Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Oops: Drunken fool drives SUV into a Muni Metro tunnel

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Jan 19, 2012, 6:50:50 PM1/19/12
to

A male 40-year-old, suspected of being drunk, drove his SUV into the a Muni
Metro tunnel at Church Street and Duboce Avenue at around 6:00 AM today,
grinding Metro service to a halt for over 2 hours during this morning's rush
hour.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/19/BAOS1MRKES.DTL


- Peter

Patrick Scheible

unread,
Jan 19, 2012, 11:06:28 PM1/19/12
to
By the time they're 40, most of them are either dead or know better.

-- Patrick

spamtrap1888

unread,
Jan 20, 2012, 1:53:19 PM1/20/12
to
On Jan 19, 8:06 pm, Patrick Scheible <k...@zipcon.net> wrote:
> Peter Lawrence <hummb...@aol.com> writes:
> > A male 40-year-old, suspected of being drunk, drove his SUV into the a
> > Muni Metro tunnel at Church Street and Duboce Avenue at around 6:00 AM
> > today, grinding Metro service to a halt for over 2 hours during this
> > morning's rush hour.
>
> >http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/19/BAOS1MRKE...
>
> By the time they're 40, most of them are either dead or know better.
>

At several points, driving onto San Jose's light rail tracks would be
easy even if the driver was merely confused, for example from the
frontage road onto San Carlos, near the children's museum.

Scott Lurndal

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 3:59:29 PM1/26/12
to
My parents neighbor, a fine upstanding citizen, was once arrested for something
similar (driving an SUV on the train tracks). In his case, he had lost his
youngest child recently in a semi-vs-auto collision (icy roads in the midwest).

Not an excuse, but a rationale.

Scott Lurndal

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 3:59:49 PM1/26/12
to
spamtrap1888 <spamtr...@gmail.com> writes:
>On Jan 19, 8:06=A0pm, Patrick Scheible <k...@zipcon.net> wrote:
>> Peter Lawrence <hummb...@aol.com> writes:
>> > A male 40-year-old, suspected of being drunk, drove his SUV into the a
>> > Muni Metro tunnel at Church Street and Duboce Avenue at around 6:00 AM
>> > today, grinding Metro service to a halt for over 2 hours during this
>> > morning's rush hour.
>>
>> >http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=3D/c/a/2012/01/19/BAOS1MRKE.=
>..
>>
>> By the time they're 40, most of them are either dead or know better.
>>
>
>At several points, driving onto San Jose's light rail tracks would be
>easy even if the driver was merely confused, for example from the
>frontage road onto San Carlos, near the children's museum.

Happens quite regularly on first street.

David Kaye

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 5:09:15 PM1/26/12
to
"Scott Lurndal" <sc...@slp53.sl.home> wrote

>
> Happens quite regularly on first street.

But I imagine this is very different from driving into the Muni's Duboce
tunnel. First, there's no road there. Second, you have to drive many feet
to get to the tunnel entrance.



hannahf...@gmail.com

unread,
May 2, 2012, 3:53:45 PM5/2/12
to
The first time I saw the entrance to the tunnel, I thought it looked a lot like a car wash. Maybe he needed a wax job.

Jym Dyer

unread,
May 22, 2012, 12:49:54 PM5/22/12
to
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/19/BAOS1MRKES.DTL

> At several points, driving onto San Jose's light rail tracks
> would be easy even if the driver was merely confused, for
> example from the frontage road onto San Carlos, near the
> children's museum.

=v= The intersection of Church and Duboce has four NO TURN
signs, and a freeway-sized (i.e. gigantic) DO NOT ENTER sign
made of very bright LEDs. The pavement changes as well, you
know, into tracks. Even so, someone attempts to drive a car
into it about once a week.

=v= What makes this one newsworthy is that the driver actually
managed to get as far as the Van Ness station before trying
(and, of course, failing) to drive up the stairs onto the
platform. Wouldn't that make a dandy ad for his SUV?
<_Jym_>
0 new messages