DISCUSSION WITH DFS BY UNIONS TODAY

394 views
Skip to first unread message

MOHAN P

unread,
Nov 27, 2025, 6:17:36 AM (6 days ago) Nov 27
to bankpensioner
Discussion by Secretary, DFS with #UFBU 


IMG-20251127-WA0015.jpg

Manickam Ravindran

unread,
Nov 27, 2025, 11:23:10 PM (5 days ago) Nov 27
to bankpensioner
The outcome of the discussions with DFS does not bring cheer on any of the issues of the pensioners particularly updation. A passing reference about the pensioners issues do not alter anything. THIS is expected as UFBE never bother about retirees. 

JSOMA SHEKARA

unread,
Nov 27, 2025, 11:23:11 PM (5 days ago) Nov 27
to Bankpensioner Google
The UFBU has issued a circular today itself on the discussion held with DFS. It is stated that the Govt discussed on the implementation of four labour codes introduced in replacement of existing 29 
codes. Also said that some other points were  discussed without   elaborating further  in the circular. 

But I firmly believe that the meeting called by DFS today ( 27.11.2025) was not for discussion on labour code implementation. 

My conviction is because of three reasons:- 

First  reason is that the four  labour codes have already been passed by the Parliament and are  brought into effect  from November 21, 2025. So, it has no meaning of discussing with any trade union now. That too for discussion of its implementation at this stage ,because this  must have been taken care of before placing  it in the parliament . 

Secondly, UFBU is not the right forum for discussion on newly adopted  labour law codes . If at all it is to be discussed by the Govt, then the right forum for discussion will be the various central trade unions like, INTUC, AITUC, CITU, BMS, HMS , UTUC etc.  All industry specific  trade unions  are affiliated to any  of these central trade unions only. UFBU is not a central trade union . 
What is the  locus standi of UFBU to discuss on implementation of labour code ? In what way UFBU is concerned with implementation of labour code ? 

Thirdly, if the Govt is at all interested to hold any discussion on newly adopted  labour code with Central Trade Union bodies , then the ministry of labour is the right authority to hold such discussion , not DFS ! DFS is a department of Finance Ministry to administer financial services ! 

So, this circular of UFBU is  to fallaciously circumvent the real points of discussion .

Biswanath Bandyopadhyay
Mumbai
Rtd Head HR
eDena Bank 
27/11/25

On Thu, 27 Nov 2025, 16:47 MOHAN P, <moha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Discussion by Secretary, DFS with #UFBU 


--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAMCbyDTYO8FtQneHgcF_rqbm4E_XrzorrmidqvrywLXOVdEx5Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Mohan V.R

unread,
Nov 28, 2025, 5:38:50 AM (5 days ago) Nov 28
to bankpe...@googlegroups.com
Very precise analysis

It is your ATTITUDE not your APTITUDE  which determines your ALTITUDE in life.

Mohan.V.R.
F-1, CSR HOMES, 
Plot 95, Nehru Street,
Alwar Thiru Nagar,
CHENNAI 600087.
MOB No. 8148236931

Rajender Sharma

unread,
Nov 30, 2025, 11:31:06 PM (2 days ago) Nov 30
to bankpensioner
Sir,
you are absolutely right.
When the stage is set for implementing the labour codes,there
is no point in holding discussions with the United Forum or 
with any Central trade Union.
It seems to be an eye wash.
The fact remains that the so called labour codes will deprive
the workers of their hard won rights  achieved in the last decades.
R K Sharma

SHAILEN Bhavnani

unread,
Nov 30, 2025, 11:31:06 PM (2 days ago) Nov 30
to jsomasekara2007, bankpe...@googlegroups.com
 
Dear Shri Bandhopadhyay ji,
Your reading of the situation is absolutely right. UFBU has always been misguiding it's members as well as ex-members, I.e. the Retirees.
 

-- Regards, S.G. Bhavnani Contact No. +919540410341
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages