Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

flamers boot off!!!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

lara_s...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 29, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/29/98
to
Shitstirrer wrote:

>I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
>place.
>Nothing has changed...
>Maybe instead of knocking people who use this n/group to post personal
>contact requests, you flamers should all get together and have sex.
>By the bitchy comments I have read from most females here, I think a
>good shag is well over due.

How about it girls? Let's leave the men at home and have one helluva
shagging? <sarcasm>Seeing as though it's ALWAYS us women that are bitching
and moaning ALL the time </sarcasm>

Geez. What do you guys want? One day it's 'Where are all the females in this
newsgroup?' and the next it's 'You can all shut your whining mouths and get
laid while your at it!'

*sigh* Can't win ;)

-L

ps This is not a flame... merely my own inane ramblings :)

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Blue Sky

unread,
Oct 29, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/29/98
to
Quite rude I should think - I would have thought whowhere was expressing
his/her observations.

Mystic Radication Warrior <trickn...@mailexcite.com> wrote in article
<3638E8...@mailexcite.com>...
> hello Mr Troll


>
>
> whowhere wrote:
> >
> > I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
> > place.
> > Nothing has changed...
> > Maybe instead of knocking people who use this n/group to post personal
> > contact requests, you flamers should all get together and have sex.
> > By the bitchy comments I have read from most females here, I think a
> > good shag is well over due.
>

> --
>
> MG
>
> "no alternative but to fight."
>
>
> with no apologies to Dame Margret Thatcher
>

whowhere

unread,
Oct 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/30/98
to

Mystic Radication Warrior

unread,
Oct 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/30/98
to
hello Mr Troll

--

near_tru...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Oct 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/30/98
to
In article <363897...@hotmail.com>,
whow...@projectx.com.au whined:

> I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
> place.
> Nothing has changed...
> Maybe instead of knocking people who use this n/group to post personal
> contact requests, you flamers should all get together and have sex.
> By the bitchy comments I have read from most females here, I think a
> good shag is well over due.

Mr Michael Bradshaw, you anonymous coward!
Why don't you form your own forum/newsgroup
and send your patheticly 'anonymous' threatening
emails to those who post there!?

--
Your best friend, Tejay, s890..
"Some people feel they own the rights to self-importance, or they
put some arbritrary personal stake on outcomes well beyond their
sphere of influence." --- Sheila Green.

Sandgroper

unread,
Oct 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/30/98
to

whowhere <whow...@projectx.com.au> wrote in article
<363897...@hotmail.com>...

> I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
> place.

Well friggin whoopdi doo to you wanker, now piss off troll.

--

Sandgroper
==========
Remove XXNOSPAMXX in reply address

whowhere

unread,
Oct 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/30/98
to
> Mr Michael Bradshaw, you anonymous coward!
> Why don't you form your own forum/newsgroup
> and send your patheticly 'anonymous' threatening
> emails to those who post there!?

I think you need to think again as I am not Mr Michael Bradshaw...
As far as threatening...*sniggering*Again I am only voicing my opinion.
Better lay off the drugs for a while...

Rudi Mulder

unread,
Oct 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/30/98
to

whowhere heeft geschreven in bericht <363897...@hotmail.com>...

>I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
>place.
>Nothing has changed...
>Maybe instead of knocking people who use this n/group to post personal
>contact requests, you flamers should all get together and have sex.
>By the bitchy comments I have read from most females here, I think a
>good shag is well over due.


did you post this little piece just for the pleasure off being flamed?????
is it your cry for attention of what you call bitchy females???
maybe its just you and your attitude?
sofar i never encountered any problems even the opposite is the fact got
e-mails from some nice group members and support on the group with some fun
was nice aswell.
I would say if your afraid of the water don't go swimming init.

And for all those warm and kind Aussie's thank you for your mail and
responds towards me
greetings from Holland Rudi
ill trade Australia any sec for Holland if they would let me LOL.

Mystic Radication Warrior

unread,
Oct 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/31/98
to
whowhere wrote:
>
> I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
> place.
> Nothing has changed...
> Maybe instead of knocking people who use this n/group to post personal
> contact requests, you flamers should all get together and have sex.
> By the bitchy comments I have read from most females here, I think a
> good shag is well over due.


some of enjoying being flamed, eh Ric?
we cup our little hands around our little ...
well I'll leave the rest to your imagination!
:-)

Deborah

unread,
Oct 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/31/98
to

lara_s...@hotmail.com wrote:

> Shitstirrer wrote:
>
> >I don't post here any more because of all the flaming which was taking
> >place.
> >Nothing has changed...
> >Maybe instead of knocking people who use this n/group to post personal
> >contact requests, you flamers should all get together and have sex.
> >By the bitchy comments I have read from most females here, I think a
> >good shag is well over due.
>

> How about it girls? Let's leave the men at home and have one helluva
> shagging? <sarcasm>Seeing as though it's ALWAYS us women that are bitching
> and moaning ALL the time </sarcasm>

You're right...it's always the females who post pathetic 'wanna root' ads and
whinge about how hard it is to find young, firm-bodied lads who want
conveniently located no-strings sex.

> Geez. What do you guys want? One day it's 'Where are all the females in this
> newsgroup?' and the next it's 'You can all shut your whining mouths and get
> laid while your at it!'

It's my guess that the females of the newsgroup are getting laid far more
regularly than the guys who hold views similar to those of the original poster.
:))

> *sigh* Can't win ;)

'Course we can! ;)

Deb

> -L
>
> ps This is not a flame... merely my own inane ramblings :)
>

tms...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/1/98
to
In article <36397E...@projectx.com.au>,
whow...@projectx.com.au boasted:

> > Mr Michael Bradshaw, you anonymous coward!
> > Why don't you form your own forum/newsgroup
> > and send your patheticly 'anonymous' threatening
> > emails to those who post there!?
> I think you need to think again as I am not Mr Michael Bradshaw...
So you don't object to being an anonymous coward then?

> As far as threatening...*sniggering*Again I am only voicing my opinion.
> Better lay off the drugs for a while...
Well, its none of my business what you do with your drugs Mr Coward.
If you can't handle them, perhaps you should lay off them for while.
On the subject of your identity, you have been posting from these
IP addresses lately:
203.21.104.167,
203.21.104.139, and
203.21.104.184.
These are the same ones Mr Michael Bradshaw, and Errol(?)
have used in the past. See DejaNews.
I could be wrong, you may not be either of these two people, in which case
they'd be innocent. It could be that each time a

near_tru...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Nov 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/1/98
to
In article <71h6km$ih7$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,

tms...@hotmail.com wrote:
> In article <36397E...@projectx.com.au>,
> whow...@projectx.com.au boasted:
> > > Mr Michael Bradshaw, you anonymous coward!
> > > Why don't you form your own forum/newsgroup
> > > and send your patheticly 'anonymous' threatening
> > > emails to those who post there!?
> > I think you need to think again as I am not Mr Michael Bradshaw...
> So you don't object to being an anonymous coward then?
> > As far as threatening...*sniggering*Again I am only voicing my opinion.
> > Better lay off the drugs for a while...
> Well, its none of my business what you do with your drugs Mr Coward.
> If you can't handle them, perhaps you should lay off them for while.
> On the subject of your identity, you have been posting from these
> IP addresses lately:
> 203.21.104.167,
> 203.21.104.139, and
> 203.21.104.184.
> These are the same ones Mr Michael Bradshaw, and Errol(?)
> have used in the past. See DejaNews.
> I could be wrong, you may not be either of these two people, in which case
> they'd be innocent. It could be that each time a

Hmm, Dejanews is not that reliable after all maybe?

Babydoll-

unread,
Nov 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/2/98
to
For somebody who said they would not post again one has to wonder why you
ARE posting.

Time to crawl back into your hole.


whowhere wrote in message <363897...@hotmail.com>...

0 new messages