Dear Sir,
PENSION scheme settlement was signed by IBA on behalf of BANKS and by Unions on behalf of employees in 1993 and subsequently in 1994 in small committee meeting it is clearly mentioned that our PENSION scheme is similar to central Govt and RBI
In RBI 100%.DA is paid to pre retirees of 2002 and pension also revised subsequently to all retirees. When our settlement speaks that our PENSION scheme is similar to RBI why the BANKS have not implemented and why the Unions are not demanded updation at that time itself. Then there is no meaning in settlements.
I have filed updation case in Madras High court and I got reply to my court order from bank that they have referred the matter to IBA. In reply the bank said that the IBA in their letter mentioned that similar updation case was dismissed in Supreme court by mentioning Canara Bank 100% DA case
IBA says clearly in its circular that it acts according to the BANKS instructions. Now whom to believe and whom to blame.
In another case filed by Shri Dhanaraj senior officer Bank of Baroda the Govt replied that bank has to provide funds for updation of pension, but there is no proper reply from bank. When the pension and 100%DA is revised in RBI banks must implement it automatically , and when it is not implemented the Unions must raise their voice but our UNIONS say there is no money in banks to revise. This reply clearly indicates that updation clause is in our pension settlement.
Banks have Surplus funds to provide for NPA s ( non living things). but no money to living things. (To pensioners)
Govt revises salary, PENSION, family pension to its employees once in. ten years automatically by 30%increase by collecting taxes from public. Why not the banks collect additional interest of 0.20% on loans to meet the short fall in PENSION fund. 🙏🙏🙏