[German, please use a translating tool if necessary]
Am 17. Januar wird in der flämischen Hafenmetropole Antwerpen ein denkwürdiges Treffen stattfinden. Unter Federführung der flämischen Volkspartei Vlaams Belang, die allein in Antwerpen regelmäßig Wahlergebnisse von über 30 Prozent erzielt, treffen sich am 17. Januar führende Vertreter wichtiger patriotischen Parteien und Bewegungen Europas, um eine "Städte-Allianz gegen die Islamisierung" ins Leben zu rufen. Neben dem Vlaams-Belang-Fraktionschef Filip Dewinter (l.), dem Vorsitzenden der Freiheitlichen Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) HC Strache (r.) und weiteren europäischen Rechtsdemokraten wird dabei auch der pro-Köln-und pro-NRW-Vorsitzende Markus Beisicht (M.) den Eintritt der nonkonformen Bürgerbewegung in die neu gegründete Allianz verkünden.
Die Details dieser neuen Partnerschaft werden in Antwerpen von Dewinter, Strache und Beisicht bei einer internationalen Pressekonferenz erläutert werden. Zusammen mit Beisicht werden die pro-Köln-Fraktionsvorsitzende Judith Wolter und der pro-NRW-Generalsekretär Markus Wiener an den anschließenden Gesprächen teilnehmen. Klar ist jetzt schon, daß pro Köln und pro NRW dabei eine zentrale Rolle als unverbrauchte und erfolgreiche Rechtsformationen im größten EU-Mitgliedsland Deutschland spielen werden. Folgerichtig soll auch im Herbst 2008 ein großer Anti-Islamisierungs-Kongress in Köln stattfinden - mit der vollen Unterstützung besagter europäischer Partnerparteien.
"Gerade mit unserer lokalen Verwurzelung in den überfremdungsgeplagten Städten des Rheinlandes und des Ruhrgebietes sind wir natürlich prädestiniert für ein solches Projekt", zeigt sich Markus Beisicht überzeugt. "Wir führen beispielhaft für ganz Deutschland seit Jahren eine erfolgreiche Kampagne gegen die Islamisierung. Aufgrund des von uns organisierten und angeführten Bürgerprotestes gibt es bis heute keine Genehmigung für die seit langem geplante Großmoschee in Köln. Stattdessen wurde landes- und sogar europaweit über den Großmoschee-Streit berichtet. Und in Folge davon gibt es jetzt ähnliche politische Kampagnen gegen Großmoscheen und die weitere Islamisierung des Abendlandes in der ganzen Bundesrepublik sowie in vielen europäischen Nachbarländern.
In der neu zu gründenden patriotischen Städte-Allianz werden alle Seiten vom jeweiligen Wissen und der Organisationskraft der Partnerverbände profitieren. Mit einer gesunden Portion Stolz erfüllt uns zudem die Tatsache, daß wir als regional aufstrebende Gruppierung gleichberechtigt mit bereits landesweit erfolgreichen Formationen und manch langjähriger Regierungspartei an einem Tisch sitzen. Das können alle Mitglieder, Freunde und Unterstützer unserer Bürgerbewegung durchaus als Anerkennung ihres herausragenden politischen Einsatzes verstehen."
> Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: >> [German, please use a translating tool if necessary]
> Translation: > Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
> In English: > Fuck off Nazi
Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as being a nazi. Is it merely an ad-hominem attack by a thoughtless moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam? Or is it an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all criticism of Islam?
>> Translation: >> Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
>> In English: >> Fuck off Nazi
> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as > being a nazi. Is it merely an ad-hominem attack by a thoughtless > moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam? Or is it > an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all > criticism of Islam?
================= According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, if compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
>>> Translation: >>> Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
>>> In English: >>> Fuck off Nazi
>> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as >> being a nazi. Is it merely an ad-hominem attack by a thoughtless >> moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam? Or is it >> an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all >> criticism of Islam? > ================= > According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the > current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, if > compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
> -lm
You don't think Islam doesn't already have Canada in its sights? What do you think they've forgotten about you? Maybe you should read up on what's happening in Australia.
Doug wrote: > "B J Foster" <bjfos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:4786925b$0$26343$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: > >> [German, please use a translating tool if necessary]
> > Translation: > > Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
> > In English: > > Fuck off Nazi
> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as > being a nazi.
Seeing as now Nazis were exclusively Germans, it's racist to call someone a Nazi. So report him to his ISP.
> Is it merely an ad-hominem attack by a thoughtless > moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam? Or is it > an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all > criticism of Islam?
> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the > current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, if > compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
'If compatible'? Well, measured by current canadian practices, this must then mean any third-worlder, including mohammedans.
Are you sure that 'America Alone' doesn't in reality mean 'The USA Alone'? And certainly only if remains under a republican president, one might add.
-- Proudly introducing the free speech concept to german/european politicians & jurists. >.)
> Doug wrote: >> "B J Foster" <bjfos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:4786925b$0$26343$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... >> > Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: >> >> [German, please use a translating tool if necessary]
>> > Translation: >> > Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
>> > In English: >> > Fuck off Nazi
>> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as >> being a nazi.
> Seeing as now Nazis were exclusively Germans, it's racist to call > someone a Nazi. So report him to his ISP.
http://www.srpska-mreza.com/library/facts/hanjar.html Most of the basic literature, while talking about WWII Independent State of Croatia (ISC), does not fail to mention that entire Bosnia-Herzegovina was part of this Nazi satellite
Many different European nations were called by Himmler to join SS... and many did
(Belgians, Danes, Norwegians,... even Russian Cossacks). A photograph on page 160 shows
happy SS volunteers from The Hague leaving for a training camp in Germany. Himmler knew
he would not get Serbs to volunteer in the SS and they are among rare people not called.
>> Is it merely an ad-hominem attack by a thoughtless >> moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam? Or is it >> an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all >> criticism of Islam?
>>>> Translation: >>>> Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
>>>> In English: >>>> Fuck off Nazi
>>> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as >>> being a nazi. Is it merely an ad-hominem attack by a thoughtless >>> moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam? Or is it >>> an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all >>> criticism of Islam? >> ================= >> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the >> current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, >> if compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
>> -lm
> You don't think Islam doesn't already have Canada in its sights?
========================= I sure do...that's why I want disillusioned Europeans ( or Aussies) to come to Canada and why I use the word 'compatible'. -------------
>What do you think > they've forgotten about you? Maybe you should read up on what's happening > in > Australia.
----------------------------------------------- I have, I have, that's why I'm worried. -lm
>> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the >> current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, >> if compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
> 'If compatible'? Well, measured by current canadian practices, this must > then mean any third-worlder, including mohammedans.
=================== Exactly. but that's what must be changed. Years of Liberal governments have already destroyed the old Canada and now we're not far behind Europe on the path to extinction. With it's smaller population, Canada makes an easy target. ------
> Are you sure that 'America Alone' doesn't in reality mean 'The USA Alone'?
--------------------------- Probably, in terms of 'last man standing'. Canada is on the edge of being lost. ---------------------------
> And certainly only if remains under a republican president, one might add.
----------------------------------------------
Republican or democrat makes no difference. Both parties (USA or Canada) are now captive to voting blocks who determine the government. No party can speak out against the dangers of immigration and hope to get elected.. Democracy has been skewered. The only hope is that the rest of the electorate recognizes what is happening and decide to unite in their vote. Even that opportunity is fast disappearing. So far, the author is calling it like it is. -----------------------
> 'Freedom of speech - use it or lose it.'
-------------------------- Free speech has been replaced by the politically correct and it'll only come back if people finally wake up. The big part of our problem is the flower power people of the sixties. They've been teaching several generations of our kids an unrealistic vision of the world. That vision is characterized by thinking that if they stick a flower in the gun barrel of an aggressor that, overtaken by compassion, he won't shoot. That is not the history of mankind, tribalism is still alive and growing. -lm
>>> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the >>> current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, >>> if compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
>> 'If compatible'? Well, measured by current canadian practices, this must >> then mean any third-worlder, including mohammedans. > =================== > Exactly. but that's what must be changed. Years of Liberal governments > have already destroyed the old Canada and now we're not far behind Europe > on the path to extinction. > With it's smaller population, Canada makes an easy target. > ------
I thought all Canadians were bleeding heart libidiots. Thankfully I'm wrong. Obviously TJ Hardman was right!
That last sentence is frightening. FOr the muslims to acheive a majority in Canada wouldn't take long, relative to say, the US.
>> Are you sure that 'America Alone' doesn't in reality mean 'The USA >> Alone'? > --------------------------- > Probably, in terms of 'last man standing'. Canada is on the edge of being > lost. > ---------------------------
Already? I didn't realize it was that bad. Sorry to hear this.
>> And certainly only if remains under a republican president, one might >> add. > ----------------------------------------------
> Republican or democrat makes no difference. Both parties (USA or Canada) > are now captive > to voting blocks who determine the government. No party can speak out > against the dangers of immigration and hope to get elected.. Democracy > has been skewered. > The only hope is that the rest of the electorate recognizes what is > happening and decide to unite in their vote. Even that opportunity is > fast disappearing. > So far, the author is calling it like it is. > -----------------------
Len is mostly right on this. THe candidates that are really behind stopping illegal immigration have been silenced and outcast by the Mainstream Media in the US. Still-in-all, the demorat candidates are much worse in terms of their support of unrestricted illegal immigration. I would've loved to see Tancredo or Duncan HUnter elected.
>> 'Freedom of speech - use it or lose it.' > -------------------------- > Free speech has been replaced by the politically correct and it'll only > come back if people finally wake up. The big part of our problem is the > flower power people of the sixties. They've been teaching several > generations of our kids an unrealistic vision of the world. > That vision is characterized by thinking that if they stick a flower in > the gun barrel of an aggressor that, overtaken by compassion, he won't > shoot. > That is not the history of mankind, tribalism is still alive and growing. > -lm
Libidiots figure that if they tolerate/appease the intolerance of Islam, Islam will somehow become magically more tolerant and less full of hate. Appeasement didn't work for Chamberlain and it won't work w/the intolerant hatred that is the religion of Islam.
It would be nice if you would give yanks the chance to immigrate to Canada, but I can understand why you don't.
Doug wrote: > "B J Foster" <bjfos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:4786925b$0$26343$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... >> Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: >>> [German, please use a translating tool if necessary]
>> Translation: >> Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
>> In English: >> Fuck off Nazi
> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as > being a nazi.
Deep inside a bigoted nazi's skull there is always a miswired brain - and it manifests itself in generalisation.
I am critical of Islam. Do I call myself a nazi?
> Is it merely an ad-hominem attack
Nope. It is not 'merely' an ad-hom attack.
> by a thoughtless > moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam?
I would not refute 'any and all' criticsm either
> Or is it > an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all > criticism of Islam?
More like a filter - to increase the signal-to-noise ratio
>> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the >> current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, if >> compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
> 'If compatible'? Well, measured by current canadian practices, this must > then mean any third-worlder, including mohammedans.
> Are you sure that 'America Alone' doesn't in reality mean 'The USA Alone'? > And certainly only if remains under a republican president, one might add.
> It would be nice if you would give yanks the chance to immigrate to > Canada, but I can understand why you don't. >===============
I would like to see more Yanks come to Canada and I wasn't aware of any backlog of applicants.
The problem may lay with changes in our basic immigration policy, changes quietly put in place by a Liberal Prime Minister (Trudeau) a few decades back.
The immigration policy that made Canada 'punch above its weight' in the world was one that called for compatible immigrants. This didn't directly refer to race or color but referred more to Christians and democrats. This basically eliminated Muslim and African countries since few were from democracies or were Christians.
Trudeau changed all of that by dropping the 'compatible' bit, replacing it with ''proportional''. So, for example, since China outnumbered Americans in the world , the number of Chinese accepted as immigrants could be greater than Americans or English or Europeans, etc.
Many of us figured that since Trudeau represented the French element in Canada, he also wanted to dilute the Anglos coming to Canada in order to strengthen the French minority..
In case you haven't read the following, I'm sending it along, just for interest. The writer makes his opinions known on Trudeau and a few others. This is a guy that expects to be running in the next Federal election in Canada and who can be quite interesting. -lm.
>To Editorial Archives
A Mish Mash Of Politics Wednesday, January 09, 2008
USA Election 2008 By Howard Galganov
Galganov Dot Com
So, HL Menken, who wrote: “No one ever went broke by underestimating the intelligence of the American people” was wrong yesterday in terms of the Democratic Party New Hampshire Primary.
And that’s a really good thing.
Barak Hussein Obama was taken down a peg or two by the Clintons, once again giving me hope that not all American voters can be so easily conned.
If you’re an American reading this, please do not be offended by my assessment of American voters and their intellectual incapacity, since I feel no differently about the intellectual incapacity of far too many Canadians.
The problem with Democracy is that the most ill informed people get to vote. I am referring to people who don’t look beyond the rhetoric and the staged appearances, who don’t ask the hard questions, or never bother to look into the true history of the candidate(s) they favor.
Voting in North America is very much like voting for American or Canadian Idol.
In Canada, the son (Justin) of the late Prime Minster Pierre Elliott Trudeau, who was in my opinion one of the worst, if not the worst Prime Minister Canada ever had, wants to follow in his father’s footsteps.
Trudeau senior was a lawyer and associate professor at a French Montreal university. He was born wealthy with a silver spoon, and never had to really work a day in his life.
During World War II, as Canadian soldiers were bleeding and dying overseas, Trudeau flirted with a Quebec based pro Nazi organization called the Bloc Populaire.
And like the smug elitist jerk that he was, Trudeau toured the back roads of Quebec on his motorcycle wearing Nazi regalia while Nazis murdered more than 12 million people in their death camps.
Enough said about Trudeau senior.
The son of Pierre (Justin), whose life experience includes sitting on “uncle Castro’s knee” while the family vacationed in Cuba, has taught school and roamed the world in his very Liberal hippy style, is being touted by many in the federal Liberal Party as the natural successor to his dad.
On what basis?
What could possibly qualify this airhead to one day be the Prime Minister of Canada, other than he looks cool, he dresses cool, he speaks with theatrical passion and his dad was Pierre Elliot Trudeau?
In the United States of America, there were the Kennedys, a family of “natural leaders” by birthright. Joe Kennedy was a Nazi sympathizer who profited big time from his dealings with freedom’s enemies.
Nonetheless, these Kennedys had a better grasp on how to manipulate the media and star-struck voters better than anyone.
JFK ran the White House as if it was his personal brothel.
Ted Kennedy left a woman to die in his overturned car in Chappaquiddick, with barely a wrinkle to his reputation.
Most Americans blame Johnston and Nixon for the Vietnamese War. But it was Kennedy who got America involved in it.
Most Americans credit Kennedy for staring down the Russians during the Cuban Missile Crisis, but forget how Kennedy set-up thousands of Cuban Patriots for death, capture and torture when Kennedy gave the order to abandon them at the Bay of Pigs.
Lovers of the Kennedy mystique never talk of the deal he made to surrender critical missiles in Asia, in a trade with the Russians not to place their nuclear weapons in Cuba.
There are those, myself included, who believe Khrushchev purposefully outmaneuvered Kennedy over the Missile Crisis. The Russians walked away with something while the Americans got nothing back in return.
But reality doesn’t matter when it comes to charisma, populism and what the people want to believe. And that’s why the chance for Barak Hussein Obama bothers me so much.
I certainly don’t want to see Hillary Clinton in the White House, but given my druthers, I’d rather see her there than Obama, or Edwards, the multi million-dollar ambulance chaser.
In yesterday’s (January 8, 2008) editorial; I wrote that Obama was born in Indonesia. This was a misstatement. Obama was born in Hawaii, and later moved to Indonesia where he was partially educated in a Moslem school.
The reason I REALLY dislike Obama, is for his politics and theatrics. He is an absolute phony who sells a dream, no less dishonestly than how the old-day snake oil salesmen sold their cure-all elixirs.
He reminds me of the television preachers who sell nothing but a great sermon of gibberish, platitudes and false hope in exchange for personal wealth.
Many Americans wrote to tell me that Obama could not run for President if he was not born in the USA. I don’t believe this to be true.
The resolution that deals with rules governing who can, and who cannot be President of the United States of America says: No naturalized citizen can be President.
But, what about a child born out of the USA whose parents (or parent) are US citizens?
Many people in the US Foreign Service and military have children born out of the USA. Are their children not American citizens with all rights?
I have Canadian born cousins whose father is an American, who has lived in Canada for most of his life, but never took out Canadian citizenship.
One of my cousins now lives in the Boston Area. He carries an American passport and is not considered a naturalized citizen. He is an American citizen through and though.
What would stop him from running to be President of the United States?
These American Primaries are better than all the sporting events of the world combined. For political junkies like me, I’d rather watch a Primary debate than the Super Bowl, and I really like the Super Bowl.
For what it’s worth, and probably not that much, I still think the next President of the USA will be Rudy Giuliani.
Thank you for reading Galganov.com and for all of your moral and financial support. And most of all, thank you for spreading the word.
Within the next few days I will start publishing quite a number of fabulous letters I have received in the past weeks.
Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov
How To Support Galganov Dot Com
Home | Editorials | Media Links | Letters | Publications | Contact Us
>> It would be nice if you would give yanks the chance to immigrate to >> Canada, but I can understand why you don't. >>=============== > I would like to see more Yanks come to Canada and I wasn't aware of any > backlog of applicants.
I thought it was requirment for citizens of Commonwealth countries to despise yanks, maybe the Islamic invasion has changed that tune though.
> The problem may lay with changes in our basic immigration policy, changes > quietly put in place by a Liberal Prime Minister (Trudeau) a few decades > back.
> The immigration policy that made Canada 'punch above its weight' in the > world was one that called for compatible immigrants. This didn't directly > refer to race or color but referred more to Christians and democrats. > This > basically eliminated Muslim and African countries since few were from > democracies > or were Christians.
> Trudeau changed all of that by dropping the 'compatible' bit, replacing it > with ''proportional''. > So, for example, since China outnumbered Americans in the world , the > number > of Chinese accepted as immigrants could be greater than Americans or > English > or Europeans, etc.
> Many of us figured that since Trudeau represented the French element in > Canada, he also wanted to dilute the Anglos coming to Canada in order to > strengthen the French minority..
> In case you haven't read the following, I'm sending it along, just for > interest. The writer makes his opinions known on Trudeau and a few > others. > This is a guy that expects to be running in the next Federal election in > Canada and who can be quite interesting. > -lm.
>>To Editorial Archives
> A Mish Mash Of Politics Wednesday, January 09, 2008
> USA Election 2008 By Howard Galganov
> Galganov Dot Com
> So, HL Menken, who wrote: “No one ever went broke > by > underestimating the intelligence of the American people” was wrong > yesterday > in terms of the Democratic Party New Hampshire Primary.
> And that’s a really good thing.
> Barak Hussein Obama was taken down a peg or two by > the Clintons, once again giving me hope that not all American voters can > be > so easily conned.
> If you’re an American reading this, please do not > be > offended by my assessment of American voters and their intellectual > incapacity, since I feel no differently about the intellectual incapacity > of > far too many Canadians.
> The problem with Democracy is that the most ill > informed people get to vote. I am referring to people who don’t look > beyond > the rhetoric and the staged appearances, who don’t ask the hard questions, > or never bother to look into the true history of the candidate(s) they > favor.
> Voting in North America is very much like voting > for > American or Canadian Idol.
> In Canada, the son (Justin) of the late Prime > Minster Pierre Elliott Trudeau, who was in my opinion one of the worst, if > not the worst Prime Minister Canada ever had, wants to follow in his > father’s > footsteps.
> Trudeau senior was a lawyer and associate professor > at a French Montreal university. He was born wealthy with a silver spoon, > and never had to really work a day in his life.
> During World War II, as Canadian soldiers were > bleeding and dying overseas, Trudeau flirted with a Quebec based pro Nazi > organization called the Bloc Populaire.
> And like the smug elitist jerk that he was, Trudeau > toured the back roads of Quebec on his motorcycle wearing Nazi regalia > while > Nazis murdered more than 12 million people in their death camps.
> Enough said about Trudeau senior.
> The son of Pierre (Justin), whose life experience > includes sitting on “uncle Castro’s knee” while the family vacationed in > Cuba, has taught school and roamed the world in his very Liberal hippy > style, is being touted by many in the federal Liberal Party as the natural > successor to his dad.
> On what basis?
> What could possibly qualify this airhead to one day > be the Prime Minister of Canada, other than he looks cool, he dresses > cool, > he speaks with theatrical passion and his dad was Pierre Elliot Trudeau?
> In the United States of America, there were the > Kennedys, a family of “natural leaders” by birthright. Joe Kennedy was a > Nazi sympathizer who profited big time from his dealings with freedom’s > enemies.
> Nonetheless, these Kennedys had a better grasp on > how to manipulate the media and star-struck voters better than anyone.
> JFK ran the White House as if it was his personal > brothel.
> Ted Kennedy left a woman to die in his overturned > car in Chappaquiddick, with barely a wrinkle to his reputation.
> Most Americans blame Johnston and Nixon for the > Vietnamese War. But it was Kennedy who got America involved in it.
> Most Americans credit Kennedy for staring down the > Russians during the Cuban Missile Crisis, but forget how Kennedy set-up > thousands of Cuban Patriots for death, capture and torture when Kennedy > gave > the order to abandon them at the Bay of Pigs.
> Lovers of the Kennedy mystique never talk of the > deal he made to surrender critical missiles in Asia, in a trade with the > Russians not to place their nuclear weapons in Cuba.
> There are those, myself included, who believe > Khrushchev purposefully outmaneuvered Kennedy over the Missile Crisis. The > Russians walked away with something while the Americans got nothing back > in > return.
> But reality doesn’t matter when it comes to > charisma, populism and what the people want to believe. And that’s why the > chance for Barak Hussein Obama bothers me so much.
> I certainly don’t want to see Hillary Clinton in > the > White House, but given my druthers, I’d rather see her there than Obama, > or > Edwards, the multi million-dollar ambulance chaser.
> In yesterday’s (January 8, 2008) editorial; I wrote > that Obama was born in Indonesia. This was a misstatement. Obama was born > in > Hawaii, and later moved to Indonesia where he was partially educated in a > Moslem school.
> The reason I REALLY dislike Obama, is for his > politics and theatrics. He is an absolute phony who sells a dream, no less > dishonestly than how the old-day snake oil salesmen sold their cure-all > elixirs.
> He reminds me of the television preachers who sell > nothing but a great sermon of gibberish, platitudes and false hope in > exchange for personal wealth.
> Many Americans wrote to tell me that Obama could > not > run for President if he was not born in the USA. I don’t believe this to > be > true.
> The resolution that deals with rules governing who > can, and who cannot be President of the United States of America says: No > naturalized citizen can be President.
> But, what about a child born out of the USA whose > parents (or parent) are US citizens?
> Many people in the US Foreign Service and military > have children born out of the USA. Are their children not American > citizens > with all rights?
> I have Canadian born cousins whose father is an > American, who has lived in Canada for most of his life, but never took out > Canadian citizenship.
> One of my cousins now lives in the Boston Area. He > carries an American passport and is not considered a naturalized citizen. > He > is an American citizen through and though.
> What would stop him from running to be President of > the United States?
> These American Primaries are better than all the > sporting events of the world combined. For political junkies like me, I’d > rather watch a Primary debate than the Super Bowl, and I really like the > Super Bowl.
> For what it’s worth, and probably not that much, I > still think the next President of the USA will be Rudy Giuliani.
Not cross-dressing Rudy. Not the Rudy who supports amnesty for all illegal aliens regardless of who they are.
> Thank you for reading Galganov.com and for all of > your moral and financial support. And most of all, thank you for spreading > the word.
> Within the next few days I will start publishing > quite a number of fabulous letters I have received in the past weeks.
> Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov
> How To Support Galganov Dot Com
Interesting stuff Len. I'm betting your viewpoints represent a slim minority of Canadians though.
> Doug wrote: >> "B J Foster" <bjfos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:4786925b$0$26343$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... >>> Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: >>>> [German, please use a translating tool if necessary]
>>> Translation: >>> Sieg Heil. Deutschland Uber Alles!
>>> In English: >>> Fuck off Nazi
>> Interesting. BlowJob accuses everyone critical of Islam as >> being a nazi.
> Deep inside a bigoted nazi's skull there is always a miswired brain - and > it manifests itself in generalisation.
> I am critical of Islam. Do I call myself a nazi?
>> Is it merely an ad-hominem attack
> Nope. It is not 'merely' an ad-hom attack.
>> by a thoughtless >> moron who can't refute any and all criticism of Pislam?
> I would not refute 'any and all' criticsm either
In point of fact, you never attempt to refute anything critical of Islam, instead you resort to the ad-hom attack.
>> Or is it >> an attempt to curtail free speech and prevent any and all >> criticism of Islam?
> More like a filter - to increase the signal-to-noise ratio
Where the noise you filter out is anything critical of Islam.
>> -- >> "Michael Laudahn eOpposition" <ch805...@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message >> news:1i42f0.u00.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> "Len McLaughlin" <l...@nospam.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag >>> news:4786c2e1$0$19887$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net... >>>> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the >>>> current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My advice, >>>> if compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
>>> 'If compatible'? Well, measured by current canadian practices, this must >>> then mean any third-worlder, including mohammedans. >> =================== >> Exactly. but that's what must be changed. Years of Liberal governments >> have already destroyed the old Canada and now we're not far behind Europe >> on the path to extinction. >> With it's smaller population, Canada makes an easy target. >> ------
> I thought all Canadians were bleeding heart libidiots. Thankfully I'm wrong. > Obviously TJ Hardman was right!
I always am, unless of course I have senselessly decided that people such as in the present Administration will stop backstabbing me and the nation.
No, Canadians are a very interesting and complex people. One of the best ways to understand them is to think of them as Winter People. To survive being cooped up all winter long -- 8 months or more -- with other people in fairly confined spaces with a deadly exterior environment, it's necessary to be mellow, laid-back, easy-going sorts of people. The one exception to that is when someone threatens your ability to make it through the winter. Canadians like to sit around fires and be friendly with each other. But if you try to burn the fuel they need to get them through winter, each and every last Canadian will pile on and rip you apart. It's only commonsense.
For Canadians, "conservative" has different meanings in the fields of politics, and the field of staying alive. In the latter domain, all Canadians are conservative to a degree most Americans can't imagine.
The reason Canadians are loved and respected throughout the world is mostly because Canadians have necessarily evolved the skill of being loveable... and anyone who fails to give them certain kinds of respect generally doesn't live to spread that disrespect. Canadians will try almost anything to help people get along so that they'll be able to last out the winter. If it turns out that it's not working, they quickly abandon what does not, cannot, work.
Canadians are all about getting along... except with people who refuse to get along. If you're American, be kind to the Canadians, they are your slightly-estranged brethren. If you're Canadian, please forgive us for being your crazy big brother who isn't very good at thinking things through, and often forgets that other people have their own ways and needs.
> That last sentence is frightening. FOr the muslims to acheive a > majority in Canada wouldn't take long, relative to say, the US.
Look at it this way: semi-tropical people whose religion is based in warm temperate climates, where people don't have to cooperate, do not last long when confronted with the chilling beauty of the Boreal Forest. When confronted with the Cold Facts of Winter, either they learn Canadian ways and tolerance and sharing the warmth -- in which case they have become Canadians -- or their froze-solid bodies will have to be chipped loose from the permafrost next May.
Canadians may feel free to call me an asshole.
-- The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may often assume the appearance, and produce the effects, of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy. --Gibbon, "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire"
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:38:42 -0400, in uk.politics.misc, in thread Re: 'European city alliance against islamisation', "Len McLaughlin" <l...@nospam.com>, wrote
>> 'Freedom of speech - use it or lose it.' >-------------------------- >Free speech has been replaced by the politically correct and it'll only come >back if people finally wake up. The big part of our problem is the flower >power people of the sixties. They've been teaching several generations of >our kids an unrealistic vision of the world. >That vision is characterized by thinking that if they stick a flower in the >gun barrel of an aggressor that, overtaken by compassion, he won't shoot. >That is not the history of mankind, tribalism is still alive and growing. >-lm
It is not just in the West. Or, as an Italian put it to me, the problem is not just the '68 people alone.
Earlier when i said that some writer was a bit starry-eyed for thinking that he could explain to the islamists the error of their ways, I was thinking of the young girl in Moscow who walked into the Opera House under siege by Chechnyan Islamists to "negotiate" with them. They shot her dead. I think they threw the body out the front doors.
Hopefully, your "Human Rights Commissions" will not succeed in shutting Steyn up.
FACE
****
"Ever since September 11, the subtext of this war could be summed up as something like, 'Suburban Jason, with his iPod, godlessness, and earring, loves to live too much to die, while Ali, raised as the 11th son of an impoverished but devout street-sweeper in Damascus, loves death too much to live.' The Iranians, like bin Laden, promulgate this mythical antithesis which, like all caricatures, has elements of truth in it. But what the Iranians, like the al Qaedists, do not fully fathom, is that Jason, upon concluding that he would lose not only his iPod and earring, but his entire family and suburb as well, is capable of conjuring up things far more frightening than anything in the 8th-century brain of Mr. Ahmadinejad. Unfortunately, the barbarity of the nightmares at Antietam, Verdun, Dresden, and Hiroshima prove that well enough. "
>>> It would be nice if you would give yanks the chance to immigrate to >>> Canada, but I can understand why you don't. >>>=============== >> I would like to see more Yanks come to Canada and I wasn't aware of any >> backlog of applicants.
> I thought it was requirment for citizens of Commonwealth countries to > despise yanks, maybe the Islamic invasion has changed that tune though.
> Interesting stuff Len. I'm betting your viewpoints represent a slim > minority > of Canadians though.
============================================ No way, Doug. There may be a slim minority that DON"T like Americans and I mean slim. Because you're so much bigger, there's sure to be some conflicts and politics come into it as well. The Liberals don't care for the Bush government but they loved Clinton and basically visa versa for the Conservatives. Sometimes we see your politicians as bullies but we sometimes see our own as worst. Our current Conservative government is very pro-American. The Liberals didn't agree with your Iraq adventure but then they committed troops to Afghanstan and the current gov't increased that committent.
Canadians can't wait to go south to the US in the winter time or anytime for vacation or shopping and you don't do that if you hate the people. A lot of Canadians would even like to see us join the US and someday I think that will happen, unless the Islamists get to us first. I have a nephew who is currently teaching in NY but your bureauracy gave him such a run around that he almost gave up in disgust.
Like you, we have businesses who push immigration for cheap labor and that may be one reason they push for 3rd world types, just as you do the Mexicans. The Liberal party has positioned themselves as the darlings of immigration just for the votes. and sometimes they play hate-the- Americans card for votes as well but it's mostly politics. Where do you get the idea that we don't like Americans? . -lm
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:38:27 GMT, in uk.politics.misc, in thread Re: 'European city alliance against islamisation', "Doug" <no...@nowhere.com>, wrote
>>> Are you sure that 'America Alone' doesn't in reality mean 'The USA >>> Alone'? >> --------------------------- >> Probably, in terms of 'last man standing'. Canada is on the edge of being >> lost. >> ---------------------------
>Already? I didn't realize it was that bad. Sorry to hear this.
Maybe you should read more Steyn? His Macleans articles are the best.
"America Alone" refers to the US.
FACE
--
"We are not fighting so that you will offer us something. We are fighting to eliminate you." -- Hussein Massawi, a former Hezbollah leader.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:46:58 -0800, in uk.politics.misc, in thread Re: 'European city alliance against islamisation', "Doug" <no...@nowhere.com>, wrote
>> I would like to see more Yanks come to Canada and I wasn't aware of any >> backlog of applicants.
>I thought it was requirment for citizens of Commonwealth countries to >despise yanks, maybe the Islamic invasion has changed that tune though.
It is mostly usenet tradition. And not just for commonwealth countries.
>>> -- >>> "Michael Laudahn eOpposition" <ch805...@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message >>> news:1i42f0.u00.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> "Len McLaughlin" <l...@nospam.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag >>>> news:4786c2e1$0$19887$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net... >>>>> According to the book (America Alone) that I'm curently reading, the >>>>> current Europe is history, the Islamists have already won. My >>>>> advice, if compatable, pack up and come to Canada.
>>>> 'If compatible'? Well, measured by current canadian practices, this >>>> must then mean any third-worlder, including mohammedans. >>> =================== >>> Exactly. but that's what must be changed. Years of Liberal governments >>> have already destroyed the old Canada and now we're not far behind >>> Europe on the path to extinction. >>> With it's smaller population, Canada makes an easy target. >>> ------
>> I thought all Canadians were bleeding heart libidiots. Thankfully I'm >> wrong. >> Obviously TJ Hardman was right!
> I always am, unless of course I have senselessly decided that people such > as in the present Administration will stop backstabbing me and the nation.
> No, Canadians are a very interesting and complex people. One of the best > ways to understand them is to think of them as Winter People. To survive > being cooped up all winter long -- 8 months or more -- with other people > in fairly confined spaces with a deadly exterior environment, it's > necessary to be mellow, laid-back, easy-going sorts of people. The one > exception to that is when someone threatens your ability to make it > through the winter. Canadians like to sit around fires and be friendly > with each other. But if you try to burn the fuel they need to get them > through winter, each and every last Canadian will pile on and rip you > apart. It's only commonsense.
> For Canadians, "conservative" has different meanings in the fields of > politics, and the field of staying alive. In the latter domain, all > Canadians are conservative to a degree most Americans can't imagine.
> The reason Canadians are loved and respected throughout the world is > mostly because Canadians have necessarily evolved the skill of being > loveable... and anyone who fails to give them certain kinds of respect > generally doesn't live to spread that disrespect. Canadians will try > almost anything to help people get along so that they'll be able to last > out the winter. If it turns out that it's not working, they quickly > abandon what does not, cannot, work.
> Canadians are all about getting along... except with people who refuse to > get along. If you're American, be kind to the Canadians, they are your > slightly-estranged brethren. If you're Canadian, please forgive us for > being your crazy big brother who isn't very good at thinking things > through, and often forgets that other people have their own ways and > needs.
>> That last sentence is frightening. FOr the muslims to acheive a >> majority in Canada wouldn't take long, relative to say, the US.
> Look at it this way: semi-tropical people whose religion is based in warm > temperate climates, where people don't have to cooperate, do not last long > when confronted with the chilling beauty of the Boreal Forest. When > confronted with the Cold Facts of Winter, either they learn Canadian ways > and tolerance and sharing the warmth -- in which case they have become > Canadians -- or their froze-solid bodies will have to be chipped loose > from the permafrost next May.
> Canadians may feel free to call me an asshole.
========================================= Far from it, I find your take on Canadians rather amusing but sadly, typically American. And that's part of your problem in dealing with the rest of the world, you go off half cocked. But, otherwise you're good people.
America reminds me of what Churchill said about democracy, something like 'it not being perfect but better than any alternative.' Or about America always getting it right, after they did every thing wrong.
> -- > The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may > often assume the appearance, and produce the effects, > of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy. > --Gibbon, "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire"
>>>> It would be nice if you would give yanks the chance to immigrate to >>>> Canada, but I can understand why you don't. >>>>=============== >>> I would like to see more Yanks come to Canada and I wasn't aware of any >>> backlog of applicants.
>> I thought it was requirment for citizens of Commonwealth countries to >> despise yanks, maybe the Islamic invasion has changed that tune though.
>> Interesting stuff Len. I'm betting your viewpoints represent a slim >> minority >> of Canadians though. > ============================================ > No way, Doug. There may be a slim minority that DON"T like Americans and > I > mean slim. Because you're so much bigger, there's sure to be some > conflicts > and politics come into it as well. The Liberals don't care for the Bush > government but they loved Clinton and basically visa versa for the > Conservatives. Sometimes we see your politicians as bullies but we > sometimes see our own as worst. Our current Conservative government is > very > pro-American. The Liberals didn't agree with your Iraq adventure but then > they committed troops to Afghanstan and the current gov't increased that > committent.
> Canadians can't wait to go south to the US in the winter time or anytime > for > vacation or shopping and you don't do that if you hate the people. > A lot of Canadians would even like to see us join the US and someday I > think > that will happen, unless the Islamists get to us first. > I have a nephew who is currently teaching in NY but your bureauracy gave > him > such a run around that he almost gave up in disgust.
> Like you, we have businesses who push immigration for cheap labor and that > may be one reason they push for 3rd world types, just as you do the > Mexicans. The Liberal party has positioned themselves as the darlings of > immigration just for the votes. and sometimes they play hate-the- > Americans > card for votes as well but it's mostly politics. Where do you get the > idea > that we don't like Americans? . > -lm
Other Canadians! LOL.
I appreciate your comments. I just hope Canada can learn from the immigration mistakes other Commonwealth countries are making as well as the US -- before it's too late. Unrestricted immigration has been proven to be a bad idea and the evidence is to be found in places like France, the UK, Germany, Australia and the US.
There are PAC's (Political Action Committees) in the US trying to STOP illegal immigration in the US though: ALIPAC (the dot com ALIPAC not the .net or .org) and NumbersUSA are the two most prominent. Maybe it's time something like ALIPAC or NumbersUSA be formed in Canada?
I've read that New Zealand has prohibited foreigners from owning property, does anyone know if it's true? If it is, KUDOS to New Zealand!
