Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Radiation (?) question
14 views
Skip to first unread message
felix_unger
May 16, 2012, 10:34:25 PM5/16/12
to
You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
“Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep!”
"The only way right now to restore integrity to our Parliament, to restore the reputation of our polity, is for this sad and sorry Parliament to be dissolved and for there to be an election" - Tony Abbott, Federal Opposition Leader
Give Juliar the boot!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/boot.jpg
Phil Allison
May 16, 2012, 10:45:21 PM5/16/12
to
"felix_unger"
>
> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used it,
> and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I kept
> moving the radio further away, but was still getting the interference. So
> I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to avoid
> interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still picking up
> static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms away! I then took
> it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was still getting
> interference! My question is.. what does this signify or indicate? Does it
> mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way? My experience has
> always been that moving a radio away from electronic devices by just one
> to a few meters will cause the interference to cease. and since the radio
> is battery operated, it cannot be picking up interference via the mains.
> ???. Thanks for any help.
>
> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
** Looks like it has a brush motor like a vacuum cleaner - so there is
> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used it,
> and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I kept
> moving the radio further away, but was still getting the interference. So
> I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to avoid
> interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still picking up
> static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms away! I then took
> it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was still getting
> interference! My question is.. what does this signify or indicate? Does it
> mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way? My experience has
> always been that moving a radio away from electronic devices by just one
> to a few meters will cause the interference to cease. and since the radio
> is battery operated, it cannot be picking up interference via the mains.
> ???. Thanks for any help.
>
> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
arcing on the commutator.
Arcing produces local RFI.
.... Phil
Petzl
May 16, 2012, 11:41:24 PM5/16/12
to
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:34:25 +1000, felix_unger <m...@nothere.com>
wrote:
>
>You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
>electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
>bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
>it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
>kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
>interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
>avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
>picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
>away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
>still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
>indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
>way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
>electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
>interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
>cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>
>This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
Can you take it back it is illegal creating interferance to
transmisions.
There are noise suppresion filters which plug between power point and
device $$
http://tinyurl.com/6uke943
wrote:
>
>You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
>electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
>bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
>it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
>kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
>interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
>avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
>picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
>away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
>still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
>indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
>way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
>electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
>interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
>cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>
>This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
transmisions.
There are noise suppresion filters which plug between power point and
device $$
http://tinyurl.com/6uke943
Phil Allison
May 17, 2012, 12:11:30 AM5/17/12
to
"Petzl"
>>
>>This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
> Can you take it back it is illegal creating interferance to
> transmisions.
The machine has C-Tick approval so whatever EMI it generates is within the
allowed limit.
Noise on the AM band is the least controlled sort of EMI.
.... Phil
Coach
May 17, 2012, 12:31:03 AM5/17/12
to
On May 17, 12:34 pm, felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote:
> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
> indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
> way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
> interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
> cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>
> This is the machine..http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
> indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
> way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
> interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
> cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>
>
> --
> rgds,
>
> Pete
> -------
> “If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
>
> “Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep!”
>
> "The only way right now to restore integrity to our Parliament, to restore the reputation of our polity, is for this sad and sorry Parliament to be dissolved and for there to be an election" - Tony Abbott, Federal Opposition Leader
>
> Give Juliar the boot!..http://ausnet.info/pics/boot.jpg
What sort of fool pays good money for an exercise machine? Just go for
> --
> rgds,
>
> Pete
> -------
> “If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
>
> “Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep!”
>
> "The only way right now to restore integrity to our Parliament, to restore the reputation of our polity, is for this sad and sorry Parliament to be dissolved and for there to be an election" - Tony Abbott, Federal Opposition Leader
>
> Give Juliar the boot!..http://ausnet.info/pics/boot.jpg
a fucking walk or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
with one stone - plus it doesn't cost you anything. Unless or course,
you have an ankle bracelet that doesn't allow you to leave your
residence. If so, carry on.
Trevor Wilson
May 17, 2012, 12:40:54 AM5/17/12
to
Even interference that is within allowable limits.
--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
IamThe99%
May 17, 2012, 1:05:10 AM5/17/12
to
I can’t believe anyone would pay good money for that.
To me it looks too much like “standing up” & "holding on" !
Creating a carbon footprint the size of a small 3rd world country to stand
on a wobbly platform .
You call that exercise?
Couldn’t you buy a ticket on a bus and stand up for the trip, wouldn’t that
be the same thing?
No wonder were living beyond our means, people want to build nuclear power
plants for our “base load” power then waste on exercise machines etc?!.
Phil Allison
May 17, 2012, 1:55:10 AM5/17/12
to
"Coach"
What sort of fool pays good money for an exercise machine? Just go for
a fucking walk or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
with one stone - plus it doesn't cost you anything.
half blind car drivers and vicious dogs.
Not to mention the chances of breaking you ankle or leg b stepping in an
invisible hole in the pavement
PLUS with a running machine, you can sensibly enjoy cold beer and pizza at
the same time as you exercise.
.... Phil ;-)
Trevor Wilson
May 17, 2012, 1:57:53 AM5/17/12
to
fitted with a decent ashtray. Coach wouldn't think of exercising without
a fag (cigarette).
--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
Fred Nurk
May 17, 2012, 2:50:04 AM5/17/12
to
On Thu, 17 May 2012 15:57:53 +1000, Trevor Wilson
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>**That's all well and good, but see if you can find an exercise machine
>fitted with a decent ashtray. Coach wouldn't think of exercising without
>a fag (cigarette).
Coach likes to suck on fags?
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>**That's all well and good, but see if you can find an exercise machine
>fitted with a decent ashtray. Coach wouldn't think of exercising without
>a fag (cigarette).
Coach
May 17, 2012, 12:44:22 AM5/17/12
to
On May 17, 2:40 pm, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:
interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
or something. In other words, use your brain man.
wrote:
> On 5/17/2012 1:41 PM, Petzl wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:34:25 +1000, felix_unger<m...@nothere.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> >> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> >> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
> >> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
> >> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
> >> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
> >> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
> >> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
> >> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
> >> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
> >> indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
> >> way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
> >> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
> >> interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
> >> cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>
> >> This is the machine..http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:34:25 +1000, felix_unger<m...@nothere.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> >> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> >> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
> >> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
> >> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
> >> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
> >> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
> >> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
> >> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
> >> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
> >> indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
> >> way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
> >> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
> >> interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
> >> cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>
>
> > Can you take it back it is illegal creating interferance to
> > transmisions.
> > There are noise suppresion filters which plug between power point and
> > device $$
> >http://tinyurl.com/6uke943
>
> **Waste of money. AM radios are extremely susceptible to interference.
> Even interference that is within allowable limits.
I have to agree with Trev. The better the am radio, the worse the
> > Can you take it back it is illegal creating interferance to
> > transmisions.
> > There are noise suppresion filters which plug between power point and
> > device $$
> >http://tinyurl.com/6uke943
>
> **Waste of money. AM radios are extremely susceptible to interference.
> Even interference that is within allowable limits.
interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
or something. In other words, use your brain man.
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 3:47:33 AM5/17/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used it,
> and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I kept
> moving the radio further away, but was still getting the interference. So
> I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to avoid
> interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still picking up
> static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms away! I then took
> it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was still getting
> interference! My question is.. what does this signify or indicate?
Just that it’s a fucked design that doesn’t give a damn about
radio interference and may even be illegally bad in that regard.
> Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way?
Nope.
> My experience has always been that moving a radio away from electronic
> devices by just one to a few meters will cause the interference to cease.
That’s only because of the interference that’s being
produced by those and whether it uses the mains
power lead as an aerial in effect etc.
> and since the radio is battery operated, it cannot be picking up
> interference via the mains. ???.
Correct. But you will find that badly maintained car
engines with crude wire spark plug leads can do the
same thing and it’s a complete yawn health wise.
Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used it,
> and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I kept
> moving the radio further away, but was still getting the interference. So
> I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to avoid
> interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still picking up
> static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms away! I then took
> it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was still getting
> interference! My question is.. what does this signify or indicate?
radio interference and may even be illegally bad in that regard.
> Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way?
> My experience has always been that moving a radio away from electronic
> devices by just one to a few meters will cause the interference to cease.
produced by those and whether it uses the mains
power lead as an aerial in effect etc.
> and since the radio is battery operated, it cannot be picking up
> interference via the mains. ???.
engines with crude wire spark plug leads can do the
same thing and it’s a complete yawn health wise.
Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 3:50:17 AM5/17/12
to
Phil Allison <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote
> Pretzl wrote
>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>> Can you take it back it is illegal creating interferance to transmisions.
We'll see...
> The machine has C-Tick approval
> so whatever EMI it generates is within the allowed limit.
> Noise on the AM band is the least controlled sort of EMI.
Phil Allison
May 17, 2012, 3:54:48 AM5/17/12
to
"Rod Speed"
>
>> Noise on the AM band is the least controlled sort of EMI.
>
> But you don’t see that effect with such small motors normally.
conditions there is always some EMI.
... Phil
Rheilly Phoull
May 17, 2012, 4:21:51 AM5/17/12
to
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 4:34:47 AM5/17/12
to
Thanks Rod. out of twelve replies, yours is the only one that actually
answered the question..
On 17-May-2012 5:47 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>
>> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro
>> magnetic / electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise?
>> well I recently bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find
>> that when I used it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio
>> went 'beserk'! So I kept moving the radio further away, but was still
>> getting the interference. So I checked to see how far it would need
>> to be removed to avoid interference, and was surprised to discover
>> that it was still picking up static and noise from the exercise
>> machine several rooms away! I then took it outside to a distance of
>> about 15 metres and it was still getting interference! My question
>> is.. what does this signify or indicate?
>
> Just that it’s a fucked design that doesn’t give a damn about
> radio interference and may even be illegally bad in that regard.
>
>> Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way?
>
> Nope.
years?.. :)
>
>> My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
>> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
>> interference to cease.
>
> That’s only because of the interference that’s being
> produced by those and whether it uses the mains
> power lead as an aerial in effect etc.
>
>> and since the radio is battery operated, it cannot be picking up
>> interference via the mains. ???.
>
> Correct. But you will find that badly maintained car
> engines with crude wire spark plug leads can do the
> same thing and it’s a complete yawn health wise.
>
>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
$2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a
three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock
off, what would you buy?
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 4:42:07 AM5/17/12
to
>> What sort of fool pays good money for an exercise machine? Just go for
>> a fucking walk or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
>> with one stone - plus it doesn't cost you anything. Unless or course,
>> you have an ankle bracelet that doesn't allow you to leave your
>> residence. If so, carry on.
> LOL
> I can’t believe anyone would pay good money for that.
didn't you read about the health benefits? It has a similar effect to
>> a fucking walk or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
>> with one stone - plus it doesn't cost you anything. Unless or course,
>> you have an ankle bracelet that doesn't allow you to leave your
>> residence. If so, carry on.
> LOL
> I can’t believe anyone would pay good money for that.
having a body massage, but not as much.
>
> To me it looks too much like “standing up”& "holding on" !
>
> Creating a carbon footprint the size of a small 3rd world country to stand
> on a wobbly platform .
>
> You call that exercise?
>
> Couldn’t you buy a ticket on a bus and stand up for the trip, wouldn’t that
> be the same thing?
>
>
> No wonder were living beyond our means, people want to build nuclear power
> plants for our “base load” power then waste on exercise machines etc?!.
>
>
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 4:46:02 AM5/17/12
to
On 17-May-2012 2:31 PM, Coach wrote:
> On May 17, 12:34 pm, felix_unger<m...@nothere.com> wrote:
>> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
>> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
>> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
>> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
>> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
>> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
>> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
>> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
>> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
>> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
>> indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
>> way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
>> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
>> interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
>> cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>>
>> This is the machine..http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>
>>
> On May 17, 12:34 pm, felix_unger<m...@nothere.com> wrote:
>> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
>> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
>> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
>> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
>> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
>> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
>> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
>> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
>> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
>> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
>> indicate? Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some
>> way? My experience has always been that moving a radio away from
>> electronic devices by just one to a few meters will cause the
>> interference to cease. and since the radio is battery operated, it
>> cannot be picking up interference via the mains. ???. Thanks for any help.
>>
>> This is the machine..http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>
>>
> What sort of fool pays good money for an exercise machine?
So there's bad money??..
> Just go for a fucking walk
for that activity
> or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
> with one stone
> - plus it doesn't cost you anything. Unless or course,
> you have an ankle bracelet that doesn't allow you to leave your
> residence. If so, carry on.
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
TonyS
May 17, 2012, 4:48:14 AM5/17/12
to
There is no need to spend money on exercise machines. I pick them up on
the verge. People through them out when they realise they are too lazy
anyway.
My AM radio picks up static when I just shake out my acrylic blankets.
Tony
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 4:48:08 AM5/17/12
to
time.. and you can watch tv while doing it.
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 4:50:03 AM5/17/12
to
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
Rheilly Phoull
May 17, 2012, 5:23:55 AM5/17/12
to
I think you might just scrape through with the radiation but don't
forget the foil cap :-)
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 5:28:52 AM5/17/12
to
Phil Allison <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Phil Allison <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote
>>> Noise on the AM band is the least controlled sort of EMI.
>> But you don’t see that effect with such small motors normally.
> and at close range
It happens at much more than close range.
> and in weak AM signal conditions there is always some EMI.
But not normally anything like that bad.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Phil Allison <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote
>>> Noise on the AM band is the least controlled sort of EMI.
>> But you don’t see that effect with such small motors normally.
> A 1kW brush motor is NOT small
Few of those exercise machines are anything like that bad EMI wise.
> and at close range
It happens at much more than close range.
> and in weak AM signal conditions there is always some EMI.
keithr
May 17, 2012, 5:31:16 AM5/17/12
to
On 17/05/2012 3:55 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
> What sort of fool pays good money for an exercise machine? Just go for
> a fucking walk or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
> with one stone - plus it doesn't cost you anything.
>
> ** Well, going running in the burbs puts a soul at the mercy of the weather,
> half blind car drivers and vicious dogs.
>
> Not to mention the chances of breaking you ankle or leg b stepping in an
> invisible hole in the pavement
Just move somewhere reasonable where you can run on the beach.
> What sort of fool pays good money for an exercise machine? Just go for
> a fucking walk or a run - and take your radio with you. Kill 2 birds
> with one stone - plus it doesn't cost you anything.
>
> ** Well, going running in the burbs puts a soul at the mercy of the weather,
> half blind car drivers and vicious dogs.
>
> Not to mention the chances of breaking you ankle or leg b stepping in an
> invisible hole in the pavement
keithr
May 17, 2012, 5:34:24 AM5/17/12
to
On 17/05/2012 2:44 PM, Coach wrote:
>>> There are noise suppresion filters which plug between power point and
>>> device $$
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6uke943
>>
>> **Waste of money. AM radios are extremely susceptible to interference.
>> Even interference that is within allowable limits.
>
> I have to agree with Trev. The better the am radio, the worse the
> interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
> a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
> or something. In other words, use your brain man.
>
Useless telling Felix to listen to FM, his hero Alan Jones is only on AM
>>> There are noise suppresion filters which plug between power point and
>>> device $$
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6uke943
>>
>> **Waste of money. AM radios are extremely susceptible to interference.
>> Even interference that is within allowable limits.
>
> I have to agree with Trev. The better the am radio, the worse the
> interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
> a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
> or something. In other words, use your brain man.
>
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 5:34:05 AM5/17/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> Thanks Rod. out of twelve replies, yours is the only one that actually
> answered the question..
No problem.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
>>> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
>>> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
>>> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
>>> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
>>> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
>>> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
>>> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
>>> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
>>> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
>>> indicate?
>> Just that it’s a fucked design that doesn’t give a damn about
>> radio interference and may even be illegally bad in that regard.
>>> Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way?
>> Nope.
> Well that's my only concern.
Then you can carry on regardless...
> So I'm gonna live for another twenty years?.. :)
Depends on what else you get up to |-(
>>> My experience has always been that moving a radio away from electronic
>>> devices by just one to a few meters will cause the interference to
>>> cease.
>> That’s only because of the interference that’s being
>> produced by those and whether it uses the mains
>> power lead as an aerial in effect etc.
>>> and since the radio is battery operated, it cannot be picking up
>>> interference via the mains. ???.
>> Correct. But you will find that badly maintained car
>> engines with crude wire spark plug leads can do the
>> same thing and it’s a complete yawn health wise.
>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines for
> $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a three
> to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what
> would you buy?
I wouldn’t buy either. I just walk, well away from the burbs.
Likely that’s rather easier for me to do than for you tho.
> Thanks Rod. out of twelve replies, yours is the only one that actually
> answered the question..
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> You know how when you move a battery radio close to a electro magnetic /
>>> electro mechanical device, it picks up static and noise? well I recently
>>> bought an exercise machine, and was surprised to find that when I used
>>> it, and was listening to a radio nearby, the radio went 'beserk'! So I
>>> kept moving the radio further away, but was still getting the
>>> interference. So I checked to see how far it would need to be removed to
>>> avoid interference, and was surprised to discover that it was still
>>> picking up static and noise from the exercise machine several rooms
>>> away! I then took it outside to a distance of about 15 metres and it was
>>> still getting interference! My question is.. what does this signify or
>>> indicate?
>> Just that it’s a fucked design that doesn’t give a damn about
>> radio interference and may even be illegally bad in that regard.
>>> Does it mean that the machine is harmful to health in some way?
>> Nope.
> Well that's my only concern.
> So I'm gonna live for another twenty years?.. :)
>>> My experience has always been that moving a radio away from electronic
>>> devices by just one to a few meters will cause the interference to
>>> cease.
>> That’s only because of the interference that’s being
>> produced by those and whether it uses the mains
>> power lead as an aerial in effect etc.
>>> and since the radio is battery operated, it cannot be picking up
>>> interference via the mains. ???.
>> Correct. But you will find that badly maintained car
>> engines with crude wire spark plug leads can do the
>> same thing and it’s a complete yawn health wise.
>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines for
> $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a three
> to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what
> would you buy?
Likely that’s rather easier for me to do than for you tho.
Petzl
May 17, 2012, 5:43:02 AM5/17/12
to
On Thu, 17 May 2012 16:48:14 +0800, TonyS <nos...@mymail.com> wrote:
>My AM radio picks up static when I just shake out my acrylic blankets.
>
>Tony
I too no longer have wet dreams I also have dust storms
>My AM radio picks up static when I just shake out my acrylic blankets.
>
>Tony
--
Petzl
Petzl
May 17, 2012, 5:48:12 AM5/17/12
to
On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:34:05 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I wouldn’t buy either. I just walk, well away from the burbs.
>
>Likely that’s rather easier for me to do than for you tho.
>
This though is a vibrator don't think the Asian girl gets on with you?
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I wouldn’t buy either. I just walk, well away from the burbs.
>
>Likely that’s rather easier for me to do than for you tho.
>
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 6:10:53 AM5/17/12
to
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 6:13:18 AM5/17/12
to
get a $200 one, would you.
> I just walk, well away from the burbs.
>
> Likely that’s rather easier for me to do than for you tho.
>
>
TonyS
May 17, 2012, 6:16:31 AM5/17/12
to
Phil Allison
May 17, 2012, 7:13:27 AM5/17/12
to
"Rod Speedbot is a DUMB CUNT"
>
>> Noise on the AM band is the least controlled sort of EMI.
>
> But you don't see that effect with such small motors normally.
conditions there is always some EMI.
FUCKWIT !!
... Phil
F Murtz
May 17, 2012, 11:56:55 AM5/17/12
to
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 3:12:39 PM5/17/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
If I wanted one of those, I'd buy one
at a garage sale for much less again.
>> I just walk, well away from the burbs.
> Hate walking. It's boring.
That’s why I load the phone with what I download from
the ABC's Radio National and listen to that when I walk.
> I play golf! :)
I walk a hell of a lot further than the golfers ever do.
at a garage sale for much less again.
>> I just walk, well away from the burbs.
> Hate walking. It's boring.
the ABC's Radio National and listen to that when I walk.
> I play golf! :)
I walk a hell of a lot further than the golfers ever do.
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 3:15:23 PM5/17/12
to
Some completely unemployable fuckwit
ex toaster molester claiming to be
Phil Allison <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote
just the mindless silly shit you'd expect
from a completely unemployable fuckwit
ex toaster molester
ex toaster molester claiming to be
Phil Allison <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote
just the mindless silly shit you'd expect
from a completely unemployable fuckwit
ex toaster molester
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 8:38:26 PM5/17/12
to
On 18-May-2012 5:12 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine
>>>> with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a
>>>> Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>> I wouldn’t buy either.
>
>> Yes but if you were going to, you wouldn't spend 2 or 3K when you can
>> get a $200 one, would you.
>
> If I wanted one of those, I'd buy one
> at a garage sale for much less again.
If you could find one. and how much time and petrol would you waste looking?
>
>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine
>>>> with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a
>>>> Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>> I wouldn’t buy either.
>
>> Yes but if you were going to, you wouldn't spend 2 or 3K when you can
>> get a $200 one, would you.
>
> If I wanted one of those, I'd buy one
> at a garage sale for much less again.
felix_unger
May 17, 2012, 8:39:24 PM5/17/12
to
On 18-May-2012 1:56 AM, F Murtz wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>
>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>
>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines for
>> $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a
>> three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock
>> off, what would you buy?
>>
>
>
> Neither,both completely useless.
and you're an expert, of course..
>
>>>
>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>
>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>
>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines for
>> $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a
>> three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock
>> off, what would you buy?
>>
>
>
> Neither,both completely useless.
Phil Allison
May 17, 2012, 10:00:13 PM5/17/12
to
SG1
May 17, 2012, 6:06:59 PM5/17/12
to
"felix_unger" <m...@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:a1k1a6...@mid.individual.net...
> On 17-May-2012 7:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>
> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
Ah!! A good walk spoiled.
>
>
> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 11:43:39 PM5/17/12
to
SG1 <los...@the.races.com> wrote
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
We used to practice engine failure on takeoff which involved
landing on the golf course with no engine power.
I used to deliberately leave it to the last minute to apply power
and head up again, but never did manage to quite get any
of the golfers to actually run away. Certainly ruined their golf
a few times tho.
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
> Ah!! A good walk spoiled.
Specially with our golf course which is adjacent to the airport.
>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
> Ah!! A good walk spoiled.
We used to practice engine failure on takeoff which involved
landing on the golf course with no engine power.
I used to deliberately leave it to the last minute to apply power
and head up again, but never did manage to quite get any
of the golfers to actually run away. Certainly ruined their golf
a few times tho.
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 11:45:36 PM5/17/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Yes but if you were going to, you wouldn't spend 2 or 3K when you can
>>> get a $200 one, would you.
>> If I wanted one of those, I'd buy one
>> at a garage sale for much less again.
> If you could find one.
There's always plenty of that sort of shit that doesn�t work.
> and how much time and petrol would you waste looking?
None, because I do the garage sales anyway.
> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with
>>>>> a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese
>>>>> knock off, what would you buy?
>>>> I wouldn�t buy either.
>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with
>>>>> a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese
>>>>> knock off, what would you buy?
>>> Yes but if you were going to, you wouldn't spend 2 or 3K when you can
>>> get a $200 one, would you.
>> If I wanted one of those, I'd buy one
>> at a garage sale for much less again.
> If you could find one.
> and how much time and petrol would you waste looking?
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 11:48:13 PM5/17/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
They don’t work.
Treadmills do work tho and do have some advantages over
walking outside the house instead.
> F Murtz wrote
>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines for
>>> $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a
>>> three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock
>>> off, what would you buy?
>> Neither,both completely useless.
> and you're an expert, of course..
Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines for
>>> $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with a
>>> three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese knock
>>> off, what would you buy?
>> Neither,both completely useless.
> and you're an expert, of course..
They don’t work.
Treadmills do work tho and do have some advantages over
walking outside the house instead.
Rod Speed
May 17, 2012, 11:48:47 PM5/17/12
to
Phil Allison
May 18, 2012, 12:10:37 AM5/18/12
to
"The Speedbot is TROLLING DUMB CUNT"
ster
TonyS
May 18, 2012, 12:33:29 AM5/18/12
to
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 2:32:18 AM5/18/12
to
TonyS <nos...@mymail.com> wrote
You werent the first to say that |-)
Some even shook their fist at us when we applied full power again.
We never had anyone try to hit us with a golf ball tho
or at least they never managed to hit the plane.
Some even shook their fist at us when we applied full power again.
We never had anyone try to hit us with a golf ball tho
or at least they never managed to hit the plane.
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 2:45:28 AM5/18/12
to
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 2:46:33 AM5/18/12
to
On 18-May-2012 1:48 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine
>>>> with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a
>>>> Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
> Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>
> They don’t work.
easy to claim..
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine
>>>> with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a
>>>> Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
> Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>
> They don’t work.
>
> Treadmills do work tho and do have some advantages over
> walking outside the house instead.
keithr
May 18, 2012, 5:42:42 AM5/18/12
to
On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 5:46:12 AM5/18/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> They don�t work.
> easy to claim..
Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with
>>>>> a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese
>>>>> knock off, what would you buy?
>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>> Don�t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine with
>>>>> a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a Chinese
>>>>> knock off, what would you buy?
>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>> They don�t work.
> easy to claim..
Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 5:47:32 AM5/18/12
to
keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote
aint...
> felix_unger wrote
>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
Not when I am practicing engine failure on takeoff on the fairways it
>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
aint...
SG1
May 18, 2012, 6:32:25 AM5/18/12
to
news:a1m9gj...@mid.individual.net...
>
> --
> rgds,
>
> Pete
> -------
> �If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
> sheep!�
> On 18-May-2012 8:06 AM, SG1 wrote:
>
>>
>> "felix_unger" <m...@nothere.com> wrote in message
>> news:a1k1a6...@mid.individual.net...
>>> On 17-May-2012 7:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>
>> Ah!! A good walk spoiled.
>>
>
> Only those who can't play golf say that.. :)
Even the "Tiger" is spoiling his walks recently!!!!!
>
>>
>> "felix_unger" <m...@nothere.com> wrote in message
>> news:a1k1a6...@mid.individual.net...
>>> On 17-May-2012 7:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>
>> Ah!! A good walk spoiled.
>>
>
> Only those who can't play golf say that.. :)
>
> --
> rgds,
>
> Pete
> -------
> �If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
>
> "Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because
> they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor
> governments"
>
> "If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average
> temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years,
> perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
>
> �Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead
> "Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because
> they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor
> governments"
>
> "If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average
> temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years,
> perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
>
> sheep!�
keithr
May 18, 2012, 7:29:20 AM5/18/12
to
On 17/05/2012 8:10 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 17-May-2012 7:34 PM, keithr wrote:
>
>>> I have to agree with Trev. The better the am radio, the worse the
>>> interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
>>> a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
>>> or something. In other words, use your brain man.
>>>
>> Useless telling Felix to listen to FM, his hero Alan Jones is only on AM
>
> Not in Melbourne..
>
Andrew Bolt then, they're all the same.
> On 17-May-2012 7:34 PM, keithr wrote:
>
>>> I have to agree with Trev. The better the am radio, the worse the
>>> interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
>>> a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
>>> or something. In other words, use your brain man.
>>>
>> Useless telling Felix to listen to FM, his hero Alan Jones is only on AM
>
> Not in Melbourne..
>
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 7:41:00 AM5/18/12
to
"Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural
environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is played
regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch golf. Golf
has the record for an individual sports-person earning the highest
amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900
million in his career so far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010
from winnings and endorsements alone. "
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
�If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 7:43:44 AM5/18/12
to
On 18-May-2012 9:29 PM, keithr took his nose out of reading 'The Age'
long enuff to write..:
Just like you lefties..
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
“Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep!”
long enuff to write..:
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 8:48:55 AM5/18/12
to
On 18-May-2012 7:46 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality'
>>>>>> machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction)
>>>>>> for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
>>> Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality'
>>>>>> machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction)
>>>>>> for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
>
>>> They don’t work.
>
>> easy to claim..
>
> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
already have proven you wrong
>> easy to claim..
>
> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>
>>> Treadmills do work tho and do have some advantages over walking
>>> outside the house instead.
>
>
Wolfgang Wildeblood
May 18, 2012, 11:18:40 AM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 7:41 pm, felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote:
> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>
> > On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>
> >> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
> > Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
Golfers are wankers.
> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>
> > On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>
> >> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
> > Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 3:25:45 PM5/18/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> keithr wrote
> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
> requiring a partner).
Just because some fool claims something doesn’t make it gospel.
Bet its not even as popular as solitaire or freecell either.
> It is a game where focus is completely on individual brilliance
Individual terminal stupidity, actually.
> - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
Even sillier. Of course it is.
> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
> unmatched by any other sport.
Even sillier with walking leaving that for dead.
> Though the sport is played regularly only by the wealthier class,
Even sillier.
> people love to watch golf.
Nothing like as many as watch various codes of football.
> Golf has the record for an individual sports-
> person earning the highest amount of money ever.
Whoopy fucking do.
> As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his career so
> far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and
> endorsements alone. "
Whoopy fucking do.
> keithr wrote
>> felix_unger wrote
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
Like hell it is. Walking and wanking are MUCH more popular.
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
> requiring a partner).
Bet its not even as popular as solitaire or freecell either.
> It is a game where focus is completely on individual brilliance
> - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
> unmatched by any other sport.
> Though the sport is played regularly only by the wealthier class,
> people love to watch golf.
> Golf has the record for an individual sports-
> person earning the highest amount of money ever.
> As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his career so
> far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and
> endorsements alone. "
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 3:29:47 PM5/18/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine
>>>>>>> with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a
>>>>>>> Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>>>> Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>>>> They don’t work.
>>> easy to claim..
>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
> already have proven you wrong
Like hell you have.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of machines
>>>>>>> for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality' machine
>>>>>>> with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction) for a
>>>>>>> Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>>>> Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>>>> They don’t work.
>>> easy to claim..
>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
> already have proven you wrong
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 4:53:04 PM5/18/12
to
On 19-May-2012 5:25 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> keithr wrote
>>> felix_unger wrote
>
>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
> Like hell it is.
fact. live with it!
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> keithr wrote
>>> felix_unger wrote
>
>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
> Like hell it is.
> Walking and wanking are MUCH more popular.
>
>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>> requiring a partner).
>
>
> Bet its not even as popular as solitaire or freecell either.
neither are sports
> Bet its not even as popular as solitaire or freecell either.
>
>> It is a game where focus is completely on individual brilliance
>
> Individual terminal stupidity, actually.
>
>> - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
>
> Even sillier. Of course it is.
>
>> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
>> unmatched by any other sport.
>
> Even sillier with walking leaving that for dead.
>
>> Though the sport is played regularly only by the wealthier class,
>
> Even sillier.
>
>> people love to watch golf.
>
> Nothing like as many as watch various codes of football.
>
>> Golf has the record for an individual sports-
>> person earning the highest amount of money ever.
>
> Whoopy fucking do.
>
>> As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his
>> career so far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings
>> and endorsements alone. "
>
> Whoopy fucking do.
>
>
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 4:54:15 PM5/18/12
to
On 19-May-2012 5:29 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a
>>>>>>>> 'quality' machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200
>>>>>>>> (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
>>>>> Don�t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a
>>>>>>>> 'quality' machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200
>>>>>>>> (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
>
>>>>> They don�t work.
>
>>>> easy to claim..
>
>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>
>> already have proven you wrong
>
> Like hell you have.
never used one have you
>>>> easy to claim..
>
>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>
>> already have proven you wrong
>
> Like hell you have.
>
>>>>> Treadmills do work tho and do have some advantages over walking
>>>>> outside the house instead.
>
>
>
rgds,
Pete
-------
�If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
SG1
May 18, 2012, 6:11:04 PM5/18/12
to
news:a1mqqp...@mid.individual.net...
>
> --
> rgds,
>
> Pete
> -------
> “If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
> sheep!”
> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>
>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on individual
> brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
> unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is played regularly only by
> the wealthier class, people love to watch golf. Golf has the record for an
> individual sports-person earning the highest amount of money ever. As of
> 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his career so far.
> He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and endorsements
> alone. "
Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport, except in SA where it is wanking.
>
>> On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>
>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on individual
> brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
> unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is played regularly only by
> the wealthier class, people love to watch golf. Golf has the record for an
> individual sports-person earning the highest amount of money ever. As of
> 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his career so far.
> He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and endorsements
> alone. "
>
> --
> rgds,
>
> Pete
> -------
> “If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
>
> "Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because
> they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor
> governments"
>
> "If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average
> temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years,
> perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
>
> “Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead
> "Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because
> they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor
> governments"
>
> "If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average
> temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years,
> perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
>
> sheep!”
keithr
May 18, 2012, 6:36:04 PM5/18/12
to
On 18/05/2012 9:43 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 18-May-2012 9:29 PM, keithr took his nose out of reading 'The Age'
> long enuff to write..:
I don't live in Melbourne or anywhere near it so I do not read 'The
> On 18-May-2012 9:29 PM, keithr took his nose out of reading 'The Age'
> long enuff to write..:
Age'. Try again hypochondriac boy.
>> On 17/05/2012 8:10 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>> On 17-May-2012 7:34 PM, keithr wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I have to agree with Trev. The better the am radio, the worse the
>>>>> interference susceptibility is. Either tune into a FM station, or buy
>>>>> a really cheap am radio, or exercise on your machine listening to a cd
>>>>> or something. In other words, use your brain man.
>>>>>
>>>> Useless telling Felix to listen to FM, his hero Alan Jones is only
>>>> on AM
>>>
>>> Not in Melbourne..
>>>
>> Andrew Bolt then, they're all the same.
>
> Just like you lefties..
>
just have to have a balanced outlook on life.
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 7:13:47 PM5/18/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> live with it!
Nothing to 'live' with.
>> Walking and wanking are MUCH more popular.
> neither are sports
Wrong, as always. And fuck all play golf solo anyway.
>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>> requiring a partner).
>> Just because some fool claims something doesn’t make it gospel.
>> Bet its not even as popular as solitaire or freecell either.
> neither are sports
Wrong, as always. And fuck all play golf solo anyway.
>>> It is a game where focus is completely on individual brilliance
>> Individual terminal stupidity, actually.
> not
Fraid so.
>>> - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
>> Even sillier. Of course it is.
> wrong. there's no 'opponent' in golf
Wrong, as always. And fuck all play golf solo anyway.
>>> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
>>> unmatched by any other sport.
>> Even sillier with walking leaving that for dead.
>>> Though the sport is played regularly only by the wealthier class,
>> Even sillier.
>>> people love to watch golf.
>> Nothing like as many as watch various codes of football.
> no comparison was made
It was a pointless claim when FAR more love to watch other sports.
>>> Golf has the record for an individual sports-
>>> person earning the highest amount of money ever.
>> Whoopy fucking do.
>>> As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his career
>>> so far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and
>>> endorsements alone. "
>> Whoopy fucking do.
> jealous Rod? :)
Nope, not stupid enough waste even 5 minutes on such a stupid 'sport'
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> keithr wrote
>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>> Like hell it is.
> fact.
Its nothing like a fact, just another lie.
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> keithr wrote
>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>> Like hell it is.
> fact.
> live with it!
Nothing to 'live' with.
>> Walking and wanking are MUCH more popular.
> neither are sports
>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>> requiring a partner).
>> Bet its not even as popular as solitaire or freecell either.
> neither are sports
>>> It is a game where focus is completely on individual brilliance
>> Individual terminal stupidity, actually.
> not
>>> - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by the opponent's.
>> Even sillier. Of course it is.
> wrong. there's no 'opponent' in golf
>>> A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural environment
>>> unmatched by any other sport.
>> Even sillier with walking leaving that for dead.
>>> Though the sport is played regularly only by the wealthier class,
>> Even sillier.
>>> people love to watch golf.
>> Nothing like as many as watch various codes of football.
> no comparison was made
>>> Golf has the record for an individual sports-
>>> person earning the highest amount of money ever.
>> Whoopy fucking do.
>>> As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900 million in his career
>>> so far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and
>>> endorsements alone. "
>> Whoopy fucking do.
> jealous Rod? :)
keithr
May 18, 2012, 7:17:29 PM5/18/12
to
On 18/05/2012 9:41 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>
>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
> the opponent's.
The same is true of running, sailing, kyaking, and rock climbing but I
> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>
>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>
>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
> the opponent's.
don't suppose that you'd have the balls to try those.
In fact, I'd say that these days running is far more popular than golf,
and it is much cheaper.
Rod Speed
May 18, 2012, 7:19:15 PM5/18/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality'
>>>>>>>>> machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction)
>>>>>>>>> for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>>>>>> Don�t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>>>>>> They don�t work.
>>>>> easy to claim..
>>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>>> already have proven you wrong
>> Like hell you have.
> never used one have you
Irrelevant to your lie about proof.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a 'quality'
>>>>>>>>> machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200 (at auction)
>>>>>>>>> for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>>>>>> Don�t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless times.
>>>>>> They don�t work.
>>>>> easy to claim..
>>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>>> already have proven you wrong
>> Like hell you have.
> never used one have you
Have fun listing even a single peer reviewed scientific paper
that shows that they do anything at all except pump your wallet.
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 8:29:44 PM5/18/12
to
arguments on usenet??
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 8:31:15 PM5/18/12
to
On 19-May-2012 8:11 AM, SG1 wrote:
>
> "felix_unger" <m...@nothere.com> wrote in message
> news:a1mqqp...@mid.individual.net...
>> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>>
>>> On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>
>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>
>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>
>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>> the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and
>> natural environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is
>> played regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch
>> golf. Golf has the record for an individual sports-person earning the
>> highest amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned
>> close to $900 million in his career so far. He has earned around $90
>> million in 2010 from winnings and endorsements alone. "
>
> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport. That is the statistical
>
> "felix_unger" <m...@nothere.com> wrote in message
> news:a1mqqp...@mid.individual.net...
>> On 18-May-2012 7:42 PM, keithr wrote:
>>
>>> On 17/05/2012 8:13 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>
>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>
>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>
>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>> the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and
>> natural environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is
>> played regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch
>> golf. Golf has the record for an individual sports-person earning the
>> highest amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned
>> close to $900 million in his career so far. He has earned around $90
>> million in 2010 from winnings and endorsements alone. "
>
> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
fact. Like it or lump it.
> except in SA where it is wanking.
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 18, 2012, 8:35:00 PM5/18/12
to
On 19-May-2012 9:13 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>
>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
>>> Like hell it is.
>
>> fact.
>
> Its nothing like a fact, just another lie.
>
>> live with it!
>
> Nothing to 'live' with.
are you going to remain stupid for what's left of your life?..
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>
>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
>>> Like hell it is.
>
>> fact.
>
> Its nothing like a fact, just another lie.
>
>> live with it!
>
> Nothing to 'live' with.
>
>>> Walking and wanking are MUCH more popular.
>
>> neither are sports
>
> Wrong, as always. And fuck all play golf solo anyway.
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
F Murtz
May 18, 2012, 11:01:19 PM5/18/12
to
arguments.
keithr
May 18, 2012, 11:44:36 PM5/18/12
to
little fists on the table in frustration.
Rod Speed
May 19, 2012, 12:04:07 AM5/19/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> keithr wrote
> That is the statistical fact.
Another bare faced lie.
> Like it or lump it.
We just tell you it�s a lie instead.
>>> keithr wrote
>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>>> the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural
>>> environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is played
>>> regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch golf. Golf
>>> has the record for an individual sports-person earning the highest
>>> amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900
>>> million in his career so far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010
>>> from winnings and endorsements alone. "
>> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
> Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport.
You can repeat that lie till you are blue in the face, it�s a lie.
>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>>> the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and natural
>>> environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is played
>>> regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch golf. Golf
>>> has the record for an individual sports-person earning the highest
>>> amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close to $900
>>> million in his career so far. He has earned around $90 million in 2010
>>> from winnings and endorsements alone. "
>> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
> Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport.
> That is the statistical fact.
> Like it or lump it.
Rod Speed
May 19, 2012, 12:08:08 AM5/19/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>>> Like hell it is.
>>> fact.
>> Its nothing like a fact, just another lie.
>>> live with it!
>> Nothing to 'live' with.
> are you going to remain stupid for what's left of your life?..
Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>>> Like hell it is.
>>> fact.
>> Its nothing like a fact, just another lie.
>>> live with it!
>> Nothing to 'live' with.
> are you going to remain stupid for what's left of your life?..
>>>> Walking and wanking are MUCH more popular.
>>> neither are sports
>> Wrong, as always. And fuck all play golf solo anyway.
> Solo means not played against an opponent.
felix_unger
May 19, 2012, 2:27:03 AM5/19/12
to
people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
felix_unger
May 19, 2012, 2:28:46 AM5/19/12
to
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 19, 2012, 2:31:16 AM5/19/12
to
On 19-May-2012 2:04 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> SG1 wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>
>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
>>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced
>>>> by the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and
>>>> natural environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport
>>>> is played regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to
>>>> watch golf. Golf has the record for an individual sports-person
>>>> earning the highest amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods
>>>> has earned close to $900 million in his career so far. He has
>>>> earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and endorsements
>>>> alone. "
>
>>> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
>
>> Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport.
>
> You can repeat that lie till you are blue in the face, it�s a lie.
not. google it
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> SG1 wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>
>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>
>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>
>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>
>>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced
>>>> by the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and
>>>> natural environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport
>>>> is played regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to
>>>> watch golf. Golf has the record for an individual sports-person
>>>> earning the highest amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods
>>>> has earned close to $900 million in his career so far. He has
>>>> earned around $90 million in 2010 from winnings and endorsements
>>>> alone. "
>
>>> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
>
>> Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport.
>
> You can repeat that lie till you are blue in the face, it�s a lie.
>
>> That is the statistical fact.
>
> Another bare faced lie.
>
>> Like it or lump it.
>
> We just tell you it�s a lie instead.
>
>>> except in SA where it is wanking.
>
>
felix_unger
May 19, 2012, 2:32:21 AM5/19/12
to
On 19-May-2012 2:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
> just complete and utter stupidity
as usual
> just complete and utter stupidity
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
�If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
Rod Speed
May 19, 2012, 3:16:27 AM5/19/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>> keithr wrote
>>>> The same is true of running, sailing, kyaking, and rock climbing but I
>>>> don't suppose that you'd have the balls to try those.
>>>> In fact, I'd say that these days running is far more popular than golf,
>>>> and it is much cheaper.
>>> Get lost wanker! don't you have anything better to do than try to start
>>> arguments on usenet??
> so it's not a case of 'pot/kettle'.
Another mindlessly silly lie.
> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
Because you spew mindless silly shit and quite a few keep pointing that out
to you.
> F Murtz wrote
>> felix_unger wrote
>>> keithr wrote
>> felix_unger wrote
>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>>>>> the opponent's.
Complete pack of mindless silly lies.
>>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>>>>> the opponent's.
>>>> The same is true of running, sailing, kyaking, and rock climbing but I
>>>> don't suppose that you'd have the balls to try those.
>>>> In fact, I'd say that these days running is far more popular than golf,
>>>> and it is much cheaper.
>>> Get lost wanker! don't you have anything better to do than try to start
>>> arguments on usenet??
Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
>> Pot kettle, I don't suppose you realize that "all" your posts start
>> arguments.
> But I don't start the arguments.
The last two of your posts did just that, child.
>> arguments.
> But I don't start the arguments.
> so it's not a case of 'pot/kettle'.
> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
to you.
Rod Speed
May 19, 2012, 3:19:27 AM5/19/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> not.
Fraid so.
> google it
No point, I know that all of walking, wanking, fishing etc
etc etc are MUCH more popular solo sports than golf.
>>> That is the statistical fact.
>> Another bare faced lie.
>>> Like it or lump it.
>> We just tell you it’s a lie instead.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> SG1 wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>>>>> the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and
>>>>> natural environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is
>>>>> played regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch
>>>>> golf. Golf has the record for an individual sports-person earning the
>>>>> highest amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close
>>>>> to $900 million in his career so far. He has earned around $90 million
>>>>> in 2010 from winnings and endorsements alone. "
>>>> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
>>> Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport.
>> You can repeat that lie till you are blue in the face, it’s a lie.
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> SG1 wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> keithr wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger wrote
>>>>>>> Hate walking. It's boring. I play golf! :)
>>>>>> Oh god! The most boring activity ever invented by man.
>>>>> I guess that's why it's the most popular solo sport in the world..
>>>>> "Golf is the most popular sport which can be played solo (without
>>>>> requiring a partner). It is a game where focus is completely on
>>>>> individual brilliance - ones performance in Golf is not influenced by
>>>>> the opponent's. A golf course can offer unique scenic beauty and
>>>>> natural environment unmatched by any other sport. Though the sport is
>>>>> played regularly only by the wealthier class, people love to watch
>>>>> golf. Golf has the record for an individual sports-person earning the
>>>>> highest amount of money ever. As of 2010, Tiger Woods has earned close
>>>>> to $900 million in his career so far. He has earned around $90 million
>>>>> in 2010 from winnings and endorsements alone. "
>>>> Fishing is "THE" most popular solo sport,
>>> Golf is the worlds most popular solo sport.
> not.
Fraid so.
> google it
No point, I know that all of walking, wanking, fishing etc
etc etc are MUCH more popular solo sports than golf.
>>> That is the statistical fact.
>> Another bare faced lie.
>>> Like it or lump it.
keithr
May 19, 2012, 3:22:02 AM5/19/12
to
On 19/05/2012 4:28 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>> Get lost wanker! don't you have anything better to do than try to start
>>> arguments on usenet??
>>
>> Oh dear poor little felix lost the argument, now he is beating his
>> little fists on the table in frustration.
>
> There's wasn't any argument. but you're too stupid to realize that.
>
If there wasn't an argument, why are you accusing me of starting one?
>>> Get lost wanker! don't you have anything better to do than try to start
>>> arguments on usenet??
>>
>> Oh dear poor little felix lost the argument, now he is beating his
>> little fists on the table in frustration.
>
> There's wasn't any argument. but you're too stupid to realize that.
>
felix_unger
May 19, 2012, 3:49:05 AM5/19/12
to
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
�If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
"Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor governments"
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
felix_unger
May 26, 2012, 11:05:32 PM5/26/12
to
>> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
>
> Because you spew mindless silly shit and quite a few keep pointing
> that out to you.
rather it's because my profound wisdom is beyond their ability to cope,
>
> Because you spew mindless silly shit and quite a few keep pointing
> that out to you.
so feeling slighted, they respond with unjustified criticism and stupid
comment, just like you.. :)
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
�If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!�
felix_unger
May 26, 2012, 11:15:06 PM5/26/12
to
On 19-May-2012 9:19 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a
>>>>>>>>>> 'quality' machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200
>>>>>>>>>> (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>>>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
>>>>>>> Don’t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless
> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>
>>>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a
>>>>>>>>>> 'quality' machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200
>>>>>>>>>> (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>
>>>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>
>>>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>
>>>>>>> times.
>
>>>>>>> They don’t work.
>
>>>>>> easy to claim..
>
>>>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>
>>>> already have proven you wrong
>
>>> Like hell you have.
>
>> never used one have you
>
> Irrelevant to your lie about proof.
proved you wrong by personal experience, peabrain
>>>>>> easy to claim..
>
>>>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>
>>>> already have proven you wrong
>
>>> Like hell you have.
>
>> never used one have you
>
> Irrelevant to your lie about proof.
>
> Have fun listing even a single peer reviewed scientific paper
> that shows that they do anything at all except pump your wallet.
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
“If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”
“Juliar will fine business up to $1.1 million for lies about the carbon tax. What will she pay for her whopper?!”
"The only way right now to restore integrity to our Parliament, to
restore the reputation of our polity, is for this sad and sorry
Parliament to be dissolved and for there to be an election" - Tony
Abbott, Federal Opposition Leader
"If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average
temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years,
perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
“Wayne Swan threatening the Banks, is a bit like being savaged by a dead sheep!”
temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years,
perhaps over on thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner
Give Juliar the boot!..http://ausnet.info/pics/boot.jpg
Rod Speed
May 27, 2012, 12:08:12 AM5/27/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
>> Because you spew mindless silly shit and
>> quite a few keep pointing that out to you.
> rather it's because my profound wisdom is beyond their
> ability to cope, so feeling slighted, they respond with
> unjustified criticism and stupid comment, just like you.. :)
You never ever could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag.
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
>> Because you spew mindless silly shit and
>> quite a few keep pointing that out to you.
> rather it's because my profound wisdom is beyond their
> ability to cope, so feeling slighted, they respond with
> unjustified criticism and stupid comment, just like you.. :)
Rod Speed
May 27, 2012, 12:15:06 AM5/27/12
to
felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a
>>>>>>>>>>> 'quality' machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200
>>>>>>>>>>> (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>>>>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>>>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>>>>>>>> Don�t need to be, that sort of thing has been tested countless
> Rod Speed wrote
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the machine.. http://tinyurl.com/home-exercise-gym
>>>>>>>>>>>> Typical chinese shit, the bimbo even has slitty eyes.
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, but at the home show they were selling these type of
>>>>>>>>>>> machines for $2000 - $3500. So two or three grand for a
>>>>>>>>>>> 'quality' machine with a three to five year warranty, or $200
>>>>>>>>>>> (at auction) for a Chinese knock off, what would you buy?
>>>>>>>>>> Neither,both completely useless.
>>>>>>>>> and you're an expert, of course..
>>>>>>>> times.
>>>>>>>> They don�t work.
>>>>>>> easy to claim..
>>>>>> Easy to prove too. You are about to do that yourself.
>>>>> already have proven you wrong
>>>> Like hell you have.
>>> never used one have you
>> Irrelevant to your lie about proof.
> proved you wrong by personal experience
>> Have fun listing even a single peer reviewed scientific paper
>> that shows that they do anything at all except pump your wallet.
> google is your fiend..
keithr
May 27, 2012, 6:21:53 PM5/27/12
to
On 27/05/2012 1:05 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 19-May-2012 5:16 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>
>>
>>> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
>>
>> Because you spew mindless silly shit and quite a few keep pointing
>> that out to you.
>
> rather it's because my profound wisdom is beyond their ability to cope,
> so feeling slighted, they respond with unjustified criticism and stupid
> comment, just like you.. :)
>
>
Hmm a very severe case of rectomyopia.
> On 19-May-2012 5:16 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> felix_unger <m...@nothere.com> wrote
>>
>>
>>> people (for some strange reason) seem to want to argue with me.
>>
>> Because you spew mindless silly shit and quite a few keep pointing
>> that out to you.
>
> rather it's because my profound wisdom is beyond their ability to cope,
> so feeling slighted, they respond with unjustified criticism and stupid
> comment, just like you.. :)
>
>
0 new messages