Only 2 1/2 years to go.
>Another "accurate" Gore prediction:
>
>http://anhonestclimatedebate.wordpress.com/predictions/11/
>
He is a politician not a scientist !
The right hand graph on the following page shows the measured rate of
Arctic sea ice decline
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/
Larger image here
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/n_plot_hires.png
Then why the fuck do the politicians, who we pay to spend out money
wisely, even listen to him - let alone heed his advice?
He should be banned as an unqualified fraud from even speaking in
Australia. Instead, the Labor lunatics welcome him with open arms and
accolades.
> The right hand graph on the following page shows the measured rate of
> Arctic sea ice decline
> http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/
>
> Larger image here
> http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/n_plot_hires.png
>
>
--
"If we cut emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop
for about a thousand years. "
-- Tim (it ain't a gonna rain no more) Flannery
- Australian Climate Commissar
That is what we've been telling you moron alarmists for years.
To be accurate, it's what you've been telling each other. No scientist
ever thought anything different, but you stupid deniers just *think*
they did.
Remember 350-0 in 6 months?? You can't forget really can you? The nil
hasn't changed over the next six months, but the 350 certainly has.
(Not as it used to, mind. The lesson I taught you had to be hard
learned, but you deniers don't mention him as often as you did. Well
done).
Dawlish, what percentage exactly is six months, when divided into 4.5
billion years?
PS. The mind of a child at work.
Chow
I remember you throwing Gore under the bus 350 times in 6 months. You
kept cuont for us.
> Dawlish, what percentage exactly is six months, when divided into 4.5
> billion years?
>
> PS. The mind of a child at work.
>
So in two years time theres going to be no snow in the Arctic
according to Gore.
Dawlish of course is going along with his hero.
A break in the ranks now would be a disaster...
All those lovely grants for 'Climate change' "research" are up for
dibs.....
Dawlish the Liar loves to count. It amuses him greatly.
Only when it shows up stupids like you catoni. It's actually hilarious
watching you struggle too; you are right there. *>))
You seem a little irrelevant these days. What's the matter?
He learnt at the feet of the Sesame Street Count
georgie's on the case! Marvellous. GW is bound to be ending now.
Is it me, or are these stupids breeding?
Well, I do have a life above and beyond this ng... And later this
year or early next year I may not be on here really much at all.
Planning a RTW trip, and I'll be gone many months, or even perhaps
years. Being retired gives one that opportunity.
I have a great interest in history and culture and ancient
religions and philosophy. So I hope to spend much time exploring
ancient Greek and Roman ruins around the Mediterranean Sea, search for
my ancestral roots in Scotland and England and Ireland, (And Hamburg,
Germany, since my one grandmother's family came from there),
Visit Hindu and Buddhist temples in India and Thailand, Laos, and
Cambodia, (Angkor Wat being one of them), and see the beaches and
nature of the Philippines.
It's a major trip.... much planning to do.
The years are going by, and I want to do that while I still have
my health and strength before I die.
Good luck. I hope it goes well. Don't miss Vietnam. You would never
regret going there.
There's no accounting for taste.
A lie. We demand a recount.
>"Good luck. I hope it goes well. Don't miss Vietnam. You would never
>regret going there."
I may go there as well. Certainly a country with a fascinating
history. Much to see. I'll be packing just one carry-on size bag.
After much research, and studying sites like Doug Dyment's www.onebag.com,
I've purchased a new MEI Voyageur bag. The maximum carry-on size for
most airlines. Can be carried with a shoulder strap, or the zip away
backpack straps and waist belt. And tough built.
Vietnam is a possibility for sure.
In Australia we follow Lord Monckton for our climate science, not Al Gore. You
idiot, how can Gore know anything about science when he's not a Lord or even
English for that matter?
Perhaps you filthy Kiwis will do the same once we invade and slaughter you all as
we have warned. You socialists need to be taught a lesson.
All scientists are socialists because they're funded by government and not
corporations. Gore is a Leftist and therefore an enemy of free thought.
Conservative scholars, venerated right thinking Think Tanks and learned
Republicans now say that Al Gore is the Satanic High Priest of the
Socialist Global Warming Religion and his only goal is to enslave us under an
oppressive one world collectivist government.
The fact is that Al Gore only invented the Global Warming Hoax 2 years ago to
get even with Bush. Since then, the Liberals have forced it down our throats
and have silenced all debate.
Conservative experts say that scientists cannot be trusted because a scientist
is just a person who passed whatever school tests were set up to get a "Ph.D".
What are scientists saying about global warming?
Unfortunately, we cannot trust the scientists. They are also lying about 9/11,
or they are silent about the truth, which is the same as lying.
Some of the possible reasons the scientists are lying:
o Emotional Weakness
Some scientists may not have the emotional strength to deal with unpleasant
issues, such as 9/11.
o Member of the Crime Network
Some scientists may be accepted members of the Zionist crime network, and
some scientists may be working with the crime network simply for money, sex, or
some other reward.
o Victim of the Crime Network
Some scientists may be blackmailed or threatened by the Zionist crime
network into remaining silent or supporting the official story.
o Disillusioned with the Human Race
Some scientists may have become so disillusioned with the human race that
they ignore the world around them.
Some of them may not have bothered to take a close look at 9/11, and others
may have decided that the human race is so hopelessly corrupt and stupid that
there is no point in trying to expose it.
o Stupidity, Greed, or Mental Illness
Timothy Leary is a scientist, and so is Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski.
If you were to put all of the scientists on their own planet, it would
definitely be a more intelligent planet, but there would be mental illness,
crime, fights, and other problems.
Scientists are just ordinary people with intelligence
Scientists are just humans with an education; monkeys with a PhD.
"9/11? I don't see anything strange about 9/11"
Have you noticed that the scientists who work for chemical companies
"discover" that their pesticides and other poisons are perfectly safe?
And that the scientists who do medical research discover that those same
chemicals are dangerous?
Scientists may be slightly more honest and intelligent than "ordinary" people,
but that is nothing to boast about. Smelling slightly better than a dead fish
is still stinking very badly.
It doesn't matter why they lie!
It doesn't matter why a scientist is lying about 9/11. The important concept is
that we are fools to trust anybody who lies.
The issue of global warming has a tremendous effect on corporate profits,
government policies, and the future of the world.
Since scientists are willing to lie about 9/11, why wouldn't they also lie
about global warming and other issues of major significance?
The only issues scientists seem to be 100% honest about are the issues of no
financial or political importance, such as the boiling point of water.