2...@newsfe07.iad>,

Christy Clark like Joyce Murray hold LPC memberships!

[Rob]

On 5/15/2013 6:29 AM, The Doctor wrote:

> So John Fleming on Halloween could not decide on a Halloween
> custom for 2013. His good Toastmaster friend Dave Yadallee described
> how Liberals were beating the odds. So John cracked an egg on his face
> and went out being a pollster for Halloween!!

"Halloween custom"?
Fucking illiterate imbecile

[Sharx35]

"ConsRconž" <Con~Rcon~@cda.ca> wrote in message
news:VoSkt.483$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...

Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective heads
(no pun intended), up their collective asses.

[Sharx35]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kn110f$5mm$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

> In article <VoSkt.483$1m2...@newsfe07.iad>,
> =?windows-1252?Q?ConsRcon=9E?= <Conžconž@cda.ca> wrote:
>>On 5/15/2013 5:29 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> And Liberals are back with a majority government in BC. Life is
>>> good.
>>> Now Christy Clark ahs to find a seat.
>>
>>
>>Still rooting for conservative leaders, eh, doc? No bloody
>>wonder the
>>voters in this country got fed up with your Liberals and found
>>YOUR seat
>>with their collective foot.
>>
>>It's not 'Liberals' who govern BC - it's conservatives hiding
>>behind the
>>Liberal label.
>>
>>If you were any smarter than you are, you would have noticed that
>>it's
>>Stephen Harper that holds Christy Clark's hand in all
>>negotiations
>>involving oil pipelines and in foisting the HST onto BCers. You
>>won't
>>see Justin Trudeau doing that. Unless he wants no seats at all
>>in BC,
>>that is.
>
> Christy Clark like Joyce Murray hold LPC memberships!

Nonetheless, I AM glad to see the upset in BC--now all necessary
pipelines WILL BE BUILT without further idealistic crap from the
natives and the lefties. If need be, bring in the army to protect
the pipelines which, BY THE WAY, are safer than transporting oil by
rail. Ask the people near Lake Wabamun about rail transport of
petroleum and what happens, even years later, to their lake after
the railroad accident there.

[The Doctor]

10/10 Teeth! You should come be to Toastmasters.

[Rob]

On 5/15/2013 6:11 PM, The Doctor wrote:

> 10/10 Teeth! You should come be to Toastmasters.

"come be"?
fucking illiterate imbecile

[ConsRconž]

On 5/15/2013 4:51 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> Nonetheless, I AM glad to see the upset in BC--now all necessary
> pipelines WILL BE BUILT without further idealistic crap from the natives
> and the lefties.

Wanna bet your rent money on it?

[ConsRconž]

>> Nonetheless, I AM glad to see the upset in BC--now all necessary
>> pipelines WILL BE BUILT without further idealistic crap from the
>> natives and the lefties. If need be, bring in the army to protect
>> the pipelines which, BY THE WAY, are safer than transporting oil by
>> rail. Ask the people near Lake Wabamun about rail transport of
>> petroleum and what happens, even years later, to their lake after
>> the railroad accident there.

On 5/15/2013 5:11 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> 10/10 Teeth! You should come be to Toastmasters.

I think you meant: 10-100, doc.

[Con®conž]

On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective heads (no
> pun intended), up their collective asses.

Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache of
nothingness.

[M.I.Wakefield]

"ConsRconž" wrote in message news:jNVkt.642$_Q4...@newsfe10.iad...

Why? Will the NDP be coming through to stop it?

[Sharx35]

"ConsRcon�" <Con~Rcon~@cda.ca> wrote in message
news:jNVkt.642$_Q4...@newsfe10.iad...

RENT money? SOME of us do NOT pay rent--I've been a homeowner, with
no mortgage, for decades. Guaranteed, a pipeline WILL be built in
BC, you and all the other economic illiterates can NOT stop it.
They will bring in the army, if need be, to silence your goons.

>
>

[Sharx35]

"Con�con�" <Con�co...@cda.ca> wrote in message
news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...

So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no
doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
call.


>
>
>

[The Doctor]

In article <kn1fu3$b94$2...@dont-email.me>,

10/10 Wakefield.

[Mr.Smartypants]

On May 16, 4:27 am, "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "ConsRcon " <Con~Rc...@cda.ca> wrote in message

If the majority of British Columbians don't want a pipeline in B.C.,
who has the right to force them to accept one?

[The Doctor]

In article <9f0e0f94-ab73-491f...@v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

Lies chronic liar and satanic illuminati occultic anti-Semitic bigot
Mr.Smartypants . Mr.SmartyPants is a luser lurker stalker. 

B.C. elected a government that can manage an economy not wreck it.

Smae with Labrdor voting Liberal, they voted in an honest person!

[Sharx35]

"Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:9f0e0f94-ab73-491f...@v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

There are FAR more people who would BENEFIT from such pipeline than
would be harmed. The FACT is that a pipeline is SAFER than
transporting oil by railroad. FACT is that chances of a serious
spill are MINIMAL. I, for one, am getting fucking tired of the
goddamn CHICKEN LITTLES who run around like chickens with their
fucking heads cut off. Too many of them are braindamaged from
abusing drugs past or present. The pipeline WILL be built. Count on
it. People like myself have the power to overcome the whinings of
nobodies. It's in the NATIONAL INTEREST to transport petrochemical
to the coast for export now that the U.S. is become self-sufficient
in petrochemicals.




>

[The Doctor]

Thank you for the facts Teeth.

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $"Con®con˛" <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote in message
> $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
> $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
> $>> heads (no
> $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
> $>
> $>
> $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache
> $> of nothingness.
> $
> $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no
> $doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
> $call.

To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
like Karen could be had for $2.00.

--


John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:02:34 -0600, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $"Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote in message
> $news:9f0e0f94-ab73-491f...@v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> $> On May 16, 4:27 am, "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> "ConsRcon " <Con~Rc...@cda.ca> wrote in message
> $>>
> $>> news:jNVkt.642$_Q4...@newsfe10.iad...
> $>>
> $>> > On 5/15/2013 4:51 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> $>> >> Nonetheless, I AM glad to see the upset in BC--now all
> $>> >> necessary
> $>> >> pipelines WILL BE BUILT without further idealistic crap from
> $>> >> the
> $>> >> natives
> $>> >> and the lefties.
> $>>
> $>> > Wanna bet your rent money on it?
> $>>
> $>> RENT money? SOME of us do NOT pay rent--I've been a homeowner,
> $>> with
> $>> no mortgage, for decades. Guaranteed, a pipeline WILL be built
> $>> in
> $>> BC, you and all the other economic illiterates can NOT stop it.
> $>> They will bring in the army, if need be, to silence your goons.
> $>>
> $>
> $>
> $> If the majority of British Columbians don't want a pipeline in
> $> B.C.,
> $> who has the right to force them to accept one?
> $
> $
> $There are FAR more people who would BENEFIT from such pipeline than
> $would be harmed. The FACT is that a pipeline is SAFER than
> $transporting oil by railroad. FACT is that chances of a serious
> $spill are MINIMAL. I, for one, am getting fucking tired of the
> $goddamn CHICKEN LITTLES who run around like chickens with their
> $fucking heads cut off. Too many of them are braindamaged from
> $abusing drugs past or present. The pipeline WILL be built. Count on
> $it. People like myself have the power to overcome the whinings of
> $nobodies. It's in the NATIONAL INTEREST to transport petrochemical
> $to the coast for export now that the U.S. is become self-sufficient
> $in petrochemicals.

If I understand the story right, the Liberals in BC aren\t against the
Northern Gateway pipeline per se. What they are after is a bigger
slice of the revenue said pipeline will generate.

And contrary to Con/Karen's belief, the Liberal majority in BC is the
result of support by a plurality of voters rather than a majority.

--


John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada

[M.I.Wakefield]

"John Fleming" wrote in message
news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...

> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> like Karen could be had for $2.00.

I remember hearing that the $2 bill wasn't popular on the Prairies because
of its connotation as the "going rate".

[Eric©]

John Fleming wrote...

>
> [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk
> in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > $"Con®con?" <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote in message

> > $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
> > $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> > $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
> > $>> heads (no
> > $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
> > $>
> > $>
> > $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache
> > $> of nothingness.
> > $
> > $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no
> > $doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
> > $call.
>
> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> like Karen could be had for $2.00.

Unfortunately since then the price of a phone call has gone up.

[Sharx35]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:3j5bp8p8dejbe3uv4...@4ax.com...

That's also my understanding, John. The pipeline(s) will go
through, no matter HOW MUCH the natives and the lefties whine and
kvetch. It's a done deal. The left whine away about tanker
accidents--if they fucking well had stayed in school, they would
have learned that REFINED oil is LIGHTER than sea water and will
stay on top of the ocean, all the easier to suck up. It's the
unrefined crude that tends to sink and be harder to clean up. Also,
natural gas hydrocarbons, if released, simply rise straight up and
become rapidly diluted in the atmosphere. Little or no lasting
pollution. These whiners had parents who were whiners back in the
60's. The parental drug use obviously damaged their DNA, resulting
in brain-dead idiots, running around like a bunch of Chicken
Littles.

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 21:07:16 -0700, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium Eric� <er...@nil.ca> wrote:
> $John Fleming wrote...
> $> [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk
> $> in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $> > $"Con�con?" <Con�co...@cda.ca> wrote in message
> $> > $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
> $> > $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> $> > $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
> $> > $>> heads (no
> $> > $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
> $> > $>
> $> > $>

> $> > $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache

> $> > $> of nothingness.
> $> > $

> $> > $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no

> $> > $doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
> $> > $call.
> $>
> $> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> $> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> $
> $Unfortunately since then the price of a phone call has gone up.

As has the price of women.

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 23:19:32 -0400, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" wrote in message
> $news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...
> $
> $> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> $> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> $
> $I remember hearing that the $2 bill wasn't popular on the Prairies because
> $of its connotation as the "going rate".

I believe it also had a negative association because of its connection
with bets in horse racing, or something along that line, too.

There was a double whammy.

[The Doctor]

In edm.general John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
: [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:02:34 -0600, while chained to a desk

The BC Liberal PArty is an alliance of Federal Liberals, Conservatives and
Socreds.

[The Doctor]

In edm.general Sharx35 <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:


: "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

Blunt but honest Teeth.

: >
: > And contrary to Con/Karen's belief, the Liberal majority in BC is

: > the
: > result of support by a plurality of voters rather than a
: > majority.
: > --
: >
: >
: > John Fleming
: > Edmonton, Canada
: >
: >
: > Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
: > And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
: > With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
: > Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
: > Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O

[SaPeIsMa]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...

> [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk
> in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> $"Con®conž" <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote in message

>> $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
>> $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
>> $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
>> $>> heads (no
>> $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
>> $>
>> $>
>> $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache
>> $> of nothingness.
>> $
>> $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no
>> $doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
>> $call.
>
> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> --

Ish !
Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth

[M.I.Wakefield]

"SaPeIsMa" wrote in message news:kn5q1t$j7t$3...@dont-email.me...

> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...

> > To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> > like Karen could be had for $2.00.
>

> Ish !
> Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth

It's an old joke, but ...

Karen Gordon got home late one evening, to find her parents sitting up at
the kitchen table, waiting for her.

"And what have you been doing, out at this hour?" asked her mother.

"Whoring, Mommy", answered Karen.

"Whoring! That's terrible. And just how much money did you make, selling
your body?" demanded her father.

"Well, Daddy, I'll have you know that I made twenty-two dollars and five
cents."

Karen's parents sit dumbstruck for a moment.

" ... and five cents. Who paid you five cents?" wondered her mother.

"Silly Mommy ... all of them did!"

[Con®conž]

> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote in message

>> If the majority of British Columbians don't want a pipeline in B.C.,
>> who has the right to force them to accept one?

On 5/16/2013 2:02 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> There are FAR more people who would BENEFIT from such pipeline than
> would be harmed.

eg: The oil companies operating the tarsands in Alberta - most of which
are foreign-owned;

The Harper government, which could start putting taxes on still more oil
exports from Canada;

and of course, the Chinese, who would be not only owners of a large oil
company in the tarsands, but extractors of this resource from Canada
using the pristine west coast for its oil tankers.

You BET there are 'far more people who would benefit from such pipeline.'

Problems is: far more people don't care about the oil companies, the
Harper government's need for tax revenue, and the Chinese.

[Con®conž]

On 5/16/2013 3:27 AM, Sharx35 wrote:
>> Wanna bet your rent money on it?
>
> RENT money? SOME of us do NOT pay rent--I've been a homeowner, with no
> mortgage, for decades. Guaranteed, a pipeline WILL be built in BC, you
> and all the other economic illiterates can NOT stop it. They will bring
> in the army, if need be, to silence your goons.

Ooooh ......... Sound a lot like the Nazis. Is that what you're
comparing the Harper Cons and BC 'Liberals' to?

[Con®conž]

On 5/16/2013 7:26 PM, John Fleming wrote:
> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> like Karen could be had for $2.00.

Had to pay for 'em, eh ?

[Barry Bruyea]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:43:36 -0500, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
>news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...
>> [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk
>> in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> $"Con®con˛" <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote in message

>>> $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
>>> $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
>>> $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
>>> $>> heads (no
>>> $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
>>> $>
>>> $>
>>> $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache
>>> $> of nothingness.
>>> $
>>> $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no
>>> $doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
>>> $call.
>>
>> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
>> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
>> --
>
>
>Ish !
> Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth

Did she give change? Or was Canadian Tire Money acceptable?

[Barry Bruyea]

Why, were you free?
>

[Con®conž]

>> Had to pay for 'em, eh ?

On 5/17/2013 3:04 PM, Barry Bruyea wrote:
> Why, were you free?

You're STILL paying for 'it', Bruyea.

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:43:36 -0500, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...
> $> [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk
> $> in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $"Con®con˛" <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote in message
> $>> $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
> $>> $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> $>> $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
> $>> $>> heads (no
> $>> $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>

> $>> $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache

> $>> $> of nothingness.
> $>> $

> $>> $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no

> $>> $doubt. Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
> $>> $call.
> $>
> $> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> $> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> $
> $Ish !
> $ Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth

A girl's gotta make a living somehow, right? And if a guy is willing
to pay $2.00 . . ..

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:38:30 -0400, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote:
> $"SaPeIsMa" wrote in message news:kn5q1t$j7t$3...@dont-email.me...
> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...
> $
> $> > To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> $> > like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> $>
> $> Ish !
> $> Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth
> $
> $It's an old joke, but ...
> $
> $Karen Gordon got home late one evening, to find her parents sitting up at
> $the kitchen table, waiting for her.
> $
> $"And what have you been doing, out at this hour?" asked her mother.
> $
> $"Whoring, Mommy", answered Karen.
> $
> $"Whoring! That's terrible. And just how much money did you make, selling
> $your body?" demanded her father.
> $
> $"Well, Daddy, I'll have you know that I made twenty-two dollars and five
> $cents."
> $
> $Karen's parents sit dumbstruck for a moment.
> $
> $" ... and five cents. Who paid you five cents?" wondered her mother.
> $
> $"Silly Mommy ... all of them did!"

LOL

Adds a whole new spin to being nickled and dimed.

[Sharx35]

"Con®conž" <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote in message
news:Ecwlt.16806$EN2....@newsfe15.iad...

You guys are the goons, ignoring the law whenever your "warm
fuzzies" are disturbed. Well, you can fucking well join hands, sing
Kumbyah right off of the fucking Prince Rupert pier. Good Riddance!

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:26:09 -0700, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium Con®conž <Con®co...@cda.ca> wrote:
> $On 5/16/2013 7:26 PM, John Fleming wrote:

> $> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> $> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> $
> $Had to pay for 'em, eh ?

It's cheaper than picking up women for one night stands down at the
bar.

[Barry Bruyea]

Not waiting for you to make change, though.
>
>

[Barry Bruyea]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:31:15 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:

The Frau blew her stack when they discontinued the penny!

[not Lambourn]

On May 18, 4:42 am, Barry Bruyea <damnthetorped...@duck.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:31:15 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >[Default] On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:38:30 -0400, while chained to a desk

> >in the scriptorium "M.I.Wakefield" <n...@present.com> wrote:
> >> $"SaPeIsMa"  wrote in messagenews:kn5q1t$j7t$3...@dont-email.me...

I fall on my knees every day when the tab at No Frills comes to $1.42
and I get dimes back!

God Bless Canada!

[not Lambourn]

On May 17, 7:29 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> [Default] On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:43:36 -0500, while chained to a desk

> in the scriptorium "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> > $news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...
> > $> [Default] On Thu, 16 May 2013 04:28:39 -0600, while chained to a desk

> > $> in the scriptorium "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>> $"Con®conž" <Con®c...@cda.ca> wrote in message

> > $>> $news:UmWkt.484$1m2...@newsfe07.iad...
> > $>> $> On 5/15/2013 4:49 PM, Sharx35 wrote:
> > $>> $>> Small "l" liberals are fools, often having their collective
> > $>> $>> heads (no
> > $>> $>> pun intended), up their collective asses.
> > $>> $>
> > $>> $>
> > $>> $> Thanks for that valuable elucidation, based on your usual cache
> > $>> $> of nothingness.
> > $>> $
> > $>> $So, where have all your brains gotten you? A negative net worth, no
> > $>> $doubt.  Unfocused idealism and 50 cents will get you a pay phone
> > $>> $call.
> > $>
> > $> To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls
> > $> like Karen could be had for $2.00.
> > $
> > $Ish !
> > $    Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth
>
> A girl's gotta make a living somehow, right?  And if a guy is willing
> to pay $2.00 . . ..
> --
>

I was at the Calgary airport in the mid 1990s and purchased a pack of
gum. The guy gave me 2 $1.00 bills and a $2 bill in my change.

I asked "Why?".

He said "This is the Calgary airport, we still get tourists from the
1988 Winter Games, and they bring their money from those days with
them."

By then, we'd moved on from the pink / orange $2.00 bill, and the
$1.00 bill was history.

I suppose it would be like me taking out my old French Francs in Paris
today.

But they would have laughed at me.

[not Lambourn]

Of course, since my father was with the underground, we still have
Vichy Francs. Recognized by the Nazi Occupation government, with a
little luck.

Or, I suppose there are some bills from the US revolution. Southern
currency.

Not legal tender.

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Sat, 18 May 2013 04:42:13 -0400, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium Barry Bruyea <damnthet...@duck.com> wrote:
> $On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:31:15 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>[Default] On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:38:30 -0400, while chained to a desk
> $>in the scriptorium "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote:
> $>> $"SaPeIsMa" wrote in message news:kn5q1t$j7t$3...@dont-email.me...
> $>> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $>> $> news:395bp8pgguo1pldnm...@4ax.com...

> $>> $
> $>> $> > To think there was a time a pay phone call cost a nickel and girls

> $>> $> > like Karen could be had for $2.00.

> $>> $>
> $>> $> Ish !

> $>> $> Even then $2.00 was way more than the product was worth

> $>> $
> $>> $It's an old joke, but ...
> $>> $
> $>> $Karen Gordon got home late one evening, to find her parents sitting up at

> $>> $the kitchen table, waiting for her.

> $>> $
> $>> $"And what have you been doing, out at this hour?" asked her mother.
> $>> $
> $>> $"Whoring, Mommy", answered Karen.
> $>> $
> $>> $"Whoring! That's terrible. And just how much money did you make, selling

> $>> $your body?" demanded her father.

> $>> $
> $>> $"Well, Daddy, I'll have you know that I made twenty-two dollars and five

> $>> $cents."
> $>> $

> $>> $Karen's parents sit dumbstruck for a moment.
> $>> $
> $>> $" ... and five cents. Who paid you five cents?" wondered her mother.
> $>> $
> $>> $"Silly Mommy ... all of them did!"

> $>
> $>LOL
> $>
> $>Adds a whole new spin to being nickled and dimed.
> $
> $The Frau blew her stack when they discontinued the penny!

She could get around that by allowing pre-booking, perhaps with an
incentive of buy five and get one free.