Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
KRudd has experienced what all males have: Getting bitchslapped by the abuse of the Gender Card.....As if these bitches could have beaten the racist Johnnie Howard
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 27, 2012, 3:02:27 AM2/27/12
to
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LIST VCAT
Refernce: A226/2011
Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
Heisey
(Clayton Police), S. Const Dean Fraser, S. Const Fred Cantsilieris,
Const Rachel Dunn (Moorabbin Police)
APPLICANT SUBMISSION
1. On the 20th February 2012, Senior Member G Nihill, reinstated
this
matter and adjourned to an administrative mention on 19 March 2012;
2. The Applicant sought on that same day that Written Statements
of
Reasons be given for every and ALL decisions, henceforth;
3. In order to assist the Applicant in seeking legal advice as
advised
by Senior Member, written statements of reasons are required for the
following questions:
4. In the event that the Senior Member accepts that Medical
certificate(s) of Medical/Cardiovascular condition are valid, is it
not in the interest of Justice to proceed to directions in order to
expand and articulate Particulars of the case to spell the
grievances;
5. It may be that the other party is so incompetent that they
cannot
see the discrimination; the horde of Commonwealth legal counsels lost
the Malaysia Refugee Swap case in the High Court.
6. No material evidence/document was presented at the hearing on
the
20th February to indicate or challenge the discrimination grievance
already submitted; Police procedure document was asked of Ms
Katherine
Francis, Solicitor, none was proffered.
7. The Applicant’s main concern was the two statements the
Senior
Member G Nihill made to the Respondent(s):
8. “File Strike out papers prior to19th March”, “Are there any
other
quicker way”
9. Those two statements sounded like illegal legal advice and
illegal
instruction from the Senior Member to the Respondent(s) that
prejudice
the case;
10. It sounded like collusion and conspiracy to pervert the
course
of
justice from the Senior Member;
11. If the Senior Member cannot conduct the proceedings in the
impartial manner, is it not in the best of justice for the Senior
Member to disqualify herself?
12. The Applicant seeks to be heard FULLY, orally and in writing
and
in person, on any strike-out application from the Respondents;
13. The Justice Michael Kirby has already accused the High Court
Australia of racial discrimination in depriving Aborigines access to
the Whiteman’s legal system;
14. The Applicant seeks to see how Black Deaths In Custody might
have
been initiated: collusion between the Judiciary and Police,
conspiring
to cause injuries and deaths;
15. Brief History:
a. On the Friday of the period in question, at closing time
4-5pm and
no way to contact his medical doctor, the Applicant approached the
Clayton police station and corresponded with Senior Constable Heisey/
Heisley;
b. The Applicant sought to obtain the heart medication left with
Anthony Stephan of Monash Florist, in addition to his other
properties;
c. Senior Constable Heisey/Heisley physically threatened to
throw
the
Applicant out of the police station, without any reasons;
d. On the weekend of the period in question, the Applicant
sought
Senior Constable Cantsilieris and his partner, come by Monash Florist
in order to assist the Applicant recover his properties;
e. All and full properties were refused to the Applicant by the
Police
and Anthony Stephan;
f. On the following Monday, the Applicant sought an Order from
VCAT to
retrieve his properties;
g. Constable Rachel Dunn refused to carry out the Order; when
asked if
she had more power than VCAT, she said “Yeah”
h. Police Ethical standards refused to identify the Respondents;
Heisey was the name noted on the name tag, VCAT has renamed it;
16. FOI applications will now be sought for recordings,
statements
and
reports, inter alia, of this matter from Victoria Police and
government solicitors;
17. The Applicant has requested to be notified my email; VCAT has
refused to do so in order to prejudice the Applicant; the Applicant
would like it to be corrected asap, and be notified by email;
18. The Applicant gives notice of change of postal
address: PO BOX
1255
St Albans,
3021
19. Authority:
a. QANTAS vs Gama NSD 2539/2006: Discrimination cases should not
be
approached on the assumption that a higher standard of evidence
contemplated in Briginshaw automatically applies. In general,
discrimination claims would not require application of a higher
standard than is usual.
b. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565, “the power
of
Summary Dismissal is to be used with caution”
c. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565 at [8], “it
must
be recognised that the terms of section 46PO(3) suggests a degree of
flexibility ... and a complaint, which usually will not be drawn by a
lawyer, should not be construed as if it were a pleading”.
d. Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32
e. Gurnett v The Macquarie Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [No 2][126]
cc. Federal Attorney General Nicola Roxson
Victoria Attorney General Peter Ryan
Le Tuan PHAM
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3021
/././.
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LIST VCAT
Refernce: A226/2011
Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
Heisey
(Clayton Police), S. Const Dean Fraser, S. Const Fred Cantsilieris,
Const Rachel Dunn (Moorabbin Police)
APPLICANT SUBMISSION
1. On the 20th February 2012, Senior Member G Nihill, reinstated
this
matter and adjourned to an administrative mention on 19 March 2012;
2. The Applicant sought on that same day that Written Statements
of
Reasons be given for every and ALL decisions, henceforth;
3. In order to assist the Applicant in seeking legal advice as
advised
by Senior Member, written statements of reasons are required for the
following questions:
4. In the event that the Senior Member accepts that Medical
certificate(s) of Medical/Cardiovascular condition are valid, is it
not in the interest of Justice to proceed to directions in order to
expand and articulate Particulars of the case to spell the
grievances;
5. It may be that the other party is so incompetent that they
cannot
see the discrimination; the horde of Commonwealth legal counsels lost
the Malaysia Refugee Swap case in the High Court.
6. No material evidence/document was presented at the hearing on
the
20th February to indicate or challenge the discrimination grievance
already submitted; Police procedure document was asked of Ms
Katherine
Francis, Solicitor, none was proffered.
7. The Applicant’s main concern was the two statements the
Senior
Member G Nihill made to the Respondent(s):
8. “File Strike out papers prior to19th March”, “Are there any
other
quicker way”
9. Those two statements sounded like illegal legal advice and
illegal
instruction from the Senior Member to the Respondent(s) that
prejudice
the case;
10. It sounded like collusion and conspiracy to pervert the
course
of
justice from the Senior Member;
11. If the Senior Member cannot conduct the proceedings in the
impartial manner, is it not in the best of justice for the Senior
Member to disqualify herself?
12. The Applicant seeks to be heard FULLY, orally and in writing
and
in person, on any strike-out application from the Respondents;
13. The Justice Michael Kirby has already accused the High Court
Australia of racial discrimination in depriving Aborigines access to
the Whiteman’s legal system;
14. The Applicant seeks to see how Black Deaths In Custody might
have
been initiated: collusion between the Judiciary and Police,
conspiring
to cause injuries and deaths;
15. Brief History:
a. On the Friday of the period in question, at closing time
4-5pm and
no way to contact his medical doctor, the Applicant approached the
Clayton police station and corresponded with Senior Constable Heisey/
Heisley;
b. The Applicant sought to obtain the heart medication left with
Anthony Stephan of Monash Florist, in addition to his other
properties;
c. Senior Constable Heisey/Heisley physically threatened to
throw
the
Applicant out of the police station, without any reasons;
d. On the weekend of the period in question, the Applicant
sought
Senior Constable Cantsilieris and his partner, come by Monash Florist
in order to assist the Applicant recover his properties;
e. All and full properties were refused to the Applicant by the
Police
and Anthony Stephan;
f. On the following Monday, the Applicant sought an Order from
VCAT to
retrieve his properties;
g. Constable Rachel Dunn refused to carry out the Order; when
asked if
she had more power than VCAT, she said “Yeah”
h. Police Ethical standards refused to identify the Respondents;
Heisey was the name noted on the name tag, VCAT has renamed it;
16. FOI applications will now be sought for recordings,
statements
and
reports, inter alia, of this matter from Victoria Police and
government solicitors;
17. The Applicant has requested to be notified my email; VCAT has
refused to do so in order to prejudice the Applicant; the Applicant
would like it to be corrected asap, and be notified by email;
18. The Applicant gives notice of change of postal
address: PO BOX
1255
St Albans,
3021
19. Authority:
a. QANTAS vs Gama NSD 2539/2006: Discrimination cases should not
be
approached on the assumption that a higher standard of evidence
contemplated in Briginshaw automatically applies. In general,
discrimination claims would not require application of a higher
standard than is usual.
b. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565, “the power
of
Summary Dismissal is to be used with caution”
c. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565 at [8], “it
must
be recognised that the terms of section 46PO(3) suggests a degree of
flexibility ... and a complaint, which usually will not be drawn by a
lawyer, should not be construed as if it were a pleading”.
d. Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32
e. Gurnett v The Macquarie Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [No 2][126]
cc. Federal Attorney General Nicola Roxson
Victoria Attorney General Peter Ryan
Le Tuan PHAM
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3021
/././.
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 27, 2012, 6:41:26 AM2/27/12
to
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 28, 2012, 7:41:21 AM2/28/12
to
On Feb 27, 10:41 pm, Kangaroo Court Australia
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 28, 2012, 3:27:44 PM2/28/12
to
On Feb 28, 11:41 pm, Kangaroo Court Australia
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 28, 2012, 5:17:00 PM2/28/12
to
To the Federal Attorney General,
Victorian Attorney General,
State Attorney Generals,
Members of Parliament,
and Friends
RE: Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
A226/2011
RE: PHAM vs Shade
Dear Ms Roxon and Friends,
1. Congratulations on becoming the first female attorney general;
2. What the Americans call Affirmative Action seems to have worked
for
you;
3. How about trying to level the playing field for everyone else?
4. Why is it you don't want a Bill of Rights? Perhaps the attached
documents will change your mind, regarding the collusion between VCAT
and Victoria Police, in addition to the VCAT and the Court of Appeals
Registrar colluding to deny access to the legal process.
5. And we are just started on extra-judicial perversion of justice,
not including the Human Rights Commission and its president; another
email will deal with the Judicial: Supreme Court Victoria, Court of
Appeals, Federal Court (Victorian Branch), High Court Australia and
my
old mate Chief Justice Robert French;
6. What you will note about the document is the collusion between
Senior Member G Nihill (female), and the government solicitors
(females), in order to coverup for Victoria Police, in a conspiracy
to
cause injury (and deaths in other cases);
7. In ALL cases, it is the use of disability discrimination in an
attempt at racial discrimination; asking the Applicant to do what is
clearly beyond his capability;
8. So when you design your Disability Scheme, please take note;
9. What you will note about how VCAT registrars (and Human Rights
registrars) attempt to pervert the judicial process: they send in
"Acting" Registrars, as in "pretend", movie acting, Oscar worthy; and
profiting from the proceeds of crime;
10. The Australian Tribunals love to manipulate the evidence, or lack
there of and hoping to prevent people challenging their decisions on
question of law grounds;
11 Unfortunately for the dishonorable weasels, there is a High Court
decision: Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32,
which deals with the abuse of the Evidence Act, as Charles Pham
already brought to Federal Court;
12. You will note that Judicial/VCAT registrars and Members never
give
any reason for their decision: Justice should not only be done, but
to
be seen to be done;
13. You will note that Kostas sounds Greek: my Greek friend Bill also
feels that the Australian Judicial system is designed for Anglo-
Saxons, who are protestants,
14. And he feels Chief Magistrate Ian Gray is coverup for judicial
officers fudging court transcripts!!
15. These Registars/Members patronise the Applicant by requiring him
to get legal advice from corrupt, racist legal aid? I think we have
deal with the dishonorable Commonwealth Senate Inquiries on Judicial
Process and the Role of Judges, and the Inquiries on Access to the
Legal Process.
16. If we need legal advice, we should seek it from CJ French and the
High Court Australia, after all it was Justice Michael Kirby who
indicated that the High Court Australia denied Aborigines access to
legal remedies based on their "Aboriginality".
17. I would urge the Attorney General to reconsider a Bill of Rights
that is OUT of the hands of the Judges and corruptive Regisrtars, and
into the Grand Jury;
18. I urge the Attorney Generals to keep abreast of these case before
VCAT as they look to go to the High Court, before they get to the
Victoria Court of Appeals for obvious reasons;
19. The Attorney Generals will be asked questions of a Constitutional
Matter.
Sincerely,
charles pham
============
2 attachments — Download all attachments
VCAT_A2262011_phamvsvicpolice.pdf
14K View Download
Pham v Shade.pdf
58K View Download
/ 102
Victorian Attorney General,
State Attorney Generals,
Members of Parliament,
and Friends
RE: Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
Heisey (Clayton Police), S. Const Dean Fraser, S. Const Fred
Cantsilieris, Const Rachel Dunn (Moorabbin Police) VCAT Refernce:
A226/2011
RE: PHAM vs Shade
Dear Ms Roxon and Friends,
1. Congratulations on becoming the first female attorney general;
2. What the Americans call Affirmative Action seems to have worked
for
you;
3. How about trying to level the playing field for everyone else?
4. Why is it you don't want a Bill of Rights? Perhaps the attached
documents will change your mind, regarding the collusion between VCAT
and Victoria Police, in addition to the VCAT and the Court of Appeals
Registrar colluding to deny access to the legal process.
5. And we are just started on extra-judicial perversion of justice,
not including the Human Rights Commission and its president; another
email will deal with the Judicial: Supreme Court Victoria, Court of
Appeals, Federal Court (Victorian Branch), High Court Australia and
my
old mate Chief Justice Robert French;
6. What you will note about the document is the collusion between
Senior Member G Nihill (female), and the government solicitors
(females), in order to coverup for Victoria Police, in a conspiracy
to
cause injury (and deaths in other cases);
7. In ALL cases, it is the use of disability discrimination in an
attempt at racial discrimination; asking the Applicant to do what is
clearly beyond his capability;
8. So when you design your Disability Scheme, please take note;
9. What you will note about how VCAT registrars (and Human Rights
registrars) attempt to pervert the judicial process: they send in
"Acting" Registrars, as in "pretend", movie acting, Oscar worthy; and
profiting from the proceeds of crime;
10. The Australian Tribunals love to manipulate the evidence, or lack
there of and hoping to prevent people challenging their decisions on
question of law grounds;
11 Unfortunately for the dishonorable weasels, there is a High Court
decision: Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32,
which deals with the abuse of the Evidence Act, as Charles Pham
already brought to Federal Court;
12. You will note that Judicial/VCAT registrars and Members never
give
any reason for their decision: Justice should not only be done, but
to
be seen to be done;
13. You will note that Kostas sounds Greek: my Greek friend Bill also
feels that the Australian Judicial system is designed for Anglo-
Saxons, who are protestants,
14. And he feels Chief Magistrate Ian Gray is coverup for judicial
officers fudging court transcripts!!
15. These Registars/Members patronise the Applicant by requiring him
to get legal advice from corrupt, racist legal aid? I think we have
deal with the dishonorable Commonwealth Senate Inquiries on Judicial
Process and the Role of Judges, and the Inquiries on Access to the
Legal Process.
16. If we need legal advice, we should seek it from CJ French and the
High Court Australia, after all it was Justice Michael Kirby who
indicated that the High Court Australia denied Aborigines access to
legal remedies based on their "Aboriginality".
17. I would urge the Attorney General to reconsider a Bill of Rights
that is OUT of the hands of the Judges and corruptive Regisrtars, and
into the Grand Jury;
18. I urge the Attorney Generals to keep abreast of these case before
VCAT as they look to go to the High Court, before they get to the
Victoria Court of Appeals for obvious reasons;
19. The Attorney Generals will be asked questions of a Constitutional
Matter.
Sincerely,
charles pham
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3021
0412 871 985
St Albans 3021
============
VCAT_A2262011_phamvsvicpolice.pdf
14K View Download
Pham v Shade.pdf
58K View Download
/ 102
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 29, 2012, 4:18:25 PM2/29/12
to
0 new messages