> On Nov 19, 1:13 pm, ALP Fomenting Debt
> <gmsmerk...@carbon.tax.is.ineffective> wrote:
> > On 19/11/2012 11:37 AM, HD wrote:
> > > "ALP Fomenting Debt" <gmsmerk...@carbon.tax.is.ineffective> wrote in
> > > messagenews:k8bpnh$ig3$1@dont-email.me...
> > >> "Senator Barnaby Joyce says a single cow or lamb could effectively
> > >> cost as much as a house, if it meant an abbatoir was pushed over the
> > >> edge and had to pay the carbon tax".
> > >>http://www.canberratimes.com.au/opinion/political-news/joyces-100-roa...
> > >> [Joyce explained patiently (as you do), that if you slaughter a
> > >> million cows and the million-and-first cow crosses the 25,000 tonne
> > >> threshold, then that cow incurs tax for *all* of the cows.
> > >> But do you think anyone in the ALP understood costs (or tax) at the
> > >> margin?]
> > > He certainly doesn't.
> > > If abbatoirs collect the methane gas and use it to generate electricity,
> > > the cost of meat will actually be a lot cheaper.
> > Cost cannot be cheaper - that is self-definitional nonsense - but meat
> > can be cheaper although not in an ALP-run Australia.
> > The ALP's bureaucracy and pointless tax is slowly but surely strangling
> > Australia.
> > >> "The government derided his new claim of extravagantly expensive meals
> > >> as deranged".
> > >> "Senator Joyce said ... 'Seeing that there's a 25,000 tonne limit, and
> > >> then you pay the $23-a-tonne carbon tax, ...'
> > >> 'That next beast costs them 23,000 by $23 which - what's that -
> > >> $575,000 for a beast, so it's costing you vastly more than a $100
> > >> roast, that one'.
> > >> [Speaking of deluded...
> > --
> > Paul Howes...
> > "Labor has an obligation to stop extremists who threaten our democracy"
> > Tanner...
> > "When I joined the Labor Party people joined Labor to change the world.
> > Now they join Labor to run the world".
> > How much new law is there every year?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lePrBUHihKI-Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> You again Blowjob?