Spam
restore24-7
<coff...@aussieisp.com> wrote in message
news:1178243561....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On May 4, 11:31 am, "coffee...@aussieisp.com"
> <coffee...@aussieisp.com> wrote:
> > http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.politics/browse_thread/thread/5...
>
> The Immigration Department estimates the lifetime cost of an HIV-
> positive person is $240,000 to $250,000. In 2005-06, HIV-positive
> people accounted for 48 per cent of requests for health waivers in
> cases where lifetime medical costs exceeded $200,000.
>
>
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=australia+hiv+cost+homosexual&meta=
>
> Over 80 percent of people living with HIV/AIDS in Australia are
> infected through homosexual sex. Therefore it is to be expected that a
> significant proportion of HIV positive applicants for permanent
> residence will be gay men in relationships with Australian citizens.
> (However there are also considerable numbers of HIV positive
> applicants who are not gay).
>
>
>
restore24-7
restore24-7
<coff...@aussieisp.com> wrote in message
news:1178246095.6...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > > Over 80 percent of people living with HIV/AIDS in Australia are
> > > > infected through homosexual sex. Therefore it is to be expected that
a
> > > > significant proportion of HIV positive applicants for permanent
> > > > residence will be gay men in relationships with Australian citizens.
> > > > (However there are also considerable numbers of HIV positive
>
> Arthur Brain wrote:
>
> Don't be an idiot. Poofs have the disease, and poofs spread it -
> usually to other poofs, although sometimes they are realy generous
> and
> inject their venomous sperm into women, or generously share needles
> in
> order to spread it.
>
>
CrowdedHouse
BearCave
<coffee...@aussieisp.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 12:34 pm, "coffee...@aussieisp.com"
>
> <coffee...@aussieisp.com> wrote:
> > > > > Over 80 percent of people living with HIV/AIDS in Australia are
> > > > > infected through homosexual sex. Therefore it is to be expected that a
> > > > > significant proportion of HIV positive applicants for permanent
> > > > > residence will be gay men in relationships with Australian citizens.
> > > > > (However there are also considerable numbers of HIV positive
> > Arthur Brain wrote:
>
> > Don't be an idiot. Poofs have the disease, and poofs spread it -
> > usually to other poofs, although sometimes they are realy generous
> > and
> > inject their venomous sperm into women, or generously share needles
> > in
> > order to spread it.
>
> TraceRoute to 211.28.210.96
> [c211-28-210-96.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au]
>
> BearCave: NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.28.46.225
> TraceRoute to 211.28.46.225
> [c211-28-46-225.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au]
>
> http://www.bearcave75.blogspot.com/
no shit sherlock ;)
restore24-7
"BearCave" <bearc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178247244.2...@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
restore24-7
"BearCave" <bearc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178247244.2...@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Possum Comitatus
<bearc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Listen up Christie you spamming little fucktard, why do you
think anyone is even remotely interested in you reposting
reams of horseshit back into multiple groups?
Some cockspank spamming a number of groups on a daily basis
is bad enough, but you reckon its a really fabulous and
constructive exercise to repost the whole fucking lot all
over again?
Did you get dropped on your head when you were a kid?
Wake up to yourself you silly twat.
BearCave
wrote:
> restore24-7: NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.28.210.96
> TraceRoute to 211.28.210.96
> [c211-28-210-96.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au]
> BearCave: NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.28.46.225
> TraceRoute to 211.28.46.225
> [c211-28-46-225.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au]
>
> http://www.bearcave75.blogspot.com/
As I said before, no shit Sherlock :)
You wish for my attention, CoffeeCup?
Well, I hope this teaches you: be careful what you wish for!
Internet Spammer Can't Take What He Dishes Out
from the absolutely-classic dept:
Fri, Dec 6th 2002
A few weeks ago, the Detroit Free Press had the story of yet another
spammer, Alan Ralsky, bragging about his big house and how he'll never
stop spamming. It seems some of the fine folks over at Slashdot looked
up the address of his new home and convinced more than enough people
to make sure that Ralsky knew what it felt like to get a ton of
unwanted advertising. He's been getting lots of junk snail mail every
day, and man, does he seem pissed off. That he doesn't realize the
irony in the situation is both a little scary and a little sad. He
says that the people who signed him up for all this our "out of their
minds" and accuses them of "harassing" him. He's now planning on suing
them. How is it that he's not harassing all of us with his "greatest
business model in the world" spam? If he gets away with his proposed
lawsuit, then, clearly everyone who receives any of his spam needs to
sue him using the exact same charges.
Possum Comitatus
Bearcave with its spambot "restore24-7"
<resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Listen up you spamming little fucktard, why do you
>
>> think anyone is even remotely interested in you reposting
>
>> reams of horseshit back into multiple groups?
>
>>
>
>> Some cockspank spamming a number of groups on a daily basis
>
>> is bad enough, but you reckon its a really fabulous and
>
>> constructive exercise to repost the whole fucking lot all
>
>> over again?
>
>>
>
>> Did you get dropped on your head when you were a kid?
>
>>
>
>> Wake up to yourself you silly twat.
>
>My interest is NOT aus.politics (I gave up on this newsgroup many months
>ago).
Do I sound like I give three fifths of five eights of a fuck
what your interest is "in"?
Stop spamming you silly clown.
>Rather, it's to tell your "resident fucktard" Coffee-Cup to stop spamming
>other "non-political" groups.
And I see that's just going smashing for you.He spams, so
you respam it!
Doubling the spam.Might as well be fucking for some
virginity there comrade.
>STOP IMPOSING YOUR POLITICS ON "NON-POLITICAL NEWSGROUPS", YOU FUCKING
>ZEALOTS!
Right - so the logic is that because coffeecup spams out of
aus.politics, then you think its a brilliant idea to repost
it all not only back into aus.politics, but every other damn
group that he's inflicted his silly shit on?
So the thousands of readers of all of these groups not only
have to put up with his shit - but yours as well.Because,
you know, your reposts are just so fucking important in the
general scheme of things that we all really need to have
them clog up our newsreaders.
Grow up you cretin.
>Quite simply, not everyone are as unhappy as some of you are.
>
>The way to deal with "your unhappiness" is to lobby appropriately, not
>impose a "wank-fest" of prima donna speeches on the general newsgroup
>community.
Get fucked spam boy.How about you stop chucking tantrums,
take that thumb out of your mouth and stop spamming the aus.
net space?
>Assess your own behaviours
Sure - the participants in these newsgroups, far more groups
than are in this post, dont spam anything at all.
But because you are such a pathetic little sook, WE all have
to put up with not only that coffeecup idiot - but YOU
reposting the same horseshit as well.
Because , you know.... once obviously wasnt enough.We all
just love to hear it.
The only behaviour that needs to be assesed here is yours
you pathetic snivelling little grub.
> before telling people from outside of this
>newsgroup what to do! (In other words, deal with the cause, not the
>symptom!)
I am dealing with the cause - YOU.
YOU make the choice to act like a spambot.
YOU repost vast quantities of complete horshit into the aus.
netspace
Take some self responsibility and stop deliberately adding
to the problem.
>This message is from a "reformed" newsgroup poster that used to believe in
>the potential of this newsgroup.
I dont give a fuck if you're a 3 headed dragqueen that wears
lipstick on your arsehole.
Stop spamming the aus. netspace you fucking clown.
Do you think the thousands of people in it are all just
fine and dandy about having their groups cluttered because
you chuck tantrums over another spammer?
Fuck no - get over yourself!
How old are you child?
Grow up.
jonz
"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:i4dl33d7bb81e5lg2...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 4 May 2007 14:07:43 +1000, An arseclown called
> Bearcave with its spambot "restore24-7"
> <resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
if you can`t beat `em join `em............
restore24-7
"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message >
Do I sound like I give three fifths of five eights of a fuck
> what your interest is "in"?
No, but you do sound rather angry in your quick response, but hey, that's
what staying around aus.politics in heavy doses does to you.
> Stop spamming you silly clown.
Yes, as soon as the arrogant bastards on your "out-of-control" newsgroup
finally understand the concept of cost-benefit (the cost of "imposing your
politics" on non-political newsgroups outweighs the benefit of prima donna
attitudes and being an excessive wanker).
> Doubling the spam.Might as well be fucking for some
> virginity there comrade.
Don't worry mate. Only "aus.politics - the source of political spamming in
Australia" are getting all of the "restore24-7" messages. The remaining
groups are being
> The only behaviour that needs to be assesed here is yours
> you pathetic snivelling little grub.
> Take some self responsibility and stop deliberately adding
> to the problem.
No, you stop being indifferent to the fact that other newsgroups are trying
to discuss matters primarily defined by the title of that newsgroup.
All the extremists that have for years been harrassing other groups with
political spam "all originate" from the same rotten, stinking source -
aus.politics!
Fuck aus.politics!!!
Don't accuse me of over-stating my importance, using this protest campaign
as your only evidence.
You idiots from your giant, collective ego-bubble called "aus.politics" have
been over-stating your importance for years - the evidence being that too
many of you cannot either (i) confine your comments to aus.politics, or (ii)
be prepared to accept the consequences of spreading your word to moderated
political forums, the main consequence being that there's actually codes of
conduct to adhere to, just like there are in the workplace.
Possum Comitatus
<resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message >
>
>Do I sound like I give three fifths of five eights of a fuck
>> what your interest is "in"?
>
>No, but you do sound rather angry in your quick response, but hey, that's
>what staying around aus.politics in heavy doses does to you.
>
>> Stop spamming you silly clown.
>
>Yes, as soon as the arrogant bastards on your "out-of-control" newsgroup
>finally understand the concept of cost-benefit (the cost of "imposing your
>politics" on non-political newsgroups outweighs the benefit of prima donna
>attitudes and being an excessive wanker).
You giving me a lecture on cost/benefit.....well that's
courageous.
So you think its a perfectly acceptable idea to punish
thousands of readers over a dozen groups because of nothing
more than a single poster?
A single poster!
>> Doubling the spam.Might as well be fucking for some
>> virginity there comrade.
>
>Don't worry mate. Only "aus.politics - the source of political spamming in
>Australia" are getting all of the "restore24-7" messages.
Bullshit only aus.politcs is getting it - you've already
spammed into aus.tv today!
So aus.politics is a borg collective now?
So what would happen if there was someone in this group with
the same lack of nuerons as you enjoy which thought "well
fuck this John Christie chump and his restore24-7 spambot,
aus.radio.broadcast needs to reign him in, so I'm gonna post
all his shit right back to him there!"?
Do you think the denizens of aus.radio.broadcast would be
happy about that?
Fuck no!
Do you think they'd deserve it?
Fuck no!
But you reckon half the aus. netspace does!
You pull it any harder and it really will fall off.
>> The only behaviour that needs to be assesed here is yours
>> you pathetic snivelling little grub.
>
>> Take some self responsibility and stop deliberately adding
>> to the problem.
>
>No, you stop being indifferent to the fact that other newsgroups are trying
>to discuss matters primarily defined by the title of that newsgroup.
They aint my groups - there's plenty of people to care about
it within those groups.
In aus.politics - we get your shit, so should someone from
here repost all of your horseshit back into aus.radio
broadcast?
Tell me why its good for the goose and not the gander?
>All the extremists that have for years been harrassing other groups with
>political spam "all originate" from the same rotten, stinking source -
>aus.politics!
>
>Fuck aus.politics!!!
You can fuck it till your weener is blue, aus.politics isnt
a collective.You are complaining about individuals - so why
are you spamming the aus. netspace?
And why shouldnt everyone else do it right back into
aus.radio.broadcast?
>Don't accuse me of over-stating my importance, using this protest campaign
>as your only evidence.
Protest campaign my arse - its spam comming from a silly
child chucking a tantrum.And the thousands of participants
in the aus. netspace that have never spammed in their life
have to put up with your bullshit because you cant get a
fucking grip.
>You idiots from your giant, collective ego-bubble called "aus.politics" have
>been over-stating your importance for years - the evidence being that too
>many of you cannot either (i) confine your comments to aus.politics,
i.e. a small percentage of posters are serial cross-psoters,
but every reader is responsible for their actions!
Grow up.
>or (ii)
>be prepared to accept the consequences of spreading your word to moderated
>political forums,
It's not my word son - I'm not coffeecup.
I'm just a reader in a newsgroup getting volumes of your
spamming horseshit.
>the main consequence being that there's actually codes of
>conduct to adhere to, just like there are in the workplace.
Codes of conduct like your Optus terms and conditions?
So if you think its acceptable to blame the entire
readership of the group because of the actions of a single
individual and use that to justify spamming us, is it
acceptable for someone to spam all of your reposted
horseshit back into aus.radio.broadcast, or into your blog,
or into whichever forum you might post to or read?
And if its not - why not?
Its exactly the same.
So wake up to yourself and fucking stop it you silly child.
restore24-7
"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> So if you think its acceptable to blame the entire
> readership of the group because of the actions of a single
> individual and use that to justify spamming us, is it
> acceptable for someone to spam all of your reposted
> horseshit back into aus.radio.broadcast, or into your blog,
> or into whichever forum you might post to or read?
>
> And if its not - why not?
>
> Its exactly the same.
No mate, "nothing compares" to aus.politics!
It is the most extremely behaved newsgroup on the internet.
It also happens to be one of the biggest newsgroups.
Add that equation up:
= spamming that orginates from aus.politics is sticking in boot in the face
of smaller group dynamics such as aus.radio.broadcast
Not fair!
My protest campaign will not only continue, it was evolve in tactics to
ensure that the impact aus.politics has on aus.radio.broadcast is "blown to
bits", and to give vindication to the position I've chosen to take.
Possum Comitatus
<resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>
>> So if you think its acceptable to blame the entire
>> readership of the group because of the actions of a single
>> individual and use that to justify spamming us, is it
>> acceptable for someone to spam all of your reposted
>> horseshit back into aus.radio.broadcast, or into your blog,
>> or into whichever forum you might post to or read?
>>
>> And if its not - why not?
>>
>> Its exactly the same.
>
>No mate, "nothing compares" to aus.politics!
I should hope not.
Meanwhile, back at the point - are saying it would be
alright if people cross-posted your spam back into
aus.radio.broadcast, your blog or any other forum where you
participate?
If not, why not?
If its good enough for you to do it to aus.politics, why
isnt it good enough for aus.politics to do it back to you?
>It is the most extremely behaved newsgroup on the internet.
You need to get out more.
>It also happens to be one of the biggest newsgroups.
>
>Add that equation up:
>
>= spamming that orginates from aus.politics is sticking in boot in the face
>of smaller group dynamics such as aus.radio.broadcast
>
>Not fair!
Its not aus.politics that is doing it.It is INDIVIDUAL
people.
Can you see the difference?
Do you reckon all asians should be punished because some
Korean guy blew the shit out of people in Virginia? Do you
believe that all Iraqis should be punished for the actions
of Saddam Hussein? Do you believe that every member of the
Bulldogs football club should be punished because a couple
of their members were recently jailed as serial rapists? Do
you believe that all church members should be punished for
the kiddy fiddling of a few priests?Do you believe that
aus.politics, aus.tv and half the aus. netspace should be
punished for the actions of a few INDIVIDUAL posters?
>My protest campaign will not only continue, it was evolve in tactics to
>ensure that the impact aus.politics has on aus.radio.broadcast is "blown to
>bits", and to give vindication to the position I've chosen to take.
You make your own bed.
restore24-7
"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> Its not aus.politics that is doing it.It is INDIVIDUAL
> people.
>
> Can you see the difference?
>
Mate, only to the point that that not all newsgroups should get a "double
dose of spam" just because of my public fight with CoffeeCup.
However, I'll be making no distinction between CoffeeCup as an individual
and the newsgroup he depends most on as his media.
aus.politics is THE source of political cross-post spam and happens to be
one of the biggest groups on Usenet, yet there is absolutely "no moderation,
therefore no code of conduct" to protect smaller, especially non-political
groups from the wrath of aus.politics spammers who want to impose their
bitter taste for life on innocent newsgroup users.
> Do you reckon all asians should be punished because some
> Korean guy blew the shit out of people in Virginia? Do you
> believe that all Iraqis should be punished for the actions
> of Saddam Hussein? Do you believe that every member of the
> Bulldogs football club should be punished because a couple
> of their members were recently jailed as serial rapists? Do
> you believe that all church members should be punished for
> the kiddy fiddling of a few priests?Do you believe that
> aus.politics, aus.tv and half the aus. netspace should be
> punished for the actions of a few INDIVIDUAL posters?
Yeah, that's right - address "anything but" your group's absolute lack of
accountability for its actions.
All you do is just shrug your shoulders and say with nose pointed upwards,
"we collectively do not condone this individual behaviour......but will do
absolutely nothing about it......except apply the "political tactic" of
displaying the protestor as the extremist precisely because we have no
standards, yet we also think aus.politics are "privileged" not to get a
serving what our extremist newsgroup dishes out in the form of spam. This
is a one-way street and we think our interests are "superior" to the
interests of other groups. Quite simply, our shit doesn't stink"
Well, fuck you very much for your opinion Possum. I have taken your opinion
on board and will respond appropriately.
Possum Comitatus
reposter "restore24-7" <resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>
>> Its not aus.politics that is doing it.It is INDIVIDUAL
>> people.
>>
>> Can you see the difference?
>>
>
>Mate, only to the point that that not all newsgroups should get a "double
>dose of spam" just because of my public fight with CoffeeCup.
>
>However, I'll be making no distinction between CoffeeCup as an individual
>and the newsgroup he depends most on as his media.
>
>aus.politics is THE source of political cross-post spam and happens to be
>one of the biggest groups on Usenet, yet there is absolutely "no moderation,
>therefore no code of conduct" to protect smaller, especially non-political
>groups from the wrath of aus.politics spammers who want to impose their
>bitter taste for life on innocent newsgroup users.
So you think reposting back into aus.politics every piece of
stuff from Coffeecup that is crossposted into other groups
achieves exactly what spammer?
Apart from doubling and tripling the spam levels across half
the aus. netspace?
>> Do you reckon all asians should be punished because some
>> Korean guy blew the shit out of people in Virginia? Do you
>> believe that all Iraqis should be punished for the actions
>> of Saddam Hussein? Do you believe that every member of the
>> Bulldogs football club should be punished because a couple
>> of their members were recently jailed as serial rapists? Do
>> you believe that all church members should be punished for
>> the kiddy fiddling of a few priests?Do you believe that
>> aus.politics, aus.tv and half the aus. netspace should be
>> punished for the actions of a few INDIVIDUAL posters?
>
>Yeah, that's right - address "anything but" your group's absolute lack of
>accountability for its actions.
There CANNOT BE group accountability on Usenet !
Do you know what it is? Do you know how its designed? Do you
have even the slightest understanding of the way it works?
If you understood even an ounce of this, you would know that
newsgroups are nothing but an open system of data
propagation. Readers have no control over content that is
posted by other people, readers have no control over other
posters.It's designed that way!
Blaming the readers of aus.politics for some spammer and
reposting volumes of idiot spam back into not only
aus.politics but other groups, doubling and tripling the
spam, is quite frankly one of the most fucking retarded
things a person can do.
>All you do is just shrug your shoulders and say with nose pointed upwards,
>
>"we collectively do not condone this individual behaviour......but will do
>absolutely nothing about it......
Do you know why aus.politics readers will do nothing about
it?
Because there is nothing they can do even if they wanted to.
aus.politics is a newsgroup.Its not a person, its a
newsgroup.This is Usenet.
Get it clown?
>except apply the "political tactic" of
>displaying the protestor as the extremist
You arent an extremist, you're just a silly spamming child
that doesnt understand what Usenet is, and is trying to hold
a newsgroup accountable for the actions of some individual
spammer.All you are doing is spamming the four corners of
the aus. netspace.
>precisely because we have no
>standards, yet we also think aus.politics are "privileged" not to get a
>serving what our extremist newsgroup dishes out in the form of spam. This
>is a one-way street and we think our interests are "superior" to the
>interests of other groups. Quite simply, our shit doesn't stink"
Usenet doesnt work that way you fucking drongo.
>Well, fuck you very much for your opinion Possum. I have taken your opinion
>on board and will respond appropriately.
Knock yourself out.
restore24-7
"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message:
>
> Blaming the readers of aus.politics for some spammer
> and
> reposting volumes of idiot spam back into not only
> aus.politics but other groups, doubling and tripling the
> spam, is quite frankly one of the most fucking retarded
> things a person can do.
Yeah, but it's obviously having some effect, otherwise you wouldn't need to
repond at all. But you do respond because you know very well that
"aus.politics" is the source of all political spamming in the Australian
Usenet space, and you are desperately trying to divert people's attention
from that fact.
A "zero-tolerance reponse" now applies to CoffeeCup, with a commitment to
minimising the effect this has on innocent Usenet users.
However, that "minimising effect" will be least experienced by users of
aus.politics. Don't expect "amoral behaviour" to be a one-way street, just
because of the fact aus.politics is part of a regulation-free Usenet.
What you're effectively saying is "give up, you can't control it".
Actually, it is YOU that misunderstood me!
I'm not trying to "control" Usenet, merely "persuade" CoffeeCup's
decision-making by "sharing his spamming values" to make my point.
CoffeeCup has constantly demanded my attention, even calling my name.
He has been granted what he wished for, which might make him consider more
carefully in future just what he does wish for!
> aus.politics is a newsgroup.Its not a person, its a
> newsgroup.This is Usenet.
> Usenet doesnt work that way you fucking drongo.
>
Errr.......which way what????
Don't lecture me about how Usenet works, then act all stunned as you
experience the unintended consequences of how it works!
If what you say is true, then there is no such thing as a "one way street"
in which aus.politics gets to be a source of spamming in a "way" no one else
is.
Build a bridge and get the fuck over it. The CoffeeCup campaign is now to
be absolutely undermined. All your resident fuctard needs to change is to
stop cross-posting to non-political newsgroups. "That way", he can be a
wanker all he likes and I can get on with my usual newsgroup posting.
If you don't understand that, then you're not very mature either.
Possum Comitatus
<resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message:
>
>>
>> Blaming the readers of aus.politics for some spammer
>> and
>> reposting volumes of idiot spam back into not only
>> aus.politics but other groups, doubling and tripling the
>> spam, is quite frankly one of the most fucking retarded
>> things a person can do.
>
>Yeah, but it's obviously having some effect,
It's having no effect whatsoever.I'm doing you a favour and
trying to reason with you about what Usenet is, the way it
works and how what you're doing is ultimately pointless and
just makes you look like a net kook.It started as an attempt
to explain things to somebody that might not have been aware
of the way Usenet works.
Now I'm just poking you with a stick because you're a
dickhead.
When I get bored doing this, which is quickly approaching,
you'll go BACK into my killfile and I wont see your spam.
>otherwise you wouldn't need to
>repond at all. But you do respond because you know very well that
>"aus.politics" is the source of all political spamming in the Australian
>Usenet space, and you are desperately trying to divert people's attention
>from that fact.
I dont need to divert it - its so obvious that even a kook
like you can see it!
>A "zero-tolerance reponse" now applies to CoffeeCup, with a commitment to
>minimising the effect this has on innocent Usenet users.
Roflol!
Yeah - that'll make a difference!
>However, that "minimising effect" will be least experienced by users of
>aus.politics.
Wont be experienced by me - you'll be in my killfile.
> Don't expect "amoral behaviour" to be a one-way street, just
>because of the fact aus.politics is part of a regulation-free Usenet.
>
>What you're effectively saying is "give up, you can't control it".
You cant control it - Usenet was designed that way and has
deliberately continued to evolve that way.
The reason is a simple one too - so net kooks like you have
no impact.
>Actually, it is YOU that misunderstood me!
It's you that hasnt got a fucking clue about how Usenet
works.Someone will get annoyed and Optus will slap you.
>I'm not trying to "control" Usenet,
You cant anyway.
>merely "persuade" CoffeeCup's
>decision-making by "sharing his spamming values" to make my point.
No skin of anyones back here - they'll just killfile you as
the silly spamming wanker you are.
>CoffeeCup has constantly demanded my attention, even calling my name.
Well why dont you two get a room and fuck off with the spam?
>He has been granted what he wished for, which might make him consider more
>carefully in future just what he does wish for!
It wont make him do jack shit.
Your robospamming has had what effect on coffeecup again?
Oh that's right - none at all.
But everyone that's read your spamming now knows that the
Justin Christie/Bearcave chap is a complete raving lunatic
fuckwit.
Nice work son - you must be in marketing.
>> aus.politics is a newsgroup.Its not a person, its a
>> newsgroup.This is Usenet.
>
>> Usenet doesnt work that way you fucking drongo.
>
>Errr.......which way what????
>
>Don't lecture me about how Usenet works,
You seem to need it.
>then act all stunned as you
>experience the unintended consequences of how it works!
It's not unintended and I'm far from stunned - its the way
it works.Net kooks just like you have been around since you
were shitting in your nappies.I emptied my killfile the
other day as I do every few months to let the kooks out
before I start refilling the idiot bin.As a result I saw
your posts.
Its no skin of my back what you do - I'll just stick you
back in the killfile where you belong like everyone else
does.
>If what you say is true, then there is no such thing as a "one way street"
>in which aus.politics gets to be a source of spamming in a "way" no one else
>is.
>
>Build a bridge and get the fuck over it.
Or what - you'll keep on spamming?
Knock yourself out.I wont see it.
Coffecup wont care - he'll keep reposting reams of
horseshit.Fuck, you're probably encouraging him do to it.
The only thing that will happen is that everyone will know,
if they already dont, that you're a complete loon.
And not even a very good one at that.
>The CoffeeCup campaign is now to
>be absolutely undermined.
Someone hasnt been taking their meds... naughty naughty.
>All your resident fuctard needs to change is to
>stop cross-posting to non-political newsgroups. "That way", he can be a
>wanker all he likes and I can get on with my usual newsgroup posting.
Dont spit that dummy too far kid!
>If you don't understand that, then you're not very mature either.
You can do what you want.Kooks get treated as they deserve
to be - made invisible except for the occasional bit of
kicking they receive when someone gets bored.
restore24-7
"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> It's you that hasnt got a fucking clue about how Usenet
> works.Someone will get annoyed and Optus will slap
> you.
For somebody lecturing me about "control issues", it's interesting to note
that Possum now resorts to "threats of control" at the ISP point.
You therefore effectively conceed that there are different types of control
at different points in the chain.
You've just killed your own argument, buddy.
Either there is control over Usenet.....or there isn't.
It's actually YOU that cannot take the heat of this debate. You can't accept
that what I'm doing is fair game.
The days of aus.politics zealots treating spamming as "a one way street" are
over. From now on, when one of your zealots decides to "impose his rage and
anger" on the widespread usenet community, all subject titles will be
edited, to minimise the pain your newsgroup tries to impose on the rest of
Usenet.
Oh, another thing........I don't believe for a minute all your bullshit
about finding me in your Killfile.
Nothing will make me happier if you put me back in your Killfile and leave
me alone!
The reason you don't seem to be able to do that is one only you fully know
about!
So, just remember, if you even move an inch against aus.radio.broadcast in
future, I will strike back a mile!
Oh, and pleeeeze, before accusing me of having problems, you guys should
seriously get over your "John Howard Complex".
I'm not even a Liberal voter, or a National voter for that matter. Yet even
I can see this stupid campaign originating from aus.politics WILL NOT WORK!
All it achieves is sticking a boot in the inteface of less powerful
newsgroups that get spammed, many of which do not carry the word "politics"
in their defining title.
No wonder all your criticism has been so personal, rather than directly
addressing my protest.
Learn the art of conversation, lobby appropriately and form coalitions.
That's the stuff that really gets things done, not the "keyboard cowboy"
tactics of people like CoffeeCup.
Possum Comitatus
<resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Possum Comitatus" <crouch...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>
>> It's you that hasnt got a fucking clue about how Usenet
>> works.Someone will get annoyed and Optus will slap
>> you.
>
>For somebody lecturing me about "control issues", it's interesting to note
>that Possum now resorts to "threats of control" at the ISP point.
Not my threat comrade - that's just what happens when you
spam across half the aus. netspace.Someone will get pissed
off, complain to Optus and you'll get slapped.
Killfiles work for me.
>You therefore effectively conceed that there are different types of control
>at different points in the chain.
>
>You've just killed your own argument, buddy.
>
>Either there is control over Usenet.....or there isn't.
There's no control over Usenet content.Even cancels dont
tend to work anymore.ISPs can give their customers a slap as
a result of compaints and that's about it.
All your robospamming amounts to a hill of beans.You're just
too stupid to realise it.
>It's actually YOU that cannot take the heat of this debate.
There is no debate - you are spamming half the aus. netspace
to "punish" some chronic cross-poster without realising that
sort of thing is completely pointless.
>You can't accept
>that what I'm doing is fair game.
That's what all the spamming net kooks with an overblown
sense of their own importance say.
"Its all about ME!"
Well comrade, its not.You dont actually matter.
>The days of aus.politics zealots treating spamming as "a one way street" are
>over.
Roflol!
Oh No!
Head to the hills!
Women and children first!
We're all gonna suffer at the hands of the great net-kook
Bearcave!
>From now on, when one of your zealots decides to "impose his rage and
>anger" on the widespread usenet community, all subject titles will be
>edited, to minimise the pain your newsgroup tries to impose on the rest of
>Usenet.
Roflol!
Yeah - that'll make a difference.
>Oh, another thing........I don't believe for a minute all your bullshit
>about finding me in your Killfile.
I didnt find you there, I put you there in February.It might
come as a surpise to you, some of as have seen all this shit
before for decades.You're just another spamming kook that's
doing nothing new or original.
You're just another childish fuckwit chucking a tantrum.
"Leave my widdle group alone or I'm gonna spam youse all....
whaaaaaaaa whaaaaaaaaa"
>Nothing will make me happier if you put me back in your Killfile and leave
>me alone!
I will when I've finished playing.
>The reason you don't seem to be able to do that is one only you fully know
>about!
>
>So, just remember, if you even move an inch against aus.radio.broadcast in
>future, I will strike back a mile!
"Move against aus.radio.broadcast".. Roflol!
Put it back in your pants Napoleon.
What, you seriously think of this as some kind of war?
You need to up the meds son.
>Oh, and pleeeeze, before accusing me of having problems,
I dont need to accuse you of having problems, you're taking
care of that quite effectively without me needing to say a
word.
> you guys should
>seriously get over your "John Howard Complex".
Is that like herpes complex?
>I'm not even a Liberal voter, or a National voter for that matter. Yet even
>I can see this stupid campaign originating from aus.politics WILL NOT WORK!
So you are telling us that Usenet isnt going to change the
political outcome?
Fuck me dead - I'm gonna have to slit my wrists!
>All it achieves is sticking a boot in the inteface of less powerful
>newsgroups that get spammed, many of which do not carry the word "politics"
>in their defining title.
>
>No wonder all your criticism has been so personal, rather than directly
>addressing my protest.
I stopped bothering with your protest when it became
apparent that you're just another net kook with zero
understanding of the architecture of Usenet and zero
capacity to learn.
As I said, I'm just poking you with a stick as a mental
break from modelling 3 Gb of productivity data.
>Learn the art of conversation, lobby appropriately and form coalitions.
And most importantly, remember to take TWO of the little red
pills and only ONE of the blue ones.
restore24-7
say.
Mate, if you like the image of me as a depressed, angry spammer on "meds",
then.......whatever......whatever floats your boat :)
But it doesn't change the policy I've developed (with your consultation :)
and will use against CoffeeCup's spamming of aus.radio.broadcast
You can go away now since there's pretty much nothing new to say (or you can
stay, but I've got nothing new to say to you either).
You've now seen enough of a demonstration of the consequences CoffeeCup
faces for his actions. You've now also seen that the only complaints are
coming from you and CoffeeCup (assuming you are not the same person, of
course)
Feel free to have the last word.
Fuck you very much for your time.
Possum Comitatus
<resto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>This time "Possum Comitatus", you've replied to me without anything new to
>say.
>
>Mate, if you like the image of me as a depressed, angry spammer on "meds",
>then.......whatever......whatever floats your boat :)
>
>But it doesn't change the policy I've developed (with your consultation :)
>and will use against CoffeeCup's spamming of aus.radio.broadcast
Knock yourself out boy, you can go back in the idiot bin
where your glorious spamming crusade can happen without
clogging up my screen.
restore24-7
> "BearCave" <bearcav...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Kadaitcha Man
butcher's cur. Ye gnarred:
> No, but you do sound rather angry in your quick response, but hey,
> that's what staying around aus.politics in heavy doses does to you.
> Yes, as soon as the arrogant bastards on your "out-of-control"
> newsgroup finally understand the concept of cost-benefit (the cost of
> "imposing your politics" on non-political newsgroups outweighs the
> benefit of prima donna attitudes and being an excessive wanker).
> Don't worry mate. Only "aus.politics - the source of political
> spamming in Australia" are getting all of the "restore24-7" messages.
> The remaining groups are being
> No, you stop being indifferent to the fact that other newsgroups are
> trying to discuss matters primarily defined by the title of that
> newsgroup.
>
> All the extremists that have for years been harrassing other groups
> with political spam "all originate" from the same rotten, stinking
> source - aus.politics!
>
> Fuck aus.politics!!!
>
> Don't accuse me of over-stating my importance, using this protest
> campaign as your only evidence.
>
> You idiots from your giant, collective ego-bubble called
> "aus.politics" have been over-stating your importance for years - the
> evidence being that too many of you cannot either (i) confine your
> comments to aus.politics, or (ii) be prepared to accept the
> consequences of spreading your word to moderated political forums,
> the main consequence being that there's actually codes of conduct to
> adhere to, just like there are in the workplace.
G'day. It looks like you're going to blow a blood vessel soon.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
AUK psychos and felons Lits
#2 Cog in the Usenet Hate Machine Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Caput tuum in ano est.
Also try the new beta google interfaces at australia.radio.broadcast.moderated
> "Possum Comitatus" <crouching_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
Google Groups Beta
australia.politics.moderated
http://groups.google.com/group/australiapoliticsmoderated
Visit and join this above spam and troll free group group now in beta
PPye saw and said there
And John Howard said it wouldn't happen
«
Imports take trolley jobs
Investigation as contractor sacks locals
By SARAH DEAN
THE Office of Workplace Services is investigating the employment of
trolley collectors at an Albury shopping centre.
It follows a decision to make trolley collectors at Centro Wodonga,
Albury and Lavington redundant this week and to replace them with
workers hired from Melbourne.
A spokesman for Office of Workplace Services said it had received a
claim that the trolley collectors who lost their jobs at Centro Albury
had been underpaid.
It is understood Centro trolley collectors are employed by a company
called Effective Supermarket Services.
The Border Mail has been unable to contact that company.
One former Centro Wodonga employee, who does not want to be named,
said he got a phone call on Tuesday night saying his services were no
longer required.
"There was no warning and I later discovered all the local trolley
collectors across the three Centro centres had been sacked and were
being replaced with people from Melbourne," he said.
"They are Nigerian and have all worked for ESS before, but some of
them don't even speak English."
He said a representative from the Office of Workplace Services visited
Centro Wodonga yesterday requesting the employees' time books.
"My area manager said the company was being investigated for
underpaying staff and unlawful dismissal," he said.
"One guy who never signed a workplace agreement is threatening to take
legal action as he was never paid the award rate."
One concerned resident, Phil Morton, told The Border Mail he was
alerted to the situation after his wife spoke to a check-out assistant
at Centro Lavington.
Mr Morton said that as a community people should be incensed that
local trolley collectors were now unemployed and that their jobs had
been given to people who were not local.
"Many of these trolley collectors were people with some kind of
disability, and the simple fact that they were able to earn an income
of some kind gave them a sense of accomplishment."
Mr Morton said he was saddened he would no longer be able to enjoy the
conversations he once had with the local collectors.
Centro declined to comment
God Grant me the Serenity
To accept the things I cannot change
Courage to change the things I can
And Wisdom to know the difference.
BearCave
australia.radio.broadcast.moderated"
> God Grant me the Serenity
> To accept the things I cannot change
> Courage to change the things I can
> And Wisdom to know the difference.
Well Keith, I adhered to that advice, changed the things I could and
now we have a newsgroup that's starting to look respectful again.
Last month's post count is 819 posts, the biggest count in a few
months.
Okay, not all those 819 posts are productive efforts and a very small
percentage (about 5%) is actually spam.
But let's not forget that this is the newsgroup some assumed had lost
its relevance and was a lame duck.
Those people should now accept the things they cannot change - in
particular, that not everybody else in a non-proprietary newsgroup
environment thinks as they do.
...From Justin