On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:00:39 -0700 (PDT), gladys swager
<
gsw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, May 17, 2013 6:07:42 AM UTC+10, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> Inside the Human Body
>> Creation (Repeat)
>>
>> 4.30pm - 5.30pm GEM Friday, 17 May 2013
>>The story of the human biological creation is told through surprising
>>medical research revealing the improbable sequence of events that lead
>>to birth. Plus, meet a woman expecting her 16th baby.
>>[Adult Themes or medical procedures, Sexual references/sex scenes]
>So, Evolutionists imposed their ideas on teenage school pupils in NSW from 1963.
I won't know until I see the text you said you have.
How will you send it to me?
>USA was 1957, after Sputnik orbited the earth, on the assumption
>that godless Evolution had given Russia the edge on space travel,
>(USA had caught up and passed them by 1969 (landing on the moon -
>which I watched on Television as it happened and was relayed to earth)
Russia had a remote controlled rover on the moon before the US
put a man on the moon.
>Barry, you want to dictate to God....what arrogance!!
How is it arrogance to want to love better?
You do it.
>You want to bypass the work of Jesus Christ, (Luke 1 ; 35 - the Son of God)
>in his miracles, death and resurrection -
>something that has not happened to any other person after death)
The idea that someone's death can remove your responsibilities
is evil and totally unacceptable.
>As for the woman having her 16th birth, that is proposterous...will
>she be dependent on State Aid, from other taxpayers? ....in some
>instances some women should not even have one child....although
>medical progress is changing that situation....
>but is it that you want women to be only 'for the bed, the cot and the
>sink' as you and your mates 'rule the world'?
>- better to sponsor a child (already born) in very poor conditions.
>However, in a world that, in many parts. is now over-populated,
>that sexual responisiblity must be maintained by all....
>and resources be directed to those already born.
>As I see the situation there is a lot of 'sorting out' to be done
>so that responsibility is 'the order of the day!'
That would seem to be in defiance of God's will.
God made animals to procreate without concern
for the individual. Many offspring don't survive due
to the way God arranged things but God makes up
for that by providing for more offspring.
The individual does not matter with God.
That sounds more like evolution to me but what
would I know?
>And, Barry, you need to repress your desire to post as many comments
>as possible in order to dominate this newsgroup with your Atheism...
>it is aus.religion.christian...
It is AUS.religion.christian so you must stop using the group to
talk to people outside AUStralia.
Would you like me to inform Steve and Duke that you will no
longer be replying to them?
==============
This sig intentionly left blank