Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

WTF: restaurant bathroom edition

49 views
Skip to first unread message

Aahz Maruch

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 10:38:55 AM4/8/13
to
My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
the urinals.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
The statement below is true
The statement above is false

Travis James

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 11:26:19 AM4/8/13
to
On 4/8/2013 7:38 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.
>
What's wrong with that?

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 11:30:40 AM4/8/13
to
On 4/8/13 7:38 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>
> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.

Why would having TVs above the urinals in anyway spoil a meal?

I initially thought you were going state that your meal was spoiled due to
the filthy conditions of the restrooms. But because they installed TVs?

Huh?


- Peter


evergene

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 11:59:13 AM4/8/13
to
Aahz Maruch wrote:

>My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
>expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
>by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
>the urinals.

Anything good on TV?

RED MEAT bonus:
"...scientists suspected that saturated fat and cholesterol made only
a minor contribution to the increased amount of heart disease seen in
red-meat eaters. The real culprit, they proposed, was a little-studied
chemical that is burped out by bacteria in the intestines after people
eat red meat. It is quickly converted by the liver into yet another
little-studied chemical called TMAO that gets into the blood and
increases the risk of heart disease.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/study-points-to-new-culprit-in-heart-disease.html?pagewanted=all

spamtrap1888

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:13:54 PM4/8/13
to
On Apr 8, 7:38 am, a...@pobox.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote:
> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.

Is this a sports bar, where one would want to keep track of a game?
Message has been deleted

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:24:52 PM4/8/13
to
In article <kjunm8$mvd$1...@dont-email.me>,
Peter Lawrence <humm...@aol.com> wrote:
>Why would having TVs above the urinals in anyway spoil a meal?

I don't know about a meal per se, but I'm not enthused to learn
that there are TVs in yet more places. Enough is enough sometimes,
isn't it?

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:26:31 PM4/8/13
to
On 4/8/13 8:59 AM, evergene wrote:
>
> RED MEAT bonus:
>
> "...scientists suspected that saturated fat and cholesterol made only
> a minor contribution to the increased amount of heart disease seen in
> red-meat eaters. The real culprit, they proposed, was a little-studied
> chemical that is burped out by bacteria in the intestines after people
> eat red meat. It is quickly converted by the liver into yet another
> little-studied chemical called TMAO that gets into the blood and
> increases the risk of heart disease.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/study-points-to-new-culprit-in-heart-disease.html?pagewanted=all


Thanks for the article, Gene. It is very informative.

But oh, the irony!

Based on these studies, regular meat eaters should avoid red meat (or at
least eat a lot less of it), but vegans can enjoy an occasional hearty beef
steak without any ill health effects!

And based to the study, maybe steakhouses should start offering fast-acting
antibiotics with their appetizers (for health reasons, of course).

;)



- Peter


Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:33:15 PM4/8/13
to
If I had my druthers, I would probably prefer that restaurant restrooms did
not have TVs installed in their restrooms too (except maybe at a sports bar,
so one doesn't miss any action of a game), but of all the issues I might
have with a dining establishment's restrooms, having TVs installed in them
are far down the list. More important to me would be the cleanliness,
including the smell of the restroom, and having soap in the soap dispensers.


- Peter


Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:33:43 PM4/8/13
to
In article <kjuquv$ga5$1...@dont-email.me>,
Peter Lawrence <humm...@aol.com> wrote:
>And based to the study, maybe steakhouses should start offering
>fast-acting antibiotics with their appetizers (for health reasons,
>of course).

I think you're only a little off on where this is headed: Not to
antibiotics, but to probiotics, that is populating the gut with
good bacteria that have positive effects and keep the others out.

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:35:53 PM4/8/13
to
In article <kjurbi$ji3$1...@dont-email.me>,
Peter Lawrence <humm...@aol.com> wrote:
>... of all the issues I might have with a dining establishment's
>restrooms, having TVs installed in them are far down the list.

At that particular moment, I agree, but what's the more disturbing
trend? A one-off sanitation problem can surely be corrected; will
this? Or will it only get worse? I think that's the point.

(Or put another way, although in principle a sanitation problem can
get worse, people aren't going to argue with you about whether it's
good or bad.)

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:38:10 PM4/8/13
to
On 4/8/13 9:24 AM, Todd Michel McComb wrote:
>
> ...but I'm not enthused to learn
> that there are TVs in yet more places. Enough is enough sometimes,
> isn't it?

Fortunately for you that you usually don't drive (hence you don't stop at
gas stations too often), since it's becoming ever more popular to have small
TV screens installed at the gas pumps showing some of the most lamest
commercials with out-of-date "news" or weather updates shown between the
lame commercials.


- Peter


Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 12:44:20 PM4/8/13
to
In article <kjurkp$lka$1...@dont-email.me>,
Peter Lawrence <humm...@aol.com> wrote:
>Fortunately for you that you usually don't drive (hence you don't
>stop at gas stations too often), since it's becoming ever more
>popular to have small TV screens installed at the gas pumps showing
>some of the most lamest commercials with out-of-date "news" or
>weather updates shown between the lame commercials.

Yes, fortunately for me, but unfortunately for me I have encountered
these, traveling with others. The worst about these, in my experience,
is the horribly distorted and very loud sound, so that they can't
be ignored at all. They're pretty awful, but then I expect a gas
station to be unpleasant.

sf

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 1:37:54 PM4/8/13
to
On 8 Apr 2013 07:38:55 -0700, aa...@pobox.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote:

> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.

I like their menu (just looked at page one). Thanks.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

sf

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 1:41:10 PM4/8/13
to
Interesting. I guess we buy gas at the wrong stations, because the
only time I've seen those things is on television when some comedian
is pulling a prank on a customer.

sf

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 1:43:17 PM4/8/13
to
That was my first thought too. Never heard of Van's until this
thread, but any joint that puts a patty melt on the menu has my
attention. :)

Steve Pope

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 1:53:44 PM4/8/13
to
Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:30:40 -0700, Peter Lawrence wrote:
>
>> Why would having TVs above the urinals in anyway spoil a meal?
>>
>> I initially thought you were going state that your meal was spoiled due to
>> the filthy conditions of the restrooms. But because they installed TVs?
>
>Maybe they were showing The Village People "YMCA" videos.

Or genital piercing videos.

Steve

Steve Pope

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 1:55:45 PM4/8/13
to
For some reason, gas stations in Berkeley do not have the at-pump
TV screens. They are most everywhere else.

Steve

Steve Pope

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:22:54 PM4/8/13
to
Todd Michel McComb <mcc...@medieval.org> wrote:

Do people who want to take probiotics eat at steakhouses?


S.

Al Eisner

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:51:24 PM4/8/13
to
The real problem would be if the guy ahead of you in line wants to
watch the end of a show. (But perhaps that's a problem shared at the
more common places which post newspaper pages in similar locations.)
--

Al Eisner
San Mateo Co., CA

Al Eisner

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:52:48 PM4/8/13
to
Another problem blamed on burping: first it was cows causing global
warming, and now this!

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:54:45 PM4/8/13
to
In article <alpine.LRH.2.00.1...@iris03.slac.stanford.edu>,
Al Eisner <eis...@slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>Another problem blamed on burping: first it was cows causing
>global warming, and now this!

The solution is clear: Wrap every living thing in air-tight plastic.

Al Eisner

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:55:51 PM4/8/13
to
Way too many stations do this just with audio. Frankly, the video part
is not a problem, one doesn't have to look. So, really, I don't think
TV is any worse.

Ciccio

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:59:26 PM4/8/13
to
On Apr 8, 7:38 am, a...@pobox.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote:
> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT,


I went to a wedding rehearsal dinner there some years ago. It was OK.

> but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.

I didn't notice if the bar was a sports intensive bar. If it is, then
the TVs in the bathroom are no surprise. I do, however, have a vague
recollection that the place displayed some sports memorabilia. In any
event the TVs in the bathrooms would not bother me at all.

Ciccio

Al Eisner

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 2:59:38 PM4/8/13
to
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Aahz Maruch wrote:

> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.

I'm guessing that Van's, being an old-line restaurant, serves an
older clientele. So perhaps they are just trying to keep customers with
enlarged-prostate problems entertained while waiting for, well, you
know....

Hans Klager

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 3:09:20 PM4/8/13
to
If there is one time when you want some peace and quiet
it is when you are taking a slash.


--
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 3:58:13 PM4/8/13
to
On 4/8/13 12:09 PM, Hans Klager wrote:
>
> If there is one time when you want some peace and quiet
> it is when you are taking a slash.

Why?


tutall

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 3:59:25 PM4/8/13
to
On Apr 8, 10:55 am, spop...@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote:
> Todd Michel McComb <mcc...@medieval.org> wrote:
>
> >Peter Lawrence  <hummb...@aol.com> wrote:

> For some reason, gas stations in Berkeley do not have the at-pump
> TV screens.  They are most everywhere else.
>
> Steve

Know of only on within a few miles of us, stopped going there too.

And yeah, it was loud and distorted.

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:03:29 PM4/8/13
to
>Way too many stations do this just with audio. Frankly, the video
>part is not a problem, one doesn't have to look.

I also have not seen a station where they were able to place the
video in such a position that it was difficult to avoid. However,
that may be coming.

Hans Klager

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:16:10 PM4/8/13
to
Because the future of the nation lies in your hands.

evergene

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:18:52 PM4/8/13
to
Peter Lawrence wrote:

>On 4/8/13 7:38 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>
>> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
>> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
>> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
>> the urinals.
>
>Why would having TVs above the urinals in anyway spoil a meal?
>
>I initially thought you were going state that your meal was spoiled due to
>the filthy conditions of the restrooms. But because they installed TVs?

A truly forward-thinking restaurant would install video cameras along
with the TVs.

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:21:06 PM4/8/13
to
In article <ec96m8p60cuc8u992...@4ax.com>,
evergene <ge...@geeaitcheekaygee.com> wrote:
>A truly forward-thinking restaurant would install video cameras
>along with the TVs.

Now, now... we're way past the panopticon. Think of the chemical
analysis possibilities, among other things.

evergene

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:24:03 PM4/8/13
to
Peter Lawrence wrote:

>On 4/8/13 8:59 AM, evergene wrote:
>>
>> RED MEAT bonus:
>>
>> "...scientists suspected that saturated fat and cholesterol made only
>> a minor contribution to the increased amount of heart disease seen in
>> red-meat eaters. The real culprit, they proposed, was a little-studied
>> chemical that is burped out by bacteria in the intestines after people
>> eat red meat. It is quickly converted by the liver into yet another
>> little-studied chemical called TMAO that gets into the blood and
>> increases the risk of heart disease.
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/study-points-to-new-culprit-in-heart-disease.html?pagewanted=all
>
>
>Thanks for the article, Gene. It is very informative.
>
>But oh, the irony!
>
>Based on these studies, regular meat eaters should avoid red meat (or at
>least eat a lot less of it), but vegans can enjoy an occasional hearty beef
>steak without any ill health effects!

Yeah, that finding was strange.

>And based to the study, maybe steakhouses should start offering fast-acting
>antibiotics with their appetizers (for health reasons, of course).

Seems the more we learn about stomach and gut bacteria, the more
significance they appear to have in affecting health.

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:32:11 PM4/8/13
to
In article <uh96m8t5goeek207t...@4ax.com>,
evergene <ge...@geeaitcheekaygee.com> wrote:
>Peter Lawrence wrote:
>>Based on these studies, regular meat eaters should avoid red meat
>>(or at least eat a lot less of it), but vegans can enjoy an
>>occasional hearty beef steak without any ill health effects!
>Yeah, that finding was strange.

That would make sense as part of an internal ecology.

>Seems the more we learn about stomach and gut bacteria, the more
>significance they appear to have in affecting health.

I think it's also important to suspend judgement on the history of
this, by which I mean, the bacteria inside people may have been
substantially different in the not-so-distant past.

evergene

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:49:12 PM4/8/13
to
I was thinking of the relatively recent (mid-1980s) discovery that one
major cause of gastric ulcers is bacteria.

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:52:01 PM4/8/13
to
In article <bta6m8hqpq907afma...@4ax.com>,
evergene <ge...@geeaitcheekaygee.com> wrote:
>I was thinking of the relatively recent (mid-1980s) discovery that
>one major cause of gastric ulcers is bacteria.

Acid reflux can be caused by a virus, I'm told, which broadens the
field a bit, even. But I think it's an interesting question whether
that gastric ulcer bacteria existed in other eras.

evergene

unread,
Apr 8, 2013, 4:59:56 PM4/8/13
to
Apparently it did:
"Like humans, simulations indicate that H. pylori seems to have spread
from East Africa around 58,000 years ago... Taken together, our
results establish that anatomically modern humans were already
infected by H. pylori prior to their migrations from Africa and
demonstrate that H. pylori has remained intimately associated with
their human host populations ever since."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1847463/

Travis James

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 12:30:19 AM4/9/13
to
On 4/8/2013 12:09 PM, Hans Klager wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:26:19 -0700, Travis James <travis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/8/2013 7:38 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
>>> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
>>> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
>>> the urinals.
>>>
>> What's wrong with that?
>
> If there is one time when you want some peace and quiet
> it is when you are taking a slash.
>
>
If there is one time I want some noise: TV, radio, water running... is
when going to the bathroom. (Not sure what "a slash" is a synonym for.)

The men's room at my work is library quiet. I can't stand it and will
not elaborate.

Todd Michel McComb

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 3:08:15 AM4/9/13
to
In article <ikb6m8d5v5gf0rn8p...@4ax.com>,
evergene <ge...@geeaitcheekaygee.com> wrote:
>"Like humans, simulations indicate that H. pylori seems to have
>spread from East Africa around 58,000 years ago... "

I'm always a little skeptical of some of those diversity-distance
models, but showing a similar pattern is certainly evocative.

I'm glad this is a research area that actually gets pursued. It'd
be pretty damned cool if people found a way to notice ancient
bacteria, though, instead of inferring them.

evergene

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 10:34:29 AM4/9/13
to
Travis James wrote:

>On 4/8/2013 12:09 PM, Hans Klager wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:26:19 -0700, Travis James <travis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2013 7:38 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>>> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
>>>> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
>>>> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
>>>> the urinals.
>>>>
>>> What's wrong with that?
>>
>> If there is one time when you want some peace and quiet
>> it is when you are taking a slash.
>>
>>
>If there is one time I want some noise: TV, radio, water running... is
>when going to the bathroom. (Not sure what "a slash" is a synonym for.)

"Slash" is a euphemism for one of the two ways the human body
eliminates waste. The euphemism for the other method of elimination is
"dot."

"Slashdot" is the elimination of both kinds of human waste at once.

>The men's room at my work is library quiet. I can't stand it and will
>not elaborate.

In Japan it's not uncommon for bathrooms to be equipped with some kind
of mechanical noisemaker that generates sound to cover up the noise of
the primary bathroom activity.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2010/02/11/national/masking-toilet-noise-may-date-back-to-edo/

Al Eisner

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 1:19:49 PM4/9/13
to
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, evergene wrote:

> Travis James wrote:
>
>> If there is one time I want some noise: TV, radio, water running... is
>> when going to the bathroom. (Not sure what "a slash" is a synonym for.)
>
> "Slash" is a euphemism for one of the two ways the human body
> eliminates waste. The euphemism for the other method of elimination is
> "dot."
>
> "Slashdot" is the elimination of both kinds of human waste at once.

There are some things we really don't need to know. But since you are in
an informative mood, how would you interpret Dotcom in these terms?

>> The men's room at my work is library quiet. I can't stand it and will
>> not elaborate.
>
> In Japan it's not uncommon for bathrooms to be equipped with some kind
> of mechanical noisemaker that generates sound to cover up the noise of
> the primary bathroom activity.
> http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2010/02/11/national/masking-toilet-noise-may-date-back-to-edo/

Ian B MacLure

unread,
Apr 9, 2013, 11:02:08 PM4/9/13
to
aa...@pobox.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote in news:kjukpv$13c$1...@panix5.panix.com:

> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
> the urinals.


Didja spot the cameras? Didja?
Well didja, Ralph?

axlq

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 2:29:36 PM4/12/13
to
In article <v988m8t72ik253rkr...@4ax.com>,
evergene <ge...@geeaitcheekaygee.com> wrote:
>
>In Japan it's not uncommon for bathrooms to be equipped with some kind
>of mechanical noisemaker that generates sound to cover up the noise of
>the primary bathroom activity.
>http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2010/02/11/national/masking-toilet-noise-may-date-back-to-edo/

Yes, I know about those! I always thought it would be funny to
substitute a noisemaker that makes loud-and-proud fart noises to
cover up your own fart noises, and then videotape reactions for a
show similar to Candid Camera.

-A

axlq

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 2:38:00 PM4/12/13
to
In article <kjurbi$ji3$1...@dont-email.me>,
Peter Lawrence <humm...@aol.com> wrote:
>More important to me would be the cleanliness, including the smell
>of the restroom, and having soap in the soap dispensers.

Speaking of which, am I the only one who has observed that in about
every 1 out of 8 restaurant visits, I find that the men's restroom
lacks either (a) soap or (b) a means to dry your hands?

I always report this to someone on the staff, and they fix the
problem immediately.

But still... it makes me wonder why the people in the kitchen who
handle my food, who also use the same restroom, never bother to tell
anyone there's no soap or paper towels, and why the responsibility
falls to me, a customer, to see that something gets done about it.

Paper towels might be excusable, since kitchen staff routinely carry
their own towels or rags around to wipe or dry their hands, so they
may not notice. But not noticing there's no soap? Ewww.

This observation isn't confined to cheap mom-and-pop asian places
either. I've made the same observation in the mid-range semiformal
places too. (I don't frequent high-end places enough to have a
statistically significant sampling.)

-A

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 4:04:40 PM4/12/13
to
On 4/12/13 11:38 AM, axlq wrote:
>
> Paper towels might be excusable, since kitchen staff routinely carry
> their own towels or rags around to wipe or dry their hands, so they
> may not notice. But not noticing there's no soap? Ewww.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssktVpcv9WI

:)


evergene

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 4:14:19 PM4/12/13
to
Here's an answer to a question you didn't ask. From an interview with
Mary Roach, author of the newly published Gulp: Adventures on the
Alimentary Canal.

Terry Gross: Is there a difference between male and female flatus?

Mary Roach: Well, that's a controversial area we've just wandered
into, Terry.

Terry Gross: Is it?

Mary Roach: Yes it is. Women supposedly have a more noxious smell,
this is what I've been told. But men make up for it with the larger on
average volume per passage.

http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=175381702

Aahz Maruch

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 6:20:58 PM4/12/13
to
In article <e2af8cd8-87ed-45e6...@t5g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
spamtrap1888 <spamtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 8, 7:38=A0am, a...@pobox.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote:
>>
>> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
>> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
>> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
>> the urinals.
>
>Is this a sports bar, where one would want to keep track of a game?

They have a bar that's almost always tuned to a sports channel, but it's
really not a sports bar.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
"Boost the stock market -- fire someone"

Don Martinich

unread,
Apr 12, 2013, 11:07:21 PM4/12/13
to
In article <pnqgm8p4usn062fdf...@4ax.com>,
This is why I read this newsgroup daily.

Tim May

unread,
Apr 13, 2013, 3:18:12 AM4/13/13
to
Mebbee dis be why da bruthas an da hoes be able ta suck up so much cue!
Day mune! Word.

Da jeans for allagy to meat be stopt when whitey left Africa!

Cue be a weapon to kilt da white debbils!

--
Tim May

Hans Klager

unread,
Apr 13, 2013, 11:27:14 AM4/13/13
to
On 12 Apr 2013 15:20:58 -0700, Aahz Maruch <aa...@pobox.com> wrote:
> In article <e2af8cd8-87ed-45e6...@t5g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
> spamtrap1888 <spamtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Is this a sports bar, where one would want to keep track of a game?
>
> They have a bar that's almost always tuned to a sports channel, but it's
> really not a sports bar.

My measure is more than five TVs, it's a sports bar.
Prime hunting ground for the TV-B-Gone drinker.

Aahz Maruch

unread,
Apr 14, 2013, 10:15:28 PM4/14/13
to
In article <slrnkmiufm.ac...@adeed.tele.com>,
Hans Klager <hans....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12 Apr 2013 15:20:58 -0700, Aahz Maruch <aa...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> In article <e2af8cd8-87ed-45e6...@t5g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>> spamtrap1888 <spamtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Is this a sports bar, where one would want to keep track of a game?
>>
>> They have a bar that's almost always tuned to a sports channel, but it's
>> really not a sports bar.
>
> My measure is more than five TVs, it's a sports bar.
>Prime hunting ground for the TV-B-Gone drinker.

By that measure, *now* it's a sports bar. :-( (Assuming there are also
TVs in the women's loo.)

James Silverton

unread,
Apr 14, 2013, 10:48:16 PM4/14/13
to
On 4/14/2013 10:15 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> In article <slrnkmiufm.ac...@adeed.tele.com>,
> Hans Klager <hans....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12 Apr 2013 15:20:58 -0700, Aahz Maruch <aa...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> In article <e2af8cd8-87ed-45e6...@t5g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>>> spamtrap1888 <spamtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is this a sports bar, where one would want to keep track of a game?
>>>
>>> They have a bar that's almost always tuned to a sports channel, but it's
>>> really not a sports bar.
>>
>> My measure is more than five TVs, it's a sports bar.
>> Prime hunting ground for the TV-B-Gone drinker.
>
> By that measure, *now* it's a sports bar. :-( (Assuming there are also
> TVs in the women's loo.)
>
I've been criticized for posting to this group from the other side of
the country but the use of "loo" suggests you are from the other side of
the Atlantic :-)

--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not" in Reply To.

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Apr 15, 2013, 12:21:00 AM4/15/13
to
I'm pretty sure that Aahz is a 100% born & bred Californian. Aahz will
correct me if I'm wrong.


- Peter


Aahz Maruch

unread,
Apr 15, 2013, 1:31:51 AM4/15/13
to
In article <kkfv25$m7c$1...@dont-email.me>,
You're perfectly correct, I just like to spice up my vocabulary (although
Britishisms and "spice" just seems Wrong). (And just to be completely
clear, I have never lived outside CA.)

tutall

unread,
Apr 15, 2013, 9:32:36 AM4/15/13
to
On Apr 12, 8:07 pm, Don Martinich <dmartin...@att.net> wrote:
> In article <pnqgm8p4usn062fdfh8koats3ehoa0v...@4ax.com>,

>
>  evergene <g...@geeaitcheekaygee.com> wrote:

>
> > Here's an answer to a question you didn't ask. From an interview with
> > Mary Roach, author of the newly published Gulp: Adventures on the
> > Alimentary Canal.
>
> > Terry Gross: Is there a difference between male and female flatus?
>
> > Mary Roach: Well, that's a controversial area we've just wandered
> > into, Terry.
>
> > Terry Gross: Is it?
>
> > Mary Roach: Yes it is. Women supposedly have a more noxious smell,
> > this is what I've been told. But men make up for it with the larger on
> > average volume per passage.
>
> >http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=175381702
>
> This is why I read this newsgroup daily.- Hide quoted text -
>

This is coming from the show "Fresh Air" mind you.



Helpful person

unread,
Apr 15, 2013, 9:54:30 AM4/15/13
to
On Apr 8, 11:30 am, Peter Lawrence <hummb...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Why would having TVs above the urinals in anyway spoil a meal?
>
> Huh?
>
> - Peter

It's certainly better than having urinals above the TVs.

http://www.richardfisher.com

Al Eisner

unread,
Apr 15, 2013, 5:26:31 PM4/15/13
to
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Helpful person wrote:

> On Apr 8, 11:30 am, Peter Lawrence <hummb...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why would having TVs above the urinals in anyway spoil a meal?
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> - Peter
>
> It's certainly better than having urinals above the TVs.

At last, a smart analysis of the situation!

axlq

unread,
Apr 29, 2013, 4:17:33 PM4/29/13
to
In article <kk9p7m$t5j$1...@dont-email.me>,
I remember being in a scene like that only once in my life. I yelled
at the staff member about to walk out the restroom door, "hey! wash
your hands!"

-A

mangoboy

unread,
Apr 29, 2013, 9:58:14 PM4/29/13
to
eeww and goddess forbid you would actually be inclined to change the
channels and touch the console or remote...

spamtrap1888

unread,
Apr 30, 2013, 10:57:30 AM4/30/13
to
{Like}

Aahz Maruch

unread,
May 1, 2013, 8:34:58 PM5/1/13
to
In article <kjundr$jc1$1...@dont-email.me>,
Travis James <travis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 4/8/2013 7:38 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>
>> My primary and I went to the Van's last night (Belmont) and had the
>> expected good meal of RED MEAT, but the experience was somewhat spoiled
>> by the discovery that the bathroom now has TVs in it, two of them above
>> the urinals.
>
>What's wrong with that?

An irritating intrusion.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
"It is difficult to produce a television documentary that is both
incisive and probing when every twelve minutes one is interrupted by
twelve dancing rabbits singing about toilet paper." --Rod Serling
0 new messages