Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Round 8
1 view
Skip to first unread message
David Clayton
May 20, 2012, 4:38:05 AM5/20/12
to
What a bizarre round, in the 3 matches decided by a few goals a case could
be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the amount of
luck involved at certain stages.
The ladders still flatters some sides and this will still take a while to
sort out due to the inequities of the 2012 draw - but it does give the
media another brainless week of picking a Premiership favourite.
--
Regards, David.
David Clayton
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a
measure of how many questions you have.
be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the amount of
luck involved at certain stages.
The ladders still flatters some sides and this will still take a while to
sort out due to the inequities of the 2012 draw - but it does give the
media another brainless week of picking a Premiership favourite.
--
Regards, David.
David Clayton
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a
measure of how many questions you have.
SG1
May 20, 2012, 6:37:37 AM5/20/12
to
"David Clayton" <dc33box...@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:pan.2012.05.20....@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au...
> What a bizarre round, in the 3 matches decided by a few goals a case could
> be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the amount of
> luck involved at certain stages.
>
> The ladders still flatters some sides and this will still take a while to
> sort out due to the inequities of the 2012 draw - but it does give the
> media another brainless week of picking a Premiership favourite.
But Essendon WON.
> be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the amount of
> luck involved at certain stages.
>
> The ladders still flatters some sides and this will still take a while to
> sort out due to the inequities of the 2012 draw - but it does give the
> media another brainless week of picking a Premiership favourite.
George W Frost
May 20, 2012, 6:45:00 AM5/20/12
to
"SG1" <los...@the.races.com> wrote in message
news:4fb8c972$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>
> "David Clayton" <dc33box...@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:pan.2012.05.20....@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au...
>> What a bizarre round, in the 3 matches decided by a few goals a case
>> could
>> be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the amount of
>> luck involved at certain stages.
>>
>> The ladders still flatters some sides and this will still take a while to
>> sort out due to the inequities of the 2012 draw - but it does give the
>> media another brainless week of picking a Premiership favourite.
>
> But Essendon WON.
>
Did you ever doubt that ??
> "David Clayton" <dc33box...@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:pan.2012.05.20....@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au...
>> What a bizarre round, in the 3 matches decided by a few goals a case
>> could
>> be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the amount of
>> luck involved at certain stages.
>>
>> The ladders still flatters some sides and this will still take a while to
>> sort out due to the inequities of the 2012 draw - but it does give the
>> media another brainless week of picking a Premiership favourite.
>
> But Essendon WON.
>
David J Richardson
May 20, 2012, 9:26:56 AM5/20/12
to
In article <pan.2012.05.20....@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au>,
trying to, and it fell though the pack! 'Twas hilarious, but only
because at the end the Bombers illustrated for Carlton what a pair of
balls are: sometimes you don't get everything go your way, and you have
to dig in and gut out the win...
--
David J Richardson -- work...@davidj.richardson.name
http://davidj.richardson.name/ - Dr Who articles/interviews/reviews
http://www.boomerang.org.au/ - Boomerang Association of Australia
David Clayton <dc33box...@NOSPAM.yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> What a bizarre round, in the 3 matches decided by a few goals a case
> could be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the
> amount of luck involved at certain stages.
C'mon... the only time Richmond could kick a goal was when they weren't
> What a bizarre round, in the 3 matches decided by a few goals a case
> could be made that the better sides on the day all lost due to the
> amount of luck involved at certain stages.
trying to, and it fell though the pack! 'Twas hilarious, but only
because at the end the Bombers illustrated for Carlton what a pair of
balls are: sometimes you don't get everything go your way, and you have
to dig in and gut out the win...
--
David J Richardson -- work...@davidj.richardson.name
http://davidj.richardson.name/ - Dr Who articles/interviews/reviews
http://www.boomerang.org.au/ - Boomerang Association of Australia
0 new messages