Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

8:35 CST: CNN Declares Obama ! Wins and Ohio/Penna/Leading Florida

2 views
Skip to first unread message

ObamaPhobia : Boo !

unread,
Nov 4, 2008, 9:40:32 PM11/4/08
to
Game over .

EC count 194 to 69 !

Scott Smith

unread,
Nov 4, 2008, 10:33:38 PM11/4/08
to
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:40:32 -0600, "ObamaPhobia : Boo ! " <o...@ph.com> wrote:

>Game over .
>
>EC count 194 to 69 !


It's not over until the fat lady sings...but I think I can
hear her clearing her throat on the West Coast. ;-)

.
.

- Scott Smith: scott...@iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith


The Chief Instigator

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:14:12 AM11/5/08
to
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:40:32 -0600, ObamaPhobia : Boo ! <o...@ph.com> wrote:
> Game over .
>
> EC count 194 to 69 !

Wrong, as usual: at 22:00 CST, CNN projected California for Obama,
clinching the election.

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Wilkes-Barre/Scranton 4, Houston 3 (November 2)
NEXT GAME: Friday, November 7 at Hamilton, 6:35

Ron

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 6:04:24 AM11/5/08
to
On 05 Nov 2008 08:14:12 GMT, The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:40:32 -0600, ObamaPhobia : Boo ! <o...@ph.com> wrote:
>> Game over .
>>
>> EC count 194 to 69 !
>
>Wrong, as usual: at 22:00 CST, CNN projected California for Obama,
>clinching the election.


Right about the time McCain called Obama and conceded.

Lars Eighner

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 6:24:53 AM11/5/08
to
In our last episode, <tcv2h45fcmv927s3s...@4ax.com>, the
lovely and talented Ron broadcast on houston.general:

Yeah, because there was so much suspense about the West Coast after McCain
dropped Penn, Va, and Ohio.


--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> use...@larseighner.com
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave:
But his truth is marching on!

ObamaPhobia : Boo !

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:23:35 AM11/5/08
to
The Chief Instigator wrote:

> Wrong, as usual:

You are a fucking asshole.

By winning ohIo and Penna, and leading Florida .. so early,
the panel of reporters and *experts* predicted it was over.
The remaining activity of the night was just filling TV time.

No mistake butt inspector.

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 2:21:47 PM11/5/08
to

I voted for Ron Paul, but McCain's defeat speech was honorable. I wouldn't
rip him for serving our country and surviving being a POW.

Ron

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:29:45 PM11/5/08
to
On 05 Nov 2008 19:21:47 GMT, The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:04:24 -0600, Ron <ron.cl...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> On 05 Nov 2008 08:14:12 GMT, The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:40:32 -0600, ObamaPhobia : Boo ! <o...@ph.com> wrote:
>>>> Game over .
>>>>
>>>> EC count 194 to 69 !
>>>
>>>Wrong, as usual: at 22:00 CST, CNN projected California for Obama,
>>>clinching the election.
>>
>> Right about the time McCain called Obama and conceded.
>
>I voted for Ron Paul, but McCain's defeat speech was honorable. I wouldn't
>rip him for serving our country and surviving being a POW.


I caught a few seconds of Rush Limbaugh today who was apoplyctectic
about McCains concession speech.

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:39:59 PM11/5/08
to

Rush needs to be flushed.

charliekilo

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 6:25:37 PM11/5/08
to
"The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrngh414v....@eris.io.com...

> On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:29:45 -0600, Ron <ron.cl...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> On 05 Nov 2008 19:21:47 GMT, The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:04:24 -0600, Ron <ron.cl...@peoplepc.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> On 05 Nov 2008 08:14:12 GMT, The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:40:32 -0600, ObamaPhobia : Boo ! <o...@ph.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> Game over .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EC count 194 to 69 !
>>>>>
>>>>>Wrong, as usual: at 22:00 CST, CNN projected California for Obama,
>>>>>clinching the election.
>>>>
>>>> Right about the time McCain called Obama and conceded.
>>>
>>>I voted for Ron Paul, but McCain's defeat speech was honorable. I
>>>wouldn't
>>>rip him for serving our country and surviving being a POW.
>>
>> I caught a few seconds of Rush Limbaugh today who was apoplyctectic
>> about McCains concession speech.
>
> Rush needs to be flushed.

I remember when liberals used to say, "I may not agree with a word you say
but I'll fight to the death to defend your right to say it." Now, it's just,
"Pass a law so he can't say anything I don't agree with."


Grumpy AuContraire

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 10:53:53 PM11/5/08
to


Limbaugh may be a blowhard but I have never heard him say anythibg that
was untrue.

Those that espouse the "fairness doctrine" simply do so for their
convenience, not that of the public.

Looks like interesting times ahead and let's hope the Senate is not
fillibuster proof!

JT

Mike Smith

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 11:44:14 PM11/5/08
to

As often as Rush uses the sound bites of the liberals/socialists and
reads their published articles, he may already be in compliance with
any "fairness doctrine".

Mike Smith

the wharf rat

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 11:48:08 PM11/5/08
to
In article <lTtQk.114657$Mh5....@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,

Grumpy AuContraire <Gru...@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote:
>
>Limbaugh may be a blowhard but I have never heard him say anythibg that
>was untrue.
>

"I have a prescription for these"

pitchforks&torches

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 1:47:16 AM11/6/08
to

"charliekilo" <miles_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:rUpQk.4838$D32....@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com...

WHACK!!!!
You are, obviously, some kinda dumbshit: no-one is suggesting any such thing.

Here: read this, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine.

That was the rule, until Rotten Ronny's puppeteers assassinated it...

We, the *thinking* people want it reinstated.
>
INVESTIGATE - INDICT - IMPEACH - IMPRISON!!!!

>


pitchforks&torches

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 1:56:04 AM11/6/08
to

"Mike Smith" <m...@wt.net> wrote in message
news:ndt4h45ffc03sjga9...@4ax.com...

WHACK!!!

Mike, you're an idiot.

If you had any education past a G.E.D. level, you might
understand why your statement is false.

Hint: don't try to conflate 'fair use' with the 'fairness doctrine'.

People smarter than you ( nearly everyone...) know better.
>
> Mike Smith


Mike Smith

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 5:06:40 AM11/6/08
to

He did have a prescription or two or three or...
That's why he was being charged with doctor shopping.

IOW, no lie.

Try again?

Mike Smith

the wharf rat

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 7:47:17 AM11/6/08
to
In article <7ag5h4d2r7aaqbap0...@4ax.com>,
Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>
>Try again?
>

"The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them."

"There are more acres of forestland in America today than when
Columbus discovered the continent in 1492."

"There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys
individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use,
some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling
drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good
because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which
become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing
drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they
ought to be sent up."

Oh, and

"Rush Limbaugh was arrested Friday on a prescription fraud charge"

Boston Blackie

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 8:01:08 AM11/6/08
to

Too Long in The Wasteland

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 8:44:55 AM11/6/08
to
pitchforks&torches wrote:
> We, the *thinking* people want it reinstated.
> INVESTIGATE - INDICT - IMPEACH - IMPRISON!!!!
>
>
Don't feed the lawyers ! There is already too many
over crowded jails and prisons.

I'd say hang them after they are INDICTED.

Mike Smith

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 8:56:45 AM11/6/08
to

You do not know what a lie is. You cannot recognize the difference
between a lie and satire.

That explains a lot about you.

Mike Smith

Boston Blackie

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 9:03:03 AM11/6/08
to

And really, what was he doing with that Viagra, he's not even married!
--
http://tinyurl.com/5v6rm8

the wharf rat

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 11:22:28 AM11/6/08
to
In article <aqt5h41u13nkb6qjj...@4ax.com>,

Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>
>You cannot recognize the difference between a lie and satire.
>

Boy, you sure are smart!

Grumpy AuContraire

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 1:05:38 PM11/6/08
to

Mike Smith wrote:


I seldom listen to him. Has he picked up on the Obamas "light lunch" at
the Waldorf Astoria on October 15???

$400+ smackers!

JT

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 3:07:07 PM11/6/08
to

I'm not a liberal, and never have been...and I've never been the rabid
neocon (who apparently took their cues from the Third Reich, at times). I'm
a conservative from before the times the GOP decided to drink the Kool-Aid.
No laws needed, just a sizable increase in the IQ of the audience...no
ratings, no show.

charliekilo

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 5:24:36 PM11/6/08
to
"The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrngh6jjb....@eris.io.com...

Just curious, since you used Limbaugh as an example, what positions or
philosophy of his don't you agree with?


Mike Smith

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 5:50:08 PM11/6/08
to

Yawn... you're stating the obvious.

How about answering the following:
Why can't you distinguish between a lie and satire?

Mike Smith

Mike Smith

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 6:06:50 PM11/6/08
to

I have no idea. I'm usually busy during working hours and don't get
much of a chance to listen to the radio. {maybe an hour a week}

Mike Smith

the wharf rat

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 6:30:49 PM11/6/08
to
In article <u1t6h49tciffagir9...@4ax.com>,

Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>
>Why can't you distinguish between a lie and satire?
>

Why, because I bought my satire detector from the same mail order
catalog that you got yours from! Next time I'm gonna buy a Craftsman!

Know what your problem is, Smith? You've got a .17 caliber brain
and a 12 gauge mouth. That's why you misfire everytime you pull the trigger.

pitchforks&torches

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 6:56:39 PM11/6/08
to

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Gru...@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
news:SlGQk.18262$_Y1....@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

WHACK!!!

No, but you did! Did you use a pooper scooper, or your bare hands?

Just in case you didn't get the shouting points memo, that Foxy Sir Rupert /
NewsCorpse
rush smear-job was completely destroyed, and the 'source' had to publish a
retraction.

Hey, are you sniffing your hands? Ewwwwww...

>
> $400+ smackers!

Hey, didja hear about S A R A H !!!'s latest ' problem '?

The G.O.P. has sent an attorney to Alaska to inventory and take possession
of the $ 170,000.00+ clothes she charged to the pugs!

"Those clothes, they are not my property. . I'm not taking them with me." However, it
seems that a few items did make it back to Alaska with her, and the GOP is coming to
reclaim them:
Sarah Palin left the national stage Wednesday, but the controversy over her role on
the ticket flared as aides to John McCain disclosed new details about her expensive
wardrobe purchases and revealed that a Republican Party lawyer would be dispatched to
Alaska to inventory and retrieve the clothes still in her possession.

A new story in Newsweek reveals that Palin "spent 'tens of thousands' more than the
reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband."


THAT 'dirty laundry' surely trumps a lie spread by an idiot about our First Lady, eh
Grunty?

( I'm sure some of you R'thugs will be biddin' up her used undies when the SARAH!
collection ends up on the GOP.com or Ebay listings...KKKarl Rove is bidding for Todd's
used union suit...)

>
> JT
>


pitchforks&torches

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 6:58:38 PM11/6/08
to

"Mike Smith" <m...@wt.net> wrote in message
news:u1t6h49tciffagir9...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:22:28 +0000 (UTC), wr...@panix.com (the wharf
> rat) wrote:
>
>>In article <aqt5h41u13nkb6qjj...@4ax.com>,
>>Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>You cannot recognize the difference between a lie and satire.
>>>
>>
>> Boy, you sure are smart!
>
> Yawn... you're stating the obvious.

WHACK!!!

Mike, you're an idiot.
>

Harry Manback

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 7:21:34 PM11/6/08
to
charliekilo wrote:

>> --
>
> Just curious, since you used Limbaugh as an example, what positions or
> philosophy of his don't you agree with?
>
>

I'm guessing his positions on drug laws.

Grumpy AuContraire

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 10:46:32 PM11/6/08
to

Well, it seems that the Observer has been hoodwinked.


http://www.observer.com/2008/media/consider-posts-lobster


Sounded great while it lasted though...

JT

pitchforks&torches

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 11:07:24 PM11/6/08
to

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Gru...@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message
news:sSOQk.18760$_Y1....@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

WHACK!!!

That seems to happen a lot to NewsCorpse rag pickers, Fox Newz viewers,
El Drugbo's echofans, and you.

>
>
> http://www.observer.com/2008/media/consider-posts-lobster
>
>
> Sounded great while it lasted though...

WHACK!!!

Be sure and let us know when you hear all about the Obamanistas moving through your
neighborhood taking away guns and bibles from any house that didn't plant an Obama
yard sign. And when they come for the first-born Republican male babies, let us know
first and then send an urgent EMail to Drudge...
>
> JT - Justa Tool


Mike Smith

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 1:10:40 AM11/7/08
to


I didn't post bullshit like "There are more acres of forestland in
America today than when Columbus discovered the continent in 1492" and
called it a lie. You're the pea-brain that posted then snipped it.

Mike Smith

charliekilo

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 9:32:29 AM11/7/08
to
"Harry Manback" <h...@aioe.org> wrote in message news:gf01me$b3t$3...@aioe.org...

I reality, over the years Limbaugh said v-e-r-y little about drug wars. I
believe it was Media Matters that went back and since 1988, Limbaugh had two
or three comments on the "drug wars" and those were primarily about street
drugs and the violence associated.


0 new messages