You could easily point the finger at the RTM with its "death alley" up the
rear of the Thirlmere compound.
Or you could have a go at the ARHS ACT division - it has 3102 minus tender
shoved up the end of the compound rusting to bits...
Most groups now have so much rollingstock that they don't have the means or
possibly the inclination to look after it properly. Sure, part depends on
the condition it arrives in but to point the finger at DSR&M is cutting off
one's nose to spite one's face...
Darren.
rodjg wrote in message <01be3644$be727240$c40c3acb@rodgayford>...
>The attached photo may provide some evidence of the state of the rolling
>stock at Dorrigo.
>
>Cheers
>
>Rod Gayford
>
*** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ***
How many sheds have been built at Dorrigo?
Cheers
John Wayman
GOODWIN ALCO wrote in message ...
John Wayman wrote in message <368ff...@139.134.5.33>...
>we are totally private and as far as I am aware have yet to get ANY money
>from the public purse.
What about Bi Centenary Money (Grant)
What about the Army Engineers and the time they did (Government Cost)
What about the last X years rent free
What about the time PTC (nsw), SRA, RAC then DOT and other Goverment
departments have invested in the the Dorrigo Line in what can only be
describeded as an on going saga of disputation
These are all I believe expenditures from the Public Purse
<<I have to agree with Darren. This shot is a photo of the condition of some
stock at Lowanna (not at Dorrigo). My last visit to Dorrigo itself showed a
better picture than this. Admittedly there was "some" very run down
rollingstock, but look at the size of the collection.>>
Thanks Brad. The photo did not get as far as me so I am fighting blind at
the moment. Of course we have some rolling stock in poor condition. If you
look back over this thread I never claimed otherwise (I merely challenged
one whinger to find some - he couldn't). Most of our stock is in reasonable
or better condition.
One of the hardest things to maintain is the masonite sided cars. The
railways started to use ordinary masonite during WW2. Once it starts to
deteriorate, the cars look ratty, but the interiors are surprisingly good.
We also have quite a number of cars that were used as workmen's vans and
were trashed before we got them. Not the ideal candidates for preservation,
but often the only examples in existence.
The rollingstock at Lowanna was marooned there when the SRA banned trains
running on the line. There is no point attempting to maintain passenger
rollingstock at such a remote location. There is no way to control vandalism
etc. We have concentrated on maintaining and weatherproofing the cars at
Dorrigo. Some of the cars at Lowanna will be scrapped on site.
<<No museum can work miracles with member help and money given. I think many
museums probably have their selection of major tasks sitting around.>>
Even the public museums have this problem. The Powerhouse Museum's 3265
looked absolutely derelict before work started on it.
<<What is prefered, a huge awaiting restoration job or no carrage kept for
history at all.>>
Well said. Many people knock us for the size of our collection, but are hard
pressed to nominate a significant portion of it that should have been let go
to scrap.
Trevor
<<What about Bi Centenary Money (Grant)>>
As far as I know our share was exactly nil.
<<What about the Army Engineers and the time they did (Government Cost)>>
The Army exercise was going to happen anyway. Their original intention was
to do similar work on their own site and then demolish it. It was cheaper
(and more satisfying) for them to be able to leave their work standing.
>What about the last X years rent free
Prior to our lease of the line, it earned no income, and the PTC still had
to meet the costs such as maintaining the road overbridges. With our lease
they received a token rent, and the road overbridges became our problem.
When they cancelled the lease, they got responsibility for the expenses
back.
<<What about the time PTC (nsw), SRA, RAC then DOT and other Goverment
departments have invested in the the Dorrigo Line in what can only be
describeded as an on going saga of disputation>>
To say that their costs were "invested" in the Dorrigo line is stretching
it. Their costs of cancelling our lease, then having to enact legislation to
make the cancellation legal, and then spending years going through a
tendering process, which ultimately failed, was their choice. It was hardly
money spent for our benefit, and it has cost us an enormous amount of money
for legals not to mention time and deterioration of the line.
Trevor
>To say that their costs were "invested" in the Dorrigo line is stretching
>it. Their costs of cancelling our lease, then having to enact legislation
to
>make the cancellation legal, and then spending years going through a
>tendering process, which ultimately failed, was their choice. It was hardly
>money spent for our benefit, and it has cost us an enormous amount of money
>for legals not to mention time and deterioration of the line.
>
>Trevor
>
The circumstance of the lease or proposed lease is a subject I will stay out
of.
However I can assure you the Legal Profession is alive and Thriving
especially at the Public Teat