+1
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chris...@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 04/30/2005 07:11:10 PM:
> Nilo,
> The current WS-Addr spec lists the cardinality of the wsa:To header as
simply "mandatory". Its
> not so much that the spec says there can be more than one but rather
that it doesn't say that
> there can't be more than one. So, without the WS-Addr spec being more
restrictive the B2B profile
> filled in the missing restriction by requiring each wsa:To (if there is
more than one) to be
> targeted to different node/intermediary - thus avoid confusion that
would arise if more than one
> were processed by a single soap node.
> -Doug
> Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM@IBMUS
> 04/29/2005 06:38 PM
> Please respond to
> basicB2B
> To
> basicB2B@googlegroups.com
> cc
> Subject
> Re: Question on R0005 - cardinality of wsa:To header
> ----- Forwarded by Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM on 04/29/2005 05:38 PM
-----
> Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM
> 04/15/2005 02:44 PM
> To
> nilo.mi...@ericsson.com
> cc
> Subject
> Re: Spec Feedback - basicb2b (Question on R0005)Link
> Hi Nilo!
> It's been a while since I last wrote to you on this topic, so I wanted
to at least give you a
> quick update on your question. Unfortunately, I do not yet have a
definitive answer. I have been
> unable to get a response from the IBMers involved with the WS-Addressing
spec, so at the
> suggestion of Mark Nottingham, I posed the question to his WG on the
W3C's public WS-Addressing
> comments mailing list [1]. Again, I will let you know when I have a
definitive answer from either
> my IBM sources, or the W3C WS-Addressing WG. Thank you for your
patience.
> Regards,
> Rimas V. Rekasius
> e-business Industry Standards Architect
> 1-312-245-6775 (voice/FAX)
> 1-773-934-2705 (cell phone)
> [1]
> Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM
> 04/07/2005 04:39 PM
> To
> nilo.mi...@ericsson.com
> cc
> Subject
> Re: Spec Feedback - basicb2b (Question on R0005)
> Hi Nilo!
> Thanks for your question. I'm glad you're interested in the Basic B2B
Profile, and appreciate
> your making a contribution. Let me look into this a bit, then I'll send
you my observations and
> we can discuss this further. In the meantime, please feel free to share
any other
> comments/questions/concerns that you might have on the profile. It is
only via such collaboration
> that we can make this profile a valuable piece of work.
> Regards,
> Rimas V. Rekasius
> e-business Industry Standards Architect
> 1-312-245-6775 (voice/FAX)
> 1-773-934-2705 (cell phone)
> - - Spec - -
> Name: Nilo Mitra
> Email: nilo.mi...@ericsson.com
> User may be contacted
> Other offerings may be sent to the user
> Title: zzz
> Subject: Spec Feedback - basicb2b
> Feedback Comments:
> Hi Chris:
> I can't understand Requirement R0005 in section 4.1 which states:
> "When there are more than one wsa:To header blocks present in an
> ENVELOPE.....etc. "
> I could not find anything in the WS-Addr member submission that said
that
> there could be more than one wsa:To header. The W3C WD seems also to
have
> only a single wsa:To header targeted at the ultimate recipient. Perhaps
I
> overlooked something obvious...
> Thanks,
> Nilo
|
