Re: #Florida Teen Expelled, Charged With Felony For Lesbian Relationship

[Dänk 42Ø]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 21:45:49 -0700, wy quacked:

> On 20 May, 23:26, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 09:19 PM, quack:

>>
>> > On Mon, 20 May 2013 20:27:15 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
>> >> Boys should learn to keep it in their pants. If they cannot go
>> >> without for a few weeks or months, they have more serious problems
>> >> than disapproving parents. This is called maturity and self control,
>> >> and is an important trait to have as one grows up.
>>
>> > Well, boys DON'T keep it in their pants, and that's human nature.
>>
>> Those who truly respect their ladies can, and do.
>
> You mean the same ladies you call whores for engaging in sex while not
> even giving a scintilla of blame or insulting designation to the guys
> who engage with them? Those "ladies"?

I believe that consenting adults have a right to engage in prostitution.
Dianne Feinstein, one of the most prominent Democraps in the Senate, does
not share this view.

As mayor of San Francisco, Feinstein waged all-out war on prostitution
and adult entertainment. She even went undercover dressed as a hooker to
entrap men seeking to get laid.

Liberalism is generally defined as advocating personal freedom and
economic control, while conservatism is defined as economic freedom and
personal control. Dianne Feinstein seems to be both liberal and
conservative, seeking to outlaw the personal freedom to engage in
consensual sex, and also outlawing profiting from the same consensual
sexual agreement. This makes her a FASCIST.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Brothers_O%27Farrell_Theater

"In the 1980s, newly elected Mayor Dianne Feinstein walked into the
O'Farrell [porn theater] and said, 'I want to check this place out.' Jim
Mitchell, in the lobby at that moment, reportedly said, 'Sure, if you buy
a ticket.' Feinstein walked out. Soon after, raids occurred, ostensibly
to restore safety and health of exotic dancers and resulted in obscenity
charges being filed against the Mitchells. The brothers, apparently not
lacking a sense of humor, changed their marquee to read, 'For showtimes,
call...' and displayed Feinstein's unlisted phone number."

[Liberal Here]

To call her a fascist (gee, maybe it takes one to known one???) is
going too far. That she's wrong is obvious.

The illegality of prostitution is a function of Judeo-christian
dogma....but advocated for actually sound reasons for centuries. I
refer to the evolution of sexually transmitted diseases. Until the
discovery of antibiotics, prostitution accelerated the transmission of
these disease through a population.

I disagree with faux liberals who think people with diseases such as
AIDS (including herpes) should not be listed so that innocents
considering sex with them can learn whether they're risking a life-
long or life-endangering infection. If people with such diseases could
be trusted to inform others (who have a need-to-know) there'd be no
need for a listing.

[Mr. B1ack]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 09:52:31 -0700 (PDT), Liberal Here
<liber...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>The illegality of prostitution is a function of Judeo-christian
>dogma....but advocated for actually sound reasons for centuries. I
>refer to the evolution of sexually transmitted diseases. Until the
>discovery of antibiotics, prostitution accelerated the transmission of
>these disease through a population.

Um ... nobody actally KNEW about 'transmissible' diseases
until the mid 1800s. The working theory was that Gawd was
punishing the wicked and that's why people got sick.

There was an interesting little docu the other day about
the death of president Garfield. The assassin used a
crappy 'gamblers gun' which could barely put a hole
in anyone. One bullet grazed Garfields arm, the other
made a hole in his back. Turned out the bullet only went
a few inches, making a loop and lodging in a harmless
position behind the pancreas.

IF the esteemed presidential physicians had slapped
some iodine and a bandage on the hole, Garfield
would have been up and presidenting in a couple
of weeks.

But they didn't. Instead they spent a couple of months
poking their dirty fingers and unsterile instruments
into him trying to find the bullet (in all the wrong
places). He died of massive prolonged infection
caused by his doctors, not the bullet. This was 1881
and the top docs STILL didn't understand contagious
infection worth a damn.

So ... the anti-prostitution/anti-fornication laws of
the past had NOTHING to do with any concept of
"preventing disease" - they were 100% pure
hateful anti-hedonism/anti-fun rules in the
tradition of the Zoroastrian branch religions.
Deprivation, pain, sadness and a general spite
for life are considered 'good' in those philosophies.

Oh, the rules also had to do with establishing and
maintaining a social structure/order that gave the
priesthood more power and influence. In the case
of sex laws, they literally wanted to have everybody
by the 'nads ....

>I disagree with faux liberals who think people with diseases such as
>AIDS (including herpes) should not be listed so that innocents
>considering sex with them can learn whether they're risking a life-
>long or life-endangering infection. If people with such diseases could
>be trusted to inform others (who have a need-to-know) there'd be no
>need for a listing.

We'll have an official CDC skull-n-crossbones framed
with a biohazard logo tattooed on their foreheads, OK ?

Gay guys can ask for the optional pink triangle as an
embellishment ....

[Zepp]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 17:54:19 -0400, Mr. B1ack wrote:

> On Wed, 22 May 2013 09:52:31 -0700 (PDT), Liberal Here
> <liber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>The illegality of prostitution is a function of Judeo-christian
>>dogma....but advocated for actually sound reasons for centuries. I refer
>>to the evolution of sexually transmitted diseases. Until the discovery
>>of antibiotics, prostitution accelerated the transmission of these
>>disease through a population.
>
> Um ... nobody actally KNEW about 'transmissible' diseases until the
> mid 1800s. The working theory was that Gawd was punishing the wicked
> and that's why people got sick.

You're off by about three hundred years. A guy named Girolamo Fracastoro
doped it out around 1550, and wrote it up in a book called De contagione
et contagiosis morbis. He was the first to recommend prevention of
disease spread by washing hands.

Granted, it took a while for the idea to spread amongst the hoi polloi,
especially since every religious wheezer on the continent was eager to
offer religion as a cure for what ails you, bunkie. In times of plague,
people would gather at churches to shelter from God's wrath, and provide
deep and rich pools for the contagion to spread.