Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Inside the Human Body - Creation

19 views
Skip to first unread message

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 16, 2013, 4:07:42 PM5/16/13
to
Inside the Human Body
Creation (Repeat)

4.30pm - 5.30pm
GEM
Friday, 17 May 2013

The story of the human biological creation is told through surprising
medical research revealing the improbable sequence of events that lead
to birth. Plus, meet a woman expecting her 16th baby.
[Adult Themes or medical procedures, Sexual references/sex scenes]

===========
I have come up with a way God could prove himself to everybody
in a way that would leave no doubt.
God is said to be everywhere at once so God could knock on every
door in the world at the same time. How could I deny God then?

gladys swager

unread,
May 16, 2013, 8:00:39 PM5/16/13
to
On Friday, May 17, 2013 6:07:42 AM UTC+10, Barry OGrady wrote:
> Inside the Human Body Creation (Repeat) 4.30pm - 5.30pm GEM Friday, 17 May 2013 The story of the human biological creation is told through surprising medical research revealing the improbable sequence of events that lead to birth. Plus, meet a woman expecting her 16th baby. [Adult Themes or medical procedures, Sexual references/sex scenes] =========== I have come up with a way God could prove himself to everybody in a way that would leave no doubt. God is said to be everywhere at once so God could knock on every door in the world at the same time. How could I deny God then?

So, Evolutionists imposed their ideas on teenage school pupils in NSW from 1963.
USA was 1957, after Sputnik orbited the earth, on the assumption
that godless Evolution had given Russia the edge on space travel,
(USA had caught up and passed them by 1969 (landing on the moon - which I watched on Television as it happened and was relayed to earth)

Barry, you want to dictate to God....what arrogance!!
You want to bypass the work of Jesus Christ, (Luke 1 ; 35 - the Son of God)
in his miracles, death and resurrection -
something that has not happened to any other person after death)

As for the woman having her 16th birth, that is proposterous...will she be dependent on State Aid, from other taxpayers? ....in some instances some women should not even have one child....although medical progress is changing that situation....
but is it that you want women to be only 'for the bed, the cot and the sink'
as you and your mates 'rule the world'?
- better to sponsor a child (already born) in very poor conditions.
However, in a world that, in many parts. is now over-populated,
that sexual responisiblity must be maintained by all....
and resources be directed to those already born.
As I see the situation there is a lot of 'sorting out' to be done
so that responsibility is 'the order of the day!'

And, Barry, you need to repress your desire to post as many comments as possible in order to dominate this newsgroup with your Atheism...
it is aus.religion.christian...
or is your Reading Age well below what it should be??!!.

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 17, 2013, 12:20:41 AM5/17/13
to
Please don't remove the formatting in your replys.

gladys swager

unread,
May 17, 2013, 4:19:14 AM5/17/13
to
On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013, gladys swager wrote:
> >On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> Inside the Human Body Creation (Repeat) 4.30pm - 5.30pm GEM Friday, 17 May 2013
The story of the human biological creation is told through surprising medical research revealing the improbable sequence of events that lead to birth. Plus, meet a woman expecting her 16th baby.

[Adult Themes or medical procedures, Sexual references/sex scenes] ===========
I have come up with a way God could prove himself to everybody in a way that would leave no doubt. God is said to be everywhere at once so God could knock on every door in the world at the same time. How could I deny God then? > >So, Evolutionists imposed their ideas on teenage school pupils in NSW from 1963. >USA was 1957, after Sputnik orbited the earth, on the assumption >that godless Evolution had given Russia the edge on space travel, >(USA had caught up and passed them by 1969 (landing on the moon - which I watched on Television as it happened and was relayed to earth) > >Barry, you want to dictate to God....what arrogance!! >You want to bypass the work of Jesus Christ, (Luke 1 ; 35 - the Son of God) >in his miracles, death and resurrection - >something that has not happened to any other person after death) > >As for the woman having her 16th birth, that is proposterous...will she be dependent on State Aid, from other taxpayers? ....in some instances some women should not even have one
child....although medical progress is changing that situation.... >but is it that you want women to be only 'for the bed, the cot and the sink' >as you and your mates 'rule the world'? >- better to sponsor a child (already born) in very poor conditions.
>However, in a world that, in many parts. is now over-populated,
> that sexual responisiblity must be maintained by all....
>and resources be directed to those already born.
>As I see the situation there is a lot of 'sorting out' to be done
>so that responsibility is 'the order of the day!'
> >And, Barry, you need to repress your desire to post as many comments as possible in order to dominate this newsgroup with your Atheism...
>it is aus.religion.christian...
>or is your Reading Age well below what it should be??!!.

Please...the meaning of 'formatting'. Thank you in anticipation.

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 17, 2013, 5:47:46 AM5/17/13
to
Have a look at what you have done to the message.
You have my text showing as if your text and your text showing
as though from me, and you have removed line breaks so it all
appears in one line.
Do you expect me to sort it out?
Please just reply as you were doing it.

gladys swager

unread,
May 17, 2013, 5:34:04 PM5/17/13
to
On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013, gladys swager wrote:
>On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote: up with a way God could prove himself to everybody in a way that would leave no doubt. God is said to be everywhere at once so God could knock on every door in the world at the same time. How could I deny God then?

Text deleted. Barry, I did not post as was shown on your Internet screen.
Nor do I know who is messing with the postings.
It has only occurred in the last week, and yes, I agree, it is very annoying.

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 17, 2013, 6:43:15 PM5/17/13
to
On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:34:04 -0700 (PDT), gladys swager
<gsw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 May 2013, gladys swager wrote:
>>On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote: up with a way God could prove himself to everybody in a way that would leave no doubt. God is said to be everywhere at once so God could knock on every door in the world at the same time. How could I deny God then?
>
>Text deleted. Barry, I did not post as was shown on your Internet screen.
>Nor do I know who is messing with the postings.
>It has only occurred in the last week, and yes, I agree, it is very annoying.

Sorry to accuse you of doing it deliberately. I should have known you
would not do it intentionally. I shall reply to your posts soon in my
usual friendly way.

===========
I have come up with a way God could prove himself to everybody

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 17, 2013, 11:31:31 PM5/17/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:00:39 -0700 (PDT), gladys swager
<gsw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, May 17, 2013 6:07:42 AM UTC+10, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> Inside the Human Body
>> Creation (Repeat)
>>
>> 4.30pm - 5.30pm GEM Friday, 17 May 2013
>>The story of the human biological creation is told through surprising
>>medical research revealing the improbable sequence of events that lead
>>to birth. Plus, meet a woman expecting her 16th baby.
>>[Adult Themes or medical procedures, Sexual references/sex scenes]

>So, Evolutionists imposed their ideas on teenage school pupils in NSW from 1963.

I won't know until I see the text you said you have.
How will you send it to me?

>USA was 1957, after Sputnik orbited the earth, on the assumption
>that godless Evolution had given Russia the edge on space travel,
>(USA had caught up and passed them by 1969 (landing on the moon -
>which I watched on Television as it happened and was relayed to earth)

Russia had a remote controlled rover on the moon before the US
put a man on the moon.

>Barry, you want to dictate to God....what arrogance!!

How is it arrogance to want to love better?
You do it.

>You want to bypass the work of Jesus Christ, (Luke 1 ; 35 - the Son of God)
>in his miracles, death and resurrection -
>something that has not happened to any other person after death)

The idea that someone's death can remove your responsibilities
is evil and totally unacceptable.

>As for the woman having her 16th birth, that is proposterous...will
>she be dependent on State Aid, from other taxpayers? ....in some
>instances some women should not even have one child....although
>medical progress is changing that situation....
>but is it that you want women to be only 'for the bed, the cot and the
>sink' as you and your mates 'rule the world'?
>- better to sponsor a child (already born) in very poor conditions.
>However, in a world that, in many parts. is now over-populated,
>that sexual responisiblity must be maintained by all....
>and resources be directed to those already born.
>As I see the situation there is a lot of 'sorting out' to be done
>so that responsibility is 'the order of the day!'

That would seem to be in defiance of God's will.
God made animals to procreate without concern
for the individual. Many offspring don't survive due
to the way God arranged things but God makes up
for that by providing for more offspring.
The individual does not matter with God.
That sounds more like evolution to me but what
would I know?

>And, Barry, you need to repress your desire to post as many comments
>as possible in order to dominate this newsgroup with your Atheism...
>it is aus.religion.christian...

It is AUS.religion.christian so you must stop using the group to
talk to people outside AUStralia.
Would you like me to inform Steve and Duke that you will no
longer be replying to them?

==============
This sig intentionly left blank

gladys swager

unread,
May 18, 2013, 11:39:37 AM5/18/13
to
On Saturday, May 18, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013, gladys swager wrote:
>On Friday, May 17, 2013, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> Inside the Human Body Creation (Repeat) 4.30pm-5.30pm GEM Friday 17 May'13 >>The story of the human biological creation is told through surprising >>medical research revealing the improbable sequence of events that lead to
>>birth.

And yet those 'improbable sequences' are happening every day
in all parts of the world.

>Barry, you want to dictate to God....what arrogance!!

How is it arrogance to want to love better? You do it.
>You want to bypass the work of Jesus Christ, (Luke 1 ; 35 - the Son of God) >in his miracles, death and resurrection - something that has not happened to any other person after death)

The idea that someone's death can remove your responsibilities is evil and totally unacceptable. but is it that you want women to be only 'for the bed, the cot and the >sink' as you and your mates 'rule the world'? - better to sponsor a child (already born) in very poor conditions.
>However, in a world that, in many parts. is now over-populated,
sexual responisiblity must be maintained by all.... and resources be directed to those already born.
>As I see the situation there is a lot of 'sorting out' to be done
so that responsibility is 'the order of the day!'

That would seem to be in defiance of God's will. God made animals to procreate without concern for the individual. Many offspring don't survive due to the way God arranged things but God makes up for that by providing for more offspring. The individual does not matter with God. That sounds more like evolution to me but what would I know?

Mindless acceptance by males that they have a right to use women sexually...
and let others accept the consequences.

>And, Barry, you need to repress your desire to post as many comments >as possible in order to dominate this newsgroup with your Atheism...

>it is aus.religion.christian... It is AUS.religion.christian so you must stop using the group to talk to people outside AUStralia. Would you like me to inform Steve and Duke that you will no longer be replying to them? ============== This sig intentionly left blank

So you will dominate me...in my choice of those wwho post into this group.
You are near-nigh completely irresponsible...but we have to bear with that.

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 18, 2013, 6:32:39 PM5/18/13
to
You have made a complete mess of this post. You have me saying
things that were written by you and you saying things that were
written by me. Do you expect me to go through all your posts and clean
up the mess?
Please repost properly.

gladys swager

unread,
May 19, 2013, 1:54:47 AM5/19/13
to
On Sunday, May 19, 2013
> Do you expect me to go through all your posts and clean up the mess?
> Please repost properly.

Barry, what is happening to these postings is not of my making.
So, please do not get so uptight about it all. It may be sorted out in time.

Barry OGrady

unread,
May 19, 2013, 3:13:15 AM5/19/13
to
OK then.
0 new messages