Wow! I'm missing out on a lot of superb sessions...!
Regards
Akarsh
Hope the skies do clear sometime after I get to Bangalore as well :-S
I'd love to rush with the 17.5".
Regards
Akarsh
After a disheartening first observing session on 14th july (the clouds were hanging around all night), my second observing session was very good. And with an expert in deep sky observing like Amar Sharma, my session was just perfect.
Me, along with my brother, Avinash Babu and Amar left Bangalore for Doddaballapur by around 3 pm and reached Doddaballapur by 4:15 pm. The sky appeared to be clear with a few clouds hanging around here and there which posed no real threat. We were joined by two of our friends Chethan and Anand on the way (who are also beginners) and we reached Hosahalli, our observing venue by around 5:30. At the observing site, we were joined by a BAS member Sathya Kumar Prasanna.
We started our observations by around 7:30 pm. The skies were good with our nearest neighbour, the moon just above us. Like it happens with almost all beginners, we started from the moon. Well, to be honest the moon's view through the 8' telescope was simply superb. The half cresent moon kick starting our observing session.
The next thing Amar and Sathya teached us was recognition of constellations. We could recognise Big Dipper, Sagittarius, Scorpious and few more. We saw some red stars like Arcturus, Antares, a blue star Vega which are important to know the directions in the night sky. We also saw the binary stars in the Big Dipper constellation.
Then we had dinner and waited for the moon to set and we started again at 12:15 am. The north sky was a bit cloudy but the south sky was brilliant with many shooting stars zipping through the skies. We saw some 7-9 shooting stars through the night. We were also able to recognize few satellites.
One observation which stood out from the rest was the view of our home galaxy, The Milky Way. Amar and Sathya were expressing their wonder and excitement and told us that we were very lucky to have viewed the best Milky Way that was viewed from Hosahalli over the years. Then we saw some globular clusters namely M4 and M80 in the constellation Scorpious, Omega Centauri in the constellation Centaurus and some open clusters. Sathya showed us the ring nebula. We also saw Saturn along with its largest moon Titan. It was a great moment for me to have viewed the Lord of the Rings through the 8' telescope.
By the time we observed all these objects, it was around 1:45 and some more clouds had set in. So me and my friends decided to take a nap while Amar was busy doing deep sky observations. By the time i got up it was 5:15 in the morning. But the sky never appeared to have cleared. But syill there were some parts in the sky where the clouds were absent. We viewed Venus, the next brightest thing in the sky apart from our moon. Then we saw Jupiter along with its four Galilean moons (Io, Callisto, Europa and Ganymede). With this we concluded our observing session.
For beginners like me, my brother and my friends, the session was just perfect. We would like to thank Amar and Sathya who helped us out through the session and BAS for giving us a good opportunity to know more about our Universe.
Its a good feel for me to have started my carrer in Astronomy, 400 years after Galileo first looked at the sky through his telescope.
Regards
Ravi Babu S
Just keep track of either this or the bas-announce mailing list (if
you like only announcements) and keep checking e-mail.
We announce any events on these two mailing lists.
Regards
Akarsh
Hi Prashanth and All, As a thumbrule, we have observing sessions around all New Moon dates (a week before and after). We try not to miss this even in the monsoons (as you are seeing), so observing is conducted virtually all year round.
Mostly we announce here or its also up in the BAS website Calendar. For the next month, we would be having a couple sessions after we return from the Eclipse (as usual hoping skies remain clear). Thanking You. Amar. |
|
--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Prashanth Bangalore <prashan...@gmail.com> wrote:
|
|
|
Thanks to Sathya and Ravi for typing out the 28th June observing experience. Some points from my side. The skies background in the daytime was acutally blue with fluffy white weather clouds covering the sky, and appearing non-threatning. This assured me the skies at night would be very good, unless a bad miracle takes place.
At evening we waited for the bright Half-Moon to set, and yet we saw a wonderful MilkyWay up in Sagi until Cygnus on the other side. Once Moon was setting, I think it got hazy with moments of clearing, and we couldnt do much. Anyway by midnight when we were dozing under the open sky, we were awoken up and saw a very good clearing. The Sagi MW then onwards was PHENOMENAL...and to my senses, it felt better than before.
This time the stellar density was also great, and hardly any background glow. What I realize is this happens only when transparency is very good and no traces of upper-most thin haze (...Akarsh).
I observed many globulars this time, revisiting few of them in the Southern skies, literally after a long 2 years! I caught the 9th mag bright Comet Christensen just as it was rising above the tree, earlier than I expected. This was just without a finder chart from only memory, glancing into Cartes only once. I was waiting for it to rise until zenith to get a real good view, but haze later on spoiled the show.
We still saw some mysterious meteors. I do not know which shower it is persisting from, since so many days, when there is no major shower scheduled now. Could it be an extended outburst of the lesser known Lyrids? Another eventful session, among the many. Thanking You. Amar. |
Yes, yes...
I'm waiting to come back to Bangalore.
Regards
Akarsh
Right. The skies are really transparent if they clear during monsoons
:)
So far, I guess the 17.5" has been underperforming because of
haze. People on CloudyNights gave me brighter impressions of the
telescope than what I've gotten to see. Collimation is one aspect, and
sky transparency is the other. I guess we should make it a point to
try our luck on new-moon nights during the monsoon months.
Regards
Akarsh
Thanks Akarsh,
You are an angel. As you gave me the web address of SWA-Kolkata, I wrote to them immediately and have enrolled as a member. Thanks for your guidance. But I have seen their website; - their activity level is perhaps 1/100th of what BAS is doing. I wish I could be in Bagalore for sometime to learn from you guys directly. I'll keep in touch.
For amateurs, do you think a 3" scope is good enough, or one should possess at least a 6" size, if we do not go very deep?
Shankar Lahiri
--- On Thu, 2/7/09, Akarsh Simha <akars...@gmail.com> wrote:
|
|
> You are an angel. As you gave me the web address of SWA-Kolkata, I wrote
> to them immediately and have enrolled as a member. Thanks for your
> guidance.
Well, it's just our way of sharing our interest in astronomy with
others.
> But I have seen their website; - their activity level is perhaps 1/100th
> of what BAS is doing. I wish I could be in Bagalore for sometime to learn
> from you guys directly. I'll keep in touch.
It would be nice if you could boost them into activity! We don't hear
much from Kolkata, which is why I suspected if they were active.
BAS is kept active by 4 ~ 5 active people - and they are enough to
enthuse an entire host of amateur astronomers. We had 70+ participants
in Vishnu's National-level Workshop; in the back end, the whole thing
was the brainchild of 2 ~ 3 active members of BAS and Vishnu!
So one active member is enough to enthuse several others.
> For amateurs, do you think a 3" scope is good enough, or one should
> possess at least a 6" size, if we do not go very deep?
It's a good idea to exhaust all objects visible through the 3". The
entire Messier catalog (the "M" objects) should be possible from a
dark site, and some bright NGC (New General Catalog) objects should be
possible too.
Once you "exhaust" the capabilities of a 3" scope, you can graduate to
whatever aperture you want, because you would have gained the basic
knack of deep-sky observing. Moreover, you'll be in a better position
to decide what aperture you want.
Regards
Akarsh
I think Amar was telling me that you can see all Messiers through a
big binocular.
M74 and M109 might be a problem, but I think dark skies and
experienced eyes can show it to you in a 3".
@ Rakesh and Shankar - Aperture-wise, a 3-inch should show all Messiers, but with two conditions - very good skies and good experience of the observer. I have good personal reasons to believe this is also possible with a 10x50 binocular, if the two conditions are satisfied. Many have claimed to have done it, including likes of M97, M108, M74 etc.
Like, I am lingering at 87 Messiers (some insanely difficult) (most verified by Akarsh by comparing software with the observed star field) with a 10x50 binocs. That's a good 80% of 10x50 Messiers even with limited binocular sessions! Am sure to reach more with increased practice. (review an earlier thread from archives on this)
As a matter of fact, the limiting magnitude of an aperture "increases" with experience. You will see "deeper and fainter" 5 years from now, than now. For example, some folks at CloudyNights Forum claim they have seen 12th mag galaxies in Virgo with a 25x100, which I dont think I could manage without constant practice in next 3 years!
So start like Akarsh has said - with a small aperture, get acquanited and confident of it's aperture, after few years move ahead. I would intuitively trust the power of a 8" f/8 I've been using ever since, more than a new unacquinted 12" in hand...
@ Rakesh - There are no showers like Delphinids, even they might appear to. The only one in this period is the minor Lyrids. |
Thanks Amar. Very well explained.
Since my 3"-scope got broken while shifting to Kolkata, I have now purchased a 10x50 bino. (I have to have a stand to hold it)
|
|
Date: Thursday, 2 July, 2009, 10:06 PM |
|
|
What I would mean is there is always a limit any aperture would ideally reach, exploiting it completely. If a 13th mag galaxy with a 8" appears a fantasy now, it could be possible with that much practice and training your eyes. In essence, you should be able to do a lot more than you expect your aperture would. There are certain formulae which determine the limiting magnitude of any aperture, and it should be achievable. |